274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot performance and carcass traits between two implant programs in heifers harvested at 3 different days on feed (DOF; 179, 200, or 221 d). Crossbred beef heifers (n = 3,084; 291 + 3.9 kg) were used in a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_1), p.130-131
Hauptverfasser: Nuttelman, Brandon L, Hutcheson, John P, Nichols, Wade T, Streeter, Marshall N, Crawford, Grant I, Walter, Lee-Anne J, Renter, David G, Amrine, David, Depenbusch, Brandon, Wells, Tyler
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 99
creator Nuttelman, Brandon L
Hutcheson, John P
Nichols, Wade T
Streeter, Marshall N
Crawford, Grant I
Walter, Lee-Anne J
Renter, David G
Amrine, David
Depenbusch, Brandon
Wells, Tyler
description Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot performance and carcass traits between two implant programs in heifers harvested at 3 different days on feed (DOF; 179, 200, or 221 d). Crossbred beef heifers (n = 3,084; 291 + 3.9 kg) were used in a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design. Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2) was administered on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2) 94 d before harvest (IH/200) or Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated) was administered on arrival (XH). No implant × DOF interaction was detected (P ≥ 0.09) for any parameter. Heifers subjected to IH/200 had greater (P ≤ 0.01) final BW, ADG (P < 0.01) and G:F (P = 0.01). As DOF increased, BW increased (P ≤ 0.01) while ADG (P
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skab054.219
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8104607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab054.219</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2658796749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2459-c139b5913a49b61d9cca0f19fc74405cf2d02abaeaf5c296a7aa89907d4a3a573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMoOK6evRZ4k-2dJJ10dy6CjDu7woKL6DlUp5PpjNPJmPQs7v_xh5rZGQRPnipUvvdewSPkLaNXjKp6ucW8zD-wp1JccaaekQWTXFY1a-rnZEEpZ1XXMf6SvMp5SynjUskF-c1bAdfOWTNniA6-2gfcxQR-XKbTs-KUlnXlp_0Owwz3KW4STlCgM1z9GiEGuLfJxTRhMBYwDLDCZDBnWI2Y0Mw2-Tx785Sy9sHn0YcN3FrvbMqwtgMUNbBWXUJJvDz6c87gEz7m1-SFw122b87zgnxfX39b3VZ3X24-rz7eVYYLqSrDatVLxWoUqm_YoIxB6phyphWCSuP4QDn2aNFJw1WDLWKnFG0HgTXKtr4gH06--0M_2cHYMCfc6X3yE6ZHHdHrf3-CH_UmPuiOUdHQo8G7s0GKPw82z3obDymUmzVvZNeqphWqUMsTZVLMOVn3N4FRfexSly71uUtduiyK9ydFPOz_C_8B3ZehlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658796749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nuttelman, Brandon L ; Hutcheson, John P ; Nichols, Wade T ; Streeter, Marshall N ; Crawford, Grant I ; Walter, Lee-Anne J ; Renter, David G ; Amrine, David ; Depenbusch, Brandon ; Wells, Tyler</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuttelman, Brandon L ; Hutcheson, John P ; Nichols, Wade T ; Streeter, Marshall N ; Crawford, Grant I ; Walter, Lee-Anne J ; Renter, David G ; Amrine, David ; Depenbusch, Brandon ; Wells, Tyler</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot performance and carcass traits between two implant programs in heifers harvested at 3 different days on feed (DOF; 179, 200, or 221 d). Crossbred beef heifers (n = 3,084; 291 + 3.9 kg) were used in a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design. Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2) was administered on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2) 94 d before harvest (IH/200) or Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated) was administered on arrival (XH). No implant × DOF interaction was detected (P ≥ 0.09) for any parameter. Heifers subjected to IH/200 had greater (P ≤ 0.01) final BW, ADG (P &lt; 0.01) and G:F (P = 0.01). As DOF increased, BW increased (P ≤ 0.01) while ADG (P&lt;0.01) and G:F (P ≤ 0.01) decreased. Hot carcass weight was greater (P = 0.01) for IH/200 compared with XH (367 vs. 361 kg, respectively). Heifers receiving XH had greater marbling scores (P = 0.02; 582 vs. 568) and BF (P = 0.01; 1.78 vs 1.70 cm) compared with IH/200 while re-implanted heifers had increased (P = 0.01) REA (86.5 vs. 83.2 cm2). Heifers implanted with XH tended to be fatter than those implanted with IH/200 having a greater (P = 0.01) proportion of USDA Prime and fewer (P&lt;0.01) USDA Select. Increasing DOF increased (P ≤ 0.03) HCW, DP, BF, REA, marbling, and proportion of USDA Prime carcasses. Growth performance and HCW were increased for IH/200 compared with XH heifers. Increasing DOF resulted in poorer ADG and G:F but increased HCW.