Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change
A study was performed to assess the preference of fourteen mango cultivars for fruit flies and their management by bagging. So the choice of Tephritid flies to mango cultivars during fruiting phase is crucial. Fourteen different cultivars of mango viz., ‘Dusehri’, ‘Malda’, ‘Langra’ early cultivars,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Saudi journal of biological sciences 2021-04, Vol.28 (4), p.2366-2373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2366 |
container_title | Saudi journal of biological sciences |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Karar, Haider Bashir, Muhammad Amjad Basit, Abdul Atta, Sagheer Anjum, Ahmad Ali Bakhsh, Ali Hussain, Arif Hameed, Abid Wang, Yong Alajmi, Reem Atalla Metwally, Dina M. Imran, Muhammad |
description | A study was performed to assess the preference of fourteen mango cultivars for fruit flies and their management by bagging. So the choice of Tephritid flies to mango cultivars during fruiting phase is crucial. Fourteen different cultivars of mango viz., ‘Dusehri’, ‘Malda’, ‘Langra’ early cultivars, ‘Chaunsa’, ‘Fajri Klan’, ‘Sensation’ medium whereas ‘Sanglakhi’, ‘Retaul-12’, ‘Mehmood Khan’, ‘Tukhmi’, ‘Kala Chaunsa’, ‘Chitta Chaunsa’, ‘Dai Wala’ and ‘Sobey De Ting’ late cultivars were assessed for their suitability for fruit flies. The results indicate that the population density of fruit flies was higher on late cultivars like ‘Sanglakhi’ (20.61 percent), ‘Mehmood Khan’ (20.22 percent) and ‘Reutal-12’ (19.92 percent) were proved to be highly susceptible to fruit flies. Among these the cultivar ‘Reutal-12’ was selected being commercial and future cultivar for the management of fruit flies through bagging. The results reported that the attack of tephritid fruit flies and other insect pests were zero in bagged fruits as compared with control. It was further recorded that the bagged fruits has maximum average fruit weight i.e. 203.50 and 197.83 g per fruit was noted in those treatments where butter paper bag and brown paper bag was wrapped with better coloration as compared with un-bagged fruit with 159.5 g per fruit. Similarly, on an average fruit length were more i.e. 90.17, 91.33 mm in bagged fruit and 85.33 in un-bagged fruits. Furthermore, bagged fruits have zero incidence of disease with reduced fruit crack, fruit sunburn, mechanical damage, bird damage, fruit blemished and agrochemical residues on the fruit. So, it is concluded that the special attention should be given on ‘Reutal-12’ for the management of fruit flies when devising an IPM program for the control of fruit flies. Further, bagging has proved to be the good agricultural practices for the production of quality mango. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8071905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1319562X21000334</els_id><sourcerecordid>33911951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c73bf22e4e408ce1aa330ef166adf161a40ef11cc55553dd430da04dab77fe893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQbURxx9Uf8EHyqEiPqU5fRYRlXC-w4MsKvoV0UpnO0J00SXpdv8GfNu2sg76IISRV1DknlZxk2VOgW6BQvzpsw6EP24IWsKVpMnYv2xQFsLwBWt_PNsCgy6u6-HqWPQrhQGndshYeZmeMdQBdBZvsx6XWKCNxmgwuRDKPwqbMEum8XaSbjVhrk7B7R7RfTCR6NBjI83dmjujFa3KN8-BNNErgCyKsInFA40n0ZpnmYZVLbLHHCVNoVmUb8fbXkXI0k4hIZILt8XH2QIsx4JO7_Tz78v7yevcxv_r84dPu4iqXZVXFXDas10WBJZa0lQhCMEZRQ10LlVYQ5ZqBlFUaTKmSUSVoqUTfNBrbjp1nb4-689JPqGTqy4uRzz41479zJwz_u2LNwPfuhre0gY5WSaA4CkjvQvCoT1ygfLWGH_hqDV-t4TRNxhLp2Z-nnii_vUiA9gj4hr3TQRq0Ek8wmtxjDVRNkyJgOxNFNM7u3GJjor78f2pCvzmiMT3yjUHP7xjK-PQXuHLmXxf5CUBLxQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Karar, Haider ; Bashir, Muhammad Amjad ; Basit, Abdul ; Atta, Sagheer ; Anjum, Ahmad Ali ; Bakhsh, Ali ; Hussain, Arif ; Hameed, Abid ; Wang, Yong ; Alajmi, Reem Atalla ; Metwally, Dina M. ; Imran, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Karar, Haider ; Bashir, Muhammad Amjad ; Basit, Abdul ; Atta, Sagheer ; Anjum, Ahmad Ali ; Bakhsh, Ali ; Hussain, Arif ; Hameed, Abid ; Wang, Yong ; Alajmi, Reem Atalla ; Metwally, Dina M. ; Imran, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>A study was performed to assess the preference of fourteen mango cultivars for