Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)

Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2021-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1059-1066
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Nobuhiko, Maruyama, Dai, Machida, Ryunosuke, Ichinohe, Tatsuo, Takayama, Nobuyuki, Ohba, Rie, Ohmachi, Ken, Imaizumi, Yoshitaka, Tokunaga, Masahito, Katsuya, Hiroo, Yoshida, Isao, Sunami, Kazutaka, Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi, Kubota, Nobuko, Morimoto, Hiroaki, Kobayashi, Miki, Kato, Harumi, Kameoka, Yoshihiro, Kagami, Yoshitoyo, Kizaki, Masahiro, Takeuchi, Kazuto, Munakata, Wataru, Iida, Shinsuke, Nagai, Hirokazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1066
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1059
container_title Japanese journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 51
creator Nakamura, Nobuhiko
Maruyama, Dai
Machida, Ryunosuke
Ichinohe, Tatsuo
Takayama, Nobuyuki
Ohba, Rie
Ohmachi, Ken
Imaizumi, Yoshitaka
Tokunaga, Masahito
Katsuya, Hiroo
Yoshida, Isao
Sunami, Kazutaka
Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi
Kubota, Nobuko
Morimoto, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Miki
Kato, Harumi
Kameoka, Yoshihiro
Kagami, Yoshitoyo
Kizaki, Masahiro
Takeuchi, Kazuto
Munakata, Wataru
Iida, Shinsuke
Nagai, Hirokazu
description Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria with two consecutive assessments in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jjco/hyab066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8246272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jjco/hyab066</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jjco/hyab066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-71fea243e81a23aab85f5c4d9b667927b46b06b7411f34541534afd842db6b0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EomW5cUa5ARKhdrwlHJBQBQVUqYfCOZqkTusqcaI4AeXf46iLyoWTnzxvvhn7IXRF8APBER2t12k5WnWQYCGO0JAwwX0qAnJ8oAfozNo1xpiHTJ6iAaURj6TEQ_Qz12aZK69WtiqNVR5Yq6wtlGm8MvOaGoytcjCNr43K9VInzly0eaOrXnQqLwt49MCzbeVu-j6oOw8M5J3Vtmd8jGcTQjD3bndqTu4u0EkGuVWX2_Mcfb2-fI7f_Ols8j5-nvopjWTjS5IpCBhVIYGAAiQhz3jKFlEihIwCmTDh3p1IRkhGGWeEUwbZImTBInEVRc_R04ZbtUmhFqnbr4Y8rmpduD3jEnT8t2L0Kl6W33EYMBHIwAHuN4C0Lq2tVbbvJTjuA4j7AOJtAM5-fThvb979uDPcbAxlW_2P-gUVNJIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nakamura, Nobuhiko ; Maruyama, Dai ; Machida, Ryunosuke ; Ichinohe, Tatsuo ; Takayama, Nobuyuki ; Ohba, Rie ; Ohmachi, Ken ; Imaizumi, Yoshitaka ; Tokunaga, Masahito ; Katsuya, Hiroo ; Yoshida, Isao ; Sunami, Kazutaka ; Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi ; Kubota, Nobuko ; Morimoto, Hiroaki ; Kobayashi, Miki ; Kato, Harumi ; Kameoka, Yoshihiro ; Kagami, Yoshitoyo ; Kizaki, Masahiro ; Takeuchi, Kazuto ; Munakata, Wataru ; Iida, Shinsuke ; Nagai, Hirokazu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nobuhiko ; Maruyama, Dai ; Machida, Ryunosuke ; Ichinohe, Tatsuo ; Takayama, Nobuyuki ; Ohba, Rie ; Ohmachi, Ken ; Imaizumi, Yoshitaka ; Tokunaga, Masahito ; Katsuya, Hiroo ; Yoshida, Isao ; Sunami, Kazutaka ; Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi ; Kubota, Nobuko ; Morimoto, Hiroaki ; Kobayashi, Miki ; Kato, Harumi ; Kameoka, Yoshihiro ; Kagami, Yoshitoyo ; Kizaki, Masahiro ; Takeuchi, Kazuto ; Munakata, Wataru ; Iida, Shinsuke ; Nagai, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria with two consecutive assessments in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-3621</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0368-2811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33959770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1059-1066</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-71fea243e81a23aab85f5c4d9b667927b46b06b7411f34541534afd842db6b0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33959770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Ryunosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichinohe, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayama, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohba, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmachi, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imaizumi, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokunaga, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuya, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunami, Kazutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Nobuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Harumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagami, Yoshitoyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizaki, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Kazuto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munakata, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><title>Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)</title><title>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria with two consecutive assessments