Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin
Introduction To examine the compatibility of intravitreally injected epidermal growth factor (EGF) and amphiregulin as EGF family member. Methods Four rabbits (age: 4 months; body weight: 2.5 kg) received three intravitreal injections of EGF (100 ng) uniocularly in monthly intervals and underwent oc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International ophthalmology 2021-06, Vol.41 (6), p.2053-2063 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2063 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2053 |
container_title | International ophthalmology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Bikbov, Mukharram M. Khalimov, Timur A. Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc Ragauskas, Symantas Kalesnykas, Giedrius Jonas, Jost B. |
description | Introduction
To examine the compatibility of intravitreally injected epidermal growth factor (EGF) and amphiregulin as EGF family member.
Methods
Four rabbits (age: 4 months; body weight: 2.5 kg) received three intravitreal injections of EGF (100 ng) uniocularly in monthly intervals and underwent ocular photography, tonometry, biometry, and optical coherence tomography. After sacrificing the rabbits, the globes were histomorphometrically examined. In a second study part, eyes of 22 guinea pigs (age: 2–3 weeks) received two intravitreal administrations of amphiregulin (10 ng) or phosphate buffered solution (PBS) in 10-day interval, or were left untouched. Ten days after the second injection, the guinea pigs were sacrificed, the enucleated eyes underwent histological and immune-histological examinations.
Results
The rabbit eyes with EGF injections versus the contralateral untouched eyes did not show significant differences in intraocular pressure (7.5 ± 2.4 mmHg vs. 6.8 ± 2.2 mmHg;
P
= 0.66), retinal thickness (158 ± 5 µm vs. 158 ± 3 µm;
P
= 1.0), cell counts in the retinal ganglion cell layer (3.3 ± 1.7 cells/150 µm vs. 3.0 ± 1.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), inner nuclear layer (46.4 ± 23.2 cells/150 µm vs. 39.6 ± 6.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.61), and outer nuclear layer (215 ± 108 cells/150 µm vs. 202 ± 47 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), or any apoptotic retinal cells. The guinea pig eyes injected with amphiregulin versus eyes with PBS injections did not differ (
P
= 0.72) in the degree of microglial activation, and both groups did not differ from untouched eyes in number of apoptotic retinal cells and retinal gliosis.
Conclusions
Intravitreal applications of EGF (100 ng) in rabbits nor intravitreal applications of amphiregulin (10 ng) in guinea pigs led to intraocular specific inflammation or any observed intraocular destructive effect. The findings support the notion of a compatibility of intraocular applied EGF and amphiregulin. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8172503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2536114817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-51c7949759cbc3df906094b06e16375517bdba44fa9541cc2ac1f405bb5975023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS0EotvCP8ABReLCJTDjT3xBQisoSJXgAGfLcZxdV04c7KSr_e9x2VI-DpzmML_3Zp4eIc8QXiGAel0QlKYtUGwBlcT28IBsUCjWUsngIdkAStEKBXhGzku5BgCttHxMzhhTyKjgG_Jlm8bZLqELMSzHJg1NmJZsb8KSvY3x2Nh5jsH3jZ9D7_NoY7PL6bDsm8G6JeXGTn1jx3kfst-tMUxPyKPBxuKf3s0L8u3D-6_bj-3V58tP23dXreOKL61ApzTXSmjXOdYPGiRo3oH0KJkSAlXXd5bzwWrB0TlqHQ4cRNeJKgLKLsjbk--8dqPvnb99O5o5h9Hmo0k2mL83U9ibXboxb1BRAawavLwzyOn76stixlCcj9FOPq3FVAiplPVURV_8g16nNU81XqWYROTVtFL0RLmcSsl-uH8GwdwWZk6FmVqY-VmYOVTR8z9j3Et-NVQBdgJKXU07n3_f_o_tD-Ovopc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536114817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bikbov, Mukharram M. ; Khalimov, Timur A. ; Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc ; Ragauskas, Symantas ; Kalesnykas, Giedrius ; Jonas, Jost B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bikbov, Mukharram M. ; Khalimov, Timur A. ; Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc ; Ragauskas, Symantas ; Kalesnykas, Giedrius ; Jonas, Jost B.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
To examine the compatibility of intravitreally injected epidermal growth factor (EGF) and amphiregulin as EGF family member.
Methods
Four rabbits (age: 4 months; body weight: 2.5 kg) received three intravitreal injections of EGF (100 ng) uniocularly in monthly intervals and underwent ocular photography, tonometry, biometry, and optical coherence tomography. After sacrificing the rabbits, the globes were histomorphometrically examined. In a second study part, eyes of 22 guinea pigs (age: 2–3 weeks) received two intravitreal administrations of amphiregulin (10 ng) or phosphate buffered solution (PBS) in 10-day interval, or were left untouched. Ten days after the second injection, the guinea pigs were sacrificed, the enucleated eyes underwent histological and immune-histological examinations.
