The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, othe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Northern Clinics of Istanbul 2021-01, Vol.8 (3), p.280-285
1. Verfasser: Urfalioglu, Selma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 3
container_start_page 280
container_title Northern Clinics of Istanbul
container_volume 8
creator Urfalioglu, Selma
description OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, other ocular findings, topical or systemic drugs, treatment methods, follow-up examination, and related data of the patients were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study. Optic disc edema was detected bilaterally in 65 patients, unilaterally in 35 patients. The duration of the symptoms until the first application was 19.82±17.18 (0–90) days. There were no systemic disorders in 74 patients but diabetes mellitus in 11 patients, hypertension in four patients, coronary artery disease in three patients, urticaria in two patients, lymphoma in one, multiple sclerosis in one patient, mastoiditis in one patient, scleroderma in one, and pregnancy in two patients were detected. While 93 patients had no additional ocular findings, 2 had uveitis, 1 had corneal dystrophy, 1 had keratoconus, 1 had cataract, 1 had previous cataract surgery, and 1 had peripheral retinal degenerations. The major etiology of the optic disc edema was idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was detected in 44 patients. In all these patients, bilateral optic disc edema was observed and 43 patients were given oral acetazolamide and one patient oral topiramate. CONCLUSION: The presence of optic nerve edema should be absolutely evaluated in patients presenting with symptoms of vision loss and increased intracranial pressure. The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.
doi_str_mv 10.14744/nci.2020.25483
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8240241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548598634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a263dba92904fa65f54363ac5d4f7c38201a8015ca324f67de50f19ddaf1f67e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoVrRnrwEvXrbm3awHQcQXFLzUc0jzsJHdzbrJVvrfm2oR9DQzzI-P-eYD4ByjGWZzxq46E2YEETQjnEl6AE4Ip6JinNPD0mMmK1YjMgHTlN4RQkTWWHB-DCaUEUIkRifgcbl20G10M-ocYgejh33pXJcT_Ax5DWOfg4E2JAOdda2-hhoOLg8x9c7ksHEw5dFuz8CR101y0309Ba8P98u7p2rx8vh8d7uoDCUyV5oIale6JjViXgvuOaOCasMt83NDJUFYS4S50ZQwL-bWceRxba32uIyOnoKbH91-XLXOmnLooBvVD6HVw1ZFHdTfTRfW6i1ulCQMEYaLwOVeYIgfo0tZtcWbaxrduTgmtXslr6WgrKAX_9D3OA5dsbejhOCUYVSoqx_KlJ-kwfnfYzBS3zmpkpPa5fQtTukXdXSEnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546653410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Urfalioglu, Selma</creator><creatorcontrib>Urfalioglu, Selma</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, other ocular findings, topical or systemic drugs, treatment methods, follow-up examination, and related data of the patients were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study. Optic disc edema was detected bilaterally in 65 patients, unilaterally in 35 patients. The duration of the symptoms until the first application was 19.82±17.18 (0–90) days. There were no systemic disorders in 74 patients but diabetes mellitus in 11 patients, hypertension in four patients, coronary artery disease in three patients, urticaria in two patients, lymphoma in one, multiple sclerosis in one patient, mastoiditis in one patient, scleroderma in one, and pregnancy in two patients were detected. While 93 patients had no additional ocular findings, 2 had uveitis, 1 had corneal dystrophy, 1 had keratoconus, 1 had cataract, 1 had previous cataract surgery, and 1 had peripheral retinal degenerations. The major etiology of the optic disc edema was idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was detected in 44 patients. In all these patients, bilateral optic disc edema was observed and 43 patients were given oral acetazolamide and one patient oral topiramate. CONCLUSION: The presence of optic nerve edema should be absolutely evaluated in patients presenting with symptoms of vision loss and increased intracranial pressure. The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-4902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2536-4553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/nci.2020.25483</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34222810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular disease ; Cataracts ; Edema ; Hypertension ; Oiginal ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Northern Clinics of Istanbul, 2021-01, Vol.8 (3), p.280-285</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 by Istanbul Northern Anatolian Association of Public Hospitals 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a263dba92904fa65f54363ac5d4f7c38201a8015ca324f67de50f19ddaf1f67e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240241/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240241/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urfalioglu, Selma</creatorcontrib><title>The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study</title><title>Northern Clinics of Istanbul</title><description>OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, other ocular findings, topical or systemic drugs, treatment methods, follow-up examination, and related data of the patients were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study. Optic disc edema was detected bilaterally