Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report
In 1995 Saskatchewan adopted a district health board structure in which two-thirds of members are elected and the rest are appointed. This study examines the opinions of board members about health care reform and devolution of authority from the province to the health districts. All 357 members of S...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal 2001-02, Vol.164 (3), p.343-347 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 347 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 343 |
| container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal |
| container_volume | 164 |
| creator | Lewis, Steven J Kouri, Denise Estabrooks, Carole A Dickinson, Harley Dutchak, Jacqueline J Williams, J. Ivan Mustard, Cameron Hurley, Jeremiah |
| description | In 1995 Saskatchewan adopted a district health board structure in which two-thirds of members are elected and the rest are appointed. This study examines the opinions of board members about health care reform and devolution of authority from the province to the health districts.
All 357 members of Saskatchewan district health boards were surveyed in 1997; 275 (77%) responded. Analyses included comparisons between elected and appointed members and between members with experience as health care providers and those without such experience, as well as comparisons with hypotheses about how devolution would develop, which were advanced in a 1997 report by another group.
Most respondents felt that devolution had resulted in increased local control and better quality of decisions. Ninety-two percent of respondents believed extensive reforms were necessary and 83% that changes made in the previous 5 years had been for the best. However, 56% agreed that there was no clear vision of the reformed system. A small majority (59%) perceived health care reform as having been designed to improve health rather than reduce spending, contrary to a previous hypothesis. Many respondents (76%) thought that boards were legally responsible for things over which they had insufficient control, and 63% perceived that they were too restricted by rules laid down by the provincial government, findings that confirm the expectation of tensions surrounding the division of authority. Respondents with current or former experience as health care providers were less likely than nonprovider respondents to believe that nonphysician health care providers support decisions made by the regional health boards (45% v. 63%, p = 0.02), a result that confirmed the contention that the role of health care providers on the boards would be a source of tension.
Members of Saskatchewan district health boards supported the general goals of health care reform and believed that changes already undertaken had been positive. There were few major differences in views between appointed and elected members and between provider and nonprovider members. However, tensions related to authority and representation will require resolution. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_80727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70645417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h318t-f049a988dc9badc0b2c758c4d77bfdbfd72f92a6e14d362e6809e6b8848109093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMhisEYmPwF1DFgVslp83aBHFB41Oa4ACcozT11oy2GUm6in9PEONTsmTLfmy_9k40JpSxJM1SvhuNAYAllAIfRQfOrQBCHuh-NCIkRCSj4-j-Ejem6b02XexNXGFrlJVeq7hG2fg6lr2vjdVeo4t1Fz9K9yK9qnGQ3Vksu5DzaHUbW1wb6w-jvYVsHB5t_SR6vr56mt0m84ebu9nFPKkzwnyyAMolZ6xSvJSVgjJVxZQpWhVFuaiCFemCpzJHQqssTzFnwDEvGaOMAAeeTaLzz7nrvmyxUth5KxuxDkqkfRNGavG30ulaLM1GMCjSIrSfbtutee3RedFqp7BpZIemd6KAnE4p-QBP_oEr09sunCZSmAJwzlmAjn-L-Vbx9eWfdbVe1oO2KFwrmybgRAzDQHIqMhG47B2CIYjR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205009998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lewis, Steven J ; Kouri, Denise ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Dickinson, Harley ; Dutchak, Jacqueline J ; Williams, J. Ivan ; Mustard, Cameron ; Hurley, Jeremiah</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Steven J ; Kouri, Denise ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Dickinson, Harley ; Dutchak, Jacqueline J ; Williams, J. Ivan ; Mustard, Cameron ; Hurley, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><description>In 1995 Saskatchewan adopted a district health board structure in which two-thirds of members are elected and the rest are appointed. This study examines the opinions of board members about health care reform and devolution of authority from the province to the health districts.
All 357 members of Saskatchewan district health boards were surveyed in 1997; 275 (77%) responded. Analyses included comparisons between elected and appointed members and between members with experience as health care providers and those without such experience, as well as comparisons with hypotheses about how devolution would develop, which were advanced in a 1997 report by another group.
