The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients

Introduction Specific patterns of blood test results are associated with COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify which blood tests could be used to assist in diagnosing COVID-19. Method A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients referred to hospital with a clinica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of clinical biochemistry 2021-07, Vol.58 (4), p.318-326
Hauptverfasser: Parsons, IT, Parsons, AT, Balme, E, Hazell, G, Gifford, R, Stacey, M, Woods, DR, Russell-Jones, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 4
container_start_page 318
container_title Annals of clinical biochemistry
container_volume 58
creator Parsons, IT
Parsons, AT
Balme, E
Hazell, G
Gifford, R
Stacey, M
Woods, DR
Russell-Jones, D
description Introduction Specific patterns of blood test results are associated with COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify which blood tests could be used to assist in diagnosing COVID-19. Method A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients referred to hospital with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 over a period of four weeks. The patient’s clinical presentation and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) were recorded. The patients were divided by diagnosis into COVID (COVID-19 infection) or CONTROL (an alternate diagnosis). A retrospective review of consecutive patients over a further two-week period was used for the purposes of validation. Results Overall, 399 patients (53% COVID, 47% CONTROL) were analysed. White cell count, neutrophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower, while lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin were significantly higher, in the COVID group in comparison to CONTROL. Combining the white cell count, lymphocytes and ferritin results into a COVID Combined Blood Test (CCBT) had an area under the curve of 0.79. Using a threshold CCBT of –0.8 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.63. Analysing this against a further retrospective review of 181 suspected COVID-19 patients, using the same CCBT threshold, resulted in a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.75. The sensitivity was comparable to the SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR. Discussion Mathematically combining the blood tests has the potential to assist clinical acumen allowing for rapid streaming and more accurate patient flow pending definitive diagnosis. This may be of particular use in low-resource settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0004563221999076
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8258729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0004563221999076</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2490603724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-97b713c6cfbbe5406873c6a92afe1a8cddaaacc19d339616e1bb77f73f596a8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMoun7cPUmOXqpJ0zbNRZD1EwQv6jVM03Q30ja1kwr615tlVVTwFF7eb94MM4QccnbCuZSnjLEsL0SacqUUk8UGmXGZlwlnjG-S2cpOVv4O2UV8jjKVjG2THSFyxaUSM7J4WFo6oaW-oaOfgustrVrvaxosBqTBU0B0GGiIYO1g0fsoV_j8_un2IuGKup7iWzcE30Fwhi49Di5A695tTYf4ZfuA-2SrgRbtwee7Rx6vLh_mN8nd_fXt_PwuMZnIQqJkJbkwhWmqyuYZK0oZFagUGsuhNHUNAMZwVQuhCl5YXlVSNlI0uSqgbMQeOVvnDlPV2drE3iO0ehhdB-Ob9uD0b6d3S73wr7pM81KmKgYcfwaM_mWKO9CdQ2PbFnrrJ9RppljBhEyziLI1akaPONrmuw1nenUf_fc-seTo53jfBV8HiUCyBhAWVj_7aezjuv4P_ACPRZon</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490603724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Parsons, IT ; Parsons, AT ; Balme, E ; Hazell, G ; Gifford, R ; Stacey, M ; Woods, DR ; Russell-Jones, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, IT ; Parsons, AT ; Balme, E ; Hazell, G ; Gifford, R ; Stacey, M ; Woods, DR ; Russell-Jones, D</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Specific patterns of blood test results are associated with COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify which blood tests could be used to assist in diagnosing COVID-19. Method A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients referred to hospital with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 over a period of four weeks. The patient’s clinical presentation and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) were recorded. The patients were divided by diagnosis into COVID (COVID-19 infection) or CONTROL (an alternate diagnosis). A retrospective review of consecutive patients over a further two-week period was used for the purposes of validation. Results Overall, 399 patients (53% COVID, 47% CONTROL) were analysed. White cell count, neutrophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower, while lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin were significantly higher, in the COVID group in comparison to CONTROL. Combining the white cell count, lymphocytes and ferritin results into a COVID Combined Blood Test (CCBT) had an area under the curve of 0.79. Using a threshold CCBT of –0.8 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.63. Analysing this against a further retrospective review of 181 suspected COVID-19 patients, using the same CCBT threshold, resulted in a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.75. The sensitivity was comparable to the SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR. Discussion Mathematically combining the blood tests has the potential to assist clinical acumen allowing for rapid streaming and more accurate patient flow pending definitive diagnosis. This may be of particular use in low-resource settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0004563221999076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33591793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Annals of clinical biochemistry, 2021-07, Vol.58 (4), p.318-326</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 Association for Clinical Biochemistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-97b713c6cfbbe5406873c6a92afe1a8cddaaacc19d339616e1bb77f73f596a8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-97b713c6cfbbe5406873c6a92afe1a8cddaaacc19d339616e1bb77f73f596a8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8577-8289</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0004563221999076$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0004563221999076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, IT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, AT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balme, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazell, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, DR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell-Jones, D</creatorcontrib><title>The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients</title><title>Annals