The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways

Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2022-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1482-1484
Hauptverfasser: Kitt, Eimear M., Davis, Daniela H., Kerman, Caryn, Sammons, Julia S., Handy, Lori K., Gallagher, Elizabeth, O’Callaghan, Kevin, Harris, Rebecca M., Coffin, Susan E., Bell, Louis M., Chiotos, Kathleen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1484
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1482
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 43
creator Kitt, Eimear M.
Davis, Daniela H.
Kerman, Caryn
Sammons, Julia S.
Handy, Lori K.
Gallagher, Elizabeth
O’Callaghan, Kevin
Harris, Rebecca M.
Coffin, Susan E.
Bell, Louis M.
Chiotos, Kathleen
description Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically ventilated patients. Significant operational challenges were noted at our institution using this approach. In this report, we describe our experience with routine collection of paired URT and LRT sample testing. Our results revealed a high concordance between the 2 sources, and that all children tested for SARS-CoV-2 were appropriately diagnosed with URT testing alone. There was no added benefit to LRT testing. Based on these findings, our institutional approach was therefore adjusted to sample the URT alone for most patients, with LRT sampling reserved for patients with ongoing clinical suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative URT test.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ice.2021.222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8245335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_ice_2021_222</cupid><sourcerecordid>2524867580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-99811015a6ed932b856da4cba25cd310ccd018deecac75ec41310e3ebc715283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh65w8IeLMLdsxH06Y3wjL4BQuCO4h3IU1OZ7K0TU3SGfqj_I9m2EFZMTcn5Dx5857wIvSakjUltH7nDKwZYXTNGHuCVlSIpqgkL5-iFZFNU0jGf1ygFzHeE0LqpqHP0QXnTZVXuUK_tnvAc3K9Swv2HZ60C2DxPE0QsB4t7v0x7wLEyQWdfFhwCtokHPUw9W7c4c4HHOEAAbA2c4JHbFxGG_wA2PjgR31wYY6Y4au7m293xcZ_L9g1ThDTSciN-fXkYEwRH13aYx2S65xxusfZ1VEv8SV61uk-wqtzvUTbjx-2m8_F7ddPXzY3t4UpmUxF00ia_0boCmzDWStFZXVpWs2EsZwSYyyh0gIYbWoBpqT5EDi0pqaCSX6J3j_ITnM7gDXZUtC9moIbdFiU10497oxur3b-oCQrBeciC1ydBYL_Oef51OCigb7XI_g5KiZYKataSJLRN_-g934OY55OsQwISiteZurtA2WCjzFA98cMJeoUA5VjoE4xUDkGGV-fcT20wdkd_FX974XfcgK33g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758511634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways</title><source>ProQuest Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Kitt, Eimear M. ; Davis, Daniela H. ; Kerman, Caryn ; Sammons, Julia S. ; Handy, Lori K. ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; O’Callaghan, Kevin ; Harris, Rebecca M. ; Coffin, Susan E. ; Bell, Louis M. ; Chiotos, Kathleen</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitt, Eimear M. ; Davis, Daniela H. ; Kerman, Caryn ; Sammons, Julia S. ; Handy, Lori K. ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; O’Callaghan, Kevin ; Harris, Rebecca M. ; Coffin, Susan E. ; Bell, Louis M. ; Chiotos, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically ventilated patients. Significant operational challenges were noted at our institution using this approach. In this report, we describe our experience with routine collection of paired URT and LRT sample testing. Our results revealed a high concordance between the 2 sources, and that all children tested for SARS-CoV-2 were appropriately diagnosed with URT testing alone. There was no added benefit to LRT testing. Based on these findings, our institutional approach was therefore adjusted to sample the URT alone for most patients, with LRT sampling reserved for patients with ongoing clinical suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative URT test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33966664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Concise Communication ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Ostomy ; Pandemics ; Pediatrics ; Respiratory tract ; Sample size ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Software ; Tracheotomy</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2022-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1482-1484</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America</rights><rights>The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 2021 The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-99811015a6ed932b856da4cba25cd310ccd018deecac75ec41310e3ebc715283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-99811015a6ed932b856da4cba25cd310ccd018deecac75ec41310e3ebc715283</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0142-2726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2758511634/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2758511634?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781,55603,74273</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitt, Eimear M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Daniela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerman, Caryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammons, Julia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handy, Lori K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Callaghan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffin, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Louis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiotos, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><title>The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically ventilated patients. Significant operational challenges were noted at our institution using this approach. In this report, we describe our experience with routine collection of paired URT and LRT sample testing. Our results revealed a high concordance between the 2 sources, and that all children tested for SARS-CoV-2 were appropriately diagnosed with URT testing alone. There was no added benefit to LRT testing. Based on these findings, our institutional approach was therefore adjusted to sample the URT alone for most patients, with LRT sampling reserved for patients with ongoing clinical suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative URT test.