Most respondents felt that devolution had resulted in increased local control and better quality of decisions. Ninety-two percent of respondents believed extensive reforms were necessary and 83% that changes made in the previous 5 years had been for the best. However, 56% agreed that there was no clear vision of the reformed system. A small majority (59%) perceived health care reform as having been designed to improve health rather than reduce spending, contrary to a previous hypothesis. Many respondents (76%) thought that boards were legally responsible for things over which they had insufficient control, and 63% perceived that they were too restricted by rules laid down by the provincial government, findings that confirm the expectation of tensions surrounding the division of authority. Respondents with current or former experience as health care providers were less likely than nonprovider respondents to believe that nonphysician health care providers support decisions made by the regional health boards (45% v. 63%, p = 0.02), a result that confirmed the contention that the role of health care providers on the boards would be a source of tension.
Members of Saskatchewan district health boards supported the general goals of health care reform and believed that changes already undertaken had been positive. There were few major differences in views between appointed and elected members and between provider and nonprovider members. However, tensions related to authority and representation will require resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4409</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11232134</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMAJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Can Med Assoc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Decision Making, Organizational ; Democracy ; Female ; Governing Board - organization & administration ; Health care ; Health Care Reform - organization & administration ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Job Description ; Male ; Management ; Middle Aged ; National Health Programs - organization & administration ; Organizational Innovation ; Organizational Objectives ; Politics ; Professional Competence ; Quality of Health Care ; Regional Health Planning - organization & administration ; Saskatchewan ; Social Support ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal, 2001-02, Vol.164 (3), p.343-347</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Feb 6, 2001</rights><rights>2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC80727/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC80727/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11232134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouri, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Harley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutchak, Jacqueline J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J. Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustard, Cameron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><title>Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>In 1995 Saskatchewan adopted a district health board structure in which two-thirds of members are elected and the rest are appointed. This study examines the opinions of board members about health care reform and devolution of authority from the province to the health districts.
All 357 members of Saskatchewan district health boards were surveyed in 1997; 275 (77%) responded. Analyses included comparisons between elected and appointed members and between members with experience as health care providers and those without such experience, as well as comparisons with hypotheses about how devolution would develop, which were advanced in a 1997 report by another group.
Most respondents felt that devolution had resulted in increased local control and better quality of decisions. Ninety-two percent of respondents believed extensive reforms were necessary and 83% that changes made in the previous 5 years had been for the best. However, 56% agreed that there was no clear vision of the reformed system. A small majority (59%) perceived health care reform as having been designed to improve health rather than reduce spending, contrary to a previous hypothesis. Many respondents (76%) thought that boards were legally responsible for things over which they had insufficient control, and 63% perceived that they were too restricted by rules laid down by the provincial government, findings that confirm the expectation of tensions surrounding the division of authority. Respondents with current or former experience as health care providers were less likely than nonprovider respondents to believe that nonphysician health care providers support decisions made by the regional health boards (45% v. 63%, p = 0.02), a result that confirmed the contention that the role of health care providers on the boards would be a source of tension.
