Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo

The main secondary objective of OptiMA-DRC trial was to compare the OptiMA strategy, ie.supplementing with one product, ready-to-use therapeutic food at a gradually reduced doses, with the current national nutritionnal standard protocol in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2021-06, Vol.5 (Supplement_2), p.110-110
Hauptverfasser: Cazes, Cécile, Phelan, Kevin, Hubert, Victoire, Boubacar, Harouna, Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu, Bozama, Liévin Izie, Baya, Norbert, Tusuku, Toussaint, Yao, Cyrille, Kouame, Antoine, Delphine, Gabillard, Alitanou, Rodrigue, Kinda, Moumouni, Augier, Augustin, Anglaret, Xavier, Shepherd, Susan, Becquet, Renaud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 110
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 5
creator Cazes, Cécile
Phelan, Kevin
Hubert, Victoire
Boubacar, Harouna
Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu
Bozama, Liévin Izie
Baya, Norbert
Tusuku, Toussaint
Yao, Cyrille
Kouame, Antoine
Delphine, Gabillard
Alitanou, Rodrigue
Kinda, Moumouni
Augier, Augustin
Anglaret, Xavier
Shepherd, Susan
Becquet, Renaud
description The main secondary objective of OptiMA-DRC trial was to compare the OptiMA strategy, ie.supplementing with one product, ready-to-use therapeutic food at a gradually reduced doses, with the current national nutritionnal standard protocol in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at inclusion (MUAC < 115 mm or WHZ< –3 or oedema) in both arms. This non-inferiority, individually randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted in Kasai province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) between July 2019 and July 2020. Children 6–59 months with MUAC < 115 mm or weight-for-height Zscore (WHZ)< –3 or oedema and without medical complication were randomized to either the OptiMA or standard arm and followed for 6 months.. Recovery was defined as MUAC > 125 mm for OptiMA and MUAC > 125 mm or WHZ >–1.5 for the standard arm, and absence of oedema, for two consecutive weeks in treatment with a 4-week minimum stay, and at any time during 6-months post-inclusion. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper-bound of the 95%CI of the difference of proportion of recovery between the two strategies was less than 10% in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Superiority (upper-bound of the 95%CI of this difference lower than 0%) was considered if non-inferiority was shown. Overall, 482 children with uncomplicated SAM were included in ITT analysis (242 OptiMA, 240 standard). At 6 months, 231 (95·5%) children recovered under OptiMA versus 234 (97·5%) under standard protocol (difference –2·0%, 95%CI: –1·96% to 6·4%). PP analysis was similar. There was no difference in hospitalization (11% OptiMA, 12% standard, P = 0·887) or mortality rates (0·2% both arms). Under OptiMA, weight and MUAC gains in recovered children (N = 465) were greater (median weight gain, 1400g versus 1200g, P< 0·001; median MUAC gain, 14 mm versus 11 mm, P < 0·001) and RUTF consumption (sachets) was lower (median 74 versus 112, P < 0·001). Children with uncomplicated SAM recovered as well under OptiMA as under the DRC standard protocol. Gradual RUTF reduction may allow for increased nutrition program coverage by better allocating available resources. Innocent Foundation (London) European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (Brussels).
