How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium
The strategy of reconnecting rivers with their floodplains currently gains popularity because it not only harnesses natural capacities of floodplains but also increases social co-benefits and biodiversity. In this paper, we present an example of a successfully implemented nature-based solution (NBS)...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ambio 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.1431-1445 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1445 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1431 |
| container_title | Ambio |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Turkelboom, Francis Demeyer, Rolinde Vranken, Liesbet De Becker, Piet Raymaekers, Filip De Smet, Lieven |
| description | The strategy of reconnecting rivers with their floodplains currently gains popularity because it not only harnesses natural capacities of floodplains but also increases social co-benefits and biodiversity. In this paper, we present an example of a successfully implemented nature-based solution (NBS) in the Dijle valley in the centre of Belgium. The research objective is to retrospectively assess cost and benefit differences between a technical solution (storm basins) and an alternative NBS, here the restoration of the alluvial floodplain. The method is a comparative social cost–benefit analysis. The case study analysis reveals similar flood security, lower costs, more ecosystem services benefits and higher biodiversity values associated with the NBS option in comparison to the technical alternative. However, the business case for working with NBS depends substantially on the spatial and socio-ecological context. Chances for successful NBS implementation increase in conditions of sufficient space to retain flood water, when flood water is of sufficient quality, and when economic activity and housing in the floodplain is limited. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13280-021-01548-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8249589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48739151</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48739151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-9a9b7356aefec04557f7748211578ef965c92b7b574b5c29e39603024861a7023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS1ERS-FP4AEssSGTajfjw0IroBWqsQG1pbjTG5zlcQX2ynqv8c05fJYsJqR5jtnZnQQekbJa0qIPs-UM0MawmhDqBSmEQ_QhiopGs2IfYg2hIjaC6FP0eOc94QQxTl_hE45t1owKjeoXMTvuIuQscezL0uCpvUZOpzjuJQhzriPCfdjjB0OcS4pjrVOB58Al1hFBcL1PAQ_HhVv8bY64FyW7hbDzdDBHAD3KU74PYy7YZmeoJPejxme3tcz9PXjhy_bi-bq86fL7burJkjFSmO9bTWXykMPgQgpda-1MIxSqQ30VslgWatbqUUrA7PArSKcMGEU9ZowfoberL6HpZ2gC1Dv96M7pGHy6dZFP7i_J_Nw7XbxxhkmrDS2Gry6N0jx2wK5uGnIAcbRzxCX7JhkUkkjFK3oy3_QfVzSXN-rlNBUKWVIpdhKhRRzTtAfj6HE_QzVraG6Gqq7C9WJKnrx5xtHya8UK8BXINfRvIP0e_d_bZ-vqn0uMR1dhdHcUkn5Dyjetus</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547166680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Turkelboom, Francis ; Demeyer, Rolinde ; Vranken, Liesbet ; De Becker, Piet ; Raymaekers, Filip ; De Smet, Lieven</creator><creatorcontrib>Turkelboom, Francis ; Demeyer, Rolinde ; Vranken, Liesbet ; De Becker, Piet ; Raymaekers, Filip ; De Smet, Lieven</creatorcontrib><description>The strategy of reconnecting rivers with their floodplains currently gains popularity because it not only harnesses natural capacities of floodplains but also increases social co-benefits and biodiversity. In this paper, we present an example of a successfully implemented nature-based solution (NBS) in the Dijle valley in the centre of Belgium. The research objective is to retrospectively assess cost and benefit differences between a technical solution (storm basins) and an alternative NBS, here the restoration of the alluvial floodplain. The method is a comparative social cost–benefit analysis. The case study analysis reveals similar flood security, lower costs, more ecosystem services benefits and higher biodiversity values associated with the NBS option in comparison to the technical alternative. However, the business case for working with NBS depends substantially on the spatial and socio-ecological context. Chances for successful NBS implementation increase in conditions of sufficient space to retain flood water, when flood water is of sufficient quality, and when economic activity and housing in the floodplain is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01548-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33974215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Case studies ; Cost benefit analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic conditions ; Ecosystem services ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Flood control ; Floodplains ; Floods ; Floodwater ; Harnesses ; Housing ; NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN RIVER LANDSCAPES ; Physical Geography</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.1431-1445</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-9a9b7356aefec04557f7748211578ef965c92b7b574b5c29e39603024861a7023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-9a9b7356aefec04557f7748211578ef965c92b7b574b5c29e39603024861a7023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0700-1060 ; 0000-0001-7409-4167 ; 0000-0003-1170-1139 ; 0000-0002-9686-0472 ; 0000-0002-6317-9808 ; 0000-0001-8320-4049</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249589/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249589/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turkelboom, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyer, Rolinde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranken, Liesbet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Becker, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymaekers, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Smet, Lieven</creatorcontrib><title>How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium</title><title>Ambio</title><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><description>The strategy of reconnecting rivers with their floodplains currently gains popularity because it not only harnesses natural capacities of floodplains but also increases social co-benefits and biodiversity. In this paper, we present an example of a successfully implemented nature-based solution (NBS) in the Dijle valley in the centre of Belgium. The research objective is to retrospectively assess cost and benefit differences between a technical solution (storm basins) and an alternative NBS, here the restoration of the alluvial floodplain. The method is a comparative social cost–benefit analysis. The case study analysis reveals similar flood security, lower costs, more ecosystem services benefits and higher biodiversity values associated with the NBS option in comparison to the technical alternative. However, the business case for working with NBS depends substantially on the spatial and socio-ecological context. Chances for successful NBS implementation increase in conditions of sufficient space to retain flood water, when flood water is of sufficient quality, and when economic activity and housing in the floodplain is limited.