Members of Saskatchewan district health boards supported the general goals of health care reform and believed that changes already undertaken had been positive. There were few major differences in views between appointed and elected members and between provider and nonprovider members. However, tensions related to authority and representation will require resolution.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Decision Making, Organizational</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Governing Board - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Reform - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Job Description</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Health Programs - organization & administration</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Organizational Objectives</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regional Health Planning - organization & administration</subject><subject>Saskatchewan</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0008-4409</issn><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMhisEYmPwF1DFgVslp83aBHFB41Oa4ACcozT11oy2GUm6in9PEONTsmTLfmy_9k40JpSxJM1SvhuNAYAllAIfRQfOrQBCHuh-NCIkRCSj4-j-Ejem6b02XexNXGFrlJVeq7hG2fg6lr2vjdVeo4t1Fz9K9yK9qnGQ3Vksu5DzaHUbW1wb6w-jvYVsHB5t_SR6vr56mt0m84ebu9nFPKkzwnyyAMolZ6xSvJSVgjJVxZQpWhVFuaiCFemCpzJHQqssTzFnwDEvGaOMAAeeTaLzz7nrvmyxUth5KxuxDkqkfRNGavG30ulaLM1GMCjSIrSfbtutee3RedFqp7BpZIemd6KAnE4p-QBP_oEr09sunCZSmAJwzlmAjn-L-Vbx9eWfdbVe1oO2KFwrmybgRAzDQHIqMhG47B2CIYjR</recordid><startdate>20010206</startdate><enddate>20010206</enddate><creator>Lewis, Steven J</creator><creator>Kouri, Denise</creator><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A</creator><creator>Dickinson, Harley</creator><creator>Dutchak, Jacqueline J</creator><creator>Williams, J. Ivan</creator><creator>Mustard, Cameron</creator><creator>Hurley, Jeremiah</creator><general>Can Med Assoc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010206</creationdate><title>Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report</title><author>Lewis, Steven J ; Kouri, Denise ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Dickinson, Harley ; Dutchak, Jacqueline J ; Williams, J. Ivan ; Mustard, Cameron ; Hurley, Jeremiah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h318t-f049a988dc9badc0b2c758c4d77bfdbfd72f92a6e14d362e6809e6b8848109093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Decision Making, Organizational</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Governing Board - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Reform - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Job Description</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Health Programs - organization & administration</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Organizational Objectives</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regional Health Planning - organization & administration</topic><topic>Saskatchewan</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouri, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Harley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutchak, Jacqueline J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J. Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustard, Cameron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Steven J</au><au>Kouri, Denise</au><au>Estabrooks, Carole A</au><au>Dickinson, Harley</au><au>Dutchak, Jacqueline J</au><au>Williams, J. Ivan</au><au>Mustard, Cameron</au><au>Hurley, Jeremiah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2001-02-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>343-347</pages><issn>0008-4409</issn><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><coden>CMAJAX</coden><abstract>In 1995 Saskatchewan adopted a district health board structure in which two-thirds of members are elected and the rest are appointed. This study examines the opinions of board members about health care reform and devolution of authority from the province to the health districts.
All 357 members of Saskatchewan district health boards were surveyed in 1997; 275 (77%) responded. Analyses included comparisons between elected and appointed members and between members with experience as health care providers and those without such experience, as well as comparisons with hypotheses about how devolution would develop, which were advanced in a 1997 report by another group.
Most respondents felt that devolution had resulted in increased local control and better quality of decisions. Ninety-two percent of respondents believed extensive reforms were necessary and 83% that changes made in the previous 5 years had been for the best. However, 56% agreed that there was no clear vision of the reformed system. A small majority (59%) perceived health care reform as having been designed to improve health rather than reduce spending, contrary to a previous hypothesis. Many respondents (76%) thought that boards were legally responsible for things over which they had insufficient control, and 63% perceived that they were too restricted by rules laid down by the provincial government, findings that confirm the expectation of tensions surrounding the division of authority. Respondents with current or former experience as health care providers were less likely than nonprovider respondents to believe that nonphysician health care providers support decisions made by the regional health boards (45% v. 63%, p = 0.02), a result that confirmed the contention that the role of health care providers on the boards would be a source of tension.
Members of Saskatchewan district health boards supported the general goals of health care reform and believed that changes already undertaken had been positive. There were few major differences in views between appointed and elected members and between provider and nonprovider members. However, tensions related to authority and representation will require resolution.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Can Med Assoc</pub><pmid>11232134</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-4409 |
| ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal, 2001-02, Vol.164 (3), p.343-347 |
| issn | 0008-4409 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_80727 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Aged Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Health Conflict (Psychology) Decision Making, Organizational Democracy Female Governing Board - organization & administration Health care Health Care Reform - organization & administration Humans Interprofessional Relations Job Description Male Management Middle Aged National Health Programs - organization & administration Organizational Innovation Organizational Objectives Politics Professional Competence Quality of Health Care Regional Health Planning - organization & administration Saskatchewan Social Support Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Devolution%20to%20democratic%20health%20authorities%20in%20Saskatchewan:%20an%20interim%20report&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Lewis,%20Steven%20J&rft.date=2001-02-06&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=343-347&rft.issn=0008-4409&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft.coden=CMAJAX&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70645417%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205009998&rft_id=info:pmid/11232134&rfr_iscdi=true |