Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco
Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of work exposures and health 2021-10, Vol.65 (8), p.998-1003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1003 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 998 |
container_title | Annals of work exposures and health |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Marraha, Farah Al Faker, Ibtissam Charif, Faiza Chahoub, Hanane Benyamna, Youness Rahmani, Najlaa Kabbou, Soukaina Rkiek, Yasmine Najdi, Adil Gallouj, Salim |
description | Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance.
An anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.
In total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).
Our survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/annweh/wxab018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8083207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515689438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5a9c2b7ec96d6a7491944d0cb7cfb7e919b0aa452f6e6c60bad556d181b7ebfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P3DAQtVARIODaY-VjLwE7ThynByS0QEHaFsRHOVqOM2ENib3YzlL49bjaZVVO8_XmvRk9hL5SckBJzQ6VtS8wO3z5qxpCxQbayVktsopR_mWdE7GN9kN4JITQqiwY41tomzFR8ZwWO-jt5slYfA1KR-NswNHhK_DBWdXjK-8ipP4C8OnzaOYD2IjV4OwDPjM-xGxqLODJ5Z-Lk4zW-BxUH2daecD3zj8llh_4GN-MfgGvOIn8dj7OwFv8y3mntdtDm53qA-yv4i66Ozu9nZxn08ufF5PjaaYLKmJWqlrnTQW65i1XVVHTuihaoptKd6mdyoYoVZR5x4FrThrVliVvqaBp2nTAdtHRknc-NgO0On3hVS_n3gzKv0qnjPw8sWYmH9xCCiJYTqpE8H1F4N3zCCHKwQQNfa8suDHIvKQlF3XBRIIeLKHauxA8dGsZSuQ_z-TSM7nyLC18-_-4NfzDIfYOwh6Xow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515689438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marraha, Farah ; Al Faker, Ibtissam ; Charif, Faiza ; Chahoub, Hanane ; Benyamna, Youness ; Rahmani, Najlaa ; Kabbou, Soukaina ; Rkiek, Yasmine ; Najdi, Adil ; Gallouj, Salim</creator><creatorcontrib>Marraha, Farah ; Al Faker, Ibtissam ; Charif, Faiza ; Chahoub, Hanane ; Benyamna, Youness ; Rahmani, Najlaa ; Kabbou, Soukaina ; Rkiek, Yasmine ; Najdi, Adil ; Gallouj, Salim</creatorcontrib><description>Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance.
An anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.
In total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).
Our survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-7308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-7316</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxab018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33876214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Morocco ; Occupational Exposure ; Personal Protective Equipment ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Short Communication ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Annals of work exposures and health, 2021-10, Vol.65 (8), p.998-1003</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5a9c2b7ec96d6a7491944d0cb7cfb7e919b0aa452f6e6c60bad556d181b7ebfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5a9c2b7ec96d6a7491944d0cb7cfb7e919b0aa452f6e6c60bad556d181b7ebfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4465-954X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33876214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marraha, Farah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Faker, Ibtissam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charif, Faiza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahoub, Hanane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamna, Youness</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Najlaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabbou, Soukaina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rkiek, Yasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najdi, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallouj, Salim</creatorcontrib><title>Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco</title><title>Annals of work exposures and health</title><addtitle>Ann Work Expo Health</addtitle><description>Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance.
An anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.
In total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).