Results
The rabbit eyes with EGF injections versus the contralateral untouched eyes did not show significant differences in intraocular pressure (7.5 ± 2.4 mmHg vs. 6.8 ± 2.2 mmHg;
P
= 0.66), retinal thickness (158 ± 5 µm vs. 158 ± 3 µm;
P
= 1.0), cell counts in the retinal ganglion cell layer (3.3 ± 1.7 cells/150 µm vs. 3.0 ± 1.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), inner nuclear layer (46.4 ± 23.2 cells/150 µm vs. 39.6 ± 6.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.61), and outer nuclear layer (215 ± 108 cells/150 µm vs. 202 ± 47 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), or any apoptotic retinal cells. The guinea pig eyes injected with amphiregulin versus eyes with PBS injections did not differ (
P
= 0.72) in the degree of microglial activation, and both groups did not differ from untouched eyes in number of apoptotic retinal cells and retinal gliosis.
Conclusions
Intravitreal applications of EGF (100 ng) in rabbits nor intravitreal applications of amphiregulin (10 ng) in guinea pigs led to intraocular specific inflammation or any observed intraocular destructive effect. The findings support the notion of a compatibility of intraocular applied EGF and amphiregulin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33713254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Amphiregulin ; Apoptosis ; Body weight ; Compatibility ; Epidermal growth factor ; Eye ; Eye (anatomy) ; Gliosis ; Growth factors ; Guinea pigs ; Inflammation ; Intraocular pressure ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Photography ; Rabbits ; Retina ; Retinal cells</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2021-06, Vol.41 (6), p.2053-2063</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-51c7949759cbc3df906094b06e16375517bdba44fa9541cc2ac1f405bb5975023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-51c7949759cbc3df906094b06e16375517bdba44fa9541cc2ac1f405bb5975023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2972-5227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bikbov, Mukharram M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalimov, Timur A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragauskas, Symantas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalesnykas, Giedrius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Jost B.</creatorcontrib><title>Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Introduction
To examine the compatibility of intravitreally injected epidermal growth factor (EGF) and amphiregulin as EGF family member.
Methods
Four rabbits (age: 4 months; body weight: 2.5 kg) received three intravitreal injections of EGF (100 ng) uniocularly in monthly intervals and underwent ocular photography, tonometry, biometry, and optical coherence tomography. After sacrificing the rabbits, the globes were histomorphometrically examined. In a second study part, eyes of 22 guinea pigs (age: 2–3 weeks) received two intravitreal administrations of amphiregulin (10 ng) or phosphate buffered solution (PBS) in 10-day interval, or were left untouched. Ten days after the second injection, the guinea pigs were sacrificed, the enucleated eyes underwent histological and immune-histological examinations.
Results
The rabbit eyes with EGF injections versus the contralateral untouched eyes did not show significant differences in intraocular pressure (7.5 ± 2.4 mmHg vs. 6.8 ± 2.2 mmHg;
P
= 0.66), retinal thickness (158 ± 5 µm vs. 158 ± 3 µm;
P
= 1.0), cell counts in the retinal ganglion cell layer (3.3 ± 1.7 cells/150 µm vs. 3.0 ± 1.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), inner nuclear layer (46.4 ± 23.2 cells/150 µm vs. 39.6 ± 6.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.61), and outer nuclear layer (215 ± 108 cells/150 µm vs. 202 ± 47 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), or any apoptotic retinal cells. The guinea pig eyes injected with amphiregulin versus eyes with PBS injections did not differ (
P
= 0.72) in the degree of microglial activation, and both groups did not differ from untouched eyes in number of apoptotic retinal cells and retinal gliosis.