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8181291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123106287</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2218-9a8c31fdd9d8a2be34fd4bf3c3353544667cc5ce0756198b6c46c52155720fa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctqGzEUHUoLDWnW3WpdmFqP0XjURSE4bRqICbgpXQrN1R1bZUYykmxwV_mH_kE_rV8SGZeSLgpd3cO954F0quo1o28ZVWIG1s_8d9NTITVl3bPqjDdzWXOl2PMn-GV1kdI3SilTSrVUnVU_77bZTS45vyZLM_pdji674Ml9RJMn9Jn8evhBjqzlZX21WrwjK4Swx3ggYSCfsSAcD-SrSRktWWzcaCN60haVVGQZfN4k4jwxZGW8DSXqSCvrGMYS4sx4vF7hFCCa7KDYb3f9WECxL7x1eFW9GMyY8OL3PK--fPxwv_hU395d3ywub2vgnHW1Mh0INlirbGd4j6IZbNMPAoSQQjZN284BJCCdy5aprm-haUFyJuWc08FwcV69P_mW_AktlLdHM-ptdJOJBx2M039fvNvoddjrjnWMK1YMZicDiCGliMMfLaP6WJMuNeknNRXFm5Mi7Lb_QVYnMpZP2DuMOoFDD2hdRMjaBvdP7SPzr64c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo</title><source>OUP_牛津大学出版社OA刊</source><creator>Cazes, Cécile ; Phelan, Kevin ; Hubert, Victoire ; Boubacar, Harouna ; Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu ; Bozama, Liévin Izie ; Baya, Norbert ; Tusuku, Toussaint ; Yao, Cyrille ; Kouame, Antoine ; Delphine, Gabillard ; Alitanou, Rodrigue ; Kinda, Moumouni ; Augier, Augustin ; Anglaret, Xavier ; Shepherd, Susan ; Becquet, Renaud</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazes, Cécile ; Phelan, Kevin ; Hubert, Victoire ; Boubacar, Harouna ; Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu ; Bozama, Liévin Izie ; Baya, Norbert ; Tusuku, Toussaint ; Yao, Cyrille ; Kouame, Antoine ; Delphine, Gabillard ; Alitanou, Rodrigue ; Kinda, Moumouni ; Augier, Augustin ; Anglaret, Xavier ; Shepherd, Susan ; Becquet, Renaud</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The main secondary objective of OptiMA-DRC trial was to compare the OptiMA strategy, ie.supplementing with one product, ready-to-use therapeutic food at a gradually reduced doses, with the current national nutritionnal standard protocol in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at inclusion (MUAC < 115 mm or WHZ< –3 or oedema) in both arms. This non-inferiority, individually randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted in Kasai province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) between July 2019 and July 2020. Children 6–59 months with MUAC < 115 mm or weight-for-height Zscore (WHZ)< –3 or oedema and without medical complication were randomized to either the OptiMA or standard arm and followed for 6 months.. Recovery was defined as MUAC > 125 mm for OptiMA and MUAC > 125 mm or WHZ >–1.5 for the standard arm, and absence of oedema, for two consecutive weeks in treatment with a 4-week minimum stay, and at any time during 6-months post-inclusion. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper-bound of the 95%CI of the difference of proportion of recovery between the two strategies was less than 10% in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Superiority (upper-bound of the 95%CI of this difference lower than 0%) was considered if non-inferiority was shown. Overall, 482 children with uncomplicated SAM were included in ITT analysis (242 OptiMA, 240 standard). At 6 months, 231 (95·5%) children recovered under OptiMA versus 234 (97·5%) under standard protocol (difference –2·0%, 95%CI: –1·96% to 6·4%). PP analysis was similar. There was no difference in hospitalization (11% OptiMA, 12% standard, P = 0·887) or mortality rates (0·2% both arms). Under OptiMA, weight and MUAC gains in recovered children (N = 465) were greater (median weight gain, 1400g versus 1200g, P< 0·001; median MUAC gain, 14 mm versus 11 mm, P < 0·001) and RUTF consumption (sachets) was lower (median 74 versus 112, P < 0·001). Children with uncomplicated SAM recovered as well under OptiMA as under the DRC standard protocol. Gradual RUTF reduction may allow for increased nutrition program coverage by better allocating available resources. Innocent Foundation (London) European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (Brussels).]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Community and Public Health Nutrition</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2021-06, Vol.5 (Supplement_2), p.110-110</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2021. