Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal
Background Half of the offenders convicted of impaired driving in the United States are sentenced to install alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent them from starting their vehicles if they have been drinking. No research has yet explored offenders’ patterns of alcohol consumption...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research clinical and experimental research, 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.743-751 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 751 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 743 |
container_title | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Voas, Robert B. Tippetts, Anthony Scott Romano, Eduardo Nochajski, Thomas H. Manning, Amy R. Taylor, Eileen Scherer, Michael |
description | Background
Half of the offenders convicted of impaired driving in the United States are sentenced to install alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent them from starting their vehicles if they have been drinking. No research has yet explored offenders’ patterns of alcohol consumption and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) from the time before the arrest to the time period after the IID is installed. This study aims to fill that gap in knowledge.
Methods
Using the Timeline Follow‐back interview procedure, we assessed the daily drinking of 153 convicted DUI offenders’ self‐reported total alcohol consumption and rates of self‐reported driving after drinking over 4 phases: before DUI arrest, between arrest and IID installation, during the phase on the interlock, and after the interlock is removed. Because information about behaviors in each period was not available for every participant, comparisons were made using paired‐sample contrasts.
Results
Compared with before the arrest, total alcohol use decreased by 50% in the 4‐month phase following arrest and before IID installation, though it did not change much afterward. The frequency of drinking and driving decreased sharply after the arrest (−82%), with further decrease upon installation of the interlock (−58%, p = 0.05). The frequency of drinking and driving after the IID was removed returned to preinstallation drinking and driving status (+58%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Participants made significant adjustments to their drinking behavior by adhering to the traditional DUI driving restrictions in the postarrest phase. Although installation of an IID was not associated with a significant change in drinking, it further reduced the frequency of drinking and driving. Evaluations of the IID experience should take into account information on an individual's drinking and DUI behaviors not only before the IID was installed, but before the individual was arrested.
For DUI offenders, the impact of being sentenced to an interlock device starts at the time of the arrest, after which a sharp decline in alcohol consumption and in drinking and driving occurs. Once on the interlock, consumption declines only modestly, but driving after drinking falls a further 58%. After the interlock was removed, alcohol use and driving after drinking begin to rebound, but both remain well below prearrest levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acer.14558 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501255047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-7d72bcd4381c0f326bf72d0cf709a026da21ffcc7fddc3aa8af68493a9cae5bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EoqFw4QGQJS4IacvY3rWdC9ISWohUqVJFzpbjtZNtvXaxd4P6Ajw3Dmkj4IAP4_HM518z-hF6TeCMlPNBG5vOSN008gmakYZBBVSIp2gGpVhxAHmCXuR8AwC15Pw5OmFMEOBczNDPxVaHjc24D7j1Jm6jx6tssQ4d_pz6cNuHzeNjt8-vptHEoXy4SHHAn6yLyeI2JZtHXPIjtwqdTXjcWrwMzk82GIvHiFs3lvIylOijucXXdog77V-iZ077bF893KdodXH-bfG1urz6sly0l5Wpaykr0Qm6Nl3NJDHgGOVrJ2gHxgmYa6C805Q4Z4xwXWeY1lI7Lus503OjbbN27BR9POjeTevBdsaGMWmv7lI_6HSvou7V353Qb9Um7pQEwYGLIvDuQSDF71NZWg19NtZ7HWycsqINENo0UO_Rt_-gN3FKoaxXKCIoYzUlhXp_oEyKOSfrjsMQUHt71d5e9dveAr_5c_wj-uhnAcgB-NF7e_8fKdUuzq8Por8AyOuyPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2517233421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Voas, Robert B. ; Tippetts, Anthony Scott ; Romano, Eduardo ; Nochajski, Thomas H. ; Manning, Amy R. ; Taylor, Eileen ; Scherer, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Voas, Robert B. ; Tippetts, Anthony Scott ; Romano, Eduardo ; Nochajski, Thomas H. ; Manning, Amy R. ; Taylor, Eileen ; Scherer, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Half of the offenders convicted of impaired driving in the United States are sentenced to install alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent them from starting their vehicles if they have been drinking. No research has yet explored offenders’ patterns of alcohol consumption and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) from the time before the arrest to the time period after the IID is installed. This study aims to fill that gap in knowledge.
Methods
Using the Timeline Follow‐back interview procedure, we assessed the daily drinking of 153 convicted DUI offenders’ self‐reported total alcohol consumption and rates of self‐reported driving after drinking over 4 phases: before DUI arrest, between arrest and IID installation, during the phase on the interlock, and after the interlock is removed. Because information about behaviors in each period was not available for every participant, comparisons were made using paired‐sample contrasts.
