Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence

This article examines the short‐term effects of the COVID‐19 lockdown on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala. We rely on a comprehensive panel dataset of 1,824 small agricultural households collected over two survey rounds, on November–December 2019 and May–June 2020. We place special emp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural economics 2021-05, Vol.52 (3), p.477-494
Hauptverfasser: Ceballos, Francisco, Hernandez, Manuel A., Paz, Cynthia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 494
container_issue 3
container_start_page 477
container_title Agricultural economics
container_volume 52
creator Ceballos, Francisco
Hernandez, Manuel A.
Paz, Cynthia
description This article examines the short‐term effects of the COVID‐19 lockdown on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala. We rely on a comprehensive panel dataset of 1,824 small agricultural households collected over two survey rounds, on November–December 2019 and May–June 2020. We place special emphasis on changes in agricultural and nonagricultural income sources, including remittances, and changes in dietary diversity, including consumption of animal source foods (ASF) and fruits and vegetables (F&V). We find that COVID‐19 affected the incomes, food security, and dietary patterns of households, with a decrease in ASF diversity and an increase in F&V diversity, and an overall net decrease in dietary diversity across all food groups. Dietary diversity among women in reproductive age, however, remained unchanged, and increased among children under 2 years old. Interestingly, households with relatively higher incomes appear to have reduced their dietary diversity to a larger extent than lower income ones, as well as households located in communities with more severe access restrictions. The focus of the study in a region with a high prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition provides an important perspective into the consequences of the lockdown in complex rural contexts with vulnerable populations and contributes to inform eventual recovery measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/agec.12629
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8206951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535964843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-6dc053a49e0a04f8ccff48ecb38925380b34d2c2528a8cbff7fda1acacc3c54c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1qFDEUx4Modlu98QEk4I0IU_M5m3ghlLWuhUIFP25DJnPSSZmZrMnMyt4Vn8Bn9ElM3VrUC3OTcM4vP87hj9ATSo5pOS_tJbhjymqm76EFlUtREVWz-2hBaK0rSSU5QIc5XxFCBWH8ITrgggpNOV2gbx-6mKYf198nSAMOw8a6KePo8eri89mbUqcaxxH7GFucwc0pTDtsxxaP81TeofTCiNOcbI_Xs51gsL19hd93cYTyu7EZWuxtcXdxztDFvnjmtIUdhm1oYXTwCD3wts_w-PY-Qp_enn5cvavOL9Znq5PzykmidVW3jkhuhQZiifDKOe-FAtdwpZnkijRctMwxyZRVrvF-6VtLrbPOcSeF40fo9d67mZsBWgfjVKY2mxQGm3Ym2mD-7oyhM5dxaxQjtZa0CJ7fClL8MkOezBCyg763I5TlDJOCL4kShBT02T_oVZzTWNYrFJe6FkrwQr3YUy7FnBP4u2EoMTfRmptoza9oC_z0z_Hv0N9ZFoDuga-hh91_VOZkfbraS38CoiKz7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535964843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Ceballos, Francisco ; Hernandez, Manuel A. ; Paz, Cynthia</creator><creatorcontrib>Ceballos, Francisco ; Hernandez, Manuel A. ; Paz, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the short‐term effects of the COVID‐19 lockdown on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala. We rely on a comprehensive panel dataset of 1,824 small agricultural households collected over two survey rounds, on November–December 2019 and May–June 2020. We place special emphasis on changes in agricultural and nonagricultural income sources, including remittances, and changes in dietary diversity, including consumption of animal source foods (ASF) and fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V). We find that COVID‐19 affected the incomes, food security, and dietary patterns of households, with a decrease in ASF diversity and an increase in F&amp;V diversity, and an overall net decrease in dietary diversity across all food groups. Dietary diversity among women in reproductive age, however, remained unchanged, and increased among children under 2 years old. Interestingly, households with relatively higher incomes appear to have reduced their dietary diversity to a larger extent than lower income ones, as well as households located in communities with more severe access restrictions. The focus of the study in a region with a high prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition provides an important perspective into the consequences of the lockdown in complex rural contexts with vulnerable populations and contributes to inform eventual recovery measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/agec.12629</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34149131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>agricultural households ; Animal-based foods ; COVID-19 ; Diet ; dietary diversity ; Farms ; Food ; Food groups ; Food security ; Food sources ; Households ; Income ; Malnutrition ; Nutrition ; Original ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Poverty ; Rural populations</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2021-05, Vol.52 (3), p.477-494</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Association of Agricultural Economists</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Agricultural Economics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Association of Agricultural Economists.