Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN

BACKGROUNDRapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2021-07, Vol.73 (1), p.e39-e46
Hauptverfasser: Banerjee, Ritu, Komarow, Lauren, Virk, Abinash, Rajapakse, Nipunie, Schuetz, Audrey N, Dylla, Brenda, Earley, Michelle, Lok, Judith, Kohner, Peggy, Ihde, Sherry, Cole, Nicolynn, Hines, Lisa, Reed, Katelyn, Garner, Omai B, Chandrasekaran, Sukantha, de St. Maurice, Annabelle, Kanatani, Meganne, Curello, Jennifer, Arias, Rubi, Swearingen, William, Doernberg, Sarah B, Patel, Robin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e46
container_issue 1
container_start_page e39
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 73
creator Banerjee, Ritu
Komarow, Lauren
Virk, Abinash
Rajapakse, Nipunie
Schuetz, Audrey N
Dylla, Brenda
Earley, Michelle
Lok, Judith
Kohner, Peggy
Ihde, Sherry
Cole, Nicolynn
Hines, Lisa
Reed, Katelyn
Garner, Omai B
Chandrasekaran, Sukantha
de St. Maurice, Annabelle
Kanatani, Meganne
Curello, Jennifer
Arias, Rubi
Swearingen, William
Doernberg, Sarah B
Patel, Robin
description BACKGROUNDRapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). METHODSPatients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. RESULTSOf 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cid/ciaa528
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8246790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399837557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-9b316f99951f816cd96e6290685540c9a133d023f6a64f2609663fbdf4d879b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1LHDEYhUOx1I_2yj-Qy4KMzcckk3hRsKtuF0SLbq9DNh_rKzOTbWZmQX-Av9tYl0IvXvKSc_KEw0HomJJTSjT_5sCXsVYw9QEdUMGbSgpN98pOhKpqxdU-OhyGR0IoVUR8Qvuc8aZWjB2glzvb-9TBc_B4mcG2-HJr28mO0K_xrIUeXLlbdBvrRpwivjv_BR4vLkI_QizaCKnHBYHvp8GFzQgraGF8wssw_EXElPE8267qw7qYtwH_KKSQQwf27I22uLiv5jef0cdo2yF82Z1H6PfV5XL2s7q-nS9m59eV40KNlV5xKqPWWtCoqHReyyCZJlIJUROnLeXcE8ajtLKOTBItJY8rH2uvmvKYH6Hv79zNtOqCdyVGtq3ZZOhsfjLJgvlf6eHBrNPWKFbLRpMC-LoD5PRnKiFNByV429o-pGkwjGuteCNEU6wn71aX0zDkEP99Q4l5a86U5syuOf4KlfiM3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399837557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Banerjee, Ritu ; Komarow, Lauren ; Virk, Abinash ; Rajapakse, Nipunie ; Schuetz, Audrey N ; Dylla, Brenda ; Earley, Michelle ; Lok, Judith ; Kohner, Peggy ; Ihde, Sherry ; Cole, Nicolynn ; Hines, Lisa ; Reed, Katelyn ; Garner, Omai B ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; de St. Maurice, Annabelle ; Kanatani, Meganne ; Curello, Jennifer ; Arias, Rubi ; Swearingen, William ; Doernberg, Sarah B ; Patel, Robin</creator><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Ritu ; Komarow, Lauren ; Virk, Abinash ; Rajapakse, Nipunie ; Schuetz, Audrey N ; Dylla, Brenda ; Earley, Michelle ; Lok, Judith ; Kohner, Peggy ; Ihde, Sherry ; Cole, Nicolynn ; Hines, Lisa ; Reed, Katelyn ; Garner, Omai B ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; de St. Maurice, Annabelle ; Kanatani, Meganne ; Curello, Jennifer ; Arias, Rubi ; Swearingen, William ; Doernberg, Sarah B ; Patel, Robin</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDRapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). METHODSPatients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. RESULTSOf 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P &lt; .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6-27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3-41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9-72] vs 42.1 [10.1-72] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8-72] vs 61.7 [30.4-72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONSRapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATIONNCT03218397.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa528</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32374822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Online Only</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2021-07, Vol.73 (1), p.e39-e46</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-9b316f99951f816cd96e6290685540c9a133d023f6a64f2609663fbdf4d879b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-9b316f99951f816cd96e6290685540c9a133d023f6a64f2609663fbdf4d879b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Ritu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komarow, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virk, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajapakse, Nipunie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuetz, Audrey N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dylla, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohner, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihde, Sherry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Nicolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Katelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Omai B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de St. Maurice, Annabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanatani, Meganne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curello, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Rubi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swearingen, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doernberg, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><description>BACKGROUNDRapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). METHODSPatients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. RESULTSOf 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P &lt; .