Conclusions
Intravitreal applications of EGF (100 ng) in rabbits nor intravitreal applications of amphiregulin (10 ng) in guinea pigs led to intraocular specific inflammation or any observed intraocular destructive effect. The findings support the notion of a compatibility of intraocular applied EGF and amphiregulin.</description><subject>Amphiregulin</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Compatibility</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Gliosis</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Guinea pigs</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Retinal cells</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS0EotvCP8ABReLCJTDjT3xBQisoSJXgAGfLcZxdV04c7KSr_e9x2VI-DpzmML_3Zp4eIc8QXiGAel0QlKYtUGwBlcT28IBsUCjWUsngIdkAStEKBXhGzku5BgCttHxMzhhTyKjgG_Jlm8bZLqELMSzHJg1NmJZsb8KSvY3x2Nh5jsH3jZ9D7_NoY7PL6bDsm8G6JeXGTn1jx3kfst-tMUxPyKPBxuKf3s0L8u3D-6_bj-3V58tP23dXreOKL61ApzTXSmjXOdYPGiRo3oH0KJkSAlXXd5bzwWrB0TlqHQ4cRNeJKgLKLsjbk--8dqPvnb99O5o5h9Hmo0k2mL83U9ibXboxb1BRAawavLwzyOn76stixlCcj9FOPq3FVAiplPVURV_8g16nNU81XqWYROTVtFL0RLmcSsl-uH8GwdwWZk6FmVqY-VmYOVTR8z9j3Et-NVQBdgJKXU07n3_f_o_tD-Ovopc</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Bikbov, Mukharram M.</creator><creator>Khalimov, Timur A.</creator><creator>Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc</creator><creator>Ragauskas, Symantas</creator><creator>Kalesnykas, Giedrius</creator><creator>Jonas, Jost B.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-5227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin</title><author>Bikbov, Mukharram M. ; Khalimov, Timur A. ; Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc ; Ragauskas, Symantas ; Kalesnykas, Giedrius ; Jonas, Jost B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-51c7949759cbc3df906094b06e16375517bdba44fa9541cc2ac1f405bb5975023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amphiregulin</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Compatibility</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Gliosis</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Guinea pigs</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Retinal cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bikbov, Mukharram M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalimov, Timur A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragauskas, Symantas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalesnykas, Giedrius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Jost B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bikbov, Mukharram M.</au><au>Khalimov, Timur A.</au><au>Cerrada-Gimenez, Marc</au><au>Ragauskas, Symantas</au><au>Kalesnykas, Giedrius</au><au>Jonas, Jost B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2053</spage><epage>2063</epage><pages>2053-2063</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Introduction
To examine the compatibility of intravitreally injected epidermal growth factor (EGF) and amphiregulin as EGF family member.
Methods
Four rabbits (age: 4 months; body weight: 2.5 kg) received three intravitreal injections of EGF (100 ng) uniocularly in monthly intervals and underwent ocular photography, tonometry, biometry, and optical coherence tomography. After sacrificing the rabbits, the globes were histomorphometrically examined. In a second study part, eyes of 22 guinea pigs (age: 2–3 weeks) received two intravitreal administrations of amphiregulin (10 ng) or phosphate buffered solution (PBS) in 10-day interval, or were left untouched. Ten days after the second injection, the guinea pigs were sacrificed, the enucleated eyes underwent histological and immune-histological examinations.
Results
The rabbit eyes with EGF injections versus the contralateral untouched eyes did not show significant differences in intraocular pressure (7.5 ± 2.4 mmHg vs. 6.8 ± 2.2 mmHg;
P
= 0.66), retinal thickness (158 ± 5 µm vs. 158 ± 3 µm;
P
= 1.0), cell counts in the retinal ganglion cell layer (3.3 ± 1.7 cells/150 µm vs. 3.0 ± 1.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), inner nuclear layer (46.4 ± 23.2 cells/150 µm vs. 39.6 ± 6.4 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.61), and outer nuclear layer (215 ± 108 cells/150 µm vs. 202 ± 47 cells/150 µm;
P
= 0.83), or any apoptotic retinal cells. The guinea pig eyes injected with amphiregulin versus eyes with PBS injections did not differ (
P
= 0.72) in the degree of microglial activation, and both groups did not differ from untouched eyes in number of apoptotic retinal cells and retinal gliosis.
Conclusions
Intravitreal applications of EGF (100 ng) in rabbits nor intravitreal applications of amphiregulin (10 ng) in guinea pigs led to intraocular specific inflammation or any observed intraocular destructive effect. The findings support the notion of a compatibility of intraocular applied EGF and amphiregulin.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33713254</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-5227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5701 |
ispartof | International ophthalmology, 2021-06, Vol.41 (6), p.2053-2063 |
issn | 0165-5701 1573-2630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8172503 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Amphiregulin Apoptosis Body weight Compatibility Epidermal growth factor Eye Eye (anatomy) Gliosis Growth factors Guinea pigs Inflammation Intraocular pressure Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmology Original Paper Photography Rabbits Retina Retinal cells |
title | Compatibility of intravitreally applied epidermal growth factor and amphiregulin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compatibility%20of%20intravitreally%20applied%20epidermal%20growth%20factor%20and%20amphiregulin&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Bikbov,%20Mukharram%20M.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2053&rft.epage=2063&rft.pages=2053-2063&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-021-01761-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2536114817%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536114817&rft_id=info:pmid/33713254&rfr_iscdi=true |