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab054.219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Carcasses ; Oral Presentations ; Physical growth</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_1), p.130-131</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2459-c139b5913a49b61d9cca0f19fc74405cf2d02abaeaf5c296a7aa89907d4a3a573</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104607/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104607/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1578,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuttelman, Brandon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, Marshall N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Grant I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Lee-Anne J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renter, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrine, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depenbusch, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Tyler</creatorcontrib><title>274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot performance and carcass traits between two implant programs in heifers harvested at 3 different days on feed (DOF; 179, 200, or 221 d). Crossbred beef heifers (n = 3,084; 291 + 3.9 kg) were used in a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design. Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2) was administered on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2) 94 d before harvest (IH/200) or Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated) was administered on arrival (XH). No implant × DOF interaction was detected (P ≥ 0.09) for any parameter. Heifers subjected to IH/200 had greater (P ≤ 0.01) final BW, ADG (P &lt; 0.01) and G:F (P = 0.01). As DOF increased, BW increased (P ≤ 0.01) while ADG (P&lt;0.01) and G:F (P ≤ 0.01) decreased. Hot carcass weight was greater (P = 0.01) for IH/200 compared with XH (367 vs. 361 kg, respectively). Heifers receiving XH had greater marbling scores (P = 0.02; 582 vs. 568) and BF (P = 0.01; 1.78 vs 1.70 cm) compared with IH/200 while re-implanted heifers had increased (P = 0.01) REA (86.5 vs. 83.2 cm2). Heifers implanted with XH tended to be fatter than those implanted with IH/200 having a greater (P = 0.01) proportion of USDA Prime and fewer (P&lt;0.01) USDA Select. Increasing DOF increased (P ≤ 0.03) HCW, DP, BF, REA, marbling, and proportion of USDA Prime carcasses. Growth performance and HCW were increased for IH/200 compared with XH heifers. Increasing DOF resulted in poorer ADG and G:F but increased HCW.</description><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMoOK6evRZ4k-2dJJ10dy6CjDu7woKL6DlUp5PpjNPJmPQs7v_xh5rZGQRPnipUvvdewSPkLaNXjKp6ucW8zD-wp1JccaaekQWTXFY1a-rnZEEpZ1XXMf6SvMp5SynjUskF-c1bAdfOWTNniA6-2gfcxQR-XKbTs-KUlnXlp_0Owwz3KW4STlCgM1z9GiEGuLfJxTRhMBYwDLDCZDBnWI2Y0Mw2-Tx785Sy9sHn0YcN3FrvbMqwtgMUNbBWXUJJvDz6c87gEz7m1-SFw122b87zgnxfX39b3VZ3X24-rz7eVYYLqSrDatVLxWoUqm_YoIxB6phyphWCSuP4QDn2aNFJw1WDLWKnFG0HgTXKtr4gH06--0M_2cHYMCfc6X3yE6ZHHdHrf3-CH_UmPuiOUdHQo8G7s0GKPw82z3obDymUmzVvZNeqphWqUMsTZVLMOVn3N4FRfexSly71uUtduiyK9ydFPOz_C_8B3ZehlA</recordid><startdate>20210507</startdate><enddate>20210507</enddate><creator>Nuttelman, Brandon L</creator><creator>Hutcheson, John P</creator><creator>Nichols, Wade T</creator><creator>Streeter, Marshall N</creator><creator>Crawford, Grant I</creator><creator>Walter, Lee-Anne J</creator><creator>Renter, David G</creator><creator>Amrine, David</creator><creator>Depenbusch, Brandon</creator><creator>Wells, Tyler</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210507</creationdate><title>274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days</title><author>Nuttelman, Brandon