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181291/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181291/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazes, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Victoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boubacar, Harouna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozama, Liévin Izie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baya, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tusuku, Toussaint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouame, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delphine, Gabillard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alitanou, Rodrigue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinda, Moumouni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augier, Augustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglaret, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becquet, Renaud</creatorcontrib><title>Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description><![CDATA[The main secondary objective of OptiMA-DRC trial was to compare the OptiMA strategy, ie.supplementing with one product, ready-to-use therapeutic food at a gradually reduced doses, with the current national nutritionnal standard protocol in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at inclusion (MUAC < 115 mm or WHZ< –3 or oedema) in both arms. This non-inferiority, individually randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted in Kasai province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) between July 2019 and July 2020. Children 6–59 months with MUAC < 115 mm or weight-for-height Zscore (WHZ)< –3 or oedema and without medical complication were randomized to either the OptiMA or standard arm and followed for 6 months.. Recovery was defined as MUAC > 125 mm for OptiMA and MUAC > 125 mm or WHZ >–1.5 for the standard arm, and absence of oedema, for two consecutive weeks in treatment with a 4-week minimum stay, and at any time during 6-months post-inclusion. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper-bound of the 95%CI of the difference of proportion of recovery between the two strategies was less than 10% in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Superiority (upper-bound of the 95%CI of this difference lower than 0%) was considered if non-inferiority was shown. Overall, 482 children with uncomplicated SAM were included in ITT analysis (242 OptiMA, 240 standard). At 6 months, 231 (95·5%) children recovered under OptiMA versus 234 (97·5%) under standard protocol (difference –2·0%, 95%CI: –1·96% to 6·4%). PP analysis was similar. There was no difference in hospitalization (11% OptiMA, 12% standard, P = 0·887) or mortality rates (0·2% both arms). Under OptiMA, weight and MUAC gains in recovered children (N = 465) were greater (median weight gain, 1400g versus 1200g, P< 0·001; median MUAC gain, 14 mm versus 11 mm, P < 0·001) and RUTF consumption (sachets) was lower (median 74 versus 112, P < 0·001). Children with uncomplicated SAM recovered as well under OptiMA as under the DRC standard protocol. Gradual RUTF reduction may allow for increased nutrition program coverage by better allocating available resources. Innocent Foundation (London) European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (Brussels).]]></description><subject>Community and Public Health Nutrition</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctqGzEUHUoLDWnW3WpdmFqP0XjURSE4bRqICbgpXQrN1R1bZUYykmxwV_mH_kE_rV8SGZeSLgpd3cO954F0quo1o28ZVWIG1s_8d9NTITVl3bPqjDdzWXOl2PMn-GV1kdI3SilTSrVUnVU_77bZTS45vyZLM_pdji674Ml9RJMn9Jn8evhBjqzlZX21WrwjK4Swx3ggYSCfsSAcD-SrSRktWWzcaCN60haVVGQZfN4k4jwxZGW8DSXqSCvrGMYS4sx4vF7hFCCa7KDYb3f9WECxL7x1eFW9GMyY8OL3PK--fPxwv_hU395d3ywub2vgnHW1Mh0INlirbGd4j6IZbNMPAoSQQjZN284BJCCdy5aprm-haUFyJuWc08FwcV69P_mW_AktlLdHM-ptdJOJBx2M039fvNvoddjrjnWMK1YMZicDiCGliMMfLaP6WJMuNeknNRXFm5Mi7Lb_QVYnMpZP2DuMOoFDD2hdRMjaBvdP7SPzr64c</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Cazes, Cécile</creator><creator>Phelan, Kevin</creator><creator>Hubert, Victoire</creator><creator>Boubacar, Harouna</creator><creator>Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu</creator><creator>Bozama, Liévin Izie</creator><creator>Baya, Norbert</creator><creator>Tusuku, Toussaint</creator><creator>Yao, Cyrille</creator><creator>Kouame, Antoine</creator><creator>Delphine, Gabillard</creator><creator>Alitanou, Rodrigue</creator><creator>Kinda, Moumouni</creator><creator>Augier, Augustin</creator><creator>Anglaret, Xavier</creator><creator>Shepherd, Susan</creator><creator>Becquet, Renaud</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo</title><author>Cazes, Cécile ; Phelan, Kevin ; Hubert, Victoire ; Boubacar, Harouna ; Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu ; Bozama, Liévin Izie ; Baya, Norbert ; Tusuku, Toussaint ; Yao, Cyrille ; Kouame, Antoine ; Delphine, Gabillard ; Alitanou, Rodrigue ; Kinda, Moumouni ; Augier, Augustin ; Anglaret, Xavier ; Shepherd, Susan ; Becquet, Renaud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2218-9a8c31fdd9d8a2be34fd4bf3c3353544667cc5ce0756198b6c46c52155720fa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Community