Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Understanding whether states’ breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density’s masking effect, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.685-695
Hauptverfasser: Kressin, Nancy R., Battaglia, Tracy A., Wormwood, Jolie B., Slanetz, Priscilla J., Gunn, Christine M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 695
container_issue 5
container_start_page 685
container_title Journal of the American College of Radiology
container_volume 18
creator Kressin, Nancy R.
Battaglia, Tracy A.
Wormwood, Jolie B.
Slanetz, Priscilla J.
Gunn, Christine M.
description Understanding whether states’ breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density’s masking effect, and association with increased breast cancer risk by state legislation status and women’s sociodemographic characteristics. Cross-sectional observational population-based telephone survey of women aged >40 years who underwent mammography within prior 2 years, had no history of breast cancer, and had heard the term “breast density.” Among 2,306 women, 57% received personal breast density information. Multivariate regression models adjusted for covariates indicated that women in notification states were 1.5 times more likely to receive density information, and older Black and Asian women of lower income and lower health literacy were less likely. Overall, only 39% of women discussed density with providers; women in notification states were 1.75 times as likely. Older and Asian women were less likely to have spoken with providers; women with high literacy or prior biopsy were more likely. State legislation status was not associated with differences in density knowledge, but Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy had less knowledge regarding density’s masking effects; older women were more knowledgeable. Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy were more likely, and middle-aged women less likely, to recognize increased breast cancer risk. Some positive effects were observed, but sociodemographic disparities suggest tailoring of future breast density communications for specific populations of women to ensure equitable understanding.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8106616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144020313478</els_id><sourcerecordid>2473415766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b3da3bb54378fabe07b61fcd1140c30c63fe72a40d408a80558399cbed513fa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxi3UCijlBThUPvaywWN7_wQhpDRtoVIElQKCm-X1zjaONuvU9lJx62vwejwJuwQQvfRk6_M333jmR8gBsBEwyA6Xo6U2fsQZ7wUYMeBbZBfStEiEHN-8G-4yS0BKtkM-hLBkjOd5UWyTHSFEWuSc7xL7FduA9ItHHSI9d9HW1uhoXUtn-k94-HtPJyE4YzfatY0LetFF41YYqG1pXCC9mtOfbt01T5YjOqFT70JI5mgGQTd0Hrvq7iN5X-sm4P7zuUeuvn-7nJ4ls4vTH9PJLDEyTWNSikqLskylyItal8jyMoPaVACSGcFMJmrMuZaskqzQBevHFeOxKbFKQdRaij1yssldd-UKK4Nt9LpRa29X2t8pp63696W1C_XL3aoCWJZB1gd8fg7w7neHIaqVDQabRrfouqC4zIWENM8GK99YzTCxx_q1DTA1MFJLNTBSAyMFoHpGfdGntx98LXmB0huONwbs13Rr0atgLLYGK-v7narK2f_lPwLw_qV_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473415766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kressin, Nancy R. ; Battaglia, Tracy A. ; Wormwood, Jolie B. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Gunn, Christine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kressin, Nancy R. ; Battaglia, Tracy A. ; Wormwood, Jolie B. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Gunn, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding whether states’ breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density’s masking effect, and association with increased breast cancer risk by state legislation status and women’s sociodemographic characteristics. Cross-sectional observational population-based telephone survey of women aged &gt;40 years who underwent mammography within prior 2 years, had no history of breast cancer, and had heard the term “breast density.” Among 2,306 women, 57% received personal breast density information. Multivariate regression models adjusted for covariates indicated that women in notification states were 1.5 times more likely to receive density information, and older Black and Asian women of lower income and lower health literacy were less likely. Overall, only 39% of women discussed density with providers; women in notification states were 1.75 times as likely. Older and Asian women were less likely to have spoken with providers; women with high literacy or prior biopsy were more likely. State legislation status was not associated with differences in density knowledge, but Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy had less knowledge regarding density’s masking effects; older women were more knowledgeable. Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy were more likely, and middle-aged women less likely, to recognize increased breast cancer risk. Some positive effects were observed, but sociodemographic disparities suggest tailoring of future breast density communications for specific populations of women to ensure equitable understanding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33358722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Breast cancer screening ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; dense breast notifications ; disparities ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography ; Middle Aged ; survey study</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.685-695</ispartof><rights>2020 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b3da3bb54378fabe07b61fcd1140c30c63fe72a40d408a80558399cbed513fa43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b3da3bb54378fabe07b61fcd1140c30c63fe72a40d408a80558399cbed513fa43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144020313478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33358722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kressin, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Tracy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wormwood, Jolie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Understanding whether states’ breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density’s masking effect, and association with increased