</description><subject>Concise Communication</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tracheotomy</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh65w8IeLMLdsxH06Y3wjL4BQuCO4h3IU1OZ7K0TU3SGfqj_I9m2EFZMTcn5Dx5857wIvSakjUltH7nDKwZYXTNGHuCVlSIpqgkL5-iFZFNU0jGf1ygFzHeE0LqpqHP0QXnTZVXuUK_tnvAc3K9Swv2HZ60C2DxPE0QsB4t7v0x7wLEyQWdfFhwCtokHPUw9W7c4c4HHOEAAbA2c4JHbFxGG_wA2PjgR31wYY6Y4au7m293xcZ_L9g1ThDTSciN-fXkYEwRH13aYx2S65xxusfZ1VEv8SV61uk-wqtzvUTbjx-2m8_F7ddPXzY3t4UpmUxF00ia_0boCmzDWStFZXVpWs2EsZwSYyyh0gIYbWoBpqT5EDi0pqaCSX6J3j_ITnM7gDXZUtC9moIbdFiU10497oxur3b-oCQrBeciC1ydBYL_Oef51OCigb7XI_g5KiZYKataSJLRN_-g934OY55OsQwISiteZurtA2WCjzFA98cMJeoUA5VjoE4xUDkGGV-fcT20wdkd_FX974XfcgK33g</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Kitt, Eimear M.</creator><creator>Davis, Daniela H.</creator><creator>Kerman, Caryn</creator><creator>Sammons, Julia S.</creator><creator>Handy, Lori K.</creator><creator>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creator><creator>O’Callaghan, Kevin</creator><creator>Harris, Rebecca M.</creator><creator>Coffin, Susan E.</creator><creator>Bell, Louis M.</creator><creator>Chiotos, Kathleen</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-2726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways</title><author>Kitt, Eimear M. ; Davis, Daniela H. ; Kerman, Caryn ; Sammons, Julia S. ; Handy, Lori K. ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; O’Callaghan, Kevin ; Harris, Rebecca M. ; Coffin, Susan E. ; Bell, Louis M. ; Chiotos, Kathleen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-99811015a6ed932b856da4cba25cd310ccd018deecac75ec41310e3ebc715283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Concise Communication</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tracheotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitt, Eimear M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Daniela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerman, Caryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammons, Julia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handy, Lori K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Callaghan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Rebecca M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffin, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Louis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiotos, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitt, Eimear M.</au><au>Davis, Daniela H.</au><au>Kerman, Caryn</au><au>Sammons, Julia S.</au><au>Handy, Lori K.</au><au>Gallagher, Elizabeth</au><au>O’Callaghan, Kevin</au><au>Harris, Rebecca M.</au><au>Coffin, Susan E.</au><au>Bell, Louis M.</au><au>Chiotos, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1482</spage><epage>1484</epage><pages>1482-1484</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the CDC recommended collection of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimen for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in addition to the routinely recommended upper respiratory tract (URT) testing in mechanically ventilated patients. Significant operational challenges were noted at our institution using this approach. In this report, we describe our experience with routine collection of paired URT and LRT sample testing. Our results revealed a high concordance between the 2 sources, and that all children tested for SARS-CoV-2 were appropriately diagnosed with URT testing alone. There was no added benefit to LRT testing. Based on these findings, our institutional approach was therefore adjusted to sample the URT alone for most patients, with LRT sampling reserved for patients with ongoing clinical suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative URT test.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>33966664</pmid><doi>10.1017/ice.2021.222</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-2726</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2022-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1482-1484
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8245335
source ProQuest Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Concise Communication
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Ostomy
Pandemics
Pediatrics
Respiratory tract
Sample size
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Software
Tracheotomy
title The utility of paired upper and lower respiratory tract sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in patients with artificial airways
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T22%3A31%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20utility%20of%20paired%20upper%20and%20lower%20respiratory%20tract%20sampling%20for%20severe%20acute%20respiratory%20syndrome%20coronavirus%202%20(SARS-CoV-2)%20testing%20in%20patients%20with%20artificial%20airways&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Kitt,%20Eimear%20M.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1482&rft.epage=1484&rft.pages=1482-1484&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2021.222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2524867580%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758511634&rft_id=info:pmid/33966664&rft_cupid=10_1017_ice_2021_222&rfr_iscdi=true