and Public Health Nutrition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazes, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Victoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boubacar, Harouna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozama, Liévin Izie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baya, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tusuku, Toussaint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouame, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delphine, Gabillard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alitanou, Rodrigue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinda, Moumouni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augier, Augustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglaret, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becquet, Renaud</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazes, Cécile</au><au>Phelan, Kevin</au><au>Hubert, Victoire</au><au>Boubacar, Harouna</au><au>Sakubu, Gilbert Tshibangu</au><au>Bozama, Liévin Izie</au><au>Baya, Norbert</au><au>Tusuku, Toussaint</au><au>Yao, Cyrille</au><au>Kouame, Antoine</au><au>Delphine, Gabillard</au><au>Alitanou, Rodrigue</au><au>Kinda, Moumouni</au><au>Augier, Augustin</au><au>Anglaret, Xavier</au><au>Shepherd, Susan</au><au>Becquet, Renaud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>110-110</pages><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The main secondary objective of OptiMA-DRC trial was to compare the OptiMA strategy, ie.supplementing with one product, ready-to-use therapeutic food at a gradually reduced doses, with the current national nutritionnal standard protocol in children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at inclusion (MUAC < 115 mm or WHZ< –3 or oedema) in both arms. This non-inferiority, individually randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted in Kasai province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) between July 2019 and July 2020. Children 6–59 months with MUAC < 115 mm or weight-for-height Zscore (WHZ)< –3 or oedema and without medical complication were randomized to either the OptiMA or standard arm and followed for 6 months.. Recovery was defined as MUAC > 125 mm for OptiMA and MUAC > 125 mm or WHZ >–1.5 for the standard arm, and absence of oedema, for two consecutive weeks in treatment with a 4-week minimum stay, and at any time during 6-months post-inclusion. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper-bound of the 95%CI of the difference of proportion of recovery between the two strategies was less than 10% in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Superiority (upper-bound of the 95%CI of this difference lower than 0%) was considered if non-inferiority was shown. Overall, 482 children with uncomplicated SAM were included in ITT analysis (242 OptiMA, 240 standard). At 6 months, 231 (95·5%) children recovered under OptiMA versus 234 (97·5%) under standard protocol (difference –2·0%, 95%CI: –1·96% to 6·4%). PP analysis was similar. There was no difference in hospitalization (11% OptiMA, 12% standard, P = 0·887) or mortality rates (0·2% both arms). Under OptiMA, weight and MUAC gains in recovered children (N = 465) were greater (median weight gain, 1400g versus 1200g, P< 0·001; median MUAC gain, 14 mm versus 11 mm, P < 0·001) and RUTF consumption (sachets) was lower (median 74 versus 112, P < 0·001). Children with uncomplicated SAM recovered as well under OptiMA as under the DRC standard protocol. Gradual RUTF reduction may allow for increased nutrition program coverage by better allocating available resources. Innocent Foundation (London) European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (Brussels).]]></abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2021-06, Vol.5 (Supplement_2), p.110-110
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8181291
source OUP_牛津大学出版社OA刊
subjects Community and Public Health Nutrition
title Optimising Malnutrition Treatment – OptiMA-DRC: Recovery of Severely Wasted Children 6–59 Months in a Randomised Control Trial in Democratic Republic of Congo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A41%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimising%20Malnutrition%20Treatment%20%E2%80%93%20OptiMA-DRC:%20Recovery%20of%20Severely%20Wasted%20Children%206%E2%80%9359%20Months%20in%20a%20Randomised%20Control%20Trial%20in%20Democratic%20Republic%20of%20Congo&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Cazes,%20C%C3%A9cile&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=110-110&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzab035_018&rft_els_id=S2475299123106287&rfr_iscdi=true