Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Fractal dimension (FD) calculated on oral radiographs has been proposed as a useful tool to screen for osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly aimed at assessing the reliability of FD measures in distinguishing osteoporotic patients (OP) from healthy controls (HC), and secondl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Osteoporosis international 2021-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1041-1052 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1052 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1041 |
container_title | Osteoporosis international |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Franciotti, R. Moharrami, M. Quaranta, A. Bizzoca, M. E. Piattelli, A. Aprile, G. Perrotti, V. |
description | Fractal dimension (FD) calculated on oral radiographs has been proposed as a useful tool to screen for osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly aimed at assessing the reliability of FD measures in distinguishing osteoporotic patients (OP) from healthy controls (HC), and secondly, to identify a standardized procedure of FD calculation in dental radiographs for the possible use as a surrogate measure of osteoporosis. A comprehensive search was conducted up to September 2020 using PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Meta-analysis was performed on FD values calculated for HC and OP. Overall, 293 articles were identified. After a three steps screening, 19 studies were included in the qualitative appraisal and 12 were considered for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was generally low. Most of the studies included used White and Rudolph and box counting to process the images and to calculate FD, respectively. Overall, 51% of the studies found a meaningful difference between HC and OP groups. Meta-analyses showed that to date, FD measures on dental radiographs are not able to distinguish the OP from HC group significantly. From the current evidence, the use of FD for the identification of OP is not reliable, and no clear conclusion can be drawn due to the heterogeneity of studies. The present review revealed the need for further studies and provided the fundamentals to design them in order to find a standardized procedure for FD calculation (regions for FD assessment; images processing technique; methods for FD measurement). More effort should be made to identify osteoporosis using dental images which are cheap and routinely taken during periodic dental examinations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8128830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528314089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-36ee1741c7c5d074a1c58aa1d71553358ec8114b13758584415c4046625009293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtrHDEQhEVIiDdO_kAOQeCLL0rUeow0PhiMyQsMucSQm5A1PWstM6O1NGuz_z5arx9JDjkJ1F-XqlSEvAf-ETg3nwrn0FrGBTCurRZMviALUFIy0Tb6JVnwVhrWKvh1QN6UsuJ1qW3Na3IgpQZQqlmQ1WVBmnraZx9mP1A_-WFbYqFxoh1Ou6s4-iUW2qdMU5kxrVNOO6LDGcMc03RCPS3bOhr9HAPNeBvxrip1dMTZs0fJt-RV74eC7x7OQ3L55fPP82_s4sfX7-dnFywoo2YmG0QwCoIJuuNGeQjaeg-dAa2rcYvBVvNXIE0NbZUCHRRXTSM0561o5SE53euuN1cjdqGmyH5w61yD5K1LPrq_J1O8dst06ywIayWvAscPAjndbLDMbowl4DD4CdOmOKGstGDNPXr0D7pKm1wDV0oLK0Fxu3Mk9lSoP1cy9k9mgLtdlW5fpatVuvsqnaxLH_6M8bTy2F0F5B4odTQtMT-__R_Z36YnqcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528314089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Franciotti, R. ; Moharrami, M. ; Quaranta, A. ; Bizzoca, M. E. ; Piattelli, A. ; Aprile, G. ; Perrotti, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Franciotti, R. ; Moharrami, M. ; Quaranta, A. ; Bizzoca, M. E. ; Piattelli, A. ; Aprile, G. ; Perrotti, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Fractal dimension (FD) calculated on oral radiographs has been proposed as a useful tool to screen for osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly aimed at assessing the reliability of FD measures in distinguishing osteoporotic patients (OP) from healthy controls (HC), and secondly, to identify a standardized procedure of FD calculation in dental radiographs for the possible use as a surrogate measure of osteoporosis. A comprehensive search was conducted up to September 2020 using PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Meta-analysis was performed on FD values calculated for HC and OP. Overall, 293 articles were identified. After a three steps screening, 19 studies were included in the qualitative appraisal and 12 were considered for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was generally low. Most of the studies included used White and Rudolph and box counting to process the images and to calculate FD, respectively. Overall, 51% of the studies found a meaningful difference between HC and OP groups. Meta-analyses showed that to date, FD measures on dental radiographs are not able to distinguish the OP from HC group significantly. From the current evidence, the use of FD for the identification of OP is not reliable, and no clear conclusion can be drawn due to the heterogeneity of studies. The present review revealed the need for further studies and provided the fundamentals to design them in order to find a standardized procedure for FD calculation (regions for FD assessment; images processing technique; methods for FD measurement). More effort should be made to identify osteoporosis using dental images which are cheap and routinely taken during periodic dental examinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33511446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Endocrinology ; Fractals ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Orthopedics ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Rheumatology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2021-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1041-1052</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-36ee1741c7c5d074a1c58aa1d71553358ec8114b13758584415c4046625009293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-36ee1741c7c5d074a1c58aa1d71553358ec8114b13758584415c4046625009293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6722-6499 ; 0000-0002-6246-8130 ; 0000-0002-8819-1061 ; 0000-0003-2007-4077 ; 0000-0002-4225-9374 ; 0000-0002-4364-7969 ; 0000-0001-7652-1660</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franciotti, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moharrami, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaranta, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzoca, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piattelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aprile, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotti, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Fractal dimension (FD) calculated on oral radiographs has been proposed as a useful tool to screen for osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly