SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice
Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be diagnosed by PCR during acute infection or later in their clinical course by detection of virus-specific antibodies. While in theory complementary, both PCR and serologic tests have practical shortcomings. A retrospect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2021-06, Vol.59 (7), p.e0043121-e0043121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0043121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0043121 |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Murad, Douglas Chandrasekaran, Sukantha Pillai, Ajaya Garner, Omai B Denny, Christopher T |
description | Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be diagnosed by PCR during acute infection or later in their clinical course by detection of virus-specific antibodies. While in theory complementary, both PCR and serologic tests have practical shortcomings. A retrospective study was performed in order to further define these limitations in a clinical context and to determine how to best utilize these tests in a coherent fashion. A total of 3,075 patients underwent both PCR and serology tests at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), in the study period. Among these, 2,731 (89%) had no positive tests at all, 73 (2%) had a positive PCR test and only negative serology tests, 144 (5%) had a positive serology test and only negative PCR tests, and 127 (4%) had positive PCR and serology tests. Approximately half of the patients with discordant results (i.e., PCR positive and serology negative or vice versa) had mistimed tests in reference to the course of their disease. PCR-positive patients who were asymptomatic or pregnant were less likely to generate a detectable humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2. On a quantitative level, the log number of days between symptom onset and PCR test was positively correlated with cycle threshold (
) values. However, there was no apparent relationship between PCR
and serologic (arbitrary units per milliliter) results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00431-21 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8218740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2518990677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-36e893f993f762c48dc914b0a9ddc4501825d38c614c91aff5438c21851b15153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9vFCEUx4mpcbfVm2fDsSadyuPHDFyabMaqNTVuutX0RliGWdnMQguzTfrfi-620UMPBMj78Hl5fBF6C-QUgMoPX9tvp4RwBhWFF2gKRMmqrsnNAZoSokQFwJoJOsx5TQhwLsQrNGFMEQa1nKL5Yna1qNr4s6L4IvTOjj4G_NGN-9PyAc_bK2xChxcuxSGuvMXXLo8-rLAPuB188NYMeJ5MeWHda_SyN0N2b_b7Efrx6fy6_VJdfv980c4uK8NBjhWrnVSsV2U1NbVcdlYBXxKjus5yQUBS0TFpa-ClYPpe8HKjIAUsQYBgR-hs573dLjeusy6MyQz6NvmNSQ86Gq__rwT_S6_ivZZF0nBSBMd7QYp32zKR3vhs3TCY4OI2aypAKkXqpinoyQ61KeacXP_UBoj-E4IuIei_IWgKBX-_w03eUL2O2xTKTzzHvvt3jCfxY0LsN12HjO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518990677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murad, Douglas ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; Pillai, Ajaya ; Garner, Omai B ; Denny, Christopher T</creator><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Murad, Douglas ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; Pillai, Ajaya ; Garner, Omai B ; Denny, Christopher T ; Tang, Yi-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be diagnosed by PCR during acute infection or later in their clinical course by detection of virus-specific antibodies. While in theory complementary, both PCR and serologic tests have practical shortcomings. A retrospective study was performed in order to further define these limitations in a clinical context and to determine how to best utilize these tests in a coherent fashion. A total of 3,075 patients underwent both PCR and serology tests at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), in the study period. Among these, 2,731 (89%) had no positive tests at all, 73 (2%) had a positive PCR test and only negative serology tests, 144 (5%) had a positive serology test and only negative PCR tests, and 127 (4%) had positive PCR and serology tests. Approximately half of the patients with discordant results (i.e., PCR positive and serology negative or vice versa) had mistimed tests in reference to the course of their disease. PCR-positive patients who were asymptomatic or pregnant were less likely to generate a detectable humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2. On a quantitative level, the log number of days between symptom onset and PCR test was positively correlated with cycle threshold (
) values. However, there was no apparent relationship between PCR
and serologic (arbitrary units per milliliter) results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00431-21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33903168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral ; COVID-19 ; Humans ; Los Angeles ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Serologic Tests ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-06, Vol.59 (7), p.e0043121-e0043121</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology. 2021 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-36e893f993f762c48dc914b0a9ddc4501825d38c614c91aff5438c21851b15153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-36e893f993f762c48dc914b0a9ddc4501825d38c614c91aff5438c21851b15153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8344-1068 ; 0000-0002-6232-5535 ; 0000-0002-7366-2692</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.00431-21$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JCM.00431-21$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,3177,27911,27912,52738,52739,52740,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Murad, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, Ajaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Omai B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denny, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><title>SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be diagnosed by PCR during acute