Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard

Image-based quantitative methods for liver heterogeneity (L ) and nodularity (L ) provide helpful information for evaluating liver fibrosis; however, their combinations are not fully understood in liver diseases. We developed an integrated software for assessing L and L and compared L and L accordin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2021-04, Vol.10 (8), p.1697
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tae-Hoon, Jeong, Chang-Won, Kim, Ji Eon, Kim, Jin Woong, Jo, Hoon Gil, Kim, Youe Ree, Lee, Young Hwan, Yoon, Kwon-Ha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1697
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 10
creator Kim, Tae-Hoon
Jeong, Chang-Won
Kim, Ji Eon
Kim, Jin Woong
Jo, Hoon Gil
Kim, Youe Ree
Lee, Young Hwan
Yoon, Kwon-Ha
description Image-based quantitative methods for liver heterogeneity (L ) and nodularity (L ) provide helpful information for evaluating liver fibrosis; however, their combinations are not fully understood in liver diseases. We developed an integrated software for assessing L and L and compared L and L according to fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease (CLD). Overall, 111 CLD patients and 16 subjects with suspected liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. The procedures for quantifying L and L were bias correction, contour detection, liver segmentation, and L and L measurements. L and L scores among fibrosis stages (F0-F3) were compared using ANOVA with Tukey's test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 3.49 ± 0.34, 5.52 ± 0.88, 6.80 ± 0.97, and 7.56 ± 1.79, respectively ( < 0.001). The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.91 ± 0.04, 1.09 ± 0.08, and 1.15 ± 0.14, respectively ( < 0.001). The combined L × L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 2.96 ± 0.46, 5.01 ± 0.91, 7.30 ± 0.89, and 8.48 ± 1.34, respectively ( < 0.001). The AUROCs of L , L , and L × L for differentiating F1 vs. F2 and F2 vs. F3 were 0.845, 0.958, and 0.954; and 0.619, 0.689, and 0.761, respectively. The combination of L and L scores derived from routine MR images allows better differential diagnosis of fibrosis subgroups in CLD.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm10081697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8071162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520858508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-963f9b4f3f93ae28ee831556361001491cfdfb3d38a2d79f0ee56e55411fe043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EolXpij2yxAYJBew4TpwN0rRi6EgDSENZW574OvUosQfbKcyz9GXrqKUa8MK_3z2-Ogeh15R8YKwlH3fdSAkRtG6bZ-i0JE1TECbY86P9CTqPcUfyEKIqafMSneTSkghSnaK7RYwQ4wguYW_w2t5CwEu7DT7aiH8k1QP-Ga3r8col6INKmcALp4bDDOSSK9jnyy6vCYLvwYFNB6ycxt-8ngYV5qN1eOOnZB3gr5sV_m3TDV6uLooqy2r4g1XEGzAQwHUw_-q0CvoVemHUEOH8cT1D18vP15dXxfr7l9XlYl10FWlT0dbMtNvK5JkpKAWAYJTzmtXZGVq1tDPabJlmQpW6aQ0B4DVwXlFqgFTsDH16kN1P2xF0l60IapD7YEcVDtIrK_99cfZG9v5WCtJQWpdZ4N2jQPC_JohJjjZ2MAzKgZ-iLHk2mwtOREbf_ofu_BSymzPVtqTmFSGZev9AdTmGGMA8NUOJnGOXR7Fn-s1x_0_s35DZPfQJqYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599065400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kim, Tae-Hoon ; Jeong, Chang-Won ; Kim, Ji Eon ; Kim, Jin Woong ; Jo, Hoon Gil ; Kim, Youe Ree ; Lee, Young Hwan ; Yoon, Kwon-Ha</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hoon ; Jeong, Chang-Won ; Kim, Ji Eon ; Kim, Jin Woong ; Jo, Hoon Gil ; Kim, Youe Ree ; Lee, Young Hwan ; Yoon, Kwon-Ha</creatorcontrib><description>Image-based quantitative methods for liver heterogeneity (L ) and nodularity (L ) provide helpful information for evaluating liver fibrosis; however, their combinations are not fully understood in liver diseases. We developed an integrated software for assessing L and L and compared L and L according to fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease (CLD). Overall, 111 CLD