Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings

Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiographics 2021-07, Vol.41 (4), p.E990-E1021
Hauptverfasser: Sirajuddin, Arlene, Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh, Kligerman, Seth J., Groves, Daniel W., Burke, Allen P., Kureshi, Faraz, White, Charles S., Arai, Andrew E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E1021
container_issue 4
container_start_page E990
container_title Radiographics
container_volume 41
creator Sirajuddin, Arlene
Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh
Kligerman, Seth J.
Groves, Daniel W.
Burke, Allen P.
Kureshi, Faraz
White, Charles S.
Arai, Andrew E.
description Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. However, it is expensive and has risks including vascular access site complications and contrast material–induced nephropathy. Invasive coronary angiography requires fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to determine the physiologic significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Multiple noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities can also anatomically delineate or functionally assess for significant coronary artery stenosis, as well as detect the presence of myocardial infarction (MI). While coronary CT angiography can help assess the degree of anatomic stenosis, its inability to assess the physiologic significance of lesions limits its specificity. Physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis can be determined by cardiac MR vasodilator or dobutamine stress imaging, CT stress perfusion imaging, FFR CT, PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), SPECT MPI, and stress echocardiography. Clinically unrecognized MI, another clear indicator of physiologically significant coronary artery disease, is relatively common and is best evaluated with cardiac MRI. The authors illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings of ischemic heart disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and MI); highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the various noninvasive imaging methods used to assess ischemic heart disease, as illustrated by recent clinical trials; and summarize current indications and contraindications for noninvasive imaging techniques for detection of ischemic heart disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/rg.2021200125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8262179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2531216041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-33fc0849eb127edaa62803b165e04c88d17a3c82f1def878a40566ef0345ac283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMFLwzAUh4Mobk6P3nv00pmXpGnmQZDp3GDoZZ5Dlr52kTadSTfwv7djQ_H04Pc-vsf7EXILdAwg1H2oxowyYJQCy87IEDKWp8AZPydDynJIM875gFzF-NkjIlPykgy4oDARPB-S6SLaDTbOJnM0oUueXUQT8SF5a73zexPdHpNFYyrnq2SFduPd1w5jYnyRzJwv-jhek4vS1BFvTnNEPmYvq-k8Xb6_LqZPy9RyKbqU89JSJSa4BpZjYYxkivI1yAypsEoVkBtuFSuhwFLlygiaSYkl5SIzlik-Io9H73a3brCw6Ltgar0NrjHhW7fG6f8b7za6avdaMckgn_SCu5MgtIcvOt24aLGujcd2FzXLODCQVECPpkfUhjbGgOXvGaD6ULwOlf4rnv8Asah0dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531216041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings</title><source>Radiological Society of North America</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sirajuddin, Arlene ; Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh ; Kligerman, Seth J. ; Groves, Daniel W. ; Burke, Allen P. ; Kureshi, Faraz ; White, Charles S. ; Arai, Andrew E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sirajuddin, Arlene ; Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh ; Kligerman, Seth J. ; Groves, Daniel W. ; Burke, Allen P. ; Kureshi, Faraz ; White, Charles S. ; Arai, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><description>Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. However, it is expensive and has risks including vascular access site complications and contrast material–induced nephropathy. Invasive coronary angiography requires fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to determine the physiologic significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Multiple noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities can also anatomically delineate or functionally assess for significant coronary artery stenosis, as well as detect the presence of myocardial infarction (MI). While coronary CT angiography can help assess the degree of anatomic stenosis, its inability to assess the physiologic significance of lesions limits its specificity. Physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis can be determined by cardiac MR vasodilator or dobutamine stress imaging, CT stress perfusion imaging, FFR CT, PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), SPECT MPI, and stress echocardiography. Clinically unrecognized MI, another clear indicator of physiologically significant coronary artery disease, is relatively common and is best evaluated with cardiac MRI. The authors illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings of ischemic heart disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and MI); highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the various noninvasive imaging methods used to assess ischemic heart disease, as illustrated by recent clinical trials; and summarize current indications and contraindications for noninvasive imaging techniques for detection of ischemic heart disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-5333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34019437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><ispartof>Radiographics, 2021-07, Vol.41 (4), p.E990-E1021</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-33fc0849eb127edaa62803b165e04c88d17a3c82f1def878a40566ef0345ac283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-33fc0849eb127edaa62803b165e04c88d17a3c82f1def878a40566ef0345ac283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9789-7648 ; 0000-0002-1532-1371 ; 0000-0002-5413-1466 ; 0000-0002-4912-6320 ; 0000-0002-8319-9646 ; 0000-0001-9183-5983</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4016,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sirajuddin, Arlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kligerman, Seth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Allen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kureshi, Faraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Charles S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><title>Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings</title><title>Radiographics</title><description>Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. However, it is expensive and has risks including vascular access site complications and contrast material–induced nephropathy. Invasive coronary angiography requires fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to determine the physiologic significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Multiple noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities can also anatomically