Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence
From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on behavior science 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Perspectives on behavior science |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Eilifsen, Christoffer Arntzen, Erik |
description | From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528435059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EohX0D3BAlbhwCYyXeLkgIcQmgTgAZ8tJpsUodWicVIJfj6GlLAdOY2m-efPGj5A9CkcUQB1HAZKKDBjNAJimGd8gQ5YzyLRRanP9lmZARjE-Q6KAG8n0NhlwboySVA4J3GLlXYfV-BIDtq72b67zTRi7UI3vOz_r6z6Oz-e9X7gaQ4m7ZGvi6oijVd0hjxfnD2dX2c3d5fXZ6U1WCpZ3mYYcZSk4lqyqRCEmRc7URGmluEQ0VDoAwwrglZaFo2hUMldQyllpFJUV3yEnS92XvphhVWLokjv70vqZa19t47z93Qn-yU6bhdWgpGAyCRyuBNpm3mPs7MzHEuvaBWz6aNP_aMFzyE1CD_6gz03fhnSeZRoE5MqYD0G2pMq2ibHFydoMBfuRiV1mYlMm9jMTy9PQ_s8z1iNfCSSAL4GYWmGK7ffuf2TfAWcFld4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2804057996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2520-8969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-8977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33997616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Investigations ; Original Research ; Psychology ; Reflexivity ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on behavior science, 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8471-1058 ; 0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076426/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076426/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><title>Perspectives on behavior science</title><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><description>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>2520-8969</issn><issn>2520-8977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EohX0D3BAlbhwCYyXeLkgIcQmgTgAZ8tJpsUodWicVIJfj6GlLAdOY2m-efPGj5A9CkcUQB1HAZKKDBjNAJimGd8gQ5YzyLRRanP9lmZARjE-Q6KAG8n0NhlwboySVA4J3GLlXYfV-BIDtq72b67zTRi7UI3vOz_r6z6Oz-e9X7gaQ4m7ZGvi6oijVd0hjxfnD2dX2c3d5fXZ6U1WCpZ3mYYcZSk4lqyqRCEmRc7URGmluEQ0VDoAwwrglZaFo2hUMldQyllpFJUV3yEnS92XvphhVWLokjv70vqZa19t47z93Qn-yU6bhdWgpGAyCRyuBNpm3mPs7MzHEuvaBWz6aNP_aMFzyE1CD_6gz03fhnSeZRoE5MqYD0G2pMq2ibHFydoMBfuRiV1mYlMm9jMTy9PQ_s8z1iNfCSSAL4GYWmGK7ffuf2TfAWcFld4</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creator><creator>Arntzen, Erik</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-1058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><author>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on behavior science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eilifsen, Christoffer</au><au>Arntzen, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on behavior science</jtitle><stitle>Perspect Behav Sci</stitle><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>2520-8969</issn><eissn>2520-8977</eissn><abstract>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33997616</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-1058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2520-8969 |
ispartof | Perspectives on behavior science, 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27 |
issn | 2520-8969 2520-8977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076426 |
source | PubMed (Medline); EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Investigations Original Research Psychology Reflexivity Traditions |
title | Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A28%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mediated%20Generalization%20and%20Stimulus%20Equivalence&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20behavior%20science&rft.au=Eilifsen,%20Christoffer&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=2520-8969&rft.eissn=2520-8977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528435059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2804057996&rft_id=info:pmid/33997616&rfr_iscdi=true |