of clinical biochemistry</title><addtitle>Ann Clin Biochem</addtitle><description>Introduction Specific patterns of blood test results are associated with COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify which blood tests could be used to assist in diagnosing COVID-19. Method A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients referred to hospital with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 over a period of four weeks. The patient’s clinical presentation and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) were recorded. The patients were divided by diagnosis into COVID (COVID-19 infection) or CONTROL (an alternate diagnosis). A retrospective review of consecutive patients over a further two-week period was used for the purposes of validation. Results Overall, 399 patients (53% COVID, 47% CONTROL) were analysed. White cell count, neutrophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower, while lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin were significantly higher, in the COVID group in comparison to CONTROL. Combining the white cell count, lymphocytes and ferritin results into a COVID Combined Blood Test (CCBT) had an area under the curve of 0.79. Using a threshold CCBT of –0.8 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.63. Analysing this against a further retrospective review of 181 suspected COVID-19 patients, using the same CCBT threshold, resulted in a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.75. The sensitivity was comparable to the SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR. Discussion Mathematically combining the blood tests has the potential to assist clinical acumen allowing for rapid streaming and more accurate patient flow pending definitive diagnosis. This may be of particular use in low-resource settings.</description><issn>0004-5632</issn><issn>1758-1001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMoun7cPUmOXqpJ0zbNRZD1EwQv6jVM03Q30ja1kwr615tlVVTwFF7eb94MM4QccnbCuZSnjLEsL0SacqUUk8UGmXGZlwlnjG-S2cpOVv4O2UV8jjKVjG2THSFyxaUSM7J4WFo6oaW-oaOfgustrVrvaxosBqTBU0B0GGiIYO1g0fsoV_j8_un2IuGKup7iWzcE30Fwhi49Di5A695tTYf4ZfuA-2SrgRbtwee7Rx6vLh_mN8nd_fXt_PwuMZnIQqJkJbkwhWmqyuYZK0oZFagUGsuhNHUNAMZwVQuhCl5YXlVSNlI0uSqgbMQeOVvnDlPV2drE3iO0ehhdB-Ob9uD0b6d3S73wr7pM81KmKgYcfwaM_mWKO9CdQ2PbFnrrJ9RppljBhEyziLI1akaPONrmuw1nenUf_fc-seTo53jfBV8HiUCyBhAWVj_7aezjuv4P_ACPRZon</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Parsons, IT</creator><creator>Parsons, AT</creator><creator>Balme, E</creator><creator>Hazell, G</creator><creator>Gifford, R</creator><creator>Stacey, M</creator><creator>Woods, DR</creator><creator>Russell-Jones, D</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-8289</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients</title><author>Parsons, IT ; Parsons, AT ; Balme, E ; Hazell, G ; Gifford, R ; Stacey, M ; Woods, DR ; Russell-Jones, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-97b713c6cfbbe5406873c6a92afe1a8cddaaacc19d339616e1bb77f73f596a8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, IT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, AT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balme, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazell, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, DR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell-Jones, D</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of clinical biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, IT</au><au>Parsons, AT</au><au>Balme, E</au><au>Hazell, G</au><au>Gifford, R</au><au>Stacey, M</au><au>Woods, DR</au><au>Russell-Jones, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of clinical biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Clin Biochem</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>318-326</pages><issn>0004-5632</issn><eissn>1758-1001</eissn><abstract>Introduction Specific patterns of blood test results are associated with COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify which blood tests could be used to assist in diagnosing COVID-19. Method A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients referred to hospital with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 over a period of four weeks. The patient’s clinical presentation and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) were recorded. The patients were divided by diagnosis into COVID (COVID-19 infection) or CONTROL (an alternate diagnosis). A retrospective review of consecutive patients over a further two-week period was used for the purposes of validation. Results Overall, 399 patients (53% COVID, 47% CONTROL) were analysed. White cell count, neutrophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower, while lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin were significantly higher, in the COVID group in comparison to CONTROL. Combining the white cell count, lymphocytes and ferritin results into a COVID Combined Blood Test (CCBT) had an area under the curve of 0.79. Using a threshold CCBT of –0.8 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.63. Analysing this against a further retrospective review of 181 suspected COVID-19 patients, using the same CCBT threshold, resulted in a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.75. The sensitivity was comparable to the SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR. Discussion Mathematically combining the blood tests has the potential to assist clinical acumen allowing for rapid streaming and more accurate patient flow pending definitive diagnosis. This may be of particular use in low-resource settings.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33591793</pmid><doi>10.1177/0004563221999076</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-8289</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-5632
ispartof Annals of clinical biochemistry, 2021-07, Vol.58 (4), p.318-326
issn 0004-5632
1758-1001
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8258729
source SAGE Journals Online
title The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A04%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20routine%20blood%20tests%20to%20assist%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20COVID-19%20in%20symptomatic%20hospitalized%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20clinical%20biochemistry&rft.au=Parsons,%20IT&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=318-326&rft.issn=0004-5632&rft.eissn=1758-1001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0004563221999076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2490603724%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490603724&rft_id=info:pmid/33591793&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0004563221999076&rfr_iscdi=true