fruit flies and their management by bagging. So the choice of Tephritid flies to mango cultivars during fruiting phase is crucial. Fourteen different cultivars of mango viz., ‘Dusehri’, ‘Malda’, ‘Langra’ early cultivars, ‘Chaunsa’, ‘Fajri Klan’, ‘Sensation’ medium whereas ‘Sanglakhi’, ‘Retaul-12’, ‘Mehmood Khan’, ‘Tukhmi’, ‘Kala Chaunsa’, ‘Chitta Chaunsa’, ‘Dai Wala’ and ‘Sobey De Ting’ late cultivars were assessed for their suitability for fruit flies. The results indicate that the population density of fruit flies was higher on late cultivars like ‘Sanglakhi’ (20.61 percent), ‘Mehmood Khan’ (20.22 percent) and ‘Reutal-12’ (19.92 percent) were proved to be highly susceptible to fruit flies. Among these the cultivar ‘Reutal-12’ was selected being commercial and future cultivar for the management of fruit flies through bagging. The results reported that the attack of tephritid fruit flies and other insect pests were zero in bagged fruits as compared with control. It was further recorded that the bagged fruits has maximum average fruit weight i.e. 203.50 and 197.83 g per fruit was noted in those treatments where butter paper bag and brown paper bag was wrapped with better coloration as compared with un-bagged fruit with 159.5 g per fruit. Similarly, on an average fruit length were more i.e. 90.17, 91.33 mm in bagged fruit and 85.33 in un-bagged fruits. Furthermore, bagged fruits have zero incidence of disease with reduced fruit crack, fruit sunburn, mechanical damage, bird damage, fruit blemished and agrochemical residues on the fruit. So, it is concluded that the special attention should be given on ‘Reutal-12’ for the management of fruit flies when devising an IPM program for the control of fruit flies. Further, bagging has proved to be the good agricultural practices for the production of quality mango.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1319-562X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-7106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33911951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biology ; Brown and butter paper bag ; Feeding preference ; Host plant resistance ; Insect pest complex ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics ; Mango cultivars ; Original ; Population density ; Punjab-Pakistan ; Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021-04, Vol.28 (4), p.2366-2373</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 The Authors.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000637157700013</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c73bf22e4e408ce1aa330ef166adf161a40ef11cc55553dd430da04dab77fe893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c73bf22e4e408ce1aa330ef166adf161a40ef11cc55553dd430da04dab77fe893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9993-5102</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071905/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karar, Haider</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bashir, Muhammad Amjad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basit, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atta, Sagheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjum, Ahmad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhsh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hameed, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Reem Atalla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metwally, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imran, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change</title><title>Saudi journal of biological sciences</title><addtitle>SAUDI J BIOL SCI</addtitle><addtitle>Saudi J Biol Sci</addtitle><description>A study was performed to assess the preference of fourteen mango cultivars for fruit flies and their management by bagging. So the choice of Tephritid flies to mango cultivars during fruiting phase is crucial. Fourteen different cultivars of mango viz., ‘Dusehri’, ‘Malda’, ‘Langra’ early cultivars, ‘Chaunsa’, ‘Fajri Klan’, ‘Sensation’ medium whereas ‘Sanglakhi’, ‘Retaul-12’, ‘Mehmood Khan’, ‘Tukhmi’, ‘Kala Chaunsa’, ‘Chitta Chaunsa’, ‘Dai Wala’ and ‘Sobey De Ting’ late cultivars were assessed for their suitability for fruit flies. The results indicate