Results
Compared with before the arrest, total alcohol use decreased by 50% in the 4‐month phase following arrest and before IID installation, though it did not change much afterward. The frequency of drinking and driving decreased sharply after the arrest (−82%), with further decrease upon installation of the interlock (−58%, p = 0.05). The frequency of drinking and driving after the IID was removed returned to preinstallation drinking and driving status (+58%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Participants made significant adjustments to their drinking behavior by adhering to the traditional DUI driving restrictions in the postarrest phase. Although installation of an IID was not associated with a significant change in drinking, it further reduced the frequency of drinking and driving. Evaluations of the IID experience should take into account information on an individual's drinking and DUI behaviors not only before the IID was installed, but before the individual was arrested.
For DUI offenders, the impact of being sentenced to an interlock device starts at the time of the arrest, after which a sharp decline in alcohol consumption and in drinking and driving occurs. Once on the interlock, consumption declines only modestly, but driving after drinking falls a further 58%. After the interlock was removed, alcohol use and driving after drinking begin to rebound, but both remain well below prearrest levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-6008</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1530-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acer.14558</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33710667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alcohol Consumption ; Alcohol Drinking - psychology ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholism ; Arrests ; Drinking and Driving ; Drinking behavior ; Driving ability ; Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence ; Driving Under the Influence - psychology ; Drunk driving ; Female ; Habitual offenders ; Health behavior ; Humans ; Ignition Interlocks ; IIDs ; Impaired Driving ; Law Enforcement ; Male ; Recidivism</subject><ispartof>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.743-751</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><rights>2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.</rights><rights>2021 Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-7d72bcd4381c0f326bf72d0cf709a026da21ffcc7fddc3aa8af68493a9cae5bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-7d72bcd4381c0f326bf72d0cf709a026da21ffcc7fddc3aa8af68493a9cae5bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7544-543X ; 0000-0002-2367-2550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facer.14558$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facer.14558$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voas, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tippetts, Anthony Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nochajski, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Amy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal</title><title>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>Background
Half of the offenders convicted of impaired driving in the United States are sentenced to install alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent them from starting their vehicles if they have been drinking. No research has yet explored offenders’ patterns of alcohol consumption and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) from the time before the arrest to the time period after the IID is installed. This study aims to fill that gap in knowledge.
Methods
Using the Timeline Follow‐back interview procedure, we assessed the daily drinking of 153 convicted DUI offenders’ self‐reported total alcohol consumption and rates of self‐reported driving after drinking over 4 phases: before DUI arrest, between arrest and IID installation, during the phase on the interlock, and after the interlock is removed. Because information about behaviors in each period was not available for every participant, comparisons were made using paired‐sample contrasts.
Results
Compared with before the arrest, total alcohol use decreased by 50% in the 4‐month phase following arrest and before IID installation, though it did not change much afterward. The frequency of drinking and driving decreased sharply after the arrest (−82%), with further decrease upon installation of the interlock (−58%, p = 0.05). The frequency of drinking and driving after the IID was removed returned to preinstallation drinking and driving status (+58%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Participants made significant adjustments to their drinking behavior by adhering to the traditional DUI driving restrictions in the postarrest phase. Although installation of an IID was not associated with a significant change in drinking, it further reduced the frequency of drinking and driving. Evaluations of the IID experience should take into account information on an individual's drinking and DUI behaviors not only before the IID was installed, but before the individual was arrested.