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Floodwater</subject><subject>Harnesses</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN RIVER LANDSCAPES</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS1ERS-FP4AEssSGTajfjw0IroBWqsQG1pbjTG5zlcQX2ynqv8c05fJYsJqR5jtnZnQQekbJa0qIPs-UM0MawmhDqBSmEQ_QhiopGs2IfYg2hIjaC6FP0eOc94QQxTl_hE45t1owKjeoXMTvuIuQscezL0uCpvUZOpzjuJQhzriPCfdjjB0OcS4pjrVOB58Al1hFBcL1PAQ_HhVv8bY64FyW7hbDzdDBHAD3KU74PYy7YZmeoJPejxme3tcz9PXjhy_bi-bq86fL7burJkjFSmO9bTWXykMPgQgpda-1MIxSqQ30VslgWatbqUUrA7PArSKcMGEU9ZowfoberL6HpZ2gC1Dv96M7pGHy6dZFP7i_J_Nw7XbxxhkmrDS2Gry6N0jx2wK5uGnIAcbRzxCX7JhkUkkjFK3oy3_QfVzSXN-rlNBUKWVIpdhKhRRzTtAfj6HE_QzVraG6Gqq7C9WJKnrx5xtHya8UK8BXINfRvIP0e_d_bZ-vqn0uMR1dhdHcUkn5Dyjetus</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Turkelboom, Francis</creator><creator>Demeyer, Rolinde</creator><creator>Vranken, Liesbet</creator><creator>De Becker, Piet</creator><creator>Raymaekers, Filip</creator><creator>De Smet, Lieven</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-1060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-4167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-1139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-0472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6317-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-4049</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium</title><author>Turkelboom, Francis ; Demeyer, Rolinde ; Vranken, Liesbet ; De Becker, Piet ; Raymaekers, Filip ; De Smet, Lieven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-9a9b7356aefec04557f7748211578ef965c92b7b574b5c29e39603024861a7023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Floodwater</topic><topic>Harnesses</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN RIVER LANDSCAPES</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turkelboom, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyer, Rolinde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranken, Liesbet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Becker, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymaekers, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Smet, Lieven</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turkelboom, Francis</au><au>Demeyer, Rolinde</au><au>Vranken, Liesbet</au><au>De Becker, Piet</au><au>Raymaekers, Filip</au><au>De Smet, Lieven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><stitle>Ambio</stitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1431</spage><epage>1445</epage><pages>1431-1445</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><abstract>The strategy of reconnecting rivers with their floodplains currently gains popularity because it not only harnesses natural capacities of floodplains but also increases social co-benefits and biodiversity. In this paper, we present an example of a successfully implemented nature-based solution (NBS) in the Dijle valley in the centre of Belgium. The research objective is to retrospectively assess cost and benefit differences between a technical solution (storm basins) and an alternative NBS, here the restoration of the alluvial floodplain. The method is a comparative social cost–benefit analysis. The case study analysis reveals similar flood security, lower costs, more ecosystem services benefits and higher biodiversity values associated with the NBS option in comparison to the technical alternative. However, the business case for working with NBS depends substantially on the spatial and socio-ecological context. Chances for successful NBS implementation increase in conditions of sufficient space to retain flood water, when flood water is of sufficient quality, and when economic activity and housing in the floodplain is limited.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>33974215</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13280-021-01548-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-1060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-4167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-1139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-0472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6317-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-4049</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0044-7447 |
| ispartof | Ambio, 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.1431-1445 |
| issn | 0044-7447 1654-7209 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8249589 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Biodiversity Case studies Cost benefit analysis Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic conditions Ecosystem services Environment Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Management Flood control Floodplains Floods Floodwater Harnesses Housing NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS IN RIVER LANDSCAPES Physical Geography |
| title | How does a nature-based solution for flood control compare to a technical solution? Case study evidence from Belgium |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20does%20a%20nature-based%20solution%20for%20flood%20control%20compare%20to%20a%20technical%20solution?%20Case%20study%20evidence%20from%20Belgium&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Turkelboom,%20Francis&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1431&rft.epage=1445&rft.pages=1431-1445&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13280-021-01548-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48739151%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547166680&rft_id=info:pmid/33974215&rft_jstor_id=48739151&rfr_iscdi=true |