that the population density of fruit flies was higher on late cultivars like ‘Sanglakhi’ (20.61 percent), ‘Mehmood Khan’ (20.22 percent) and ‘Reutal-12’ (19.92 percent) were proved to be highly susceptible to fruit flies. Among these the cultivar ‘Reutal-12’ was selected being commercial and future cultivar for the management of fruit flies through bagging. The results reported that the attack of tephritid fruit flies and other insect pests were zero in bagged fruits as compared with control. It was further recorded that the bagged fruits has maximum average fruit weight i.e. 203.50 and 197.83 g per fruit was noted in those treatments where butter paper bag and brown paper bag was wrapped with better coloration as compared with un-bagged fruit with 159.5 g per fruit. Similarly, on an average fruit length were more i.e. 90.17, 91.33 mm in bagged fruit and 85.33 in un-bagged fruits. Furthermore, bagged fruits have zero incidence of disease with reduced fruit crack, fruit sunburn, mechanical damage, bird damage, fruit blemished and agrochemical residues on the fruit. So, it is concluded that the special attention should be given on ‘Reutal-12’ for the management of fruit flies when devising an IPM program for the control of fruit flies. Further, bagging has proved to be the good agricultural practices for the production of quality mango.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Brown and butter paper bag</subject><subject>Feeding preference</subject><subject>Host plant resistance</subject><subject>Insect pest complex</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics</subject><subject>Mango cultivars</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Punjab-Pakistan</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><issn>1319-562X</issn><issn>2213-7106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQbURxx9Uf8EHyqEiPqU5fRYRlXC-w4MsKvoV0UpnO0J00SXpdv8GfNu2sg76IISRV1DknlZxk2VOgW6BQvzpsw6EP24IWsKVpMnYv2xQFsLwBWt_PNsCgy6u6-HqWPQrhQGndshYeZmeMdQBdBZvsx6XWKCNxmgwuRDKPwqbMEum8XaSbjVhrk7B7R7RfTCR6NBjI83dmjujFa3KN8-BNNErgCyKsInFA40n0ZpnmYZVLbLHHCVNoVmUb8fbXkXI0k4hIZILt8XH2QIsx4JO7_Tz78v7yevcxv_r84dPu4iqXZVXFXDas10WBJZa0lQhCMEZRQ10LlVYQ5ZqBlFUaTKmSUSVoqUTfNBrbjp1nb4-689JPqGTqy4uRzz41479zJwz_u2LNwPfuhre0gY5WSaA4CkjvQvCoT1ygfLWGH_hqDV-t4TRNxhLp2Z-nnii_vUiA9gj4hr3TQRq0Ek8wmtxjDVRNkyJgOxNFNM7u3GJjor78f2pCvzmiMT3yjUHP7xjK-PQXuHLmXxf5CUBLxQs</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Karar, Haider</creator><creator>Bashir, Muhammad Amjad</creator><creator>Basit, Abdul</creator><creator>Atta, Sagheer</creator><creator>Anjum, Ahmad Ali</creator><creator>Bakhsh, Ali</creator><creator>Hussain, Arif</creator><creator>Hameed, Abid</creator><creator>Wang, Yong</creator><creator>Alajmi, Reem Atalla</creator><creator>Metwally, Dina M.</creator><creator>Imran, Muhammad</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-5102</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change</title><author>Karar, Haider ; Bashir, Muhammad Amjad ; Basit, Abdul ; Atta, Sagheer ; Anjum, Ahmad Ali ; Bakhsh, Ali ; Hussain, Arif ; Hameed, Abid ; Wang, Yong ; Alajmi, Reem Atalla ; Metwally, Dina M. ; Imran, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c73bf22e4e408ce1aa330ef166adf161a40ef11cc55553dd430da04dab77fe893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Brown and butter paper bag</topic><topic>Feeding preference</topic><topic>Host plant resistance</topic><topic>Insect pest complex</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics</topic><topic>Mango cultivars</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Punjab-Pakistan</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karar, Haider</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bashir, Muhammad Amjad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basit, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atta, Sagheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjum, Ahmad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhsh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hameed, Abid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alajmi, Reem Atalla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metwally, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imran, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Saudi journal of biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karar, Haider</au><au>Bashir, Muhammad Amjad</au><au>Basit, Abdul</au><au>Atta, Sagheer</au><au>Anjum, Ahmad Ali</au><au>Bakhsh, Ali</au><au>Hussain, Arif</au><au>Hameed, Abid</au><au>Wang, Yong</au><au>Alajmi, Reem Atalla</au><au>Metwally, Dina M.