Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence

From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives on behavior science 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27
Hauptverfasser: Eilifsen, Christoffer, Arntzen, Erik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Perspectives on behavior science
container_volume 44
creator Eilifsen, Christoffer
Arntzen, Erik
description From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528435059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EohX0D3BAlbhwCYyXeLkgIcQmgTgAZ8tJpsUodWicVIJfj6GlLAdOY2m-efPGj5A9CkcUQB1HAZKKDBjNAJimGd8gQ5YzyLRRanP9lmZARjE-Q6KAG8n0NhlwboySVA4J3GLlXYfV-BIDtq72b67zTRi7UI3vOz_r6z6Oz-e9X7gaQ4m7ZGvi6oijVd0hjxfnD2dX2c3d5fXZ6U1WCpZ3mYYcZSk4lqyqRCEmRc7URGmluEQ0VDoAwwrglZaFo2hUMldQyllpFJUV3yEnS92XvphhVWLokjv70vqZa19t47z93Qn-yU6bhdWgpGAyCRyuBNpm3mPs7MzHEuvaBWz6aNP_aMFzyE1CD_6gz03fhnSeZRoE5MqYD0G2pMq2ibHFydoMBfuRiV1mYlMm9jMTy9PQ_s8z1iNfCSSAL4GYWmGK7ffuf2TfAWcFld4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2804057996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2520-8969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-8977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33997616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Investigations ; Original Research ; Psychology ; Reflexivity ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on behavior science, 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8471-1058 ; 0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076426/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076426/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><title>Perspectives on behavior science</title><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><description>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>2520-8969</issn><issn>2520-8977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EohX0D3BAlbhwCYyXeLkgIcQmgTgAZ8tJpsUodWicVIJfj6GlLAdOY2m-efPGj5A9CkcUQB1HAZKKDBjNAJimGd8gQ5YzyLRRanP9lmZARjE-Q6KAG8n0NhlwboySVA4J3GLlXYfV-BIDtq72b67zTRi7UI3vOz_r6z6Oz-e9X7gaQ4m7ZGvi6oijVd0hjxfnD2dX2c3d5fXZ6U1WCpZ3mYYcZSk4lqyqRCEmRc7URGmluEQ0VDoAwwrglZaFo2hUMldQyllpFJUV3yEnS92XvphhVWLokjv70vqZa19t47z93Qn-yU6bhdWgpGAyCRyuBNpm3mPs7MzHEuvaBWz6aNP_aMFzyE1CD_6gz03fhnSeZRoE5MqYD0G2pMq2ibHFydoMBfuRiV1mYlMm9jMTy9PQ_s8z1iNfCSSAL4GYWmGK7ffuf2TfAWcFld4</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creator><creator>Arntzen, Erik</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-1058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</title><author>Eilifsen, Christoffer ; Arntzen, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-805e6c43ec2dd4b4fb527f787736ee916a0092b03d86ba1e97039b1132c9716d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eilifsen, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntzen, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on behavior science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eilifsen, Christoffer</au><au>Arntzen, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on behavior science</jtitle><stitle>Perspect Behav Sci</stitle><addtitle>Perspect Behav Sci</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>2520-8969</issn><eissn>2520-8977</eissn><abstract>From the 1930s to the 1970s a large number of experimental studies on mediated generalization were published, and this research tradition provided an important context for early research on stimulus equivalence. Mediated generalization and stimulus equivalence have several characteristics in common, notably that both traditions seek to experimentally investigate derived responding among arbitrarily related stimuli in human participants. Although studies of stimulus equivalence are currently being regularly published, few studies investigate mediated generalization in humans today, and the research tradition is mainly of historical interest. The current article will give an account of the origin, the development, and the demise of research on mediated generalization, including a presentation of publication trends, experimental methodology, and the conceptual context research on mediated generalization took place within. Finally, some thoughts on the demise of mediated generalization and its relevance for modern research on stimulus equivalence and other types of derived responding are presented, including reflections on the observability of explanatory variables and the use of inferential statistics.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33997616</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-1058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-6745</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2520-8969
ispartof Perspectives on behavior science, 2021-03, Vol.44 (1), p.1-27
issn 2520-8969
2520-8977
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076426
source PubMed (Medline); EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Investigations
Original Research
Psychology
Reflexivity
Traditions
title Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A28%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mediated%20Generalization%20and%20Stimulus%20Equivalence&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20behavior%20science&rft.au=Eilifsen,%20Christoffer&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=2520-8969&rft.eissn=2520-8977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528435059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2804057996&rft_id=info:pmid/33997616&rfr_iscdi=true