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-6dc053a49e0a04f8ccff48ecb38925380b34d2c2528a8cbff7fda1acacc3c54c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-6dc053a49e0a04f8ccff48ecb38925380b34d2c2528a8cbff7fda1acacc3c54c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4754-8471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fagec.12629$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fagec.12629$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ceballos, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Manuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paz, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><title>Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><addtitle>Agric Econ</addtitle><description>This article examines the short‐term effects of the COVID‐19 lockdown on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala. We rely on a comprehensive panel dataset of 1,824 small agricultural households collected over two survey rounds, on November–December 2019 and May–June 2020. We place special emphasis on changes in agricultural and nonagricultural income sources, including remittances, and changes in dietary diversity, including consumption of animal source foods (ASF) and fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V). We find that COVID‐19 affected the incomes, food security, and dietary patterns of households, with a decrease in ASF diversity and an increase in F&amp;V diversity, and an overall net decrease in dietary diversity across all food groups. Dietary diversity among women in reproductive age, however, remained unchanged, and increased among children under 2 years old. Interestingly, households with relatively higher incomes appear to have reduced their dietary diversity to a larger extent than lower income ones, as well as households located in communities with more severe access restrictions. The focus of the study in a region with a high prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition provides an important perspective into the consequences of the lockdown in complex rural contexts with vulnerable populations and contributes to inform eventual recovery measures.</description><subject>agricultural households</subject><subject>Animal-based foods</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>dietary diversity</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food groups</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1qFDEUx4Modlu98QEk4I0IU_M5m3ghlLWuhUIFP25DJnPSSZmZrMnMyt4Vn8Bn9ElM3VrUC3OTcM4vP87hj9ATSo5pOS_tJbhjymqm76EFlUtREVWz-2hBaK0rSSU5QIc5XxFCBWH8ITrgggpNOV2gbx-6mKYf198nSAMOw8a6KePo8eri89mbUqcaxxH7GFucwc0pTDtsxxaP81TeofTCiNOcbI_Xs51gsL19hd93cYTyu7EZWuxtcXdxztDFvnjmtIUdhm1oYXTwCD3wts_w-PY-Qp_enn5cvavOL9Znq5PzykmidVW3jkhuhQZiifDKOe-FAtdwpZnkijRctMwxyZRVrvF-6VtLrbPOcSeF40fo9d67mZsBWgfjVKY2mxQGm3Ym2mD-7oyhM5dxaxQjtZa0CJ7fClL8MkOezBCyg763I5TlDJOCL4kShBT02T_oVZzTWNYrFJe6FkrwQr3YUy7FnBP4u2EoMTfRmptoza9oC_z0z_Hv0N9ZFoDuga-hh91_VOZkfbraS38CoiKz7w</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Ceballos, Francisco</creator><creator>Hernandez, Manuel A.</creator><creator>Paz, Cynthia</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4754-8471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence</title><author>Ceballos, Francisco ; Hernandez, Manuel A. ; Paz, Cynthia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-6dc053a49e0a04f8ccff48ecb38925380b34d2c2528a8cbff7fda1acacc3c54c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>agricultural households</topic><topic>Animal-based foods</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>dietary diversity</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food groups</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ceballos, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Manuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paz, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ceballos, Francisco</au><au>Hernandez, Manuel A.</au><au>Paz, Cynthia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><addtitle>Agric Econ</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>477-494</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>This article examines the short‐term effects of the COVID‐19 lockdown on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala. We rely on a comprehensive panel dataset of 1,824 small agricultural households collected over two survey rounds, on November–December 2019 and May–June 2020. We place special emphasis on changes in agricultural and nonagricultural income sources, including remittances, and changes in dietary diversity, including consumption of animal source foods (ASF) and fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V). We find that COVID‐19 affected the incomes, food security, and dietary patterns of households, with a decrease in ASF diversity and an increase in F&amp;V diversity, and an overall net decrease in dietary diversity across all food groups. Dietary diversity among women in reproductive age, however, remained unchanged, and increased among children under 2 years old. Interestingly, households with relatively higher incomes appear to have reduced their dietary diversity to a larger extent than lower income ones, as well as households located in communities with more severe access restrictions. The focus of the study in a region with a high prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition provides an important perspective into the consequences of the lockdown in complex rural contexts with vulnerable populations and contributes to inform eventual recovery measures.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34149131</pmid><doi>10.1111/agec.12629</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4754-8471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5150
ispartof Agricultural economics, 2021-05, Vol.52 (3), p.477-494
issn 0169-5150
1574-0862
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8206951
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects agricultural households
Animal-based foods
COVID-19
Diet
dietary diversity
Farms
Food
Food groups
Food security
Food sources
Households
Income
Malnutrition
Nutrition
Original
Polls & surveys
Poverty
Rural populations
title Short‐term impacts of COVID‐19 on food security and nutrition in rural Guatemala: Phone‐based farm household survey evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%E2%80%90term%20impacts%20of%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20on%20food%20security%20and%20nutrition%20in%20rural%20Guatemala:%20Phone%E2%80%90based%20farm%20household%20survey%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Ceballos,%20Francisco&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=477-494&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/agec.12629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2535964843%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535964843&rft_id=info:pmid/34149131&rfr_iscdi=true