Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis

BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were id...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2018-06, Vol.124 (12), p.2507-2514
Hauptverfasser: Danzig, Matthew R., Mallin, Katherine, McKiernan, James M., Stadler, Walter M., Sridhar, Srikala S., Morgan, Todd M., Bochner, Bernard H., Lee, Cheryl T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2514
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2507
container_title Cancer
container_volume 124
creator Danzig, Matthew R.
Mallin, Katherine
McKiernan, James M.
Stadler, Walter M.
Sridhar, Srikala S.
Morgan, Todd M.
Bochner, Bernard H.
Lee, Cheryl T.
description BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5‐year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.31372
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022982355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5142-41c1068977a150a7ee3dd6834678bc3ccfac8e82ce879085581f9944e85c3243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LHTEUxUOp1FfbTT9AGeimCKP5O8lsBHnUKkgrxUUXhRDvy_gimWSazLzyvr2ZPhXtotxFbu795XDCQegDwUcEY3oMAdIRI0zSV2hBcCtrTDh9jRYYY1ULzn7uo7c535WrpIK9Qfu0bShvWLNAv65SvA0xjw4q1w8xjSaArWJX-W0_rOPGZJi8SZULpXUxlKaaUhzX1jvjKzAJXIi9mZ-UYZVsKOPB-o3L79BeZ3y27x_OA3R99uV6eV5ffv96sTy9rEEUozUnQHCjWikNEdhIa9lq1SjGG6lugAF0BpRVFKySLVZCKNK1LedWCWCUswN0spMdppversCGMRmvh-R6k7Y6GqdfboJb69u40YpyRZu2CHx-EEjx92TzqHuXwXpvgo1T1hRT2irKhCjop3_Quzil8uWZEnNJNjs63FGQYs7Jdk9mCNZzZnrOTP_NrMAfn9t_Qh9DKgDZAX-ct9v_SOnlt-WPneg9TkujCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2050505734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Danzig, Matthew R. ; Mallin, Katherine ; McKiernan, James M. ; Stadler, Walter M. ; Sridhar, Srikala S. ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Bochner, Bernard H. ; Lee, Cheryl T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Danzig, Matthew R. ; Mallin, Katherine ; McKiernan, James M. ; Stadler, Walter M. ; Sridhar, Srikala S. ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Bochner, Bernard H. ; Lee, Cheryl T.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5‐year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P &lt; .001 by the log‐rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4‐1.91). CONCLUSIONS Lymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507‐14. © 2018 American Cancer Society. Patients with pathologic T3 cancer of the renal pelvis and lymphovascular invasion have significantly worse survival compared with patients with pathologic T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion, approaching the survival of patients with pathologic T4 disease. Lymphovascular invasion can aid in the risk stratification of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31372</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29624636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; cancer staging ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Confidence intervals ; Demographics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hazard assessment ; Hazard identification ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - mortality ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Kidney Pelvis - pathology ; Kidney Pelvis - surgery ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Lymphatic Vessels - pathology ; lymphovascular invasion ; Male ; Mastectomy ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephroureterectomy ; Oncology ; Patients ; Pelvis ; Prognosis ; Rank tests ; Regression analysis ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; upper tract urothelial carcinoma ; Urological cancer ; Urothelial carcinoma ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2018-06, Vol.124 (12), p.2507-2514</ispartof><rights>2018 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2018 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5142-41c1068977a150a7ee3dd6834678bc3ccfac8e82ce879085581f9944e85c3243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5142-41c1068977a150a7ee3dd6834678bc3ccfac8e82ce879085581f9944e85c3243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0435-2527 ; 0000-0003-4908-0016</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.31372$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.31372$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danzig, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallin, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKiernan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Walter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Srikala S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, Bernard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheryl T.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5‐year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P &lt; .001 by the log‐rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4‐1.91). CONCLUSIONS Lymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507‐14. © 2018 American Cancer Society. Patients with pathologic T3 cancer of the renal pelvis and lymphovascular invasion have significantly worse survival compared with patients with pathologic T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion, approaching the survival of patients with pathologic T4 disease. Lymphovascular invasion can aid in the risk stratification of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer staging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hazard identification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney Pelvis - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Pelvis - surgery</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>lymphovascular