</au><au>Imran, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change</atitle><jtitle>Saudi journal of biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>SAUDI J BIOL SCI</stitle><addtitle>Saudi J Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2366</spage><epage>2373</epage><pages>2366-2373</pages><issn>1319-562X</issn><eissn>2213-7106</eissn><abstract>A study was performed to assess the preference of fourteen mango cultivars for fruit flies and their management by bagging. So the choice of Tephritid flies to mango cultivars during fruiting phase is crucial. Fourteen different cultivars of mango viz., ‘Dusehri’, ‘Malda’, ‘Langra’ early cultivars, ‘Chaunsa’, ‘Fajri Klan’, ‘Sensation’ medium whereas ‘Sanglakhi’, ‘Retaul-12’, ‘Mehmood Khan’, ‘Tukhmi’, ‘Kala Chaunsa’, ‘Chitta Chaunsa’, ‘Dai Wala’ and ‘Sobey De Ting’ late cultivars were assessed for their suitability for fruit flies. The results indicate that the population density of fruit flies was higher on late cultivars like ‘Sanglakhi’ (20.61 percent), ‘Mehmood Khan’ (20.22 percent) and ‘Reutal-12’ (19.92 percent) were proved to be highly susceptible to fruit flies. Among these the cultivar ‘Reutal-12’ was selected being commercial and future cultivar for the management of fruit flies through bagging. The results reported that the attack of tephritid fruit flies and other insect pests were zero in bagged fruits as compared with control. It was further recorded that the bagged fruits has maximum average fruit weight i.e. 203.50 and 197.83 g per fruit was noted in those treatments where butter paper bag and brown paper bag was wrapped with better coloration as compared with un-bagged fruit with 159.5 g per fruit. Similarly, on an average fruit length were more i.e. 90.17, 91.33 mm in bagged fruit and 85.33 in un-bagged fruits. Furthermore, bagged fruits have zero incidence of disease with reduced fruit crack, fruit sunburn, mechanical damage, bird damage, fruit blemished and agrochemical residues on the fruit. So, it is concluded that the special attention should be given on ‘Reutal-12’ for the management of fruit flies when devising an IPM program for the control of fruit flies. Further, bagging has proved to be the good agricultural practices for the production of quality mango.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33911951</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.033</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-5102</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1319-562X |
ispartof | Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021-04, Vol.28 (4), p.2366-2373 |
issn | 1319-562X 2213-7106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8071905 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Biology Brown and butter paper bag Feeding preference Host plant resistance Insect pest complex Life Sciences & Biomedicine Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics Mango cultivars Original Population density Punjab-Pakistan Science & Technology |
title | Effect of host plant on cornucopia of mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their triumphant management in context of climate change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20host%20plant%20on%20cornucopia%20of%20mango%20fruit%20flies%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20and%20their%20triumphant%20management%20in%20context%20of%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Saudi%20journal%20of%20biological%20sciences&rft.au=Karar,%20Haider&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2366&rft.epage=2373&rft.pages=2366-2373&rft.issn=1319-562X&rft.eissn=2213-7106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.033&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33911951%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33911951&rft_els_id=S1319562X21000334&rfr_iscdi=true |