in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1465-3621</issn><issn>0368-2811</issn><issn>1465-3621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EomW5cUa5ARKhdrwlHJBQBQVUqYfCOZqkTusqcaI4AeXf46iLyoWTnzxvvhn7IXRF8APBER2t12k5WnWQYCGO0JAwwX0qAnJ8oAfozNo1xpiHTJ6iAaURj6TEQ_Qz12aZK69WtiqNVR5Yq6wtlGm8MvOaGoytcjCNr43K9VInzly0eaOrXnQqLwt49MCzbeVu-j6oOw8M5J3Vtmd8jGcTQjD3bndqTu4u0EkGuVWX2_Mcfb2-fI7f_Ols8j5-nvopjWTjS5IpCBhVIYGAAiQhz3jKFlEihIwCmTDh3p1IRkhGGWeEUwbZImTBInEVRc_R04ZbtUmhFqnbr4Y8rmpduD3jEnT8t2L0Kl6W33EYMBHIwAHuN4C0Lq2tVbbvJTjuA4j7AOJtAM5-fThvb979uDPcbAxlW_2P-gUVNJIU</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Nobuhiko</creator><creator>Maruyama, Dai</creator><creator>Machida, Ryunosuke</creator><creator>Ichinohe, Tatsuo</creator><creator>Takayama, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Ohba, Rie</creator><creator>Ohmachi, Ken</creator><creator>Imaizumi, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Tokunaga, Masahito</creator><creator>Katsuya, Hiroo</creator><creator>Yoshida, Isao</creator><creator>Sunami, Kazutaka</creator><creator>Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi</creator><creator>Kubota, Nobuko</creator><creator>Morimoto, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Miki</creator><creator>Kato, Harumi</creator><creator>Kameoka, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Kagami, Yoshitoyo</creator><creator>Kizaki, Masahiro</creator><creator>Takeuchi, Kazuto</creator><creator>Munakata, Wataru</creator><creator>Iida, Shinsuke</creator><creator>Nagai, Hirokazu</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)</title><author>Nakamura, Nobuhiko ; Maruyama, Dai ; Machida, Ryunosuke ; Ichinohe, Tatsuo ; Takayama, Nobuyuki ; Ohba, Rie ; Ohmachi, Ken ; Imaizumi, Yoshitaka ; Tokunaga, Masahito ; Katsuya, Hiroo ; Yoshida, Isao ; Sunami, Kazutaka ; Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi ; Kubota, Nobuko ; Morimoto, Hiroaki ; Kobayashi, Miki ; Kato, Harumi ; Kameoka, Yoshihiro ; Kagami, Yoshitoyo ; Kizaki, Masahiro ; Takeuchi, Kazuto ; Munakata, Wataru ; Iida, Shinsuke ; Nagai, Hirokazu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-71fea243e81a23aab85f5c4d9b667927b46b06b7411f34541534afd842db6b0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Ryunosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichinohe, Tatsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayama, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohba, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmachi, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imaizumi, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokunaga, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuya, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunami, Kazutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Nobuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Harumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameoka, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagami, Yoshitoyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizaki, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Kazuto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munakata, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Nobuhiko</au><au>Maruyama, Dai</au><au>Machida, Ryunosuke</au><au>Ichinohe, Tatsuo</au><au>Takayama, Nobuyuki</au><au>Ohba, Rie</au><au>Ohmachi, Ken</au><au>Imaizumi, Yoshitaka</au><au>Tokunaga, Masahito</au><au>Katsuya, Hiroo</au><au>Yoshida, Isao</au><au>Sunami, Kazutaka</au><au>Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi</au><au>Kubota, Nobuko</au><au>Morimoto, Hiroaki</au><au>Kobayashi, Miki</au><au>Kato, Harumi</au><au>Kameoka, Yoshihiro</au><au>Kagami, Yoshitoyo</au><au>Kizaki, Masahiro</au><au>Takeuchi, Kazuto</au><au>Munakata, Wataru</au><au>Iida, Shinsuke</au><au>Nagai, Hirokazu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1059</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1059-1066</pages><issn>1465-3621</issn><issn>0368-2811</issn><eissn>1465-3621</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib. Methods Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment. Results Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation. Conclusions The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria with two consecutive assessments in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33959770</pmid><doi>10.1093/jjco/hyab066</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-3621
ispartof Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021-07, Vol.51 (7), p.1059-1066
issn 1465-3621
0368-2811
1465-3621
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8246272
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Original
title Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A03%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20response%20assessment%20of%20transplant-ineligible%20multiple%20myeloma:%20a%20supplementary%20analysis%20of%20JCOG1105%20(JCOG1105S1)&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Nobuhiko&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1059&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1059-1066&rft.issn=1465-3621&rft.eissn=1465-3621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jjco/hyab066&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jjco/hyab066%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33959770&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jjco/hyab066&rfr_iscdi=true