Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios

Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002
Hauptverfasser: Xiang, Jianbang, Hao, Jiayuan, Austin, Elena, Shirai, Jeff, Seto, Edmund
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108002
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 201
creator Xiang, Jianbang
Hao, Jiayuan
Austin, Elena
Shirai, Jeff
Seto, Edmund
description Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference 6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy. •The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8224830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132321004066</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0360132321004066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvQPtKZJ1nZeiDL8goniB3gX0tPTmdklJekK_ntTp4JXXgXek-fhnJeQ45QmKU2zk1VSbnRToekTRlkawoJStkPGaZHzOCvE6y4ZU57ROOWMj8iB9ysawBkX-2TERZrnNOdjAo_oddB0WjURWPuuzTJ22KgOq-jhjiXT0-ipVcM47nDdWhf-9crpEFnjo42p0H0FduMjbTp0_WCzJvKAZsj9IdmrVePx6PudkJery-f5Tby4v76dXyxiEKLoYlUAn0I9q0WtcsqAcVZiBTNBadhaiQxhmqOCAhTHkheM5QyzgFQ1UKgFn5CzrbfdlOtAhj3CtrJ1eq3ch7RKy78To9_k0vYyqETBaRBkWwE4673D-pdNqRxqlyv5U7scapfb2gN4vgUxnNdrdNKDRgNYaYfQycrq_xSfUu-Ryw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><description>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference &lt; 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to &gt;6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy. •The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34177073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cooking ; Emission rate ; PM2.5 ; Portable air cleaner ; Range hood ; Window opening</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference &lt; 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to &gt;6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy. •The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</description><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Emission rate</subject><subject>PM2.5</subject><subject>Portable air cleaner</subject><subject>Range hood</subject><subject>Window opening</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvQPtKZJ1nZeiDL8goniB3gX0tPTmdklJekK_ntTp4JXXgXek-fhnJeQ45QmKU2zk1VSbnRToekTRlkawoJStkPGaZHzOCvE6y4ZU57ROOWMj8iB9ysawBkX-2TERZrnNOdjAo_oddB0WjURWPuuzTJ22KgOq-jhjiXT0-ipVcM47nDdWhf-9crpEFnjo42p0H0FduMjbTp0_WCzJvKAZsj9IdmrVePx6PudkJery-f5Tby4v76dXyxiEKLoYlUAn0I9q0WtcsqAcVZiBTNBadhaiQxhmqOCAhTHkheM5QyzgFQ1UKgFn5CzrbfdlOtAhj3CtrJ1eq3ch7RKy78To9_k0vYyqETBaRBkWwE4673D-pdNqRxqlyv5U7scapfb2gN4vgUxnNdrdNKDRgNYaYfQycrq_xSfUu-Ryw</recordid><startdate>20210815</startdate><enddate>20210815</enddate><creator>Xiang, Jianbang</creator><creator>Hao, Jiayuan</creator><creator>Austin, Elena</creator><creator>Shirai, Jeff</creator><creator>Seto, Edmund</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210815</creationdate><title>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</title><author>Xiang, Jianbang ; Hao, Jiayuan ; Austin, Elena ; Shirai, Jeff ; Seto, Edmund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8c35cf9f4fa702c232bedc9400934a46ec57eac8ca3eb382272e635cdfc0cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Emission rate</topic><topic>PM2.5</topic><topic>Portable air cleaner</topic><topic>Range hood</topic><topic>Window opening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Jianbang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirai, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Edmund</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiang, Jianbang</au><au>Hao, Jiayuan</au><au>Austin, Elena</au><au>Shirai, Jeff</au><au>Seto, Edmund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2021-08-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>108002</spage><pages>108002-</pages><artnum>108002</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Some cooking events can generate high levels of hazardous PM2.5. This study assesses the dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a naturally-ventilated apartment in the US, examines the dynamic process of cooking-related emissions, and demonstrates the impact of different indoor PM2.5 mitigating strategies. We conducted experiments with a standardized pan-frying cooking procedure under seven scenarios, involving opening kitchen windows, using a range hood, and utilizing a portable air cleaner (PAC) in various indoor locations. Real-time PM2.5 concentrations were measured in the open kitchen, living room, bedroom (door closed), and outdoor environments. Decay-related parameters were estimated, and time-resolved PM2.5 emission rates for each experiment were determined using a dynamic model. Results show that the 1-min mean PM2.5 concentrations in the kitchen and living room peaked 1–7 min after cooking at levels of 200–1400 μg/m3, which were more than 9 times higher than the peak bedroom levels. Mean (standard deviation) kt for the kitchen, ranging from 0.58 (0.02) to 6.62 (0.34) h−1, was generally comparable to that of the living room (relative difference &lt; 20%), but was 1–5 times larger than that of the bedroom. The range of PM2.5 full-decay time was between 1 and 10 h for the kitchen and living room, and from 0 to &gt;6 h for the bedroom. The PM2.5 emission rates during and 5 min after cooking were 2.3 (3.4) and 5.1 (3.9) mg/min, respectively. Intervention strategies, including opening kitchen windows and using PACs either in the kitchen or living room, can substantially reduce indoor PM2.5 levels and the related full-decay time. For scenarios involving a PAC, placing it in the kitchen (closer to the source) resulted in better efficacy. •The dispersion of cooking-related PM2.5 throughout a residence was illustrated.•The dynamic process of cooking-related PM2.5 levels and emission rates was examined.•The impact of various cooking-fume mitigating ways on indoor PM2.5 was evaluated.•The PM2.5 emission rates during pan-frying cooking cannot be taken as a constant.•Proper measures are needed to reduce the after-cooking emissions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34177073</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-2574</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2021-08, Vol.201, p.108002, Article 108002
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8224830
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cooking
Emission rate
PM2.5
Portable air cleaner
Range hood
Window opening
title Residential cooking-related PM2.5: Spatial-temporal variations under various intervention scenarios
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20cooking-related%20PM2.5:%20Spatial-temporal%20variations%20under%20various%20intervention%20scenarios&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Xiang,%20Jianbang&rft.date=2021-08-15&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=108002&rft.pages=108002-&rft.artnum=108002&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108002&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0360132321004066%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34177073&rft_els_id=S0360132321004066&rfr_iscdi=true