First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock
Introduction: Despite advances in critical care medicine, adjunctive approaches in sepsis therapy have failed to prove their efficacy. Notwithstanding promising results using hemoadsorption (CytoSorb), questions remain concerning timing and dosing. We created a dynamic scoring system (DSS) to assess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2021-06, Vol.10 (13), p.2939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2939 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Kogelmann, Klaus Hübner, Tobias Schwameis, Franz Drüner, Matthias Scheller, Morten Jarczak, Dominik |
description | Introduction: Despite advances in critical care medicine, adjunctive approaches in sepsis therapy have failed to prove their efficacy. Notwithstanding promising results using hemoadsorption (CytoSorb), questions remain concerning timing and dosing. We created a dynamic scoring system (DSS) to assess patients with early septic shock and performed a first evaluation of the system in this patient population. Methods: Data from 502 patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Score parameters were documented at the time of diagnosis (T0) and 6 h later (T6) to calculate a dynamic score. Survival on day 7 and 56 as well as ICU and hospital mortality were analyzed in regard to the score as well as the delay of hemoadsorption therapy. Results: Of the 502 patients analyzed, 198 received adjunctive CytoSorb treatment and 304 received standard therapy. Septic shock was typically represented by 5 points, while >6 points indicated a situation refractory to standard therapy with the worst outcome in patients shown by >8 points. The differences in mortality between the score groups (8 points) were significant. Analysis further showed a significant 56-day, ICU and hospital survival advantage in CytoSorb patients when therapy was started early. Conclusion: We created a scoring system allowing for the assessment of the clinical development of patients in the early phase of septic shock. Applying this approach, we were able to detect populations with a distinct mortality pattern. The data also showed that an early start of CytoSorb therapy was associated with significantly improved survival. As a next step, this easy-to-apply scoring system would require validation in a prospective manner to learn whether patients to be treated with hemoadsorption therapy in the course of septic shock could thereby be identified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm10132939 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8268021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549397100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83574447b1fb6d900b0aa7d3e642947e34e67003676454d62eebba8fcda2728a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1q3DAQhUVpScI2V30BQW8KZVP9rSXfFMLmF0ITcHptZHmc1daWXEne4Gfpy1Zhk5JmdDED-jhzhoPQJ0pOOC_Jt60ZKKGclbx8h44YkXJJuOLvX82H6DjGLcmllGBUHqBDLhgpCaFH6M-FDTHh853uJ52sd9h3WOMf8IjPZqcHa3BlfLDuAVdzTDDga5fAtdDi5HE1jaMPCd8FiCbY8UXgtN1OO-0SXs_JVz40-AoGr9vow56530DQ44ytw3d5LbgU8aNNG1xBBvLOjTe_PqIPne4jHD_3Bfp5cX6_vlre3F5er09vlobTIi0VX0khhGxo1xRtPqshWsuWQyFYKSRwAYUkhBeyECvRFgygabTqTKuZZErzBfq-1x2nZoDWZDdB9_UY7KDDXHtt6_9_nN3UD35XK1YowmgW-PIsEPzvCWKqBxsN9L124KdYs5VQguZXZPTzG3Trp-DyeU9UTlHSbHWBvu4pE3yMAbp_Ziipn3KvX-XO_wK3dqE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549397100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kogelmann, Klaus ; Hübner, Tobias ; Schwameis, Franz ; Drüner, Matthias ; Scheller, Morten ; Jarczak, Dominik</creator><creatorcontrib>Kogelmann, Klaus ; Hübner, Tobias ; Schwameis, Franz ; Drüner, Matthias ; Scheller, Morten ; Jarczak, Dominik</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Despite advances in critical care medicine, adjunctive approaches in sepsis therapy have failed to prove their efficacy. Notwithstanding promising results using hemoadsorption (CytoSorb), questions remain concerning timing and dosing. We created a dynamic scoring system (DSS) to assess patients with early septic shock and performed a first evaluation of the system in this patient population. Methods: Data from 502 patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Score parameters were documented at the time of diagnosis (T0) and 6 h later (T6) to calculate a dynamic score. Survival on day 7 and 56 as well as ICU and hospital mortality were analyzed in regard to the score as well as the delay of hemoadsorption therapy. Results: Of the 502 patients analyzed, 198 received adjunctive CytoSorb treatment and 304 received standard therapy. Septic shock was typically represented by 5 points, while >6 points indicated a situation refractory to standard therapy with the worst outcome in patients shown by >8 points. The