Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy
Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy. Methods A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2021-05, Vol.22 (5), p.6-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Liu, Ruirui Sun, Baozhou Zhang, Tiezhi Williamson, Jeffery F. O’Sullivan, Joseph A. Zhao, Tianyu |
description | Purpose
The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy.
Methods
A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated.
Results
Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions.
Conclusion
The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.13179 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8130244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711100404</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711100404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5159-92317feaedc9934c4581b0f0a0b20f33d57872c607da24020425c3b163dde8123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxsbV68Q8wJF6aJrvlAbMzXEw2a9WmNV70TFjmzZZmBkZgava_l3VqUz0YDpDHj-99j4-QN8CWwBi_MHbgSxBQq2fkBCq-WigF8vmT8zF5mdIdYwCNaF6QYyFqVTeSnZDrDyG5AXN0lrphNDbT0NFo_A7p5C3GbJzPe-o8HU1K7h5psiZnjM7v6BhDDp7mW4xm3L8iR53pE75-2E_J94-X3zafFzdfP11t1jcLW0GlFooXqx0abK1SQlpZNbBlHTNsy1knRFvVTc3titWt4ZJxJnllxRZWom2xAS5OyftZd5y2Q1FBn6Pp9RjdYOJeB-P03zfe3epduNcNCMalLAJnDwIx_JgwZT24ZLHvjccwJc0r1hRTwA-93v2D3oUp-jJeoXj5QlWDKtRypnamR-18F0pfW1aLg7PBY-dKfV0DlMAkOzg4nx_YGFKK2D26B6YPoepDqPp3qAV--3TeR_RPigWAGfhZ2uz_I6XXmy98Fv0FRlyriQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528409719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Ruirui ; Sun, Baozhou ; Zhang, Tiezhi ; Williamson, Jeffery F. ; O’Sullivan, Joseph A. ; Zhao, Tianyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruirui ; Sun, Baozhou ; Zhang, Tiezhi ; Williamson, Jeffery F. ; O’Sullivan, Joseph A. ; Zhao, Tianyu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy.
Methods
A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated.
Results
Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions.
Conclusion
The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33797840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain cancer ; Calibration ; Cancer therapies ; Comparative analysis ; dose calculation ; Dosimetry ; Lung cancer ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; passive scatter proton therapy ; Patients ; Planning ; Prostate cancer ; proton range uncertainty ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; retrospective study</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-05, Vol.22 (5), p.6-14</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5159-92317feaedc9934c4581b0f0a0b20f33d57872c607da24020425c3b163dde8123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5159-92317feaedc9934c4581b0f0a0b20f33d57872c607da24020425c3b163dde8123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5314-8477 ; 0000-0001-7828-1031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130244/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130244/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,1412,11543,27905,27906,45555,45556,46033,46457,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33797840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Baozhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tiezhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Jeffery F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Tianyu</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose
The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy.
Methods
A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated.
Results
Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions.
Conclusion
The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams.</description><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>dose calculation</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>passive scatter proton therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>proton range uncertainty</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>retrospective study</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxsbV68Q8wJF6aJrvlAbMzXEw2a9WmNV70TFjmzZZmBkZgava_l3VqUz0YDpDHj-99j4-QN8CWwBi_MHbgSxBQq2fkBCq-WigF8vmT8zF5mdIdYwCNaF6QYyFqVTeSnZDrDyG5AXN0lrphNDbT0NFo_A7p5C3GbJzPe-o8HU1K7h5psiZnjM7v6BhDDp7mW4xm3L8iR53pE75-2E_J94-X3zafFzdfP11t1jcLW0GlFooXqx0abK1SQlpZNbBlHTNsy1knRFvVTc3titWt4ZJxJnllxRZWom2xAS5OyftZd5y2Q1FBn6Pp9RjdYOJeB-P03zfe3epduNcNCMalLAJnDwIx_JgwZT24ZLHvjccwJc0r1hRTwA-93v2D3oUp-jJeoXj5QlWDKtRypnamR-18F0pfW1aLg7PBY-dKfV0DlMAkOzg4nx_YGFKK2D26B6YPoepDqPp3qAV--3TeR_RPigWAGfhZ2uz_I6XXmy98Fv0FRlyriQ</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Liu, Ruirui</creator><creator>Sun, Baozhou</creator><creator>Zhang, Tiezhi</creator><creator>Williamson, Jeffery F.</creator><creator>O’Sullivan, Joseph A.</creator><creator>Zhao, Tianyu</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-8477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-1031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy</title><author>Liu, Ruirui ; Sun, Baozhou ; Zhang, Tiezhi ; Williamson, Jeffery F. ; O’Sullivan, Joseph A. ; Zhao, Tianyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5159-92317feaedc9934c4581b0f0a0b20f33d57872c607da24020425c3b163dde8123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>dose calculation</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>passive scatter proton therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>proton range uncertainty</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>retrospective study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Baozhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tiezhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Jeffery F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Tianyu</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ruirui</au><au>Sun, Baozhou</au><au>Zhang, Tiezhi</au><au>Williamson, Jeffery F.</au><au>O’Sullivan, Joseph A.</au><au>Zhao, Tianyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>6-14</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy.
Methods
A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated.
Results
Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions.
Conclusion
The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33797840</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.13179</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-8477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-1031</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-05, Vol.22 (5), p.6-14 |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8130244 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Brain cancer Calibration Cancer therapies Comparative analysis dose calculation Dosimetry Lung cancer Medical research Medicine, Experimental passive scatter proton therapy Patients Planning Prostate cancer proton range uncertainty Radiation Oncology Physics Radiation therapy retrospective study |
title | Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20impact%20of%20range%20uncertainty%20in%20passive%20scattering%20proton%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Liu,%20Ruirui&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=6-14&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.13179&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA711100404%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528409719&rft_id=info:pmid/33797840&rft_galeid=A711100404&rfr_iscdi=true |