The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia
Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dyslexia (Chichester, England) England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | Dyslexia (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Witteloostuijn, Merel Boersma, Paul Wijnen, Frank Rispens, Judith |
description | Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dys.1678 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524182777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcluFTEQRVsIREJA4guQJTZsOnhqDxskFEYpEgvCgpXltst5jvrZD7s74f0DH407CWGQWLnsunV0r6vrnhJ8TDCmL_2-HhMh1b3ukGCte6yxvr_WUvSacnrQPar1AmOsBZcPuwPGBCOKDYfdj7MNIJfTXOK4zDEnlAOKycfL6Bc7IR9DgALJQW3PqM52jnWOrrUmsCXFdI7mjApYv5Y2eVR3ME3rZQcl5LK1bXiddZs4-YZCV3HeXCvXIi8zavYn-B7t4-5BsFOFJ7fnUffl3duzkw_96af3H09en_aOM6V6zige3CBGOWomhfASKyyAYTVYaq2iwXEYCLT0inCteRCMBxg0FjLAKNhR9-qGu1vGLXgHLb6dzK7ErS17k200f3dS3JjzfGkU5QqrFfDiFlDytwXqbLaxuhbbJshLNZRrTqXmWDfp83-kF3kpqcUzdKCcKCql_A10JddaINyZIdisKzbtj8y64iZ99qf5O-GvnTZBfyO4ihPs_wsyb75-vgb-BDyysu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524182777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</creator><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><description>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-9242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dys.1678</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33631835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Children ; Cognitive tasks ; Dutch language ; Dyslexia ; Educational activities ; Individual differences ; Language ; Learning ; Learning outcomes ; Literacy ; Naming ; Phonological memory ; Phonology ; Reaction time ; Reading acquisition ; Reasoning ; Skills ; spelling ; Spelling acquisition ; statistical learning ; Statistics ; Visual discrimination learning ; Visual tasks ; word reading</subject><ispartof>Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Dyslexia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdys.1678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdys.1678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33631835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><title>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Dyslexia</addtitle><description>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognitive tasks</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Phonological memory</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reading acquisition</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>spelling</subject><subject>Spelling acquisition</subject><subject>statistical learning</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><subject>word reading</subject><issn>1076-9242</issn><issn>1099-0909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcluFTEQRVsIREJA4guQJTZsOnhqDxskFEYpEgvCgpXltst5jvrZD7s74f0DH407CWGQWLnsunV0r6vrnhJ8TDCmL_2-HhMh1b3ukGCte6yxvr_WUvSacnrQPar1AmOsBZcPuwPGBCOKDYfdj7MNIJfTXOK4zDEnlAOKycfL6Bc7IR9DgALJQW3PqM52jnWOrrUmsCXFdI7mjApYv5Y2eVR3ME3rZQcl5LK1bXiddZs4-YZCV3HeXCvXIi8zavYn-B7t4-5BsFOFJ7fnUffl3duzkw_96af3H09en_aOM6V6zige3CBGOWomhfASKyyAYTVYaq2iwXEYCLT0inCteRCMBxg0FjLAKNhR9-qGu1vGLXgHLb6dzK7ErS17k200f3dS3JjzfGkU5QqrFfDiFlDytwXqbLaxuhbbJshLNZRrTqXmWDfp83-kF3kpqcUzdKCcKCql_A10JddaINyZIdisKzbtj8y64iZ99qf5O-GvnTZBfyO4ihPs_wsyb75-vgb-BDyysu8</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creator><creator>Boersma, Paul</creator><creator>Wijnen, Frank</creator><creator>Rispens, Judith</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</title><author>Witteloostuijn, Merel ; Boersma, Paul ; Wijnen, Frank ; Rispens, Judith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4388-43205c56b7b93766d70806e3085a2aa82fc4e51e076814994f634fe59067feb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognitive tasks</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Phonological memory</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reading acquisition</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>spelling</topic><topic>Spelling acquisition</topic><topic>statistical learning</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><topic>word reading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witteloostuijn, Merel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rispens, Judith</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witteloostuijn, Merel</au><au>Boersma, Paul</au><au>Wijnen, Frank</au><au>Rispens, Judith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia</atitle><jtitle>Dyslexia (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Dyslexia</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>168-186</pages><issn>1076-9242</issn><eissn>1099-0909</eissn><abstract>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non‐verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short‐term memory). A 100 Dutch‐speaking 8‐ to 11‐year‐old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant‐level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33631835</pmid><doi>10.1002/dys.1678</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-8247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-9242 |
ispartof | Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.27 (2), p.168-186 |
issn | 1076-9242 1099-0909 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8248086 |
source | Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
subjects | Children Cognitive tasks Dutch language Dyslexia Educational activities Individual differences Language Learning Learning outcomes Literacy Naming Phonological memory Phonology Reaction time Reading acquisition Reasoning Skills spelling Spelling acquisition statistical learning Statistics Visual discrimination learning Visual tasks word reading |
title | The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20contribution%20of%20individual%20differences%20in%20statistical%20learning%20to%20reading%20and%20spelling%20performance%20in%20children%20with%20and%20without%20dyslexia&rft.jtitle=Dyslexia%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Witteloostuijn,%20Merel&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=168-186&rft.issn=1076-9242&rft.eissn=1099-0909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dys.1678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2524182777%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524182777&rft_id=info:pmid/33631835&rfr_iscdi=true |