Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios
Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Building and environment 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108002 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 201 |
creator | Xiang, Jianbang Hao, Jiayuan Austin, Elena Shirai, Jeff Seto, Edmund |
description | Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference 6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy.
•The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8224830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132321004066</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0360132321004066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvQPtKZJ1nZeiDL8goniB3gX0tPTmdklJekK_ntTp4JXXgXek-fhnJeQ45QmKU2zk1VSbnRToekTRlkawoJStkPGaZHzOCvE6y4ZU57ROOWMj8iB9ysawBkX-2TERZrnNOdjAo_oddB0WjURWPuuzTJ22KgOq-jhjiXT0-ipVcM47nDdWhf-9crpEFnjo42p0H0FduMjbTp0_WCzJvKAZsj9IdmrVePx6PudkJery-f5Tby4v76dXyxiEKLoYlUAn0I9q0WtcsqAcVZiBTNBadhaiQxhmqOCAhTHkheM5QyzgFQ1UKgFn5CzrbfdlOtAhj3CtrJ1eq3ch7RKy78To9_k0vYyqETBaRBkWwE4673D-pdNqRxqlyv5U7scapfb2gN4vgUxnNdrdNKDRgNYaYfQycrq_xSfUu-Ryw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><description>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference < 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to >6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy.
•The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34177073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cooking ; Emission rate ; PM2.5 ; Portable air cleaner ; Range hood ; Window opening</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference < 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to >6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy.
•The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</description><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Emission rate</subject><subject>PM2.5</subject><subject>Portable air cleaner</subject><subject>Range hood</subject><subject>Window opening</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvQPtKZJ1nZeiDL8goniB3gX0tPTmdklJekK_ntTp4JXXgXek-fhnJeQ45QmKU2zk1VSbnRToekTRlkawoJStkPGaZHzOCvE6y4ZU57ROOWMj8iB9ysawBkX-2TERZrnNOdjAo_oddB0WjURWPuuzTJ22KgOq-jhjiXT0-ipVcM47nDdWhf-9crpEFnjo42p0H0FduMjbTp0_WCzJvKAZsj9IdmrVePx6PudkJery-f5Tby4v76dXyxiEKLoYlUAn0I9q0WtcsqAcVZiBTNBadhaiQxhmqOCAhTHkheM5QyzgFQ1UKgFn5CzrbfdlOtAhj3CtrJ1eq3ch7RKy78To9_k0vYyqETBaRBkWwE4673D-pdNqRxqlyv5U7scapfb2gN4vgUxnNdrdNKDRgNYaYfQycrq_xSfUu-Ryw</recordid><startdate>20210815</startdate><enddate>20210815</enddate><creator>Xiang, Jianbang</creator><creator>Hao, Jiayuan</creator><creator>Austin, Elena</creator><creator>Shirai, Jeff</creator><creator>Seto, Edmund</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210815</creationdate><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><author>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Emission rate</topic><topic>PM2.5</topic><topic>Portable air cleaner</topic><topic>Range hood</topic><topic>Window opening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiang, Jianbang</au><au>Hao, Jiayuan</au><au>Austin, Elena</au><au>Shirai, Jeff</au><au>Seto, Edmund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2021-08-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>108002</spage><pages>108002-</pages><artnum>108002</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference < 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to >6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy.
•The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34177073</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8224830 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Cooking Emission rate PM2.5 Portable air cleaner Range hood Window opening |
title | Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20cooking-related%20PM2.5:%20Spatial-temporal%20variations%20under%20various%20intervention%20scenarios&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Xiang,%20Jianbang&rft.date=2021-08-15&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=108002&rft.pages=108002-&rft.artnum=108002&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0360132321004066%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34177073&rft_els_id=S0360132321004066&rfr_iscdi=true |