delineate or functionally assess for significant coronary artery stenosis, as well as detect the presence of myocardial infarction (MI). While coronary CT angiography can help assess the degree of anatomic stenosis, its inability to assess the physiologic significance of lesions limits its specificity. Physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis can be determined by cardiac MR vasodilator or dobutamine stress imaging, CT stress perfusion imaging, FFR CT, PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), SPECT MPI, and stress echocardiography. Clinically unrecognized MI, another clear indicator of physiologically significant coronary artery disease, is relatively common and is best evaluated with cardiac MRI. The authors illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings of ischemic heart disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and MI); highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the various noninvasive imaging methods used to assess ischemic heart disease, as illustrated by recent clinical trials; and summarize current indications and contraindications for noninvasive imaging techniques for detection of ischemic heart disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</description><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><issn>0271-5333</issn><issn>1527-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMFLwzAUh4Mobk6P3nv00pmXpGnmQZDp3GDoZZ5Dlr52kTadSTfwv7djQ_H04Pc-vsf7EXILdAwg1H2oxowyYJQCy87IEDKWp8AZPydDynJIM875gFzF-NkjIlPykgy4oDARPB-S6SLaDTbOJnM0oUueXUQT8SF5a73zexPdHpNFYyrnq2SFduPd1w5jYnyRzJwv-jhek4vS1BFvTnNEPmYvq-k8Xb6_LqZPy9RyKbqU89JSJSa4BpZjYYxkivI1yAypsEoVkBtuFSuhwFLlygiaSYkl5SIzlik-Io9H73a3brCw6Ltgar0NrjHhW7fG6f8b7za6avdaMckgn_SCu5MgtIcvOt24aLGujcd2FzXLODCQVECPpkfUhjbGgOXvGaD6ULwOlf4rnv8Asah0dQ</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Sirajuddin, Arlene</creator><creator>Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh</creator><creator>Kligerman, Seth J.</creator><creator>Groves, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Burke, Allen P.</creator><creator>Kureshi, Faraz</creator><creator>White, Charles S.</creator><creator>Arai, Andrew E.</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-7648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-1371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-1466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4912-6320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-9646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-5983</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings</title><author>Sirajuddin, Arlene ; Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh ; Kligerman, Seth J. ; Groves, Daniel W. ; Burke, Allen P. ; Kureshi, Faraz ; White, Charles S. ; Arai, Andrew E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-33fc0849eb127edaa62803b165e04c88d17a3c82f1def878a40566ef0345ac283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sirajuddin, Arlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kligerman, Seth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Allen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kureshi, Faraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Charles S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sirajuddin, Arlene</au><au>Mirmomen, S. Mojdeh</au><au>Kligerman, Seth J.</au><au>Groves, Daniel W.</au><au>Burke, Allen P.</au><au>Kureshi, Faraz</au><au>White, Charles S.</au><au>Arai, Andrew E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings</atitle><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>E990</spage><epage>E1021</epage><pages>E990-E1021</pages><issn>0271-5333</issn><eissn>1527-1323</eissn><abstract>Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and comprises a large proportion of annual health care expenditure. Management of ischemic heart disease is now best guided by the physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography is the standard for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis. However, it is expensive and has risks including vascular access site complications and contrast material–induced nephropathy. Invasive coronary angiography requires fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to determine the physiologic significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Multiple noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities can also anatomically delineate or functionally assess for significant coronary artery stenosis, as well as detect the presence of myocardial infarction (MI). While coronary CT angiography can help assess the degree of anatomic stenosis, its inability to assess the physiologic significance of lesions limits its specificity. Physiologic significance of coronary artery stenosis can be determined by cardiac MR vasodilator or dobutamine stress imaging, CT stress perfusion imaging, FFR CT, PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), SPECT MPI, and stress echocardiography. Clinically unrecognized MI, another clear indicator of physiologically significant coronary artery disease, is relatively common and is best evaluated with cardiac MRI. The authors illustrate the spectrum of imaging findings of ischemic heart disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and MI); highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the various noninvasive imaging methods used to assess ischemic heart disease, as illustrated by recent clinical trials; and summarize current indications and contraindications for noninvasive imaging techniques for detection of ischemic heart disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</abstract><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>34019437</pmid><doi>10.1148/rg.2021200125</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-7648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-1371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-1466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4912-6320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-9646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-5983</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-5333
ispartof Radiographics, 2021-07, Vol.41 (4), p.E990-E1021
issn 0271-5333
1527-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8262179
source Radiological Society of North America; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cardiac Imaging
title Ischemic Heart Disease: Noninvasive Imaging Techniques and Findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A55%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ischemic%20Heart%20Disease:%20Noninvasive%20Imaging%20Techniques%20and%20Findings&rft.jtitle=Radiographics&rft.au=Sirajuddin,%20Arlene&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=E990&rft.epage=E1021&rft.pages=E990-E1021&rft.issn=0271-5333&rft.eissn=1527-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/rg.2021200125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2531216041%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531216041&rft_id=info:pmid/34019437&rfr_iscdi=true