Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study

This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2021-01, Vol.59 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Plebani, Mario, Parčina, Marijo, Bechri, Issam, Zehender, Gianguglielmo, Terkeš, Vedrana, Abdel Hafith, Balqis, Antinori, Spinello, Pillet, Sylvie, Gonzalo, Sylvie, Hoerauf, Achim, Lai, Alessia, Morović, Miro, Bourlet, Thomas, Torre, Alessandro, Pozzetto, Bruno, Galli, Massimo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 59
creator Plebani, Mario
Parčina, Marijo
Bechri, Issam
Zehender, Gianguglielmo
Terkeš, Vedrana
Abdel Hafith, Balqis
Antinori, Spinello
Pillet, Sylvie
Gonzalo, Sylvie
Hoerauf, Achim
Lai, Alessia
Morović, Miro
Bourlet, Thomas
Torre, Alessandro
Pozzetto, Bruno
Galli, Massimo
description This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.02240-20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8111158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463104051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v0zAYhy0EYmVw44x8BGnZ_JkPDpOqrIygVUXNmLhZbxMn9dTEwU6Q-s_wt-KuY4IDvrwHP3rejx9Cbyk5p5SlF1_y5TlhTJCIkWdoRkmWRnFMvj9HM0IyGVHKkxP0yvt7QqgQUr5EJ5wzmmYZmaFfX7VrrOugrzS2DR63Gueru-KKZuVivSoHrWtctMuLor3GaxhMjW-1H88w9Ljouqm31dbZDkbbOhi2psJz72GPg_PBdWWg7a03_iAv5-syyu1dxHDRN7oaje0_YsDLaTeaSvejdngxOTvoYC_Hqd6_Ri8a2Hn95rGeom-fFrf55-hmdV3k85sIuEjHaEM2caZ1FQtJM6gFrzTUwCUhPAGeCA5CimTDmBQxZyJL6hQaCnGSMs5TKvkpujx6h2nT6fowi4OdGpzpwO2VBaP-_enNVrX2p0ppeDINgvePAmd_TOFCqjO-0rsd9NpOXrHQmBJBJA3o2RGtnPXe6eapDSXqEKkKkaqHSBUjAf9wxMF3TN3byfXhEv9j3_29xpP4T978N0nwqFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463104051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo</creator><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo ; Tang, Yi-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02240-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33218990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antigens, Viral - immunology ; Chromatography, Affinity ; COVID-19 - blood ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - pathology ; COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ; Europe ; Humans ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoassays ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Kinetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - immunology ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.59 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Plebani et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Plebani et al. 2021 Plebani et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.02240-20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JCM.02240-20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3186,27922,27923,52749,52750,52751,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33218990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parčina, Marijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechri, Issam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkeš, Vedrana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antinori, Spinello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillet, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoerauf, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morović, Miro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlet, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzetto, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Chromatography, Affinity</subject><subject>COVID-19 - blood</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - pathology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v0zAYhy0EYmVw44x8BGnZ_JkPDpOqrIygVUXNmLhZbxMn9dTEwU6Q-s_wt-KuY4IDvrwHP3rejx9Cbyk5p5SlF1_y5TlhTJCIkWdoRkmWRnFMvj9HM0IyGVHKkxP0yvt7QqgQUr5EJ5wzmmYZmaFfX7VrrOugrzS2DR63Gueru-KKZuVivSoHrWtctMuLor3GaxhMjW-1H88w9Ljouqm31dbZDkbbOhi2psJz72GPg_PBdWWg7a03_iAv5-syyu1dxHDRN7oaje0_YsDLaTeaSvejdngxOTvoYC_Hqd6_Ri8a2Hn95rGeom-fFrf55-hmdV3k85sIuEjHaEM2caZ1FQtJM6gFrzTUwCUhPAGeCA5CimTDmBQxZyJL6hQaCnGSMs5TKvkpujx6h2nT6fowi4OdGpzpwO2VBaP-_enNVrX2p0ppeDINgvePAmd_TOFCqjO-0rsd9NpOXrHQmBJBJA3o2RGtnPXe6eapDSXqEKkKkaqHSBUjAf9wxMF3TN3byfXhEv9j3_29xpP4T978N0nwqFk</recordid><startdate>20210121</startdate><enddate>20210121</enddate><creator>Plebani, Mario</creator><creator>Parčina, Marijo</creator><creator>Bechri, Issam</creator><creator>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creator><creator>Terkeš, Vedrana</creator><creator>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creator><creator>Antinori, Spinello</creator><creator>Pillet, Sylvie</creator><creator>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creator><creator>Hoerauf, Achim</creator><creator>Lai, Alessia</creator><creator>Morović, Miro</creator><creator>Bourlet, Thomas</creator><creator>Torre, Alessandro</creator><creator>Pozzetto, Bruno</creator><creator>Galli, Massimo</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210121</creationdate><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><author>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Chromatography, Affinity</topic><topic>COVID-19 - blood</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - pathology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parčina, Marijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechri, Issam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkeš, Vedrana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antinori, Spinello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillet, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoerauf, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morović, Miro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlet, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzetto, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plebani, Mario</au><au>Parčina, Marijo</au><au>Bechri, Issam</au><au>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</au><au>Terkeš, Vedrana</au><au>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</au><au>Antinori, Spinello</au><au>Pillet, Sylvie</au><au>Gonzalo, Sylvie</au><au>Hoerauf, Achim</au><au>Lai, Alessia</au><au>Morović, Miro</au><au>Bourlet, Thomas</au><au>Torre, Alessandro</au><au>Pozzetto, Bruno</au><au>Galli, Massimo</au><au>Tang, Yi-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-01-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33218990</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.02240-20</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.59 (2)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8111158
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antigens, Viral - immunology
Chromatography, Affinity
COVID-19 - blood
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - pathology
COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods
Europe
Humans
Immunoassay - methods
Immunoassays
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Kinetics
SARS-CoV-2 - immunology
SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
title Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20COVID19SEROSpeed%20IgM/IgG%20Rapid%20Test,%20an%20Immunochromatographic%20Assay%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20SARS-CoV-2%20Infection:%20a%20Multicenter%20European%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Plebani,%20Mario&rft.date=2021-01-21&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.02240-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2463104051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463104051&rft_id=info:pmid/33218990&rfr_iscdi=true