Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain

Multiple gestations have become an increasing phenomenon that has impacted public health globally, largely due to the application of assisted reproductive technologies. The objective of this work was to find out the discourse that the health professionals involved in its follow-up have in our contex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-06, Vol.18 (11), p.6031
Hauptverfasser: Jurado-García, Estefanía, Botello-Hermosa, Alicia, Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier, Gómez-Salgado, Juan, Navas-Rojano, Nazaret, Casado-Mejía, Rosa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6031
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator Jurado-García, Estefanía
Botello-Hermosa, Alicia
Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier
Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Navas-Rojano, Nazaret
Casado-Mejía, Rosa
description Multiple gestations have become an increasing phenomenon that has impacted public health globally, largely due to the application of assisted reproductive technologies. The objective of this work was to find out the discourse that the health professionals involved in its follow-up have in our context. For this, a qualitative methodology was chosen, with semi-structured interviews recorded in audio, prior authorisation, and transcribed verbatim. It was based on a script designed for this purpose, with the following analysis categories: the current trend of multiple gestations, impact, and follow-up. The content analysis was based on the experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of the professionals interviewed. Professionals stated that the current socioeconomic and legal context hinders a single embryo transfer policy that decreases multiple gestation rates. They emphasised the importance of the psychic impact of such gestations on the couple, on the mother in particular, as well as the economic effect on families, health, and society in general. They expressed the need to create specific protocols to assist these gestations. Midwives, in particular, demanded that the health administration recognise and support the differentiated care they perform with this type of gestation. Work on specific models is needed to adequately size the impact of multiple gestations, as well as to generate social health policies that lead to co-responsible reconciliation measures that favour women having one pregnancy at a time.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18116031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8200015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539735904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-8c4f9d3bf62a96e10e93ac635139863ba57331c835a9e1b3739b4b929044eaf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS1EVSj0ytlSL70stTOJN-6hEgIKSFRAoWfLcSbEK68dbAeJU_96vQJVwGk8M5-f3swQcsDZIYBk3-wK4zTylnPBgG-RXS4EW9SC8e1X7x3yKaUVY9DWQn4kO1BXrKkquUv-_ppdtpNDeoYp62yDT1T7nh6lZFPGnv7GKYZ-Ntk-Ir1DM_rgwr3F9J3ezNrZzafSuc1z_0TDQPOI9MQmE-aYcFM4R-3ySK9jGLCIBq9dotbT20lbv08-DCXHzy9xj_z5eXp3fL64vDq7OD66XBiQTV60ph5kD90gKi0FcoYStBHQcJCtgE43SwBuWmi0RN7BEmRXd7KSrK5RDxXskR_PutPcrbE36HPUTk3RrnV8UkFb9bbj7ajuw6NqK8YYb4rA1xeBGB7msiu1LkOic9pjmJOqmrotVoG1Bf3yDl2VZWzGLhTIJTTFVqEOnykTQ0oRh_9mOFOb26q3t4V_ZkGZHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539735904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jurado-García, Estefanía ; Botello-Hermosa, Alicia ; Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier ; Gómez-Salgado, Juan ; Navas-Rojano, Nazaret ; Casado-Mejía, Rosa</creator><creatorcontrib>Jurado-García, Estefanía ; Botello-Hermosa, Alicia ; Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier ; Gómez-Salgado, Juan ; Navas-Rojano, Nazaret ; Casado-Mejía, Rosa</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple gestations have become an increasing phenomenon that has impacted public health globally, largely due to the application of assisted reproductive technologies. The objective of this work was to find out the discourse that the health professionals involved in its follow-up have in our context. For this, a qualitative methodology was chosen, with semi-structured interviews recorded in audio, prior authorisation, and transcribed verbatim. It was based on a script designed for this purpose, with the following analysis categories: the current trend of multiple gestations, impact, and follow-up. The content analysis was based on the experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of the professionals interviewed. Professionals stated that the current socioeconomic and legal context hinders a single embryo transfer policy that decreases multiple gestation rates. They emphasised the importance of the psychic impact of such gestations on the couple, on the mother in particular, as well as the economic effect on families, health, and society in general. They expressed the need to create specific protocols to assist these gestations. Midwives, in particular, demanded that the health administration recognise and support the differentiated care they perform with this type of gestation. Work on specific models is needed to adequately size the impact of multiple gestations, as well as to generate social health policies that lead to co-responsible reconciliation measures that favour women having one pregnancy at a time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18116031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34205229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Codes ; Confidentiality ; Content analysis ; Economic impact ; Embryo transfer ; Embryos ; Gestation ; Gynecology ; Health policy ; Hospital administration ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Midwifery ; Ovaries ; Pregnancy ; Primary care ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Public health ; Qualitative research ; Reproductive technologies ; Socioeconomic factors ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (11), p.6031</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-8c4f9d3bf62a96e10e93ac635139863ba57331c835a9e1b3739b4b929044eaf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-8c4f9d3bf62a96e10e93ac635139863ba57331c835a9e1b3739b4b929044eaf23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3270-8882 ; 0000-0001-9053-7730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200015/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200015/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jurado-García, Estefanía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botello-Hermosa, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Salgado, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Rojano, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado-Mejía, Rosa</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><description>Multiple gestations have become an increasing phenomenon that has impacted public health globally, largely due to the application of assisted