Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study
This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2021-01, Vol.59 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Plebani, Mario Parčina, Marijo Bechri, Issam Zehender, Gianguglielmo Terkeš, Vedrana Abdel Hafith, Balqis Antinori, Spinello Pillet, Sylvie Gonzalo, Sylvie Hoerauf, Achim Lai, Alessia Morović, Miro Bourlet, Thomas Torre, Alessandro Pozzetto, Bruno Galli, Massimo |
description | This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.02240-20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8111158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463104051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v0zAYhy0EYmVw44x8BGnZ_JkPDpOqrIygVUXNmLhZbxMn9dTEwU6Q-s_wt-KuY4IDvrwHP3rejx9Cbyk5p5SlF1_y5TlhTJCIkWdoRkmWRnFMvj9HM0IyGVHKkxP0yvt7QqgQUr5EJ5wzmmYZmaFfX7VrrOugrzS2DR63Gueru-KKZuVivSoHrWtctMuLor3GaxhMjW-1H88w9Ljouqm31dbZDkbbOhi2psJz72GPg_PBdWWg7a03_iAv5-syyu1dxHDRN7oaje0_YsDLaTeaSvejdngxOTvoYC_Hqd6_Ri8a2Hn95rGeom-fFrf55-hmdV3k85sIuEjHaEM2caZ1FQtJM6gFrzTUwCUhPAGeCA5CimTDmBQxZyJL6hQaCnGSMs5TKvkpujx6h2nT6fowi4OdGpzpwO2VBaP-_enNVrX2p0ppeDINgvePAmd_TOFCqjO-0rsd9NpOXrHQmBJBJA3o2RGtnPXe6eapDSXqEKkKkaqHSBUjAf9wxMF3TN3byfXhEv9j3_29xpP4T978N0nwqFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463104051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo</creator><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo ; Tang, Yi-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02240-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33218990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antigens, Viral - immunology ; Chromatography, Affinity ; COVID-19 - blood ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - pathology ; COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ; Europe ; Humans ; Immunoassay - methods ; Immunoassays ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Kinetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - immunology ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.59 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Plebani et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Plebani et al. 2021 Plebani et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.02240-20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JCM.02240-20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3186,27922,27923,52749,52750,52751,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33218990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tang, Yi-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parčina, Marijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechri, Issam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkeš, Vedrana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antinori, Spinello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillet, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoerauf, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morović, Miro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlet, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzetto, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Chromatography, Affinity</subject><subject>COVID-19 - blood</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - pathology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v0zAYhy0EYmVw44x8BGnZ_JkPDpOqrIygVUXNmLhZbxMn9dTEwU6Q-s_wt-KuY4IDvrwHP3rejx9Cbyk5p5SlF1_y5TlhTJCIkWdoRkmWRnFMvj9HM0IyGVHKkxP0yvt7QqgQUr5EJ5wzmmYZmaFfX7VrrOugrzS2DR63Gueru-KKZuVivSoHrWtctMuLor3GaxhMjW-1H88w9Ljouqm31dbZDkbbOhi2psJz72GPg_PBdWWg7a03_iAv5-syyu1dxHDRN7oaje0_YsDLaTeaSvejdngxOTvoYC_Hqd6_Ri8a2Hn95rGeom-fFrf55-hmdV3k85sIuEjHaEM2caZ1FQtJM6gFrzTUwCUhPAGeCA5CimTDmBQxZyJL6hQaCnGSMs5TKvkpujx6h2nT6fowi4OdGpzpwO2VBaP-_enNVrX2p0ppeDINgvePAmd_TOFCqjO-0rsd9NpOXrHQmBJBJA3o2RGtnPXe6eapDSXqEKkKkaqHSBUjAf9wxMF3TN3byfXhEv9j3_29xpP4T978N0nwqFk</recordid><startdate>20210121</startdate><enddate>20210121</enddate><creator>Plebani, Mario</creator><creator>Parčina, Marijo</creator><creator>Bechri, Issam</creator><creator>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creator><creator>Terkeš, Vedrana</creator><creator>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creator><creator>Antinori, Spinello</creator><creator>Pillet, Sylvie</creator><creator>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creator><creator>Hoerauf, Achim</creator><creator>Lai, Alessia</creator><creator>Morović, Miro</creator><creator>Bourlet, Thomas</creator><creator>Torre, Alessandro</creator><creator>Pozzetto, Bruno</creator><creator>Galli, Massimo</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210121</creationdate><title>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</title><author>Plebani, Mario ; Parčina, Marijo ; Bechri, Issam ; Zehender, Gianguglielmo ; Terkeš, Vedrana ; Abdel Hafith, Balqis ; Antinori, Spinello ; Pillet, Sylvie ; Gonzalo, Sylvie ; Hoerauf, Achim ; Lai, Alessia ; Morović, Miro ; Bourlet, Thomas ; Torre, Alessandro ; Pozzetto, Bruno ; Galli, Massimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-b0b69eec64519ad43ceada350037a3743a4547b2254632497d8af1a6782338153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Chromatography, Affinity</topic><topic>COVID-19 - blood</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - pathology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plebani, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parčina, Marijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechri, Issam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkeš, Vedrana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antinori, Spinello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillet, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoerauf, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morović, Miro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourlet, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzetto, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plebani, Mario</au><au>Parčina, Marijo</au><au>Bechri, Issam</au><au>Zehender, Gianguglielmo</au><au>Terkeš, Vedrana</au><au>Abdel Hafith, Balqis</au><au>Antinori, Spinello</au><au>Pillet, Sylvie</au><au>Gonzalo, Sylvie</au><au>Hoerauf, Achim</au><au>Lai, Alessia</au><au>Morović, Miro</au><au>Bourlet, Thomas</au><au>Torre, Alessandro</au><au>Pozzetto, Bruno</au><au>Galli, Massimo</au><au>Tang, Yi-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-01-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the new COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG rapid test (BioSpeedia, a spinoff of the Pasteur Institute of Paris) for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison to other commercial antibody assays through a large cross-European investigation. The clinical specificity was assessed on 215 prepandemic sera (including some from patients with viral infections or autoimmune disorders). The clinical sensitivity was evaluated on 710 sera from 564 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and whose antibody response was compared to that measured by five other commercial tests. The kinetics of the antibody response were also analyzed in seven symptomatic patients. The specificity of the test (BioS) on prepandemic specimens was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.2% to 99.4%). When tested on the 710 pandemic specimens, BioS showed an overall clinical sensitivity of 86.0% (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.89), with good concordance with the Euroimmun assay (overall concordance of 0.91; Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.62). Due in part to simultaneous detection of IgM and IgG for both S1 and N proteins, BioS exhibited the highest positive percent agreement at ≥11 days post-symptom onset (PSO). In conclusion, the BioS IgM/IgG rapid test was highly specific and demonstrated a higher positive percentage of agreement than all the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay/chemiluminescence immunoassay (ELISA/CLIA) commercial tests considered in this study. Moreover, by detecting the presence of antibodies prior to 11 days PSO in 78.2% of the patients, the BioS test increased the efficiency of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early stages of the disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33218990</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.02240-20</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-8467</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.59 (2) |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8111158 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibodies, Viral - blood Antigens, Viral - immunology Chromatography, Affinity COVID-19 - blood COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 - pathology COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods Europe Humans Immunoassay - methods Immunoassays Immunoglobulin G - blood Immunoglobulin M - blood Kinetics SARS-CoV-2 - immunology SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors |
title | Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20COVID19SEROSpeed%20IgM/IgG%20Rapid%20Test,%20an%20Immunochromatographic%20Assay%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20SARS-CoV-2%20Infection:%20a%20Multicenter%20European%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Plebani,%20Mario&rft.date=2021-01-21&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.02240-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2463104051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463104051&rft_id=info:pmid/33218990&rfr_iscdi=true |