Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors

Though patient factors are frequently linked to hemodialysis vascular access selection and outcomes, variability by surgeon and surgeon specialty may play a role as well. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which individual surgeons influence selection of vascular access type, re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2021-09, Vol.265, p.33-41
Hauptverfasser: Copeland, Timothy P., Lawrence, Peter F., Woo, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue
container_start_page 33
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 265
creator Copeland, Timothy P.
Lawrence, Peter F.
Woo, Karen
description Though patient factors are frequently linked to hemodialysis vascular access selection and outcomes, variability by surgeon and surgeon specialty may play a role as well. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which individual surgeons influence selection of vascular access type, removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC), and repeat vascular access. A national claims database was used to identify patients initiating hemodialysis via a THC between 2011 and 2017. Likelihood of repeat AVF/AVG was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Time from initial arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/graft (AVG) to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Weibull proportional hazard models. Individual surgeon identifier served as the random effect in all models. 6,908 AVF/AVG met the inclusion criteria: 5366 (78%) AVF and 1,542 (22%) AVG. Surgeon specialty only had a significant influence on access type, with vascular surgeons having 26% greater odds of performing AVG compared to general surgeons (P = 0.006). Relative to the other independent variables, individual surgeon identifier had the greatest magnitude of effect on access type (median odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.09-2.72). Individual surgeon identifier had the second greatest magnitude of effect likelihood of THC removal (median hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.58-1.77) and second access (median hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05), in both cases second only to the effect of AVG, which was associated with greater likelihood of THC removal (hazard ratio 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77-2.07) and lower likelihood of second access (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% CI, 0.38-0.52). Individual surgeons are associated with greater variation in vascular access type and likelihood of repeat access than surgeon specialty and measurable patient demographics/co-morbidities. Future research should focus on identifying which surgeon factors are associated with improved outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8238883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480421001657</els_id><sourcerecordid>2516843416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8d3b7a3a3621ed711fbef60d7d062a29ce28ed8c78c874a11c683d748e3f817f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpady0H6CXoGMvu9GftSQTKAQTNwGDA0lzjBhLs_aa9cqVdg359lFwbNpLT4Nm3jwN70fId85Kzri63JSblErBBC-ZKFmlPpARZ5NxYZSWH8mIMSGKyrDqjHxJacPye6LlZ3ImpTFCaj0izw9DXGHo6AxcH2Kit7BHCnQOuR3pTV2j62meP0FyQwuRXjuHKdHHl13WdZ4uht6FLSbar6Gj99A32PVHu6_kUw1twm_v9Zz8nt08Tm-L-eLX3fR6XrhqzPvCeLnUIEEqwdFrzusl1op57ZkSICYOhUFvnDbO6Ao4d8pIryuDsjZc1_Kc_Dz47oblFr3LJ0Ro7S42W4gvNkBj_510zdquwt7mGIwxMhv8eDeI4c-AqbfbJjlsW-gwDMmKMVemkhVXWcoPUhdDShHr0zec2TcudmMzF_vGxTJhM5e8c_H3faeNI4gsuDoIMKe0bzDa5HKQDn0TMwHrQ_Mf-1eny58z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516843416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Copeland, Timothy P. ; Lawrence, Peter F. ; Woo, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Timothy P. ; Lawrence, Peter F. ; Woo, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Though patient factors are frequently linked to hemodialysis vascular access selection and outcomes, variability by surgeon and surgeon specialty may play a role as well. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which individual surgeons influence selection of vascular access type, removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC), and repeat vascular access. A national claims database was used to identify patients initiating hemodialysis via a THC between 2011 and 2017. Likelihood of repeat AVF/AVG was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Time from initial arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/graft (AVG) to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Weibull proportional hazard models. Individual surgeon identifier served as the random effect in all models. 6,908 AVF/AVG met the inclusion criteria: 5366 (78%) AVF and 1,542 (22%) AVG. Surgeon specialty only had a significant influence on access type, with vascular surgeons having 26% greater odds of performing AVG compared to general surgeons (P = 0.006). Relative to the other independent variables, individual surgeon identifier had the greatest magnitude of effect on access type (median odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.09-2.72). Individual surgeon identifier had the second greatest magnitude of effect likelihood of THC removal (median hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.58-1.77) and second access (median hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05), in both cases second only to the effect of AVG, which was associated with greater likelihood of THC removal (hazard ratio 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77-2.07) and lower likelihood of second access (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% CI, 0.38-0.52). Individual surgeons are associated with greater variation in vascular access type and likelihood of repeat access than surgeon specialty and measurable patient demographics/co-morbidities. Future research should focus on identifying which surgeon factors are associated with improved outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33882377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arteriovenous fistula ; Arteriovenous graft ; Hemodialysis access ; Practice patterns ; Surgeon behaviors ; Vascular access</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2021-09, Vol.265, p.33-41</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8d3b7a3a3621ed711fbef60d7d062a29ce28ed8c78c874a11c683d748e3f817f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8d3b7a3a3621ed711fbef60d7d062a29ce28ed8c78c874a11c683d748e3f817f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3813-3576</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480421001657$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Timothy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Though patient factors are frequently linked to hemodialysis vascular access selection and outcomes, variability by surgeon and surgeon specialty may play a role as well. