The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia

Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dyslexia (Chichester, England) England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186
Hauptverfasser: Witteloostuijn, Merel, Boersma, Paul, Wijnen, Frank, Rispens, Judith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title Dyslexia (Chichester, England)
container_volume 27
creator Witteloostuijn, Merel
Boersma, Paul
Wijnen, Frank
Rispens, Judith
description Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dys.1678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524182777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcluFTEQRVsIREJA4guQJTZsOnhqDxskFEYpEgvCgpXltst5jvrZD7s74f0DH407CWGQWLnsunV0r6vrnhJ8TDCmL_2-HhMh1b3ukGCte6yxvr_WUvSacnrQPar1AmOsBZcPuwPGBCOKDYfdj7MNIJfTXOK4zDEnlAOKycfL6Bc7IR9DgALJQW3PqM52jnWOrrUmsCXFdI7mjApYv5Y2eVR3ME3rZQcl5LK1bXiddZs4-YZCV3HeXCvXIi8zavYn-B7t4-5BsFOFJ7fnUffl3duzkw_96af3H09en_aOM6V6zige3CBGOWomhfASKyyAYTVYaq2iwXEYCLT0inCteRCMBxg0FjLAKNhR9-qGu1vGLXgHLb6dzK7ErS17k200f3dS3JjzfGkU5QqrFfDiFlDytwXqbLaxuhbbJshLNZRrTqXmWDfp83-kF3kpqcUzdKCcKCql_A10JddaINyZIdisKzbtj8y64iZ99qf5O-GvnTZBfyO4ihPs_wsyb75-vgb-BDyysu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524182777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</creator><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><description>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-9242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dys.1678</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33631835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Children ; Cognitive tasks ; Dutch language ; Dyslexia ; Educational activities ; Individual differences ; Language ; Learning ; Learning outcomes ; Literacy ; Naming ; Phonological memory ; Phonology ; Reaction time ; Reading acquisition ; Reasoning ; Skills ; spelling ; Spelling acquisition ; statistical learning ; Statistics ; Visual discrimination learning ; Visual tasks ; word reading</subject><ispartof>Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Dyslexia published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdys.1678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdys.1678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33631835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><title>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Dyslexia</addtitle><description>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognitive tasks</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Phonological memory</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reading acquisition</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>spelling</subject><subject>Spelling acquisition</subject><subject>statistical learning</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><subject>word reading</subject><issn>1076-9242</issn><issn>1099-0909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcluFTEQRVsIREJA4guQJTZsOnhqDxskFEYpEgvCgpXltst5jvrZD7s74f0DH407CWGQWLnsunV0r6vrnhJ8TDCmL_2-HhMh1b3ukGCte6yxvr_WUvSacnrQPar1AmOsBZcPuwPGBCOKDYfdj7MNIJfTXOK4zDEnlAOKycfL6Bc7IR9DgALJQW3PqM52jnWOrrUmsCXFdI7mjApYv5Y2eVR3ME3rZQcl5LK1bXiddZs4-YZCV3HeXCvXIi8zavYn-B7t4-5BsFOFJ7fnUffl3duzkw_96af3H09en_aOM6V6zige3CBGOWomhfASKyyAYTVYaq2iwXEYCLT0inCteRCMBxg0FjLAKNhR9-qGu1vGLXgHLb6dzK7ErS17k200f3dS3JjzfGkU5QqrFfDiFlDytwXqbLaxuhbbJshLNZRrTqXmWDfp83-kF3kpqcUzdKCcKCql_A10JddaINyZIdisKzbtj8y64iZ99qf5O-GvnTZBfyO4ihPs_wsyb75-vgb-BDyysu8</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creator><creator>Boersma, Paul</creator><creator>Wijnen, Frank</creator><creator>Rispens, Judith</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><author>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognitive tasks</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Phonological memory</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reading acquisition</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>spelling</topic><topic>Spelling acquisition</topic><topic>statistical learning</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><topic>word reading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witteloostuijn, Merel</au><au>Boersma, Paul</au><au>Wijnen, Frank</au><au>Rispens, Judith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</atitle><jtitle>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Dyslexia</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>168-186</pages><issn>1076-9242</issn><eissn>1099-0909</eissn><abstract>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33631835</pmid><doi>10.1002/dys.1678</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-9242
ispartof Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186
issn 1076-9242
1099-0909
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248086
source Wiley Blackwell Single Titles
subjects Children
Cognitive tasks
Dutch language
Dyslexia
Educational activities
Individual differences
Language
Learning
Learning outcomes
Literacy
Naming
Phonological memory
Phonology
Reaction time
Reading acquisition
Reasoning
Skills
spelling
Spelling acquisition
statistical learning
Statistics
Visual discrimination learning
Visual tasks
word reading
title The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20contribution%20of%20individual%20differences%20in%20statistical%20learning%20to%20reading%20and%20spelling%20performance%20in%20children%20with%20and%20without%20dyslexia&rft.jtitle=Dyslexia%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Witteloostuijn,%20Merel&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=168-186&rft.issn=1076-9242&rft.eissn=1099-0909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dys.1678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2524182777%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524182777&rft_id=info:pmid/33631835&rfr_iscdi=true