aimed at assessing the reliability of FD measures in distinguishing osteoporotic patients (OP) from healthy controls (HC), and secondly, to identify a standardized procedure of FD calculation in dental radiographs for the possible use as a surrogate measure of osteoporosis. A comprehensive search was conducted up to September 2020 using PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Meta-analysis was performed on FD values calculated for HC and OP. Overall, 293 articles were identified. After a three steps screening, 19 studies were included in the qualitative appraisal and 12 were considered for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was generally low. Most of the studies included used White and Rudolph and box counting to process the images and to calculate FD, respectively. Overall, 51% of the studies found a meaningful difference between HC and OP groups. Meta-analyses showed that to date, FD measures on dental radiographs are not able to distinguish the OP from HC group significantly. From the current evidence, the use of FD for the identification of OP is not reliable, and no clear conclusion can be drawn due to the heterogeneity of studies. The present review revealed the need for further studies and provided the fundamentals to design them in order to find a standardized procedure for FD calculation (regions for FD assessment; images processing technique; methods for FD measurement). More effort should be made to identify osteoporosis using dental images which are cheap and routinely taken during periodic dental examinations.</description><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtrHDEQhEVIiDdO_kAOQeCLL0rUeow0PhiMyQsMucSQm5A1PWstM6O1NGuz_z5arx9JDjkJ1F-XqlSEvAf-ETg3nwrn0FrGBTCurRZMviALUFIy0Tb6JVnwVhrWKvh1QN6UsuJ1qW3Na3IgpQZQqlmQ1WVBmnraZx9mP1A_-WFbYqFxoh1Ou6s4-iUW2qdMU5kxrVNOO6LDGcMc03RCPS3bOhr9HAPNeBvxrip1dMTZs0fJt-RV74eC7x7OQ3L55fPP82_s4sfX7-dnFywoo2YmG0QwCoIJuuNGeQjaeg-dAa2rcYvBVvNXIE0NbZUCHRRXTSM0561o5SE53euuN1cjdqGmyH5w61yD5K1LPrq_J1O8dst06ywIayWvAscPAjndbLDMbowl4DD4CdOmOKGstGDNPXr0D7pKm1wDV0oLK0Fxu3Mk9lSoP1cy9k9mgLtdlW5fpatVuvsqnaxLH_6M8bTy2F0F5B4odTQtMT-__R_Z36YnqcA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Franciotti, R.</creator><creator>Moharrami, M.</creator><creator>Quaranta, A.</creator><creator>Bizzoca, M. E.</creator><creator>Piattelli, A.</creator><creator>Aprile, G.</creator><creator>Perrotti, V.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-6499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-8130</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-4077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-9374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-7969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-1660</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Franciotti, R. ; Moharrami, M. ; Quaranta, A. ; Bizzoca, M. E. ; Piattelli, A. ; Aprile, G. ; Perrotti, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-36ee1741c7c5d074a1c58aa1d71553358ec8114b13758584415c4046625009293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franciotti, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moharrami, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaranta, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzoca, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piattelli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aprile, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotti, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franciotti, R.</au><au>Moharrami, M.</au><au>Quaranta, A.</au><au>Bizzoca, M. E.</au><au>Piattelli, A.</au><au>Aprile, G.</au><au>Perrotti, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1041</spage><epage>1052</epage><pages>1041-1052</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Fractal dimension (FD) calculated on oral radiographs has been proposed as a useful tool to screen for osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis firstly aimed at assessing the reliability of FD measures in distinguishing osteoporotic patients (OP) from healthy controls (HC), and secondly, to identify a standardized procedure of FD calculation in dental radiographs for the possible use as a surrogate measure of osteoporosis. A comprehensive search was conducted up to September 2020 using PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Meta-analysis was performed on FD values calculated for HC and OP. Overall, 293 articles were identified. After a three steps screening, 19 studies were included in the qualitative appraisal and 12 were considered for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was generally low. Most of the studies included used White and Rudolph and box counting to process the images and to calculate FD, respectively. Overall, 51% of the studies found a meaningful difference between HC and OP groups. Meta-analyses showed that to date, FD measures on dental radiographs are not able to distinguish the OP from HC group significantly. From the current evidence, the use of FD for the identification of OP is not reliable, and no clear conclusion can be drawn due to the heterogeneity of studies. The present review revealed the need for further studies and provided the fundamentals to design them in order to find a standardized procedure for FD calculation (regions for FD assessment; images processing technique; methods for FD measurement). More effort should be made to identify osteoporosis using dental images which are cheap and routinely taken during periodic dental examinations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>33511446</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-6499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-8130</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-4077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-9374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-7969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-1660</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 2021-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1041-1052 |
issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8128830 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Endocrinology Fractals Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Orthopedics Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging Radiography Radiography, Panoramic Reproducibility of Results Review Rheumatology Systematic review |
title | Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A39%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20fractal%20analysis%20in%20dental%20images%20for%20osteoporosis%20detection:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Franciotti,%20R.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1041&rft.epage=1052&rft.pages=1041-1052&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528314089%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528314089&rft_id=info:pmid/33511446&rfr_iscdi=true |