The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance

Using data from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2009 and 2015, we studied the effects of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance. We used a differences‐in‐differences (DD) approach and found that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health economics 2021-05, Vol.30 (5), p.989-1000
Hauptverfasser: Wen, Jiebing, Wen, Hefei, Butler, J. S., Talbert, Jeffery C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1000
container_issue 5
container_start_page 989
container_title Health economics
container_volume 30
creator Wen, Jiebing
Wen, Hefei
Butler, J. S.
Talbert, Jeffery C.
description Using data from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2009 and 2015, we studied the effects of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance. We used a differences‐in‐differences (DD) approach and found that the implementation of medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) reduced morphine milligram equivalents per enrollee by 7% and 13%, respectively. The reduction associated with MMLs was predominately in people aged 55–64, whereas the reduction associated with RMLs was largely in people aged 35–44 and aged 45–54. Our findings suggest that both MMLs and RMLs have the potential to reduce opioid prescribing in the privately insured population, especially for the middle‐aged population.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.4237
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8237244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493005891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4717-ac0ee6e502d143690ed16d9c23cc91da857b57796c4c8fd9f5d9efe389e24d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1qFTEQx4MotlbBJ5CAN95snST7lRtBDq0VCt7U65CTzHZzyCZrsms5dz6Cz-iTNMfW-gFeZcj8-DEzf0JeMjhlAPztiOa05qJ7RI4ZSFkxaODxoW66SnIBR-RZzjuA0oP2KTkSouW16LtjslyNSN00a7PQONAJrTPaUx0sTWgS6sXFUD4mndxu1UFTr28yjYHG2UVn6Zwwm-S2LlxTFyhOs497TD--fc9zDDkmtHRE7ZextPOadDD4nDwZtM_44v49IZ_Pz642F9Xlpw8fN-8vK1N3rKu0AcQWG-CW1aKVgJa1VhoujJHM6r7ptk3XydbUph-sHBorcUDRS-S1bbg4Ie_uvPO6LZsZDEvSXs3JlXX2Kmqn_u4EN6rr-FX15Za8rovgzb0gxS8r5kVNLhv0XgeMa1a8lgKg6SUr6Ot_0F1cUzldoRrWggQB8rfQpJhzwuFhGAbqEKUqUapDlAV99efwD-Cv7ApQ3QE3zuP-vyJ1cbb5KbwFZjirWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516090309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wen, Jiebing ; Wen, Hefei ; Butler, J. S. ; Talbert, Jeffery C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jiebing ; Wen, Hefei ; Butler, J. S. ; Talbert, Jeffery C.</creatorcontrib><description>Using data from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2009 and 2015, we studied the effects of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance. We used a differences‐in‐differences (DD) approach and found that the implementation of medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) reduced morphine milligram equivalents per enrollee by 7% and 13%, respectively. The reduction associated with MMLs was predominately in people aged 55–64, whereas the reduction associated with RMLs was largely in people aged 35–44 and aged 45–54. Our findings suggest that both MMLs and RMLs have the potential to reduce opioid prescribing in the privately insured population, especially for the middle‐aged population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33624387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Cannabis ; Drug legalization ; Health economics ; Health insurance ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Marijuana ; Marijuana Use - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medical Marijuana ; medical marijuana laws ; Middle Aged ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; pain management ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prescribing ; prescription opioids ; Recreation ; recreational marijuana laws ; United States</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2021-05, Vol.30 (5), p.989-1000</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4717-ac0ee6e502d143690ed16d9c23cc91da857b57796c4c8fd9f5d9efe389e24d523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4717-ac0ee6e502d143690ed16d9c23cc91da857b57796c4c8fd9f5d9efe389e24d523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5064-2501</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.4237$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.4237$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jiebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Hefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Jeffery C.