Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis
Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) requires calculation of aortic valve area (AVA), which relies on the assumption of a circular-shaped left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). However, the LVOT is often elliptical, and the circular assumption underestimates the true LVOT area (LVOTA). Biplane imaging...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2020-04, Vol.33 (4), p.461-468 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) requires calculation of aortic valve area (AVA), which relies on the assumption of a circular-shaped left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). However, the LVOT is often elliptical, and the circular assumption underestimates the true LVOT area (LVOTA). Biplane imaging using transthoracic echocardiography allows direct planimetry of LVOTA. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining LVOTA using this technique and its impact on the discordance between AVA and gradient criteria in AS grading.
We prospectively studied 134 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 73-87 years; 39% women) with AS, including 82 (61%) with severe AS and 52 (39%) with mild or moderate AS. LVOTA was traced using direct planimetry (LVOTA
) and compared with LVOTA calculated using the circular assumption (LVOTA
). In a subset of patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, direct planimetry of LVOTA was used as a reference standard.
LVOTA
was significantly larger than LVOTA
(4.20 cm
[interquartile range, 3.66-4.90 cm
] vs 3.73 cm
[interquartile range, 3.14-4.15 cm
], P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0894-7317 1097-6795 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.echo.2019.12.002 |