Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play

As a global crisis, COVID-19 has altered how nation-states project influence. Public health has risen to the top of every agenda as individuals, societies, and nation-states focus on a common goal. With the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, home-grown national vaccines when distributed all over the world...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Place branding and public diplomacy 2023-03, Vol.19 (1), p.64-78
1. Verfasser: Lee, Seow Ting
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 64
container_title Place branding and public diplomacy
container_volume 19
creator Lee, Seow Ting
description As a global crisis, COVID-19 has altered how nation-states project influence. Public health has risen to the top of every agenda as individuals, societies, and nation-states focus on a common goal. With the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, home-grown national vaccines when distributed all over the world can play an integral role in nation branding as a technique for projecting soft power. This paper applies the theoretical lenses of nation branding and soft power to examine China’s bilateral vaccine diplomacy efforts, specifically the motivations and outcomes. The findings suggest that Chinese vaccines are used not only for image repair and for expanding Beijing’s great power ambitions, but also to reinforce and leverage existing soft power programs, and to capitalize on new economic and geopolitical opportunities. Vaccine diplomacy is a natural extension of Chinese soft power including prior engagement in health diplomacy. Sentiment analyses of social media and international media coverage suggest that where vaccines go, influence may follow. Although international sentiments are not all positive—with concerns over Chinese vaccines’ efficacy, safety, and data availability, Beijing reaped substantial soft power dividends through its ability to project influence in scientific prowess and civic virtue by providing the vaccines as International Public Goods through aid and gifts to countries left behind by the vaccine inequity.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2782558080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-bf209d9d0d66b423f9c4ce8b058678feedf0d9a8c98ecfac8a905219c3ea8cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQhxdRsFZfwFPA8-okm3QTD4LUf4VCL9pryGaz7ZZtsiZbpTdfw9fzSUxtqXjxNMPkm2_CL0nOMVxiYPlVoJgwmgLBKQAhNKUHSQ_nDKccmDjc9xSOk5MQFgCDiJFeMpoqrWtrUFm3jVsqvb5GVnW1s6jwypa1naFY0HBeW_X18RnQcDId3aVYoOCqDrXu3XjUNmp9mhxVqgnmbFf7ycvD_fPwKR1PHkfD23GqM8q7tKgIiFKUUA4GBSVZJTTVhhfA-CDnlTFlBaVQXAtudKU0VwIYwUJnJg41z_rJzdbbroqlKbWxnVeNbH29VH4tnarl3xdbz-XMvUlOmGCMRsHFTuDd68qETi7cytv4Z0nyCDEOHCJFtpT2LgRvqv0FDHKTudxmLmPm8idzuVFn26UQYTsz_lf9z9Y3AZCGMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2782558080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lee, Seow Ting</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seow Ting</creatorcontrib><description>As a global crisis, COVID-19 has altered how nation-states project influence. Public health has risen to the top of every agenda as individuals, societies, and nation-states focus on a common goal. With the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, home-grown national vaccines when distributed all over the world can play an integral role in nation branding as a technique for projecting soft power. This paper applies the theoretical lenses of nation branding and soft power to examine China’s bilateral vaccine diplomacy efforts, specifically the motivations and outcomes. The findings suggest that Chinese vaccines are used not only for image repair and for expanding Beijing’s great power ambitions, but also to reinforce and leverage existing soft power programs, and to capitalize on new economic and geopolitical opportunities. Vaccine diplomacy is a natural extension of Chinese soft power including prior engagement in health diplomacy. Sentiment analyses of social media and international media coverage suggest that where vaccines go, influence may follow. Although international sentiments are not all positive—with concerns over Chinese vaccines’ efficacy, safety, and data availability, Beijing reaped substantial soft power dividends through its ability to project influence in scientific prowess and civic virtue by providing the vaccines as International Public Goods through aid and gifts to countries left behind by the vaccine inequity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-8040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-8059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Coronaviruses ; Corporate Communication/Public Relations ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Diplomacy ; Marketing ; Nation states ; Original ; Original Article ; Political Science and International Relations</subject><ispartof>Place branding and public diplomacy, 2023-03, Vol.19 (1), p.64-78</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-bf209d9d0d66b423f9c4ce8b058678feedf0d9a8c98ecfac8a905219c3ea8cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-bf209d9d0d66b423f9c4ce8b058678feedf0d9a8c98ecfac8a905219c3ea8cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seow Ting</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play</title><title>Place branding and public diplomacy</title><addtitle>Place Brand Public Dipl</addtitle><description>As a global crisis, COVID-19 has altered how nation-states project