breast cancer risk by state legislation status and women’s sociodemographic characteristics. Cross-sectional observational population-based telephone survey of women aged &gt;40 years who underwent mammography within prior 2 years, had no history of breast cancer, and had heard the term “breast density.” Among 2,306 women, 57% received personal breast density information. Multivariate regression models adjusted for covariates indicated that women in notification states were 1.5 times more likely to receive density information, and older Black and Asian women of lower income and lower health literacy were less likely. Overall, only 39% of women discussed density with providers; women in notification states were 1.75 times as likely. Older and Asian women were less likely to have spoken with providers; women with high literacy or prior biopsy were more likely. State legislation status was not associated with differences in density knowledge, but Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy had less knowledge regarding density’s masking effects; older women were more knowledgeable. Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy were more likely, and middle-aged women less likely, to recognize increased breast cancer risk. Some positive effects were observed, but sociodemographic disparities suggest tailoring of future breast density communications for specific populations of women to ensure equitable understanding.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer screening</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>dense breast notifications</subject><subject>disparities</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>survey study</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxi3UCijlBThUPvaywWN7_wQhpDRtoVIElQKCm-X1zjaONuvU9lJx62vwejwJuwQQvfRk6_M333jmR8gBsBEwyA6Xo6U2fsQZ7wUYMeBbZBfStEiEHN-8G-4yS0BKtkM-hLBkjOd5UWyTHSFEWuSc7xL7FduA9ItHHSI9d9HW1uhoXUtn-k94-HtPJyE4YzfatY0LetFF41YYqG1pXCC9mtOfbt01T5YjOqFT70JI5mgGQTd0Hrvq7iN5X-sm4P7zuUeuvn-7nJ4ls4vTH9PJLDEyTWNSikqLskylyItal8jyMoPaVACSGcFMJmrMuZaskqzQBevHFeOxKbFKQdRaij1yssldd-UKK4Nt9LpRa29X2t8pp63696W1C_XL3aoCWJZB1gd8fg7w7neHIaqVDQabRrfouqC4zIWENM8GK99YzTCxx_q1DTA1MFJLNTBSAyMFoHpGfdGntx98LXmB0huONwbs13Rr0atgLLYGK-v7narK2f_lPwLw_qV_</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kressin, Nancy R.</creator><creator>Battaglia, Tracy A.</creator><creator>Wormwood, Jolie B.</creator><creator>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creator><creator>Gunn, Christine M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><author>Kressin, Nancy R. ; Battaglia, Tracy A. ; Wormwood, Jolie B. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Gunn, Christine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b3da3bb54378fabe07b61fcd1140c30c63fe72a40d408a80558399cbed513fa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer screening</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>dense breast notifications</topic><topic>disparities</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>survey study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kressin, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Tracy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wormwood, Jolie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kressin, Nancy R.</au><au>Battaglia, Tracy A.</au><au>Wormwood, Jolie B.</au><au>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</au><au>Gunn, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>685-695</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Understanding whether states’ breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density’s masking effect, and association with increased breast cancer risk by state legislation status and women’s sociodemographic characteristics. Cross-sectional observational population-based telephone survey of women aged &gt;40 years who underwent mammography within prior 2 years, had no history of breast cancer, and had heard the term “breast density.” Among 2,306 women, 57% received personal breast density information. Multivariate regression models adjusted for covariates indicated that women in notification states were 1.5 times more likely to receive density information, and older Black and Asian women of lower income and lower health literacy were less likely. Overall, only 39% of women discussed density with providers; women in notification states were 1.75 times as likely. Older and Asian women were less likely to have spoken with providers; women with high literacy or prior biopsy were more likely. State legislation status was not associated with differences in density knowledge, but Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy had less knowledge regarding density’s masking effects; older women were more knowledgeable. Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy were more likely, and middle-aged women less likely, to recognize increased breast cancer risk. Some positive effects were observed, but sociodemographic disparities suggest tailoring of future breast density communications for specific populations of women to ensure equitable understanding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33358722</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1546-1440
ispartof Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.685-695
issn 1546-1440
1558-349X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8106616
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Breast cancer screening
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
dense breast notifications
disparities
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Mammography
Middle Aged
survey study
title Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T13%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dense%20Breast%20Notification%20Laws%E2%80%99%20Association%20With%20Outcomes%20in%20the%20US%20Population:%20A%20Cross-Sectional%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Kressin,%20Nancy%20R.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=685-695&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473415766%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473415766&rft_id=info:pmid/33358722&rft_els_id=S1546144020313478&rfr_iscdi=true