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6-27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3-41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9-72] vs 42.1 [10.1-72] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8-72] vs 61.7 [30.4-72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONSRapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATIONNCT03218397.</description><subject>Online Only</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkV1LHDEYhUOx1I_2yj-Qy4KMzcckk3hRsKtuF0SLbq9DNh_rKzOTbWZmQX-Av9tYl0IvXvKSc_KEw0HomJJTSjT_5sCXsVYw9QEdUMGbSgpN98pOhKpqxdU-OhyGR0IoVUR8Qvuc8aZWjB2glzvb-9TBc_B4mcG2-HJr28mO0K_xrIUeXLlbdBvrRpwivjv_BR4vLkI_QizaCKnHBYHvp8GFzQgraGF8wssw_EXElPE8267qw7qYtwH_KKSQQwf27I22uLiv5jef0cdo2yF82Z1H6PfV5XL2s7q-nS9m59eV40KNlV5xKqPWWtCoqHReyyCZJlIJUROnLeXcE8ajtLKOTBItJY8rH2uvmvKYH6Hv79zNtOqCdyVGtq3ZZOhsfjLJgvlf6eHBrNPWKFbLRpMC-LoD5PRnKiFNByV429o-pGkwjGuteCNEU6wn71aX0zDkEP99Q4l5a86U5syuOf4KlfiM3Q</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Banerjee, Ritu</creator><creator>Komarow, Lauren</creator><creator>Virk, Abinash</creator><creator>Rajapakse, Nipunie</creator><creator>Schuetz, Audrey N</creator><creator>Dylla, Brenda</creator><creator>Earley, Michelle</creator><creator>Lok, Judith</creator><creator>Kohner, Peggy</creator><creator>Ihde, Sherry</creator><creator>Cole, Nicolynn</creator><creator>Hines, Lisa</creator><creator>Reed, Katelyn</creator><creator>Garner, Omai B</creator><creator>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creator><creator>de St. Maurice, Annabelle</creator><creator>Kanatani, Meganne</creator><creator>Curello, Jennifer</creator><creator>Arias, Rubi</creator><creator>Swearingen, William</creator><creator>Doernberg, Sarah B</creator><creator>Patel, Robin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN</title><author>Banerjee, Ritu ; Komarow, Lauren ; Virk, Abinash ; Rajapakse, Nipunie ; Schuetz, Audrey N ; Dylla, Brenda ; Earley, Michelle ; Lok, Judith ; Kohner, Peggy ; Ihde, Sherry ; Cole, Nicolynn ; Hines, Lisa ; Reed, Katelyn ; Garner, Omai B ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; de St. Maurice, Annabelle ; Kanatani, Meganne ; Curello, Jennifer ; Arias, Rubi ; Swearingen, William ; Doernberg, Sarah B ; Patel, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-9b316f99951f816cd96e6290685540c9a133d023f6a64f2609663fbdf4d879b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Online Only</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Ritu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komarow, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virk, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajapakse, Nipunie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuetz, Audrey N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dylla, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohner, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihde, Sherry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Nicolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Katelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Omai B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de St. Maurice, Annabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanatani, Meganne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curello, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Rubi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swearingen, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doernberg, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banerjee, Ritu</au><au>Komarow, Lauren</au><au>Virk, Abinash</au><au>Rajapakse, Nipunie</au><au>Schuetz, Audrey N</au><au>Dylla, Brenda</au><au>Earley, Michelle</au><au>Lok, Judith</au><au>Kohner, Peggy</au><au>Ihde, Sherry</au><au>Cole, Nicolynn</au><au>Hines, Lisa</au><au>Reed, Katelyn</au><au>Garner, Omai B</au><au>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</au><au>de St. Maurice, Annabelle</au><au>Kanatani, Meganne</au><au>Curello, Jennifer</au><au>Arias, Rubi</au><au>Swearingen, William</au><au>Doernberg, Sarah B</au><au>Patel, Robin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e39</spage><epage>e46</epage><pages>e39-e46</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDRapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). METHODSPatients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. RESULTSOf 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P &lt; .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6-27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3-41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9-72] vs 42.1 [10.1-72] hours; P &lt; .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8-72] vs 61.7 [30.4-72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONSRapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATIONNCT03218397.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32374822</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciaa528</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2021-07, Vol.73 (1), p.e39-e46
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8246790
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Online Only
title Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A05%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Trial%20Evaluating%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20RAPid%20IDentification%20and%20Susceptibility%20Testing%20for%20Gram-negative%20Bacteremia:%20RAPIDS-GN&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Banerjee,%20Ritu&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e39&rft.epage=e46&rft.pages=e39-e46&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2399837557%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399837557&rft_id=info:pmid/32374822&rfr_iscdi=true