invasion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephroureterectomy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>upper tract urothelial carcinoma</subject><subject>Urological cancer</subject><subject>Urothelial carcinoma</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9LHTEUxUOp1FfbTT9AGeimCKP5O8lsBHnUKkgrxUUXhRDvy_gimWSazLzyvr2ZPhXtotxFbu795XDCQegDwUcEY3oMAdIRI0zSV2hBcCtrTDh9jRYYY1ULzn7uo7c535WrpIK9Qfu0bShvWLNAv65SvA0xjw4q1w8xjSaArWJX-W0_rOPGZJi8SZULpXUxlKaaUhzX1jvjKzAJXIi9mZ-UYZVsKOPB-o3L79BeZ3y27x_OA3R99uV6eV5ffv96sTy9rEEUozUnQHCjWikNEdhIa9lq1SjGG6lugAF0BpRVFKySLVZCKNK1LedWCWCUswN0spMdppversCGMRmvh-R6k7Y6GqdfboJb69u40YpyRZu2CHx-EEjx92TzqHuXwXpvgo1T1hRT2irKhCjop3_Quzil8uWZEnNJNjs63FGQYs7Jdk9mCNZzZnrOTP_NrMAfn9t_Qh9DKgDZAX-ct9v_SOnlt-WPneg9TkujCA</recordid><startdate>20180615</startdate><enddate>20180615</enddate><creator>Danzig, Matthew R.</creator><creator>Mallin, Katherine</creator><creator>McKiernan, James M.</creator><creator>Stadler, Walter M.</creator><creator>Sridhar, Srikala S.</creator><creator>Morgan, Todd M.</creator><creator>Bochner, Bernard H.</creator><creator>Lee, Cheryl T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-2527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-0016</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180615</creationdate><title>Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis</title><author>Danzig, Matthew R. ; Mallin, Katherine ; McKiernan, James M. ; Stadler, Walter M. ; Sridhar, Srikala S. ; Morgan, Todd M. ; Bochner, Bernard H. ; Lee, Cheryl T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5142-41c1068977a150a7ee3dd6834678bc3ccfac8e82ce879085581f9944e85c3243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer staging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hazard identification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney Pelvis - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Pelvis - surgery</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>lymphovascular invasion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephroureterectomy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>upper tract urothelial carcinoma</topic><topic>Urological cancer</topic><topic>Urothelial carcinoma</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danzig, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallin, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKiernan, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Walter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Srikala S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, Bernard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheryl T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danzig, Matthew R.</au><au>Mallin, Katherine</au><au>McKiernan, James M.</au><au>Stadler, Walter M.</au><au>Sridhar, Srikala S.</au><au>Morgan, Todd M.</au><au>Bochner, Bernard H.</au><au>Lee, Cheryl T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-06-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2507</spage><epage>2514</epage><pages>2507-2514</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5‐year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P &lt; .001 by the log‐rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4‐1.91). CONCLUSIONS Lymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507‐14. © 2018 American Cancer Society. Patients with pathologic T3 cancer of the renal pelvis and lymphovascular invasion have significantly worse survival compared with patients with pathologic T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion, approaching the survival of patients with pathologic T4 disease. Lymphovascular invasion can aid in the risk stratification of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29624636</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.31372</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-2527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-0016</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2018-06, Vol.124 (12), p.2507-2514
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248269
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer
cancer staging
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery
Chemotherapy
Clinical trials
Confidence intervals
Demographics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hazard assessment
Hazard identification
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - mortality
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Kidney Pelvis - pathology
Kidney Pelvis - surgery
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Lymphatic Vessels - pathology
lymphovascular invasion
Male
Mastectomy
Medical prognosis
Medical research
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Nephroureterectomy
Oncology
Patients
Pelvis
Prognosis
Rank tests
Regression analysis
Renal cell carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Survival
Survival Analysis
upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Urological cancer
Urothelial carcinoma
Young Adult
title Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T18%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20importance%20of%20lymphovascular%20invasion%20in%20urothelial%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20renal%20pelvis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Danzig,%20Matthew%20R.&rft.date=2018-06-15&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2507&rft.epage=2514&rft.pages=2507-2514&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.31372&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2022982355%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2050505734&rft_id=info:pmid/29624636&rfr_iscdi=true