differences in mortality between the score groups (<6, 6–8, >8 points) were significant. Analysis further showed a significant 56-day, ICU and hospital survival advantage in CytoSorb patients when therapy was started early. Conclusion: We created a scoring system allowing for the assessment of the clinical development of patients in the early phase of septic shock. Applying this approach, we were able to detect populations with a distinct mortality pattern. The data also showed that an early start of CytoSorb therapy was associated with significantly improved survival. As a next step, this easy-to-apply scoring system would require validation in a prospective manner to learn whether patients to be treated with hemoadsorption therapy in the course of septic shock could thereby be identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132939</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34209001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Catecholamines ; Clinical medicine ; Creatinine ; Data analysis ; Hemodynamics ; Hospitals ; Intensive care ; Metabolism ; Mortality ; Normal distribution ; Patients ; Physiology ; Pneumonia ; Renal replacement therapy ; Sepsis ; Survival analysis ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-06, Vol.10 (13), p.2939</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83574447b1fb6d900b0aa7d3e642947e34e67003676454d62eebba8fcda2728a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83574447b1fb6d900b0aa7d3e642947e34e67003676454d62eebba8fcda2728a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4308-9319 ; 0000-0002-2869-6121 ; 0000-0003-0480-2089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268021/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8268021/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kogelmann, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwameis, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drüner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheller, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarczak, Dominik</creatorcontrib><title>First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>Introduction: Despite advances in critical care medicine, adjunctive approaches in sepsis therapy have failed to prove their efficacy. Notwithstanding promising results using hemoadsorption (CytoSorb), questions remain concerning timing and dosing. We created a dynamic scoring system (DSS) to assess patients with early septic shock and performed a first evaluation of the system in this patient population. Methods: Data from 502 patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Score parameters were documented at the time of diagnosis (T0) and 6 h later (T6) to calculate a dynamic score. Survival on day 7 and 56 as well as ICU and hospital mortality were analyzed in regard to the score as well as the delay of hemoadsorption therapy. Results: Of the 502 patients analyzed, 198 received adjunctive CytoSorb treatment and 304 received standard therapy. Septic shock was typically represented by 5 points, while >6 points indicated a situation refractory to standard therapy with the worst outcome in patients shown by >8 points. The differences in mortality between the score groups (<6, 6–8, >8 points) were significant. Analysis further showed a significant 56-day, ICU and hospital survival advantage in CytoSorb patients when therapy was started early. Conclusion: We created a scoring system allowing for the assessment of the clinical development of patients in the early phase of septic shock. Applying this approach, we were able to detect populations with a distinct mortality pattern. The data also showed that an early start of CytoSorb therapy was associated with significantly improved survival. As a next step, this easy-to-apply scoring system would require validation in a prospective manner to learn whether patients to be treated with hemoadsorption therapy in the course of septic shock could thereby be identified.</description><subject>Catecholamines</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Renal replacement therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1q3DAQhUVpScI2V30BQW8KZVP9rSXfFMLmF0ITcHptZHmc1daWXEne4Gfpy1Zhk5JmdDED-jhzhoPQJ0pOOC_Jt60ZKKGclbx8h44YkXJJuOLvX82H6DjGLcmllGBUHqBDLhgpCaFH6M-FDTHh853uJ52sd9h3WOMf8IjPZqcHa3BlfLDuAVdzTDDga5fAtdDi5HE1jaMPCd8FiCbY8UXgtN1OO-0SXs_JVz40-AoGr9vow56530DQ44ytw3d5LbgU8aNNG1xBBvLOjTe_PqIPne4jHD_3Bfp5cX6_vlre3F5er09vlobTIi0VX0khhGxo1xRtPqshWsuWQyFYKSRwAYUkhBeyECvRFgygabTqTKuZZErzBfq-1x2nZoDWZDdB9_UY7KDDXHtt6_9_nN3UD35XK1YowmgW-PIsEPzvCWKqBxsN9L124KdYs5VQguZXZPTzG3Trp-DyeU9UTlHSbHWBvu4pE3yMAbp_Ziipn3KvX-XO_wK3dqE0</recordid><startdate>20210630</startdate><enddate>20210630</enddate><creator>Kogelmann, Klaus</creator><creator>Hübner, Tobias</creator><creator>Schwameis, Franz</creator><creator>Drüner, Matthias</creator><creator>Scheller, Morten</creator><creator>Jarczak, Dominik</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-9319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-6121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-2089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210630</creationdate><title>First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock</title><author>Kogelmann, Klaus ; Hübner, Tobias ; Schwameis, Franz ; Drüner, Matthias ; Scheller, Morten ; Jarczak, Dominik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83574447b1fb6d900b0aa7d3e642947e34e67003676454d62eebba8fcda2728a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Catecholamines</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Renal replacement therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kogelmann, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwameis, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drüner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheller, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarczak, Dominik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kogelmann, Klaus</au><au>Hübner, Tobias</au><au>Schwameis, Franz</au><au>Drüner, Matthias</au><au>Scheller, Morten</au><au>Jarczak, Dominik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2021-06-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2939</spage><pages>2939-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Despite advances in critical care medicine, adjunctive approaches in sepsis therapy have failed to prove their efficacy. Notwithstanding promising results using hemoadsorption (CytoSorb), questions remain concerning timing and dosing. We created a dynamic scoring system (DSS) to assess patients with early septic shock and performed a first evaluation of the system in this patient population. Methods: Data from 502 patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Score parameters were documented at the time of diagnosis (T0) and 6 h later (T6) to calculate a dynamic score. Survival on day 7 and 56 as well as ICU and hospital mortality were analyzed in regard to the score as well as the delay of hemoadsorption therapy. Results: Of the 502 patients analyzed, 198 received adjunctive CytoSorb treatment and 304 received standard therapy. Septic shock was typically represented by 5 points, while >6 points indicated a situation refractory to standard therapy with the worst outcome in patients shown by >8 points. The differences in mortality between the score groups (<6, 6–8, >8 points) were significant. Analysis further showed a significant 56-day, ICU and hospital survival advantage in CytoSorb patients when therapy was started early. Conclusion: We created a scoring system allowing for the assessment of the clinical development of patients in the early phase of septic shock. Applying this approach, we were able to detect populations with a distinct mortality pattern. The data also showed that an early start of CytoSorb therapy was associated with significantly improved survival. As a next step, this easy-to-apply scoring system would require validation in a prospective manner to learn whether patients to be treated with hemoadsorption therapy in the course of septic shock could thereby be identified.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34209001</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10132939</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-9319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-6121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-2089</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-06, Vol.10 (13), p.2939 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8268021 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Catecholamines Clinical medicine Creatinine Data analysis Hemodynamics Hospitals Intensive care Metabolism Mortality Normal distribution Patients Physiology Pneumonia Renal replacement therapy Sepsis Survival analysis Ventilators |
title | First Evaluation of a New Dynamic Scoring System Intended to Support Prescription of Adjuvant CytoSorb Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20New%20Dynamic%20Scoring%20System%20Intended%20to%20Support%20Prescription%20of%20Adjuvant%20CytoSorb%20Hemoadsorption%20Therapy%20in%20Patients%20with%20Septic%20Shock&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kogelmann,%20Klaus&rft.date=2021-06-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2939&rft.pages=2939-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10132939&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2549397100%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549397100&rft_id=info:pmid/34209001&rfr_iscdi=true |