L ; Hutcheson, John P ; Nichols, Wade T ; Streeter, Marshall N ; Crawford, Grant I ; Walter, Lee-Anne J ; Renter, David G ; Amrine, David ; Depenbusch, Brandon ; Wells, Tyler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2459-c139b5913a49b61d9cca0f19fc74405cf2d02abaeaf5c296a7aa89907d4a3a573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuttelman, Brandon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, Marshall N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Grant I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Lee-Anne J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renter, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrine, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depenbusch, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Tyler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuttelman, Brandon L</au><au>Hutcheson, John P</au><au>Nichols, Wade T</au><au>Streeter, Marshall N</au><au>Crawford, Grant I</au><au>Walter, Lee-Anne J</au><au>Renter, David G</au><au>Amrine, David</au><au>Depenbusch, Brandon</au><au>Wells, Tyler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-05-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>130-131</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot performance and carcass traits between two implant programs in heifers harvested at 3 different days on feed (DOF; 179, 200, or 221 d). Crossbred beef heifers (n = 3,084; 291 + 3.9 kg) were used in a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design. Revalor-IH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2) was administered on arrival followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2) 94 d before harvest (IH/200) or Revalor-XH (80 mg TBA and 8 mg E2, uncoated; 120 mg TBA and 12 mg E2, coated) was administered on arrival (XH). No implant × DOF interaction was detected (P ≥ 0.09) for any parameter. Heifers subjected to IH/200 had greater (P ≤ 0.01) final BW, ADG (P &lt; 0.01) and G:F (P = 0.01). As DOF increased, BW increased (P ≤ 0.01) while ADG (P&lt;0.01) and G:F (P ≤ 0.01) decreased. Hot carcass weight was greater (P = 0.01) for IH/200 compared with XH (367 vs. 361 kg, respectively). Heifers receiving XH had greater marbling scores (P = 0.02; 582 vs. 568) and BF (P = 0.01; 1.78 vs 1.70 cm) compared with IH/200 while re-implanted heifers had increased (P = 0.01) REA (86.5 vs. 83.2 cm2). Heifers implanted with XH tended to be fatter than those implanted with IH/200 having a greater (P = 0.01) proportion of USDA Prime and fewer (P&lt;0.01) USDA Select. Increasing DOF increased (P ≤ 0.03) HCW, DP, BF, REA, marbling, and proportion of USDA Prime carcasses. Growth performance and HCW were increased for IH/200 compared with XH heifers. Increasing DOF resulted in poorer ADG and G:F but increased HCW.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab054.219</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2021-05, Vol.99 (Supplement_1), p.130-131
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8104607
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central
subjects Carcasses
Oral Presentations
Physical growth
title 274 Effects of Revalor ih/revalor-200 Re-implant Program or Revalor-xh on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Heifers Fed for 179, 200, or 221 Days
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=274%20Effects%20of%20Revalor%20ih/revalor-200%20Re-implant%20Program%20or%20Revalor-xh%20on%20Performance%20and%20Carcass%20Characteristics%20of%20Finishing%20Heifers%20Fed%20for%20179,%20200,%20or%20221%20Days&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Nuttelman,%20Brandon%20L&rft.date=2021-05-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=130-131&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab054.219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2658796749%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658796749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab054.219&rfr_iscdi=true