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>Using data from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2009 and 2015, we studied the effects of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance. We used a differences‐in‐differences (DD) approach and found that the implementation of medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) reduced morphine milligram equivalents per enrollee by 7% and 13%, respectively. The reduction associated with MMLs was predominately in people aged 55–64, whereas the reduction associated with RMLs was largely in people aged 35–44 and aged 45–54. Our findings suggest that both MMLs and RMLs have the potential to reduce opioid prescribing in the privately insured population, especially for the middle‐aged population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Drug legalization</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Marijuana Use - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Marijuana</subject><subject>medical marijuana laws</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>pain management</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prescribing</subject><subject>prescription opioids</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>recreational marijuana laws</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1qFTEQx4MotlbBJ5CAN95snST7lRtBDq0VCt7U65CTzHZzyCZrsms5dz6Cz-iTNMfW-gFeZcj8-DEzf0JeMjhlAPztiOa05qJ7RI4ZSFkxaODxoW66SnIBR-RZzjuA0oP2KTkSouW16LtjslyNSN00a7PQONAJrTPaUx0sTWgS6sXFUD4mndxu1UFTr28yjYHG2UVn6Zwwm-S2LlxTFyhOs497TD--fc9zDDkmtHRE7ZextPOadDD4nDwZtM_44v49IZ_Pz642F9Xlpw8fN-8vK1N3rKu0AcQWG-CW1aKVgJa1VhoujJHM6r7ptk3XydbUph-sHBorcUDRS-S1bbg4Ie_uvPO6LZsZDEvSXs3JlXX2Kmqn_u4EN6rr-FX15Za8rovgzb0gxS8r5kVNLhv0XgeMa1a8lgKg6SUr6Ot_0F1cUzldoRrWggQB8rfQpJhzwuFhGAbqEKUqUapDlAV99efwD-Cv7ApQ3QE3zuP-vyJ1cbb5KbwFZjirWQ</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Wen, Jiebing</creator><creator>Wen, Hefei</creator><creator>Butler, J. S.</creator><creator>Talbert, Jeffery C.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-2501</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance</title><author>Wen, Jiebing ; Wen, Hefei ; Butler, J. S. ; Talbert, Jeffery C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4717-ac0ee6e502d143690ed16d9c23cc91da857b57796c4c8fd9f5d9efe389e24d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Drug legalization</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Marijuana Use - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Marijuana</topic><topic>medical marijuana laws</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>pain management</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prescribing</topic><topic>prescription opioids</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>recreational marijuana laws</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jiebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Hefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Jeffery C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Jiebing</au><au>Wen, Hefei</au><au>Butler, J. S.</au><au>Talbert, Jeffery C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>1000</epage><pages>989-1000</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>Using data from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2009 and 2015, we studied the effects of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance. We used a differences‐in‐differences (DD) approach and found that the implementation of medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) reduced morphine milligram equivalents per enrollee by 7% and 13%, respectively. The reduction associated with MMLs was predominately in people aged 55–64, whereas the reduction associated with RMLs was largely in people aged 35–44 and aged 45–54. Our findings suggest that both MMLs and RMLs have the potential to reduce opioid prescribing in the privately insured population, especially for the middle‐aged population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>33624387</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4237</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-2501</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2021-05, Vol.30 (5), p.989-1000
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8237244
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Cannabis
Drug legalization
Health economics
Health insurance
Humans
Insurance, Health
Marijuana
Marijuana Use - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Marijuana
medical marijuana laws
Middle Aged
Morphine
Narcotics
Opioids
pain management
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prescribing
prescription opioids
Recreation
recreational marijuana laws
United States
title The impact of medical and recreational marijuana laws on opioid prescribing in employer‐sponsored health insurance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A10%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20medical%20and%20recreational%20marijuana%20laws%20on%20opioid%20prescribing%20in%20employer%E2%80%90sponsored%20health%20insurance&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Wen,%20Jiebing&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=1000&rft.pages=989-1000&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2493005891%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516090309&rft_id=info:pmid/33624387&rfr_iscdi=true