influence. Public health has risen to the top of every agenda as individuals, societies, and nation-states focus on a common goal. With the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, home-grown national vaccines when distributed all over the world can play an integral role in nation branding as a technique for projecting soft power. This paper applies the theoretical lenses of nation branding and soft power to examine China’s bilateral vaccine diplomacy efforts, specifically the motivations and outcomes. The findings suggest that Chinese vaccines are used not only for image repair and for expanding Beijing’s great power ambitions, but also to reinforce and leverage existing soft power programs, and to capitalize on new economic and geopolitical opportunities. Vaccine diplomacy is a natural extension of Chinese soft power including prior engagement in health diplomacy. Sentiment analyses of social media and international media coverage suggest that where vaccines go, influence may follow. Although international sentiments are not all positive—with concerns over Chinese vaccines’ efficacy, safety, and data availability, Beijing reaped substantial soft power dividends through its ability to project influence in scientific prowess and civic virtue by providing the vaccines as International Public Goods through aid and gifts to countries left behind by the vaccine inequity.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Corporate Communication/Public Relations</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><issn>1751-8040</issn><issn>1751-8059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQhxdRsFZfwFPA8-okm3QTD4LUf4VCL9pryGaz7ZZtsiZbpTdfw9fzSUxtqXjxNMPkm2_CL0nOMVxiYPlVoJgwmgLBKQAhNKUHSQ_nDKccmDjc9xSOk5MQFgCDiJFeMpoqrWtrUFm3jVsqvb5GVnW1s6jwypa1naFY0HBeW_X18RnQcDId3aVYoOCqDrXu3XjUNmp9mhxVqgnmbFf7ycvD_fPwKR1PHkfD23GqM8q7tKgIiFKUUA4GBSVZJTTVhhfA-CDnlTFlBaVQXAtudKU0VwIYwUJnJg41z_rJzdbbroqlKbWxnVeNbH29VH4tnarl3xdbz-XMvUlOmGCMRsHFTuDd68qETi7cytv4Z0nyCDEOHCJFtpT2LgRvqv0FDHKTudxmLmPm8idzuVFn26UQYTsz_lf9z9Y3AZCGMg</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Lee, Seow Ting</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play</title><author>Lee, Seow Ting</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-bf209d9d0d66b423f9c4ce8b058678feedf0d9a8c98ecfac8a905219c3ea8cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Corporate Communication/Public Relations</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seow Ting</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Place branding and public diplomacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Seow Ting</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play</atitle><jtitle>Place branding and public diplomacy</jtitle><stitle>Place Brand Public Dipl</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>64-78</pages><issn>1751-8040</issn><eissn>1751-8059</eissn><abstract>As a global crisis, COVID-19 has altered how nation-states project influence. Public health has risen to the top of every agenda as individuals, societies, and nation-states focus on a common goal. With the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, home-grown national vaccines when distributed all over the world can play an integral role in nation branding as a technique for projecting soft power. This paper applies the theoretical lenses of nation branding and soft power to examine China’s bilateral vaccine diplomacy efforts, specifically the motivations and outcomes. The findings suggest that Chinese vaccines are used not only for image repair and for expanding Beijing’s great power ambitions, but also to reinforce and leverage existing soft power programs, and to capitalize on new economic and geopolitical opportunities. Vaccine diplomacy is a natural extension of Chinese soft power including prior engagement in health diplomacy. Sentiment analyses of social media and international media coverage suggest that where vaccines go, influence may follow. Although international sentiments are not all positive—with concerns over Chinese vaccines’ efficacy, safety, and data availability, Beijing reaped substantial soft power dividends through its ability to project influence in scientific prowess and civic virtue by providing the vaccines as International Public Goods through aid and gifts to countries left behind by the vaccine inequity.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-8040
ispartof Place branding and public diplomacy, 2023-03, Vol.19 (1), p.64-78
issn 1751-8040
1751-8059
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8259554
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Business and Management
Coronaviruses
Corporate Communication/Public Relations
COVID-19 vaccines
Diplomacy
Marketing
Nation states
Original
Original Article
Political Science and International Relations
title Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China’s COVID-19 soft power play
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T00%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccine%20diplomacy:%20nation%20branding%20and%20China%E2%80%99s%20COVID-19%20soft%20power%20play&rft.jtitle=Place%20branding%20and%20public%20diplomacy&rft.au=Lee,%20Seow%20Ting&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=64-78&rft.issn=1751-8040&rft.eissn=1751-8059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2782558080%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2782558080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true