in 65 patients, unilaterally in 35 patients. The duration of the symptoms until the first application was 19.82±17.18 (0–90) days. There were no systemic disorders in 74 patients but diabetes mellitus in 11 patients, hypertension in four patients, coronary artery disease in three patients, urticaria in two patients, lymphoma in one, multiple sclerosis in one patient, mastoiditis in one patient, scleroderma in one, and pregnancy in two patients were detected. While 93 patients had no additional ocular findings, 2 had uveitis, 1 had corneal dystrophy, 1 had keratoconus, 1 had cataract, 1 had previous cataract surgery, and 1 had peripheral retinal degenerations. The major etiology of the optic disc edema was idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was detected in 44 patients. In all these patients, bilateral optic disc edema was observed and 43 patients were given oral acetazolamide and one patient oral topiramate. CONCLUSION: The presence of optic nerve edema should be absolutely evaluated in patients presenting with symptoms of vision loss and increased intracranial pressure. The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.</description><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Oiginal</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2148-4902</issn><issn>2536-4553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoVrRnrwEvXrbm3awHQcQXFLzUc0jzsJHdzbrJVvrfm2oR9DQzzI-P-eYD4ByjGWZzxq46E2YEETQjnEl6AE4Ip6JinNPD0mMmK1YjMgHTlN4RQkTWWHB-DCaUEUIkRifgcbl20G10M-ocYgejh33pXJcT_Ax5DWOfg4E2JAOdda2-hhoOLg8x9c7ksHEw5dFuz8CR101y0309Ba8P98u7p2rx8vh8d7uoDCUyV5oIale6JjViXgvuOaOCasMt83NDJUFYS4S50ZQwL-bWceRxba32uIyOnoKbH91-XLXOmnLooBvVD6HVw1ZFHdTfTRfW6i1ulCQMEYaLwOVeYIgfo0tZtcWbaxrduTgmtXslr6WgrKAX_9D3OA5dsbejhOCUYVSoqx_KlJ-kwfnfYzBS3zmpkpPa5fQtTukXdXSEnw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Urfalioglu, Selma</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study</title><author>Urfalioglu, Selma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a263dba92904fa65f54363ac5d4f7c38201a8015ca324f67de50f19ddaf1f67e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Oiginal</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urfalioglu, Selma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Northern Clinics of Istanbul</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urfalioglu, Selma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Northern Clinics of Istanbul</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>280-285</pages><issn>2148-4902</issn><eissn>2536-4553</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Optic disc edema is among major problems that neuro-ophthalmology clinics encounter. We intended to analyze patients with optic disc edema in this article. METHODS: Data related to the main complaint, associated systemic disease, visual acuity, characteristics of optic disc swelling, other ocular findings, topical or systemic drugs, treatment methods, follow-up examination, and related data of the patients were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 77 female and 23 male patients in the study. Optic disc edema was detected bilaterally in 65 patients, unilaterally in 35 patients. The duration of the symptoms until the first application was 19.82±17.18 (0–90) days. There were no systemic disorders in 74 patients but diabetes mellitus in 11 patients, hypertension in four patients, coronary artery disease in three patients, urticaria in two patients, lymphoma in one, multiple sclerosis in one patient, mastoiditis in one patient, scleroderma in one, and pregnancy in two patients were detected. While 93 patients had no additional ocular findings, 2 had uveitis, 1 had corneal dystrophy, 1 had keratoconus, 1 had cataract, 1 had previous cataract surgery, and 1 had peripheral retinal degenerations. The major etiology of the optic disc edema was idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was detected in 44 patients. In all these patients, bilateral optic disc edema was observed and 43 patients were given oral acetazolamide and one patient oral topiramate. CONCLUSION: The presence of optic nerve edema should be absolutely evaluated in patients presenting with symptoms of vision loss and increased intracranial pressure. The early diagnosis with fundoscopic examination may increase visual acuity in these patients.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><pmid>34222810</pmid><doi>10.14744/nci.2020.25483</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2148-4902
ispartof Northern Clinics of Istanbul, 2021-01, Vol.8 (3), p.280-285
issn 2148-4902
2536-4553
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8240241
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cardiovascular disease
Cataracts
Edema
Hypertension
Oiginal
Patients
title The evaluation of patients with optic disc edema: a retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T15%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20evaluation%20of%20patients%20with%20optic%20disc%20edema:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Northern%20Clinics%20of%20Istanbul&rft.au=Urfalioglu,%20Selma&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=280-285&rft.issn=2148-4902&rft.eissn=2536-4553&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/nci.2020.25483&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2548598634%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546653410&rft_id=info:pmid/34222810&rfr_iscdi=true