For DUI offenders, the impact of being sentenced to an interlock device starts at the time of the arrest, after which a sharp decline in alcohol consumption and in drinking and driving occurs. Once on the interlock, consumption declines only modestly, but driving after drinking falls a further 58%. After the interlock was removed, alcohol use and driving after drinking begin to rebound, but both remain well below prearrest levels.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcohol Consumption</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Arrests</subject><subject>Drinking and Driving</subject><subject>Drinking behavior</subject><subject>Driving ability</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - psychology</subject><subject>Drunk driving</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Habitual offenders</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ignition Interlocks</subject><subject>IIDs</subject><subject>Impaired Driving</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><issn>0145-6008</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EoqFw4QGQJS4IacvY3rWdC9ISWohUqVJFzpbjtZNtvXaxd4P6Ajw3Dmkj4IAP4_HM518z-hF6TeCMlPNBG5vOSN008gmakYZBBVSIp2gGpVhxAHmCXuR8AwC15Pw5OmFMEOBczNDPxVaHjc24D7j1Jm6jx6tssQ4d_pz6cNuHzeNjt8-vptHEoXy4SHHAn6yLyeI2JZtHXPIjtwqdTXjcWrwMzk82GIvHiFs3lvIylOijucXXdog77V-iZ077bF893KdodXH-bfG1urz6sly0l5Wpaykr0Qm6Nl3NJDHgGOVrJ2gHxgmYa6C805Q4Z4xwXWeY1lI7Lus503OjbbN27BR9POjeTevBdsaGMWmv7lI_6HSvou7V353Qb9Um7pQEwYGLIvDuQSDF71NZWg19NtZ7HWycsqINENo0UO_Rt_-gN3FKoaxXKCIoYzUlhXp_oEyKOSfrjsMQUHt71d5e9dveAr_5c_wj-uhnAcgB-NF7e_8fKdUuzq8Por8AyOuyPA</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Voas, Robert B.</creator><creator>Tippetts, Anthony Scott</creator><creator>Romano, Eduardo</creator><creator>Nochajski, Thomas H.</creator><creator>Manning, Amy R.</creator><creator>Taylor, Eileen</creator><creator>Scherer, Michael</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7544-543X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-2550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal</title><author>Voas, Robert B. ; Tippetts, Anthony Scott ; Romano, Eduardo ; Nochajski, Thomas H. ; Manning, Amy R. ; Taylor, Eileen ; Scherer, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-7d72bcd4381c0f326bf72d0cf709a026da21ffcc7fddc3aa8af68493a9cae5bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcohol Consumption</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Arrests</topic><topic>Drinking and Driving</topic><topic>Drinking behavior</topic><topic>Driving ability</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - psychology</topic><topic>Drunk driving</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Habitual offenders</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ignition Interlocks</topic><topic>IIDs</topic><topic>Impaired Driving</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voas, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tippetts, Anthony Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nochajski, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Amy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voas, Robert B.</au><au>Tippetts, Anthony Scott</au><au>Romano, Eduardo</au><au>Nochajski, Thomas H.</au><au>Manning, Amy R.</au><au>Taylor, Eileen</au><au>Scherer, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal</atitle><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>743-751</pages><issn>0145-6008</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><eissn>1530-0277</eissn><abstract>Background
Half of the offenders convicted of impaired driving in the United States are sentenced to install alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent them from starting their vehicles if they have been drinking. No research has yet explored offenders’ patterns of alcohol consumption and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) from the time before the arrest to the time period after the IID is installed. This study aims to fill that gap in knowledge.
Methods
Using the Timeline Follow‐back interview procedure, we assessed the daily drinking of 153 convicted DUI offenders’ self‐reported total alcohol consumption and rates of self‐reported driving after drinking over 4 phases: before DUI arrest, between arrest and IID installation, during the phase on the interlock, and after the interlock is removed. Because information about behaviors in each period was not available for every participant, comparisons were made using paired‐sample contrasts.
Results
Compared with before the arrest, total alcohol use decreased by 50% in the 4‐month phase following arrest and before IID installation, though it did not change much afterward. The frequency of drinking and driving decreased sharply after the arrest (−82%), with further decrease upon installation of the interlock (−58%, p = 0.05). The frequency of drinking and driving after the IID was removed returned to preinstallation drinking and driving status (+58%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Participants made significant adjustments to their drinking behavior by adhering to the traditional DUI driving restrictions in the postarrest phase. Although installation of an IID was not associated with a significant change in drinking, it further reduced the frequency of drinking and driving. Evaluations of the IID experience should take into account information on an individual's drinking and DUI behaviors not only before the IID was installed, but before the individual was arrested.
For DUI offenders, the impact of being sentenced to an interlock device starts at the time of the arrest, after which a sharp decline in alcohol consumption and in drinking and driving occurs. Once on the interlock, consumption declines only modestly, but driving after drinking falls a further 58%. After the interlock was removed, alcohol use and driving after drinking begin to rebound, but both remain well below prearrest levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33710667</pmid><doi>10.1111/acer.14558</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7544-543X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-2550</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-6008 |
ispartof | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.743-751 |
issn | 0145-6008 1530-0277 1530-0277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8076067 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Alcohol Consumption Alcohol Drinking - psychology Alcohol use Alcoholism Arrests Drinking and Driving Drinking behavior Driving ability Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence Driving Under the Influence - psychology Drunk driving Female Habitual offenders Health behavior Humans Ignition Interlocks IIDs Impaired Driving Law Enforcement Male Recidivism |
title | Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Alcohol%20Use%20and%20Drinking%20and%20Driving%20Outcomes%20From%20Before%20Arrest%20for%20Driving%20Under%20the%20Influence%20to%20After%20Interlock%20Removal&rft.jtitle=Alcoholism,%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=Voas,%20Robert%20B.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=743-751&rft.issn=0145-6008&rft.eissn=1530-0277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acer.14558&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2501255047%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2517233421&rft_id=info:pmid/33710667&rfr_iscdi=true |