Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2021-04, Vol.95 (5) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Khan, Ayesha Pettaway, Cedric Dien Bard, Jennifer Arias, Cesar A Bhatti, Micah M Humphries, Romney M |
description | are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of
infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing
is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for
, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of
Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100
or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for
, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/AAC.02631-20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8092892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487746552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-8ea706a0d01a0d5f6fc8b52ebf95d357a59a85557f36ab50ac8dea8b5170ad233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2Kqiy0t54rH0EidOLEjnOptCzQVgK1EvRsTRKHNSR2sB0k_gK_Gm-XovbQi61nP32jeY-Qjzkc5zmTn5fL1TEwUeQZgzdkkUMtM8FrsUMWAEJkpYRyl-yFcAtJ8xrekd2i4FwyWS3I09kDDjNG4yx1PY1rTX9q3zs_om315ukS7YwDXdpoRtN615ikrubQ6imaxgwmPtJrHaKxN_RSx7XrAkXb0VMT7uiJ13g3OWNjoAlKr6K2Lno3rd3oLAY64hCTShh8T972OAT94eXeJ7_Oz65X37KLH1-_r5YXGZayjJnUWIFA6CBPB-9F38qGM930Ne8KXiGvUXLOq74Q2HDAVnYakyWvADtWFPvky5Y7zc2ou1bb6HFQkzcj-kfl0Kh_f6xZqxv3oCTUTNYsAQ5eAN7dz2l1NZoUxzCg1W4OipWyqkrB-cZ6tLWm4ELwun8dk4Pa1KdSfep3fYpBsh9u7RhGpm7d7G1K4n_eT3-v8Qr-023xDL6kptM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487746552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Khan, Ayesha ; Pettaway, Cedric ; Dien Bard, Jennifer ; Arias, Cesar A ; Bhatti, Micah M ; Humphries, Romney M</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Ayesha ; Pettaway, Cedric ; Dien Bard, Jennifer ; Arias, Cesar A ; Bhatti, Micah M ; Humphries, Romney M</creatorcontrib><description>are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of
infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing
is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for
, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of
Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100
or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for
, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02631-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33558287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Susceptibility</subject><ispartof>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021-04, Vol.95 (5)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology. 2021 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-8ea706a0d01a0d5f6fc8b52ebf95d357a59a85557f36ab50ac8dea8b5170ad233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-8ea706a0d01a0d5f6fc8b52ebf95d357a59a85557f36ab50ac8dea8b5170ad233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6568-156X ; 0000-0002-0489-0712 ; 0000-0003-0524-9473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092892/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092892/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Ayesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettaway, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dien Bard, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatti, Micah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, Romney M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</title><title>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</title><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><description>are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of
infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing
is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for
, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of
Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100
or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for
, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed.</description><subject>Susceptibility</subject><issn>0066-4804</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2Kqiy0t54rH0EidOLEjnOptCzQVgK1EvRsTRKHNSR2sB0k_gK_Gm-XovbQi61nP32jeY-Qjzkc5zmTn5fL1TEwUeQZgzdkkUMtM8FrsUMWAEJkpYRyl-yFcAtJ8xrekd2i4FwyWS3I09kDDjNG4yx1PY1rTX9q3zs_om315ukS7YwDXdpoRtN615ikrubQ6imaxgwmPtJrHaKxN_RSx7XrAkXb0VMT7uiJ13g3OWNjoAlKr6K2Lno3rd3oLAY64hCTShh8T972OAT94eXeJ7_Oz65X37KLH1-_r5YXGZayjJnUWIFA6CBPB-9F38qGM930Ne8KXiGvUXLOq74Q2HDAVnYakyWvADtWFPvky5Y7zc2ou1bb6HFQkzcj-kfl0Kh_f6xZqxv3oCTUTNYsAQ5eAN7dz2l1NZoUxzCg1W4OipWyqkrB-cZ6tLWm4ELwun8dk4Pa1KdSfep3fYpBsh9u7RhGpm7d7G1K4n_eT3-v8Qr-023xDL6kptM</recordid><startdate>20210419</startdate><enddate>20210419</enddate><creator>Khan, Ayesha</creator><creator>Pettaway, Cedric</creator><creator>Dien Bard, Jennifer</creator><creator>Arias, Cesar A</creator><creator>Bhatti, Micah M</creator><creator>Humphries, Romney M</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6568-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-0712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0524-9473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210419</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</title><author>Khan, Ayesha ; Pettaway, Cedric ; Dien Bard, Jennifer ; Arias, Cesar A ; Bhatti, Micah M ; Humphries, Romney M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-8ea706a0d01a0d5f6fc8b52ebf95d357a59a85557f36ab50ac8dea8b5170ad233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Susceptibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Ayesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettaway, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dien Bard, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatti, Micah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphries, Romney M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Ayesha</au><au>Pettaway, Cedric</au><au>Dien Bard, Jennifer</au><au>Arias, Cesar A</au><au>Bhatti, Micah M</au><au>Humphries, Romney M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</atitle><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle><stitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</stitle><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><date>2021-04-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0066-4804</issn><eissn>1098-6596</eissn><abstract>are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of
infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing
is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for
, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of
Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100
or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for
, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33558287</pmid><doi>10.1128/AAC.02631-20</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6568-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-0712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0524-9473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0066-4804 |
ispartof | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021-04, Vol.95 (5) |
issn | 0066-4804 1098-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8092892 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Susceptibility |
title | Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Performance%20of%20Manual%20Antimicrobial%20Susceptibility%20Testing%20Methods%20and%20Disk%20Breakpoints%20for%20Stenotrophomonas%20maltophilia&rft.jtitle=Antimicrobial%20agents%20and%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Khan,%20Ayesha&rft.date=2021-04-19&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0066-4804&rft.eissn=1098-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/AAC.02631-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487746552%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487746552&rft_id=info:pmid/33558287&rfr_iscdi=true |