A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response

This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741
Hauptverfasser: Duska, Linda R, Filiaci, Virginia L, Walker, Joan L, Holman, Laura L, Hill, Emily K, Moore, Richard G, Ring, Kari L, Pearl, Michael L, Muller, Carolyn Y, Kushnir, Christina L, Lankes, Heather A, Samuelson, Megan I, Carrick, Kelley S, Rajan, Anand, Rodgers, William H, Kohn, Elise C, Piekarz, Richard, Leslie, Kimberly K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2741
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2734
container_title Clinical cancer research
container_volume 27
creator Duska, Linda R
Filiaci, Virginia L
Walker, Joan L
Holman, Laura L
Hill, Emily K
Moore, Richard G
Ring, Kari L
Pearl, Michael L
Muller, Carolyn Y
Kushnir, Christina L
Lankes, Heather A
Samuelson, Megan I
Carrick, Kelley S
Rajan, Anand
Rodgers, William H
Kohn, Elise C
Piekarz, Richard
Leslie, Kimberly K
description This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response. Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively, = 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone ( = 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation ( < 0.008). This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8127359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506290132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCAfuaR4bCdxLkhLtFCkIlApcLTsZLI1ZO3FdvrnqXhFnG5bwWk8mm--mfGvKF4CPQao5BugjSyp4Oy4685KRktRg3xUHEJVNSVndfU4v-81B8WzGH9SCgKoeFoccN7UtQRxWPxZka9z2NheT-SHdYO_IufB5mR9qadZJ-s25BMOwV_f7ILfYEwYvEOy6jHphOTKpgviw230cyJrl1t8zDViHfmSDdCluJets_0W0619p12PgWg3kO96skMWekf8SN5Zv9XhF4a4ZB1O0zzpQM4w7ryL-Lx4Muop4ou7eFR8e78-707K088fPnar07IXAKlsjDBMsxpabVpac8GpplIYWVE5ci5HyWGE3gjQHMyAoqYo0YyosR1aafhR8Xbvu5vNFoc-XxH0pHbB5u1ulNdW_V9x9kJt_KWSwBpetdng9Z1B8L_n_G9qa2Ofz9EO_RwVq2jNWgqcZWm1l_bBxxhwfBgDVC2w1QJSLSBVhq0YVQvs3Pfq3x0fuu7p8r_tOqs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506290132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</creator><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><description>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response. Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively, = 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone ( = 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation ( &lt; 0.008). This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33766814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Benzamides - administration &amp; dosage ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Disease Management ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration &amp; dosage ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage ; Time-to-Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741</ispartof><rights>2021 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7612-0266 ; 0000-0002-5034-4309 ; 0000-0002-3591-7893 ; 0000-0002-0623-9667 ; 0000-0002-8878-4123 ; 0000-0003-2582-1078 ; 0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33766814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filiaci, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Kari L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushnir, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankes, Heather A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelson, Megan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrick, Kelley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajan, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohn, Elise C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piekarz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response. Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively, = 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone ( = 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation ( &lt; 0.008). This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Benzamides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCAfuaR4bCdxLkhLtFCkIlApcLTsZLI1ZO3FdvrnqXhFnG5bwWk8mm--mfGvKF4CPQao5BugjSyp4Oy4685KRktRg3xUHEJVNSVndfU4v-81B8WzGH9SCgKoeFoccN7UtQRxWPxZka9z2NheT-SHdYO_IufB5mR9qadZJ-s25BMOwV_f7ILfYEwYvEOy6jHphOTKpgviw230cyJrl1t8zDViHfmSDdCluJets_0W0619p12PgWg3kO96skMWekf8SN5Zv9XhF4a4ZB1O0zzpQM4w7ryL-Lx4Muop4ou7eFR8e78-707K088fPnar07IXAKlsjDBMsxpabVpac8GpplIYWVE5ci5HyWGE3gjQHMyAoqYo0YyosR1aafhR8Xbvu5vNFoc-XxH0pHbB5u1ulNdW_V9x9kJt_KWSwBpetdng9Z1B8L_n_G9qa2Ofz9EO_RwVq2jNWgqcZWm1l_bBxxhwfBgDVC2w1QJSLSBVhq0YVQvs3Pfq3x0fuu7p8r_tOqs0</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Duska, Linda R</creator><creator>Filiaci, Virginia L</creator><creator>Walker, Joan L</creator><creator>Holman, Laura L</creator><creator>Hill, Emily K</creator><creator>Moore, Richard G</creator><creator>Ring, Kari L</creator><creator>Pearl, Michael L</creator><creator>Muller, Carolyn Y</creator><creator>Kushnir, Christina L</creator><creator>Lankes, Heather A</creator><creator>Samuelson, Megan I</creator><creator>Carrick, Kelley S</creator><creator>Rajan, Anand</creator><creator>Rodgers, William H</creator><creator>Kohn, Elise C</creator><creator>Piekarz, Richard</creator><creator>Leslie, Kimberly K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-0266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-4309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-7893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-9667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-4123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-1078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><author>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Benzamides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filiaci, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Kari L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushnir, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankes, Heather A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelson, Megan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrick, Kelley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajan, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohn, Elise C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piekarz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duska, Linda R</au><au>Filiaci, Virginia L</au><au>Walker, Joan L</au><au>Holman, Laura L</au><au>Hill, Emily K</au><au>Moore, Richard G</au><au>Ring, Kari L</au><au>Pearl, Michael L</au><au>Muller, Carolyn Y</au><au>Kushnir, Christina L</au><au>Lankes, Heather A</au><au>Samuelson, Megan I</au><au>Carrick, Kelley S</au><au>Rajan, Anand</au><au>Rodgers, William H</au><au>Kohn, Elise C</au><au>Piekarz, Richard</au><au>Leslie, Kimberly K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2734</spage><epage>2741</epage><pages>2734-2741</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response. Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively, = 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone ( = 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation ( &lt; 0.008). This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33766814</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-0266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-4309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-7893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-9667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-4123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-1078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0432
ispartof Clinical cancer research, 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741
issn 1078-0432
1557-3265
1557-3265
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8127359
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Benzamides - administration & dosage
Clinical Decision-Making
Disease Management
Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis
Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology
Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy - methods
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration & dosage
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Pyridines - administration & dosage
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
title A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T02%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Surgical%20Window%20Trial%20Evaluating%20Medroxyprogesterone%20Acetate%20with%20or%20without%20Entinostat%20in%20Patients%20with%20Endometrial%20Cancer%20and%20Validation%20of%20Biomarkers%20of%20Cellular%20Response&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Duska,%20Linda%20R&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2734&rft.epage=2741&rft.pages=2734-2741&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2506290132%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506290132&rft_id=info:pmid/33766814&rfr_iscdi=true