Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions

Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2020-09, Vol.54 (18), p.11506-11514
Hauptverfasser: Zimmerle, Daniel, Vaughn, Timothy, Bell, Clay, Bennett, Kristine, Deshmukh, Parik, Thoma, Eben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11514
container_issue 18
container_start_page 11506
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 54
creator Zimmerle, Daniel
Vaughn, Timothy
Bell, Clay
Bennett, Kristine
Deshmukh, Parik
Thoma, Eben
description Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facility that closely resembles upstream natural gas field operations. Professional surveyors from 16 oil and gas companies and 8 regulatory agencies participated, completing 488 tests over a 10 month period. Detection rates were significantly lower than prior studies focused on camera performance. The leak size required to achieve a 90% probability-of-detection in this study is an order-of-magnitude larger than prior studies. Study results indicate that OGI survey experience significantly impacts leak detection rate: Surveyors from operators/contractors who had surveyed more than 551 sites prior to testing detected 1.7 (1.5–1.8) times more leaks than surveyors who had completed fewer surveys. Highly experienced surveyors adjust their survey speed, examine components from multiple viewpoints, and make other adjustments that improve their leak detection rate, indicating that modifications of survey protocols and targeted training could improve leak detection rates overall.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.0c01285
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8193645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434054228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a523t-a96e1d2b1284cd77949a8be255fe45a7f2da32711e661c6639c6a48cf2b499363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1r2zAYhcXoWNKu17srgt4MilN9274ZjPQTQgNlg96JN7KcqbOtVLIL_feVSZaug11JSM85eo8OQl8omVHC6DmYOLOxnxFDKCvkBzSlkpFMFpIeoCkhlGclVw8TdBjjIyGEcVJ8QhPO8kJJVU6Ru7C9Nb3zHV641vUR-xovN70z0OBriPi2hbXr1rj2Ad9BP4Td-cLCb_wmdh2-t9C4mJR47rs--Kax1bit3EjEz-hjDU20x7v1CP28uvwxv8kWy-vb-fdFBpLxPoNSWVqxVYojTJXnpSihWFkmZW2FhLxmFaTxKbVKUaMUL40CUZiarUSZsvIj9G3ruxlWra2MTbNAozfBtRBetAen39907pde-2dd0CQXMhl83RkE_zSk39Wti8Y2DXTWD1EzwQWRgrEioaf_oI9-CF2KlyiRl5woIRJ1vqVM8DEGW--HoUSPNepUox7VuxqT4uTvDHv-T28JONsCo3L_5v_sXgH426kE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447930644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions</title><source>American Chemical Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Zimmerle, Daniel ; Vaughn, Timothy ; Bell, Clay ; Bennett, Kristine ; Deshmukh, Parik ; Thoma, Eben</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmerle, Daniel ; Vaughn, Timothy ; Bell, Clay ; Bennett, Kristine ; Deshmukh, Parik ; Thoma, Eben</creatorcontrib><description>Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facility that closely resembles upstream natural gas field operations. Professional surveyors from 16 oil and gas companies and 8 regulatory agencies participated, completing 488 tests over a 10 month period. Detection rates were significantly lower than prior studies focused on camera performance. The leak size required to achieve a 90% probability-of-detection in this study is an order-of-magnitude larger than prior studies. Study results indicate that OGI survey experience significantly impacts leak detection rate: Surveyors from operators/contractors who had surveyed more than 551 sites prior to testing detected 1.7 (1.5–1.8) times more leaks than surveyors who had completed fewer surveys. Highly experienced surveyors adjust their survey speed, examine components from multiple viewpoints, and make other adjustments that improve their leak detection rate, indicating that modifications of survey protocols and targeted training could improve leak detection rates overall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32786569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Cameras ; Contractors ; Controlled conditions ; Detection limits ; Energy and Climate ; Leak detection ; Limit of Detection ; Methane ; Natural Gas ; Natural gas industry ; Oil and Gas Fields ; Oil and gas industry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Regulatory agencies ; Training ; Upstream</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2020-09, Vol.54 (18), p.11506-11514</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Sep 15, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a523t-a96e1d2b1284cd77949a8be255fe45a7f2da32711e661c6639c6a48cf2b499363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a523t-a96e1d2b1284cd77949a8be255fe45a7f2da32711e661c6639c6a48cf2b499363</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2832-048X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.0c01285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c01285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32786569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmerle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Clay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Parik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Eben</creatorcontrib><title>Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facility that closely resembles upstream natural gas field operations. Professional surveyors from 16 oil and gas companies and 8 regulatory agencies participated, completing 488 tests over a 10 month period. Detection rates were significantly lower than prior studies focused on camera performance. The leak size required to achieve a 90% probability-of-detection in this study is an order-of-magnitude larger than prior studies. Study results indicate that OGI survey experience significantly impacts leak detection rate: Surveyors from operators/contractors who had surveyed more than 551 sites prior to testing detected 1.7 (1.5–1.8) times more leaks than surveyors who had completed fewer surveys. Highly experienced surveyors adjust their survey speed, examine components from multiple viewpoints, and make other adjustments that improve their leak detection rate, indicating that modifications of survey protocols and targeted training could improve leak detection rates overall.