Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide

Purpose The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2019-03, Vol.28 (3), p.621-627
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Eric K. H., Edwards, Todd C., Haywood, Kirstie, Mikles, Sean P., Newton, Louise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 627
container_issue 3
container_start_page 621
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 28
creator Chan, Eric K. H.
Edwards, Todd C.
Haywood, Kirstie
Mikles, Sean P.
Newton, Louise
description Purpose The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide. Methods Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL’s CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada ( n  = 2), Denmark ( n  = 1), England ( n  = 2), Holland ( n  = 1), and the United States ( n  = 4). Results Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User’s Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice. Conclusions Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8084633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704929</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-baa5dbd6e87ae4f5c223441bf2a183c3662579ba2f41101c01f3cfcdc799a5f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRS0EYnoaPoAFKBIbNgaX7Tj2Bgm1eIw0EhtYW45TadxK4mAnI_H3uJWheSxYuaQ697qqLiHPgL0Gxpo3GQCEogw05UxqKh-QHdSNoFxJ85DsmFGcGiHFFbnO-cQY04bxx-RKMCm1AdiRw804DzjitITpWM1uCaWkCeeYFuyquC4-jliN6PKaMFdhqvwQpuDdUM3J-SV4fEIe9W7I-PT-3ZOvH95_OXyit58_3hze3VIvDV9o61zdtZ1C3TiUfe05F1JC23MHWnihFK8b0zreSwAGnkEvfO873xjj6r4Re_J2853XdsTOl0mTG-ycwujSDxtdsH93pvDNHuOd1UxLJUQxeHVvkOL3FfNix5A9DoObMK7ZchC1EnVdrronL_9BT3FNU1nvTEnFJAdVKNgon2LOCfvLMMDsOSK7RWRLRPYckZVF8-LPLS6KX5kUgG9ALq3piOn31_9zfb6JTnmJ6WIqdcPK8Y34CVt6pr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2134604216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Chan, Eric K. H. ; Edwards, Todd C. ; Haywood, Kirstie ; Mikles, Sean P. ; Newton, Louise</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eric K. H. ; Edwards, Todd C. ; Haywood, Kirstie ; Mikles, Sean P. ; Newton, Louise</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide. Methods Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL’s CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada ( n  = 2), Denmark ( n  = 1), England ( n  = 2), Holland ( n  = 1), and the United States ( n  = 4). Results Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User’s Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice. Conclusions Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30448911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Canada ; CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Consensus ; Denmark ; England ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Netherlands ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Sociology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2019-03, Vol.28 (3), p.621-627</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018</rights><rights>Quality of Life Research is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-baa5dbd6e87ae4f5c223441bf2a183c3662579ba2f41101c01f3cfcdc799a5f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-baa5dbd6e87ae4f5c223441bf2a183c3662579ba2f41101c01f3cfcdc799a5f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704929$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eric K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Todd C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikles, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Louise</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide. Methods Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL’s CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada ( n  = 2), Denmark ( n  = 1), England ( n  = 2), Holland ( n  = 1), and the United States ( n  = 4). Results Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User’s Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice. Conclusions Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRS0EYnoaPoAFKBIbNgaX7Tj2Bgm1eIw0EhtYW45TadxK4mAnI_H3uJWheSxYuaQ697qqLiHPgL0Gxpo3GQCEogw05UxqKh-QHdSNoFxJ85DsmFGcGiHFFbnO-cQY04bxx-RKMCm1AdiRw804DzjitITpWM1uCaWkCeeYFuyquC4-jliN6PKaMFdhqvwQpuDdUM3J-SV4fEIe9W7I-PT-3ZOvH95_OXyit58_3hze3VIvDV9o61zdtZ1C3TiUfe05F1JC23MHWnihFK8b0zreSwAGnkEvfO873xjj6r4Re_J2853XdsTOl0mTG-ycwujSDxtdsH93pvDNHuOd1UxLJUQxeHVvkOL3FfNix5A9DoObMK7ZchC1EnVdrronL_9BT3FNU1nvTEnFJAdVKNgon2LOCfvLMMDsOSK7RWRLRPYckZVF8-LPLS6KX5kUgG9ALq3piOn31_9zfb6JTnmJ6WIqdcPK8Y34CVt6pr0</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Chan, Eric K. H.</creator><creator>Edwards, Todd C.</creator><creator>Haywood, Kirstie</creator><creator>Mikles, Sean P.</creator><creator>Newton, Louise</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice</title><author>Chan, Eric K. H. ; Edwards, Todd C. ; Haywood, Kirstie ; Mikles, Sean P. ; Newton, Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-baa5dbd6e87ae4f5c223441bf2a183c3662579ba2f41101c01f3cfcdc799a5f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eric K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Todd C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikles, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Louise</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Eric K. H.</au><au>Edwards, Todd C.</au><au>Haywood, Kirstie</au><au>Mikles, Sean P.</au><au>Newton, Louise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>621-627</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice is increasing. Following the creation of a ‘User’s Guide to Implementing PRO Assessment in Clinical Practice’ by the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), volunteers from ISOQOL sought to create a Companion Guide to assist health care providers with the scientific and practical considerations involved in implementing and using PRO measures in clinical care by using information from real-world case studies. This paper summarizes the key issues presented in the Companion Guide. Methods Ten respondents, who were members of the ISOQOL’s CP-SIG and worked in various clinical areas, participated in a survey or telephone interview. Participants were from Canada ( n  = 2), Denmark ( n  = 1), England ( n  = 2), Holland ( n  = 1), and the United States ( n  = 4). Results Based on the information provided by respondents, a Companion Guide was produced, organized according to the nine questions presented in the User’s Guide. An additional section for key take-home messages was also provided. This guide provides examples of issues and considerations related to the implementation of PRO measures in clinical practice. Conclusions Respondents provided insight into their experiences and emphasized that PRO initiatives were likely to be more successful if there is purposeful, designed integration into clinical practice, meaningful substantive engagement with all stakeholders and access to necessary organizational resources. The ability to leverage existing technology as well as realistic and stakeholder consensus-driven expectations for planning and timing were also key to the successful implementation of PRO measures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>30448911</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2019-03, Vol.28 (3), p.621-627
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8084633
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Canada
CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS
Clinical medicine
Clinical outcomes
Consensus
Denmark
England
Guidelines as Topic
Health Personnel
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Netherlands
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Public Health
Quality of Life
Quality of Life Research
Sociology
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20patient-reported%20outcome%20measures%20in%20clinical%20practice:%20a%20companion%20guide%20to%20the%20ISOQOL%20user%E2%80%99s%20guide&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Chan,%20Eric%20K.%20H.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=621-627&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-018-2048-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48704929%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2134604216&rft_id=info:pmid/30448911&rft_jstor_id=48704929&rfr_iscdi=true