reproductive technologies. The objective of this work was to find out the discourse that the health professionals involved in its follow-up have in our context. For this, a qualitative methodology was chosen, with semi-structured interviews recorded in audio, prior authorisation, and transcribed verbatim. It was based on a script designed for this purpose, with the following analysis categories: the current trend of multiple gestations, impact, and follow-up. The content analysis was based on the experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of the professionals interviewed. Professionals stated that the current socioeconomic and legal context hinders a single embryo transfer policy that decreases multiple gestation rates. They emphasised the importance of the psychic impact of such gestations on the couple, on the mother in particular, as well as the economic effect on families, health, and society in general. They expressed the need to create specific protocols to assist these gestations. Midwives, in particular, demanded that the health administration recognise and support the differentiated care they perform with this type of gestation. Work on specific models is needed to adequately size the impact of multiple gestations, as well as to generate social health policies that lead to co-responsible reconciliation measures that favour women having one pregnancy at a time.</description><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Embryo transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Hospital administration</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS1EVSj0ytlSL70stTOJN-6hEgIKSFRAoWfLcSbEK68dbAeJU_96vQJVwGk8M5-f3swQcsDZIYBk3-wK4zTylnPBgG-RXS4EW9SC8e1X7x3yKaUVY9DWQn4kO1BXrKkquUv-_ppdtpNDeoYp62yDT1T7nh6lZFPGnv7GKYZ-Ntk-Ir1DM_rgwr3F9J3ezNrZzafSuc1z_0TDQPOI9MQmE-aYcFM4R-3ySK9jGLCIBq9dotbT20lbv08-DCXHzy9xj_z5eXp3fL64vDq7OD66XBiQTV60ph5kD90gKi0FcoYStBHQcJCtgE43SwBuWmi0RN7BEmRXd7KSrK5RDxXskR_PutPcrbE36HPUTk3RrnV8UkFb9bbj7ajuw6NqK8YYb4rA1xeBGB7msiu1LkOic9pjmJOqmrotVoG1Bf3yDl2VZWzGLhTIJTTFVqEOnykTQ0oRh_9mOFOb26q3t4V_ZkGZHw</recordid><startdate>20210603</startdate><enddate>20210603</enddate><creator>Jurado-García, Estefanía</creator><creator>Botello-Hermosa, Alicia</creator><creator>Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier</creator><creator>Gómez-Salgado, Juan</creator><creator>Navas-Rojano, Nazaret</creator><creator>Casado-Mejía, Rosa</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-8882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-7730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210603</creationdate><title>Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain</title><author>Jurado-García, Estefanía ; Botello-Hermosa, Alicia ; Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier ; Gómez-Salgado, Juan ; Navas-Rojano, Nazaret ; Casado-Mejía, Rosa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-8c4f9d3bf62a96e10e93ac635139863ba57331c835a9e1b3739b4b929044eaf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Embryo transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Hospital administration</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jurado-García, Estefanía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botello-Hermosa, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Salgado, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Rojano, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado-Mejía, Rosa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jurado-García, Estefanía</au><au>Botello-Hermosa, Alicia</au><au>Fernández-Carrasco, Francisco Javier</au><au>Gómez-Salgado, Juan</au><au>Navas-Rojano, Nazaret</au><au>Casado-Mejía, Rosa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><date>2021-06-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6031</spage><pages>6031-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Multiple gestations have become an increasing phenomenon that has impacted public health globally, largely due to the application of assisted reproductive technologies. The objective of this work was to find out the discourse that the health professionals involved in its follow-up have in our context. For this, a qualitative methodology was chosen, with semi-structured interviews recorded in audio, prior authorisation, and transcribed verbatim. It was based on a script designed for this purpose, with the following analysis categories: the current trend of multiple gestations, impact, and follow-up. The content analysis was based on the experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of the professionals interviewed. Professionals stated that the current socioeconomic and legal context hinders a single embryo transfer policy that decreases multiple gestation rates. They emphasised the importance of the psychic impact of such gestations on the couple, on the mother in particular, as well as the economic effect on families, health, and society in general. They expressed the need to create specific protocols to assist these gestations. Midwives, in particular, demanded that the health administration recognise and support the differentiated care they perform with this type of gestation. Work on specific models is needed to adequately size the impact of multiple gestations, as well as to generate social health policies that lead to co-responsible reconciliation measures that favour women having one pregnancy at a time.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34205229</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18116031</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-8882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-7730</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (11), p.6031
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8200015
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Codes
Confidentiality
Content analysis
Economic impact
Embryo transfer
Embryos
Gestation
Gynecology
Health policy
Hospital administration
Interviews
Medical personnel
Midwifery
Ovaries
Pregnancy
Primary care
Professional ethics
Professionals
Public health
Qualitative research
Reproductive technologies
Socioeconomic factors
Womens health
title Multiple Gestations and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Qualitative Study of the Discourse of Health Professionals in Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T03%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20Gestations%20and%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technologies:%20Qualitative%20Study%20of%20the%20Discourse%20of%20Health%20Professionals%20in%20Spain&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Jurado-Garc%C3%ADa,%20Estefan%C3%ADa&rft.date=2021-06-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6031&rft.pages=6031-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18116031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2539735904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539735904&rft_id=info:pmid/34205229&rfr_iscdi=true