</description><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Detection limits</subject><subject>Energy and Climate</subject><subject>Leak detection</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Natural Gas</subject><subject>Natural gas industry</subject><subject>Oil and Gas Fields</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1r2zAYhcXoWNKu17srgt4MilN9274ZjPQTQgNlg96JN7KcqbOtVLIL_feVSZaug11JSM85eo8OQl8omVHC6DmYOLOxnxFDKCvkBzSlkpFMFpIeoCkhlGclVw8TdBjjIyGEcVJ8QhPO8kJJVU6Ru7C9Nb3zHV641vUR-xovN70z0OBriPi2hbXr1rj2Ad9BP4Td-cLCb_wmdh2-t9C4mJR47rs--Kax1bit3EjEz-hjDU20x7v1CP28uvwxv8kWy-vb-fdFBpLxPoNSWVqxVYojTJXnpSihWFkmZW2FhLxmFaTxKbVKUaMUL40CUZiarUSZsvIj9G3ruxlWra2MTbNAozfBtRBetAen39907pde-2dd0CQXMhl83RkE_zSk39Wti8Y2DXTWD1EzwQWRgrEioaf_oI9-CF2KlyiRl5woIRJ1vqVM8DEGW--HoUSPNepUox7VuxqT4uTvDHv-T28JONsCo3L_5v_sXgH426kE</recordid><startdate>20200915</startdate><enddate>20200915</enddate><creator>Zimmerle, Daniel</creator><creator>Vaughn, Timothy</creator><creator>Bell, Clay</creator><creator>Bennett, Kristine</creator><creator>Deshmukh, Parik</creator><creator>Thoma, Eben</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-048X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200915</creationdate><title>Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions</title><author>Zimmerle, Daniel ; Vaughn, Timothy ; Bell, Clay ; Bennett, Kristine ; Deshmukh, Parik ; Thoma, Eben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a523t-a96e1d2b1284cd77949a8be255fe45a7f2da32711e661c6639c6a48cf2b499363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Detection limits</topic><topic>Energy and Climate</topic><topic>Leak detection</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Natural Gas</topic><topic>Natural gas industry</topic><topic>Oil and Gas Fields</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmerle, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Clay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Parik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Eben</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmerle, Daniel</au><au>Vaughn, Timothy</au><au>Bell, Clay</au><au>Bennett, Kristine</au><au>Deshmukh, Parik</au><au>Thoma, Eben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2020-09-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>11506</spage><epage>11514</epage><pages>11506-11514</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a commonly utilized leak detection method in the upstream and midstream sectors of the U.S. natural gas industry. This study characterized the detection efficacy of OGI surveyors, using their own cameras and protocols, with controlled releases in an 8-acre outdoor facility that closely resembles upstream natural gas field operations. Professional surveyors from 16 oil and gas companies and 8 regulatory agencies participated, completing 488 tests over a 10 month period. Detection rates were significantly lower than prior studies focused on camera performance. The leak size required to achieve a 90% probability-of-detection in this study is an order-of-magnitude larger than prior studies. Study results indicate that OGI survey experience significantly impacts leak detection rate: Surveyors from operators/contractors who had surveyed more than 551 sites prior to testing detected 1.7 (1.5–1.8) times more leaks than surveyors who had completed fewer surveys. Highly experienced surveyors adjust their survey speed, examine components from multiple viewpoints, and make other adjustments that improve their leak detection rate, indicating that modifications of survey protocols and targeted training could improve leak detection rates overall.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>32786569</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.0c01285</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-048X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2020-09, Vol.54 (18), p.11506-11514
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8193645
source American Chemical Society; MEDLINE
subjects Cameras
Contractors
Controlled conditions
Detection limits
Energy and Climate
Leak detection
Limit of Detection
Methane
Natural Gas
Natural gas industry
Oil and Gas Fields
Oil and gas industry
Polls & surveys
Regulatory agencies
Training
Upstream
title Detection Limits of Optical Gas Imaging for Natural Gas Leak Detection in Realistic Controlled Conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20Limits%20of%20Optical%20Gas%20Imaging%20for%20Natural%20Gas%20Leak%20Detection%20in%20Realistic%20Controlled%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Zimmerle,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-09-15&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=11506&rft.epage=11514&rft.pages=11506-11514&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c01285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2434054228%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447930644&rft_id=info:pmid/32786569&rfr_iscdi=true