Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)

In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus ter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Society (New Brunswick) 2021-06, Vol.58 (3), p.179-188
Hauptverfasser: Elliott, Karen, Price, Rob, Shaw, Patricia, Spiliotopoulos, Tasos, Ng, Magdalene, Coopamootoo, Kovila, van Moorsel, Aad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 188
container_issue 3
container_start_page 179
container_title Society (New Brunswick)
container_volume 58
creator Elliott, Karen
Price, Rob
Shaw, Patricia
Spiliotopoulos, Tasos
Ng, Magdalene
Coopamootoo, Kovila
van Moorsel, Aad
description In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8202049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2543704904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3c22b24f3d52f0ca6f230431629f0b9673be2c2fbcbd0cc8f70df8f851a26b1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxsevqP-DBTOJlexiFBwwzHkw226qbNDGp9UyAgZVmdtgCY7P_falbW-tBLhDe7_vee_kQekPwe4Kx-JAIEMJrDKTGmHesbp-hGeloUzMB_DmaYcJEDZiQY_QypStcDgB7gY4pI6wjADO0vQw3KvapUmN1dj35rPRgq1O_Ka-h-h6Mt3n_sVrG7J03vvytx2yHwW_saGy1WK5PirSvViHuQlT5UXth0y6MyWs_-LyvFqvTi5NX6MipIdnX9_cc_fh8drn6Wp9_-7JeLc9rwwTLNTUAGpijPQeHjWocUMwoaaBzWHeNoNqCAaeN7rExrRO4d61rOVHQaKLoHH06-O4mvbW9sWOOapC76Lcq7mVQXj6tjP6n3IRfsgUMmHXFYHFvEMP1ZFOWW59M2VuNNkxJAmdUFLBMNUfv_kGvwhTHsl6hOBei5fzOEA6UiSGlaN3DMATLuzTlIU1Z0pS_05RtEb39e40HyZ_4CkAPQCqlcWPjY-__2N4Cwneq2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555778559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Elliott, Karen ; Price, Rob ; Shaw, Patricia ; Spiliotopoulos, Tasos ; Ng, Magdalene ; Coopamootoo, Kovila ; van Moorsel, Aad</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Karen ; Price, Rob ; Shaw, Patricia ; Spiliotopoulos, Tasos ; Ng, Magdalene ; Coopamootoo, Kovila ; van Moorsel, Aad</creatorcontrib><description>In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34149122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Data Use ; Decisions ; Delegation ; Ethics ; Financial services ; Governance ; Intelligence ; Legal system ; Mathematics ; Opportunity costs ; Original ; Original Article ; Political Science ; Productivity ; Responsibility ; Risk assessment ; Scores ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Society (New Brunswick), 2021-06, Vol.58 (3), p.179-188</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3c22b24f3d52f0ca6f230431629f0b9673be2c2fbcbd0cc8f70df8f851a26b1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3c22b24f3d52f0ca6f230431629f0b9673be2c2fbcbd0cc8f70df8f851a26b1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7233-6943 ; 0000-0002-2455-0475 ; 0000-0002-9914-4586 ; 0000-0002-9573-8360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotopoulos, Tasos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Magdalene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coopamootoo, Kovila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorsel, Aad</creatorcontrib><title>Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)</title><title>Society (New Brunswick)</title><addtitle>Soc</addtitle><addtitle>Society</addtitle><description>In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Data Use</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Delegation</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Legal system</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0147-2011</issn><issn>1936-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxsevqP-DBTOJlexiFBwwzHkw226qbNDGp9UyAgZVmdtgCY7P_falbW-tBLhDe7_vee_kQekPwe4Kx-JAIEMJrDKTGmHesbp-hGeloUzMB_DmaYcJEDZiQY_QypStcDgB7gY4pI6wjADO0vQw3KvapUmN1dj35rPRgq1O_Ka-h-h6Mt3n_sVrG7J03vvytx2yHwW_saGy1WK5PirSvViHuQlT5UXth0y6MyWs_-LyvFqvTi5NX6MipIdnX9_cc_fh8drn6Wp9_-7JeLc9rwwTLNTUAGpijPQeHjWocUMwoaaBzWHeNoNqCAaeN7rExrRO4d61rOVHQaKLoHH06-O4mvbW9sWOOapC76Lcq7mVQXj6tjP6n3IRfsgUMmHXFYHFvEMP1ZFOWW59M2VuNNkxJAmdUFLBMNUfv_kGvwhTHsl6hOBei5fzOEA6UiSGlaN3DMATLuzTlIU1Z0pS_05RtEb39e40HyZ_4CkAPQCqlcWPjY-__2N4Cwneq2A</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Elliott, Karen</creator><creator>Price, Rob</creator><creator>Shaw, Patricia</creator><creator>Spiliotopoulos, Tasos</creator><creator>Ng, Magdalene</creator><creator>Coopamootoo, Kovila</creator><creator>van Moorsel, Aad</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-6943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-0475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-4586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-8360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)</title><author>Elliott, Karen ; Price, Rob ; Shaw, Patricia ; Spiliotopoulos, Tasos ; Ng, Magdalene ; Coopamootoo, Kovila ; van Moorsel, Aad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3c22b24f3d52f0ca6f230431629f0b9673be2c2fbcbd0cc8f70df8f851a26b1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Data Use</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Delegation</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Legal system</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiliotopoulos, Tasos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Magdalene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coopamootoo, Kovila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorsel, Aad</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Society (New Brunswick)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Karen</au><au>Price, Rob</au><au>Shaw, Patricia</au><au>Spiliotopoulos, Tasos</au><au>Ng, Magdalene</au><au>Coopamootoo, Kovila</au><au>van Moorsel, Aad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)</atitle><jtitle>Society (New Brunswick)</jtitle><stitle>Soc</stitle><addtitle>Society</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>179-188</pages><issn>0147-2011</issn><eissn>1936-4725</eissn><abstract>In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34149122</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-6943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-0475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-4586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-8360</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-2011
ispartof Society (New Brunswick), 2021-06, Vol.58 (3), p.179-188
issn 0147-2011
1936-4725
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8202049
source SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Data Use
Decisions
Delegation
Ethics
Financial services
Governance
Intelligence
Legal system
Mathematics
Opportunity costs
Original
Original Article
Political Science
Productivity
Responsibility
Risk assessment
Scores
Social Sciences
Society
Sociology
title Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A19%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20an%20Equitable%20Digital%20Society:%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20(AI)%20and%20Corporate%20Digital%20Responsibility%20(CDR)&rft.jtitle=Society%20(New%20Brunswick)&rft.au=Elliott,%20Karen&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=179-188&rft.issn=0147-2011&rft.eissn=1936-4725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2543704904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555778559&rft_id=info:pmid/34149122&rfr_iscdi=true