A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response
This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2741 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2734 |
container_title | Clinical cancer research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Duska, Linda R Filiaci, Virginia L Walker, Joan L Holman, Laura L Hill, Emily K Moore, Richard G Ring, Kari L Pearl, Michael L Muller, Carolyn Y Kushnir, Christina L Lankes, Heather A Samuelson, Megan I Carrick, Kelley S Rajan, Anand Rodgers, William H Kohn, Elise C Piekarz, Richard Leslie, Kimberly K |
description | This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response.
Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively,
= 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone (
= 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation (
< 0.008).
This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8127359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506290132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCAfuaR4bCdxLkhLtFCkIlApcLTsZLI1ZO3FdvrnqXhFnG5bwWk8mm--mfGvKF4CPQao5BugjSyp4Oy4685KRktRg3xUHEJVNSVndfU4v-81B8WzGH9SCgKoeFoccN7UtQRxWPxZka9z2NheT-SHdYO_IufB5mR9qadZJ-s25BMOwV_f7ILfYEwYvEOy6jHphOTKpgviw230cyJrl1t8zDViHfmSDdCluJets_0W0619p12PgWg3kO96skMWekf8SN5Zv9XhF4a4ZB1O0zzpQM4w7ryL-Lx4Muop4ou7eFR8e78-707K088fPnar07IXAKlsjDBMsxpabVpac8GpplIYWVE5ci5HyWGE3gjQHMyAoqYo0YyosR1aafhR8Xbvu5vNFoc-XxH0pHbB5u1ulNdW_V9x9kJt_KWSwBpetdng9Z1B8L_n_G9qa2Ofz9EO_RwVq2jNWgqcZWm1l_bBxxhwfBgDVC2w1QJSLSBVhq0YVQvs3Pfq3x0fuu7p8r_tOqs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506290132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</creator><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><description>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response.
Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively,
= 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone (
= 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation (
< 0.008).
This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33766814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Benzamides - administration & dosage ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Disease Management ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration & dosage ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Pyridines - administration & dosage ; Time-to-Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741</ispartof><rights>2021 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7612-0266 ; 0000-0002-5034-4309 ; 0000-0002-3591-7893 ; 0000-0002-0623-9667 ; 0000-0002-8878-4123 ; 0000-0003-2582-1078 ; 0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33766814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filiaci, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Kari L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushnir, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankes, Heather A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelson, Megan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrick, Kelley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajan, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohn, Elise C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piekarz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response.
Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively,
= 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone (
= 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation (
< 0.008).
This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Benzamides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pyridines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCAfuaR4bCdxLkhLtFCkIlApcLTsZLI1ZO3FdvrnqXhFnG5bwWk8mm--mfGvKF4CPQao5BugjSyp4Oy4685KRktRg3xUHEJVNSVndfU4v-81B8WzGH9SCgKoeFoccN7UtQRxWPxZka9z2NheT-SHdYO_IufB5mR9qadZJ-s25BMOwV_f7ILfYEwYvEOy6jHphOTKpgviw230cyJrl1t8zDViHfmSDdCluJets_0W0619p12PgWg3kO96skMWekf8SN5Zv9XhF4a4ZB1O0zzpQM4w7ryL-Lx4Muop4ou7eFR8e78-707K088fPnar07IXAKlsjDBMsxpabVpac8GpplIYWVE5ci5HyWGE3gjQHMyAoqYo0YyosR1aafhR8Xbvu5vNFoc-XxH0pHbB5u1ulNdW_V9x9kJt_KWSwBpetdng9Z1B8L_n_G9qa2Ofz9EO_RwVq2jNWgqcZWm1l_bBxxhwfBgDVC2w1QJSLSBVhq0YVQvs3Pfq3x0fuu7p8r_tOqs0</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Duska, Linda R</creator><creator>Filiaci, Virginia L</creator><creator>Walker, Joan L</creator><creator>Holman, Laura L</creator><creator>Hill, Emily K</creator><creator>Moore, Richard G</creator><creator>Ring, Kari L</creator><creator>Pearl, Michael L</creator><creator>Muller, Carolyn Y</creator><creator>Kushnir, Christina L</creator><creator>Lankes, Heather A</creator><creator>Samuelson, Megan I</creator><creator>Carrick, Kelley S</creator><creator>Rajan, Anand</creator><creator>Rodgers, William H</creator><creator>Kohn, Elise C</creator><creator>Piekarz, Richard</creator><creator>Leslie, Kimberly K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-0266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-4309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-7893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-9667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-4123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-1078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</title><author>Duska, Linda R ; Filiaci, Virginia L ; Walker, Joan L ; Holman, Laura L ; Hill, Emily K ; Moore, Richard G ; Ring, Kari L ; Pearl, Michael L ; Muller, Carolyn Y ; Kushnir, Christina L ; Lankes, Heather A ; Samuelson, Megan I ; Carrick, Kelley S ; Rajan, Anand ; Rodgers, William H ; Kohn, Elise C ; Piekarz, Richard ; Leslie, Kimberly K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7b4b2a2619ab9063430a084b8508f338f831f1cb41a31bde460e8ebfeae9d98b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Benzamides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pyridines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duska, Linda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filiaci, Virginia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Kari L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushnir, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankes, Heather A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuelson, Megan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrick, Kelley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajan, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohn, Elise C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piekarz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duska, Linda R</au><au>Filiaci, Virginia L</au><au>Walker, Joan L</au><au>Holman, Laura L</au><au>Hill, Emily K</au><au>Moore, Richard G</au><au>Ring, Kari L</au><au>Pearl, Michael L</au><au>Muller, Carolyn Y</au><au>Kushnir, Christina L</au><au>Lankes, Heather A</au><au>Samuelson, Megan I</au><au>Carrick, Kelley S</au><au>Rajan, Anand</au><au>Rodgers, William H</au><au>Kohn, Elise C</au><au>Piekarz, Richard</au><au>Leslie, Kimberly K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2734</spage><epage>2741</epage><pages>2734-2741</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>This surgical window of opportunity (window) study assessed the short-term effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone versus MPA plus the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat on regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) in women with newly diagnosed endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
This multisite, randomized, open-label surgical window study treated women intramuscularly on day 1 with 400 mg MPA. Entinostat given 5 mg by mouth on days 1, 8, and 15 was randomly assigned with equal probability. Surgery followed on days 21-24. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue was assessed for PR H-scores, Ki-67 levels, and histologic response.
Fifty patients were accrued in 4 months; 22 and 20 participants had PR evaluable pretreatment and posttreatment slides in the MPA and MPA/entinostat arms, respectively. Median posttreatment PR H-scores were significantly lower than pretreatment H-scores in both arms but did not differ significantly (MPA: 247 vs. 27, MPA/entinostat 260 vs. 23, respectively,
= 0.87). Decreased Ki-67 was shown in 90% treated with MPA/entinostat compared with 68% treated with MPA alone (
= 0.13). Median PR H-score decreases were larger when Ki-67 was decreased (208) versus not decreased (45). The decrease in PR pretreatment versus posttreatment was associated with loss of Ki-67 nuclear staining, consistent with reduced cellular proliferation (
< 0.008).
This surgical window trial rapidly accrued in a multisite setting and evaluated PR as its primary endpoint and Ki-67 as secondary endpoint. Despite no immediate effect of entinostat on PR in this short-term study, lessons learned can inform future window and treatment trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33766814</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-0266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-4309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-7893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-9667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-4123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-1078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-5217</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0432 |
ispartof | Clinical cancer research, 2021-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2734-2741 |
issn | 1078-0432 1557-3265 1557-3265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8127359 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - adverse effects Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Benzamides - administration & dosage Clinical Decision-Making Disease Management Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis Endometrial Neoplasms - etiology Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy Female Humans Hysterectomy - methods Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - administration & dosage Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - adverse effects Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - therapeutic use Middle Aged Pyridines - administration & dosage Time-to-Treatment Treatment Outcome |
title | A Surgical Window Trial Evaluating Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with or without Entinostat in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and Validation of Biomarkers of Cellular Response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T02%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Surgical%20Window%20Trial%20Evaluating%20Medroxyprogesterone%20Acetate%20with%20or%20without%20Entinostat%20in%20Patients%20with%20Endometrial%20Cancer%20and%20Validation%20of%20Biomarkers%20of%20Cellular%20Response&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Duska,%20Linda%20R&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2734&rft.epage=2741&rft.pages=2734-2741&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2506290132%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506290132&rft_id=info:pmid/33766814&rfr_iscdi=true |