Our survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Morocco</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Personal Protective Equipment</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>2398-7308</issn><issn>2398-7316</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1P3DAQtVARIODaY-VjLwE7ThynByS0QEHaFsRHOVqOM2ENib3YzlL49bjaZVVO8_XmvRk9hL5SckBJzQ6VtS8wO3z5qxpCxQbayVktsopR_mWdE7GN9kN4JITQqiwY41tomzFR8ZwWO-jt5slYfA1KR-NswNHhK_DBWdXjK-8ipP4C8OnzaOYD2IjV4OwDPjM-xGxqLODJ5Z-Lk4zW-BxUH2daecD3zj8llh_4GN-MfgGvOIn8dj7OwFv8y3mntdtDm53qA-yv4i66Ozu9nZxn08ufF5PjaaYLKmJWqlrnTQW65i1XVVHTuihaoptKd6mdyoYoVZR5x4FrThrVliVvqaBp2nTAdtHRknc-NgO0On3hVS_n3gzKv0qnjPw8sWYmH9xCCiJYTqpE8H1F4N3zCCHKwQQNfa8suDHIvKQlF3XBRIIeLKHauxA8dGsZSuQ_z-TSM7nyLC18-_-4NfzDIfYOwh6Xow</recordid><startdate>20211009</startdate><enddate>20211009</enddate><creator>Marraha, Farah</creator><creator>Al Faker, Ibtissam</creator><creator>Charif, Faiza</creator><creator>Chahoub, Hanane</creator><creator>Benyamna, Youness</creator><creator>Rahmani, Najlaa</creator><creator>Kabbou, Soukaina</creator><creator>Rkiek, Yasmine</creator><creator>Najdi, Adil</creator><creator>Gallouj, Salim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-954X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211009</creationdate><title>Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco</title><author>Marraha, Farah ; Al Faker, Ibtissam ; Charif, Faiza ; Chahoub, Hanane ; Benyamna, Youness ; Rahmani, Najlaa ; Kabbou, Soukaina ; Rkiek, Yasmine ; Najdi, Adil ; Gallouj, Salim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-5a9c2b7ec96d6a7491944d0cb7cfb7e919b0aa452f6e6c60bad556d181b7ebfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Morocco</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Personal Protective Equipment</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marraha, Farah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Faker, Ibtissam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charif, Faiza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahoub, Hanane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamna, Youness</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Najlaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabbou, Soukaina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rkiek, Yasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najdi, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallouj, Salim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of work exposures and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marraha, Farah</au><au>Al Faker, Ibtissam</au><au>Charif, Faiza</au><au>Chahoub, Hanane</au><au>Benyamna, Youness</au><au>Rahmani, Najlaa</au><au>Kabbou, Soukaina</au><au>Rkiek, Yasmine</au><au>Najdi, Adil</au><au>Gallouj, Salim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco</atitle><jtitle>Annals of work exposures and health</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Work Expo Health</addtitle><date>2021-10-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>998-1003</pages><issn>2398-7308</issn><eissn>2398-7316</eissn><abstract>Health care workers (HCWs) adopted several protective measures, including hand hygiene and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the frequent use of these preventive measures can lead to skin reactions. Our study aimed to determine the frequency of these reactions in Northern Morocco. In addition, we also looked at the risk factors and the consequences of these injuries on work efficiency and performance.
An anonymous online survey was used to collect data, which was sent to 500 health workers in the study region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data on IBM SPSS software.
In total, 273/500 responded to the questionnaire (55%). For the participants' profession, 41% were doctors, 32% were nursing staff, and 26% held other jobs. The general prevalence rate of adverse reactions for all health workers was (80%), including skin problems: after wearing goggles (58%), after wearing surgical masks and respirators (57%), after handwashing and wearing gloves (45%), after wearing a face shield (23%), and after wearing protective clothing (11%). Bleach immersion was highly significantly associated with hand reaction (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.77-4.90; P < 0.001). Moreover, we found a statistically significant association between hand cream use more than twice daily and fewer reactions (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.98-3.77; P = 0.038). The skin reactions related to goggles use were also significantly associated with use duration (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.988-3.12; P = 0.05). Similarly, wearing masks and N95 respirators and their related adverse reactions were significantly associated with use duration (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.20-0.7; P = 0.02). In addition, adverse reactions of regular use of protective clothing were related to the frequency of its use per shift (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.47-8.54; P = 0.05).
Our survey-based study showed that the prevalence of these skin reactions in our context should not be neglected. The length of daily wearing time and the frequency of PPE uses were the most implicated factors. More attention must be paid to these reactions for better care of HCWs during these critical times.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33876214</pmid><doi>10.1093/annweh/wxab018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-954X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2398-7308 |
ispartof | Annals of work exposures and health, 2021-10, Vol.65 (8), p.998-1003 |
issn | 2398-7308 2398-7316 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8083207 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 Health Personnel Humans Morocco Occupational Exposure Personal Protective Equipment SARS-CoV-2 Short Communication Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A32%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skin%20Reactions%20to%20Personal%20Protective%20Equipment%20among%20First-Line%20COVID-19%20Healthcare%20Workers:%20A%20Survey%20in%20Northern%20Morocco&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20work%20exposures%20and%20health&rft.au=Marraha,%20Farah&rft.date=2021-10-09&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=998-1003&rft.issn=2398-7308&rft.eissn=2398-7316&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/annweh/wxab018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2515689438%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515689438&rft_id=info:pmid/33876214&rfr_iscdi=true |