infection or later in their clinical course by detection of virus-specific antibodies. While in theory complementary, both PCR and serologic tests have practical shortcomings. A retrospective study was performed in order to further define these limitations in a clinical context and to determine how to best utilize these tests in a coherent fashion. A total of 3,075 patients underwent both PCR and serology tests at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), in the study period. Among these, 2,731 (89%) had no positive tests at all, 73 (2%) had a positive PCR test and only negative serology tests, 144 (5%) had a positive serology test and only negative PCR tests, and 127 (4%) had positive PCR and serology tests. Approximately half of the patients with discordant results (i.e., PCR positive and serology negative or vice versa) had mistimed tests in reference to the course of their disease. PCR-positive patients who were asymptomatic or pregnant were less likely to generate a detectable humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2. On a quantitative level, the log number of days between symptom onset and PCR test was positively correlated with cycle threshold (
) values. However, there was no apparent relationship between PCR
and serologic (arbitrary units per milliliter) results.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Serologic Tests</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9vFCEUx4mpcbfVm2fDsSadyuPHDFyabMaqNTVuutX0RliGWdnMQguzTfrfi-620UMPBMj78Hl5fBF6C-QUgMoPX9tvp4RwBhWFF2gKRMmqrsnNAZoSokQFwJoJOsx5TQhwLsQrNGFMEQa1nKL5Yna1qNr4s6L4IvTOjj4G_NGN-9PyAc_bK2xChxcuxSGuvMXXLo8-rLAPuB188NYMeJ5MeWHda_SyN0N2b_b7Efrx6fy6_VJdfv980c4uK8NBjhWrnVSsV2U1NbVcdlYBXxKjus5yQUBS0TFpa-ClYPpe8HKjIAUsQYBgR-hs573dLjeusy6MyQz6NvmNSQ86Gq__rwT_S6_ivZZF0nBSBMd7QYp32zKR3vhs3TCY4OI2aypAKkXqpinoyQ61KeacXP_UBoj-E4IuIei_IWgKBX-_w03eUL2O2xTKTzzHvvt3jCfxY0LsN12HjO0</recordid><startdate>20210618</startdate><enddate>20210618</enddate><creator>Murad, Douglas</creator><creator>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creator><creator>Pillai, Ajaya</creator><creator>Garner, Omai B</creator><creator>Denny, Christopher T</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-1068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-5535</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-2692</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210618</creationdate><title>SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice</title><author>Murad, Douglas ; Chandrasekaran, Sukantha ; Pillai, Ajaya ; Garner, Omai B ; Denny, Christopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-36e893f993f762c48dc914b0a9ddc4501825d38c614c91aff5438c21851b15153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Serologic Tests</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murad, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, Ajaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Omai B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denny, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murad, Douglas</au><au>Chandrasekaran, Sukantha</au><au>Pillai, Ajaya</au><au>Garner, Omai B</au><au>Denny, Christopher T</au><au>Tang, Yi-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-06-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0043121</spage><epage>e0043121</epage><pages>e0043121-e0043121</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be diagnosed by PCR during acute infection or later in their clinical course by detection of virus-specific antibodies. While in theory complementary, both PCR and serologic tests have practical shortcomings. A retrospective study was performed in order to further define these limitations in a clinical context and to determine how to best utilize these tests in a coherent fashion. A total of 3,075 patients underwent both PCR and serology tests at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), in the study period. Among these, 2,731 (89%) had no positive tests at all, 73 (2%) had a positive PCR test and only negative serology tests, 144 (5%) had a positive serology test and only negative PCR tests, and 127 (4%) had positive PCR and serology tests. Approximately half of the patients with discordant results (i.e., PCR positive and serology negative or vice versa) had mistimed tests in reference to the course of their disease. PCR-positive patients who were asymptomatic or pregnant were less likely to generate a detectable humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2. On a quantitative level, the log number of days between symptom onset and PCR test was positively correlated with cycle threshold (
) values. However, there was no apparent relationship between PCR
and serologic (arbitrary units per milliliter) results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33903168</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00431-21</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-1068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-5535</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-2692</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-06, Vol.59 (7), p.e0043121-e0043121 |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8218740 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibodies, Viral COVID-19 Humans Los Angeles Polymerase Chain Reaction Retrospective Studies SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Tests Virology |
title | SARS-CoV-2 Infection Detection by PCR and Serologic Testing in Clinical Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A17%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SARS-CoV-2%20Infection%20Detection%20by%20PCR%20and%20Serologic%20Testing%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Murad,%20Douglas&rft.date=2021-06-18&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0043121&rft.epage=e0043121&rft.pages=e0043121-e0043121&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00431-21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2518990677%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518990677&rft_id=info:pmid/33903168&rfr_iscdi=true |