Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation

The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been tested in different languages and populations; thus, there is a need for a culturally adapted Korean version. We evaluated the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the SOFI among construction workers. The SOFI was translated into K...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-04, Vol.18 (8), p.4302
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Sangeun, Seong, Sojeong, Park, Soyeon, Lim, Jeeyeon, Hong, Soyun, Cho, Youngshin, Kim, Heejung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4302
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator Lee, Sangeun
Seong, Sojeong
Park, Soyeon
Lim, Jeeyeon
Hong, Soyun
Cho, Youngshin
Kim, Heejung
description The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been tested in different languages and populations; thus, there is a need for a culturally adapted Korean version. We evaluated the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the SOFI among construction workers. The SOFI was translated into Korean and reviewed through a back-translation process involving standardized scaling procedures. Its reliability and validity were evaluated with a sample of 193 construction workers using internal consistency, item-subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and content, construct, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total scale and each subscale were satisfactory. Item-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability were both at acceptable levels. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the five-factor model had acceptable model fits corresponding to the structure of the original instrument. However, some modifications were made to improve in the new context from model fit (such as χ (95) = 113.905 ( = 0.091), CFI = 0.994, and RMSEA = 0.033, as well as the lowest AIC = 383.905). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship of SOFI with other fatigue measures in terms of total and subscale scores. Occupational fatigue is one of the important risk factors associated with workers' health and safety at work. The new translated instrument is a reliable and valid tool for assessing fatigue among Korean construction workers. However, this instrument should be tested extensively in other working populations to devise specific interventions concerning fatigue reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18084302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2566041370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-a14e4988902a447fc42bb19b348bfae0d396b9da3ce710145805a2c04277a3dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtP3DAUha2qVXmULUtkqZtuhl7HnsTuohIaAUVFolILLC3HcSaZJnbqx6D5B_zseoAi6MpXOt85utcHoUMCx5QK-NyvjJ86woEzCsUbtEvKEmasBPL2xbyD9kJYAVDOSvEe7WQrESUUu-j-u_NGWXxjfOidxa7FsTP4551p-tDhK63TpGJW1IDP8rBMBl_YtbHR-Q1Wo7NLvHA2RJ_0FsO3zv_OWV_wIg0x-Ww7adQUHzKwsg3-ETa6c6OJvtf4dK2G9KB9QO9aNQRz8PTuo-uz01-Lb7PLq_OLxcnlTDPC40wRZpjgXEChGKtazYq6JqKmjNetMtBQUdaiUVSbigBhcw5zVWhgRVUp2jR0H319zJ1SPZpG50vyknLy_aj8RjrVy9eK7Tu5dGvJoaKkEjng01OAd3-SCVGOfdBmGJQ1LgVZzAvgFaWUZfTjf-jKJZ-_ckvlbhihFWTq-JHS3oXgTfu8DAG5LVm-Ljkbjl6e8Iz_a5X-BR7UpwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566041370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, Sangeun ; Seong, Sojeong ; Park, Soyeon ; Lim, Jeeyeon ; Hong, Soyun ; Cho, Youngshin ; Kim, Heejung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sangeun ; Seong, Sojeong ; Park, Soyeon ; Lim, Jeeyeon ; Hong, Soyun ; Cho, Youngshin ; Kim, Heejung</creatorcontrib><description>The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been tested in different languages and populations; thus, there is a need for a culturally adapted Korean version. We evaluated the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the SOFI among construction workers. The SOFI was translated into Korean and reviewed through a back-translation process involving standardized scaling procedures. Its reliability and validity were evaluated with a sample of 193 construction workers using internal consistency, item-subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and content, construct, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total scale and each subscale were satisfactory. Item-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability were both at acceptable levels. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the five-factor model had acceptable model fits corresponding to the structure of the original instrument. However, some modifications were made to improve in the new context from model fit (such as χ (95) = 113.905 ( = 0.091), CFI = 0.994, and RMSEA = 0.033, as well as the lowest AIC = 383.905). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship of SOFI with other fatigue measures in terms of total and subscale scores. Occupational fatigue is one of the important risk factors associated with workers' health and safety at work. The new translated instrument is a reliable and valid tool for assessing fatigue among Korean construction workers. However, this instrument should be tested extensively in other working populations to devise specific interventions concerning fatigue reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33919602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chi-square test ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Chronic illnesses ; Committees ; Construction ; Construction industry ; Correlation analysis ; Data analysis ; Evaluation ; Fatigue ; Fatigue tests ; Likert scale ; Medical screening ; Occupational safety ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Populations ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Statistical tests ; Validity ; Workers</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-04, Vol.18 (8), p.4302</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-a14e4988902a447fc42bb19b348bfae0d396b9da3ce710145805a2c04277a3dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-a14e4988902a447fc42bb19b348bfae0d396b9da3ce710145805a2c04277a3dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1468-8566 ; 0000-0001-9532-9877 ; 0000-0003-3719-0111</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073179/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073179/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sangeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Sojeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jeeyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Soyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Youngshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heejung</creatorcontrib><title>Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been tested in different languages and populations; thus, there is a need for a culturally adapted Korean version. We evaluated the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the SOFI among construction workers. The SOFI was translated into Korean and reviewed through a back-translation process involving standardized scaling procedures. Its reliability and validity were evaluated with a sample of 193 construction workers using internal consistency, item-subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and content, construct, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total scale and each subscale were satisfactory. Item-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability were both at acceptable levels. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the five-factor model had acceptable model fits corresponding to the structure of the original instrument. However, some modifications were made to improve in the new context from model fit (such as χ (95) = 113.905 ( = 0.091), CFI = 0.994, and RMSEA = 0.033, as well as the lowest AIC = 383.905). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship of SOFI with other fatigue measures in terms of total and subscale scores. Occupational fatigue is one of the important risk factors associated with workers' health and safety at work. The new translated instrument is a reliable and valid tool for assessing fatigue among Korean construction workers. However, this instrument should be tested extensively in other working populations to devise specific interventions concerning fatigue reduction.</description><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue tests</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtP3DAUha2qVXmULUtkqZtuhl7HnsTuohIaAUVFolILLC3HcSaZJnbqx6D5B_zseoAi6MpXOt85utcHoUMCx5QK-NyvjJ86woEzCsUbtEvKEmasBPL2xbyD9kJYAVDOSvEe7WQrESUUu-j-u_NGWXxjfOidxa7FsTP4551p-tDhK63TpGJW1IDP8rBMBl_YtbHR-Q1Wo7NLvHA2RJ_0FsO3zv_OWV_wIg0x-Ww7adQUHzKwsg3-ETa6c6OJvtf4dK2G9KB9QO9aNQRz8PTuo-uz01-Lb7PLq_OLxcnlTDPC40wRZpjgXEChGKtazYq6JqKmjNetMtBQUdaiUVSbigBhcw5zVWhgRVUp2jR0H319zJ1SPZpG50vyknLy_aj8RjrVy9eK7Tu5dGvJoaKkEjng01OAd3-SCVGOfdBmGJQ1LgVZzAvgFaWUZfTjf-jKJZ-_ckvlbhihFWTq-JHS3oXgTfu8DAG5LVm-Ljkbjl6e8Iz_a5X-BR7UpwM</recordid><startdate>20210418</startdate><enddate>20210418</enddate><creator>Lee, Sangeun</creator><creator>Seong, Sojeong</creator><creator>Park, Soyeon</creator><creator>Lim, Jeeyeon</creator><creator>Hong, Soyun</creator><creator>Cho, Youngshin</creator><creator>Kim, Heejung</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-8566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-9877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-0111</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210418</creationdate><title>Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation</title><author>Lee, Sangeun ; Seong, Sojeong ; Park, Soyeon ; Lim, Jeeyeon ; Hong, Soyun ; Cho, Youngshin ; Kim, Heejung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-a14e4988902a447fc42bb19b348bfae0d396b9da3ce710145805a2c04277a3dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue tests</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sangeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Sojeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jeeyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Soyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Youngshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heejung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sangeun</au><au>Seong, Sojeong</au><au>Park, Soyeon</au><au>Lim, Jeeyeon</au><au>Hong, Soyun</au><au>Cho, Youngshin</au><au>Kim, Heejung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-04-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4302</spage><pages>4302-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>The Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) has been tested in different languages and populations; thus, there is a need for a culturally adapted Korean version. We evaluated the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the SOFI among construction workers. The SOFI was translated into Korean and reviewed through a back-translation process involving standardized scaling procedures. Its reliability and validity were evaluated with a sample of 193 construction workers using internal consistency, item-subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and content, construct, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total scale and each subscale were satisfactory. Item-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability were both at acceptable levels. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the five-factor model had acceptable model fits corresponding to the structure of the original instrument. However, some modifications were made to improve in the new context from model fit (such as χ (95) = 113.905 ( = 0.091), CFI = 0.994, and RMSEA = 0.033, as well as the lowest AIC = 383.905). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship of SOFI with other fatigue measures in terms of total and subscale scores. Occupational fatigue is one of the important risk factors associated with workers' health and safety at work. The new translated instrument is a reliable and valid tool for assessing fatigue among Korean construction workers. However, this instrument should be tested extensively in other working populations to devise specific interventions concerning fatigue reduction.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33919602</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18084302</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-8566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-9877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-0111</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-04, Vol.18 (8), p.4302
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8073179
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Chi-square test
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Chronic illnesses
Committees
Construction
Construction industry
Correlation analysis
Data analysis
Evaluation
Fatigue
Fatigue tests
Likert scale
Medical screening
Occupational safety
Polls & surveys
Populations
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Reliability analysis
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Statistical tests
Validity
Workers
title Korean Version of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory among Construction Workers: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A57%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Korean%20Version%20of%20the%20Swedish%20Occupational%20Fatigue%20Inventory%20among%20Construction%20Workers:%20Cultural%20Adaptation%20and%20Psychometric%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Lee,%20Sangeun&rft.date=2021-04-18&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4302&rft.pages=4302-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18084302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2566041370%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566041370&rft_id=info:pmid/33919602&rfr_iscdi=true