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which individual surgeons influence selection of vascular access type, removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC), and repeat vascular access. A national claims database was used to identify patients initiating hemodialysis via a THC between 2011 and 2017. Likelihood of repeat AVF/AVG was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Time from initial arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/graft (AVG) to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Weibull proportional hazard models. Individual surgeon identifier served as the random effect in all models. 6,908 AVF/AVG met the inclusion criteria: 5366 (78%) AVF and 1,542 (22%) AVG. Surgeon specialty only had a significant influence on access type, with vascular surgeons having 26% greater odds of performing AVG compared to general surgeons (P = 0.006). Relative to the other independent variables, individual surgeon identifier had the greatest magnitude of effect on access type (median odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.09-2.72). Individual surgeon identifier had the second greatest magnitude of effect likelihood of THC removal (median hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.58-1.77) and second access (median hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05), in both cases second only to the effect of AVG, which was associated with greater likelihood of THC removal (hazard ratio 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77-2.07) and lower likelihood of second access (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% CI, 0.38-0.52). Individual surgeons are associated with greater variation in vascular access type and likelihood of repeat access than surgeon specialty and measurable patient demographics/co-morbidities. Future research should focus on identifying which surgeon factors are associated with improved outcomes.</description><subject>Arteriovenous fistula</subject><subject>Arteriovenous graft</subject><subject>Hemodialysis access</subject><subject>Practice patterns</subject><subject>Surgeon behaviors</subject><subject>Vascular access</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpady0H6CXoGMvu9GftSQTKAQTNwGDA0lzjBhLs_aa9cqVdg359lFwbNpLT4Nm3jwN70fId85Kzri63JSblErBBC-ZKFmlPpARZ5NxYZSWH8mIMSGKyrDqjHxJacPye6LlZ3ImpTFCaj0izw9DXGHo6AxcH2Kit7BHCnQOuR3pTV2j62meP0FyQwuRXjuHKdHHl13WdZ4uht6FLSbar6Gj99A32PVHu6_kUw1twm_v9Zz8nt08Tm-L-eLX3fR6XrhqzPvCeLnUIEEqwdFrzusl1op57ZkSICYOhUFvnDbO6Ao4d8pIryuDsjZc1_Kc_Dz47oblFr3LJ0Ro7S42W4gvNkBj_510zdquwt7mGIwxMhv8eDeI4c-AqbfbJjlsW-gwDMmKMVemkhVXWcoPUhdDShHr0zec2TcudmMzF_vGxTJhM5e8c_H3faeNI4gsuDoIMKe0bzDa5HKQDn0TMwHrQ_Mf-1eny58z</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Copeland, Timothy P.</creator><creator>Lawrence, Peter F.</creator><creator>Woo, Karen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-3576</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors</title><author>Copeland, Timothy P. ; Lawrence, Peter F. ; Woo, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8d3b7a3a3621ed711fbef60d7d062a29ce28ed8c78c874a11c683d748e3f817f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arteriovenous fistula</topic><topic>Arteriovenous graft</topic><topic>Hemodialysis access</topic><topic>Practice patterns</topic><topic>Surgeon behaviors</topic><topic>Vascular access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Timothy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Copeland, Timothy P.</au><au>Lawrence, Peter F.</au><au>Woo, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>265</volume><spage>33</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>33-41</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Though patient factors are frequently linked to hemodialysis vascular access selection and outcomes, variability by surgeon and surgeon specialty may play a role as well. The objective of this study is to examine the extent to which individual surgeons influence selection of vascular access type, removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC), and repeat vascular access. A national claims database was used to identify patients initiating hemodialysis via a THC between 2011 and 2017. Likelihood of repeat AVF/AVG was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Time from initial arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/graft (AVG) to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Weibull proportional hazard models. Individual surgeon identifier served as the random effect in all models. 6,908 AVF/AVG met the inclusion criteria: 5366 (78%) AVF and 1,542 (22%) AVG. Surgeon specialty only had a significant influence on access type, with vascular surgeons having 26% greater odds of performing AVG compared to general surgeons (P = 0.006). Relative to the other independent variables, individual surgeon identifier had the greatest magnitude of effect on access type (median odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.09-2.72). Individual surgeon identifier had the second greatest magnitude of effect likelihood of THC removal (median hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.58-1.77) and second access (median hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05), in both cases second only to the effect of AVG, which was associated with greater likelihood of THC removal (hazard ratio 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77-2.07) and lower likelihood of second access (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% CI, 0.38-0.52). Individual surgeons are associated with greater variation in vascular access type and likelihood of repeat access than surgeon specialty and measurable patient demographics/co-morbidities. Future research should focus on identifying which surgeon factors are associated with improved outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33882377</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.046</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-3576</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2021-09, Vol.265, p.33-41
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8238883
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arteriovenous fistula
Arteriovenous graft
Hemodialysis access
Practice patterns
Surgeon behaviors
Vascular access
title Surgeon Factors Have a Larger Effect on Vascular Access Type and Outcomes than Patient Factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A28%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgeon%20Factors%20Have%20a%20Larger%20Effect%20on%20Vascular%20Access%20Type%20and%20Outcomes%20than%20Patient%20Factors&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Copeland,%20Timothy%20P.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=265&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=33-41&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2516843416%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516843416&rft_id=info:pmid/33882377&rft_els_id=S0022480421001657&rfr_iscdi=true