patients and 16 subjects with suspected liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. The procedures for quantifying L and L were bias correction, contour detection, liver segmentation, and L and L measurements. L and L scores among fibrosis stages (F0-F3) were compared using ANOVA with Tukey's test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 3.49 ± 0.34, 5.52 ± 0.88, 6.80 ± 0.97, and 7.56 ± 1.79, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.91 ± 0.04, 1.09 ± 0.08, and 1.15 ± 0.14, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The combined L × L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 2.96 ± 0.46, 5.01 ± 0.91, 7.30 ± 0.89, and 8.48 ± 1.34, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The AUROCs of L , L , and L × L for differentiating F1 vs. F2 and F2 vs. F3 were 0.845, 0.958, and 0.954; and 0.619, 0.689, and 0.761, respectively. The combination of L and L scores derived from routine MR images allows better differential diagnosis of fibrosis subgroups in CLD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33920804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Archives &amp; records ; Bias ; Biopsy ; Clinical medicine ; Hepatitis ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver diseases ; Methods ; Patients ; Software</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-04, Vol.10 (8), p.1697</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-963f9b4f3f93ae28ee831556361001491cfdfb3d38a2d79f0ee56e55411fe043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-963f9b4f3f93ae28ee831556361001491cfdfb3d38a2d79f0ee56e55411fe043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4725-5687 ; 0000-0002-2634-8510 ; 0000-0002-2552-0665</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071162/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071162/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Hoon Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youe Ree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Kwon-Ha</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Image-based quantitative methods for liver heterogeneity (L ) and nodularity (L ) provide helpful information for evaluating liver fibrosis; however, their combinations are not fully understood in liver diseases. We developed an integrated software for assessing L and L and compared L and L according to fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease (CLD). Overall, 111 CLD patients and 16 subjects with suspected liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. The procedures for quantifying L and L were bias correction, contour detection, liver segmentation, and L and L measurements. L and L scores among fibrosis stages (F0-F3) were compared using ANOVA with Tukey's test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 3.49 ± 0.34, 5.52 ± 0.88, 6.80 ± 0.97, and 7.56 ± 1.79, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.91 ± 0.04, 1.09 ± 0.08, and 1.15 ± 0.14, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The combined L × L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 2.96 ± 0.46, 5.01 ± 0.91, 7.30 ± 0.89, and 8.48 ± 1.34, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The AUROCs of L , L , and L × L for differentiating F1 vs. F2 and F2 vs. F3 were 0.845, 0.958, and 0.954; and 0.619, 0.689, and 0.761, respectively. The combination of L and L scores derived from routine MR images allows better differential diagnosis of fibrosis subgroups in CLD.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EolXpij2yxAYJBew4TpwN0rRi6EgDSENZW574OvUosQfbKcyz9GXrqKUa8MK_3z2-Ogeh15R8YKwlH3fdSAkRtG6bZ-i0JE1TECbY86P9CTqPcUfyEKIqafMSneTSkghSnaK7RYwQ4wguYW_w2t5CwEu7DT7aiH8k1QP-Ga3r8col6INKmcALp4bDDOSSK9jnyy6vCYLvwYFNB6ycxt-8ngYV5qN1eOOnZB3gr5sV_m3TDV6uLooqy2r4g1XEGzAQwHUw_-q0CvoVemHUEOH8cT1D18vP15dXxfr7l9XlYl10FWlT0dbMtNvK5JkpKAWAYJTzmtXZGVq1tDPabJlmQpW6aQ0B4DVwXlFqgFTsDH16kN1P2xF0l60IapD7YEcVDtIrK_99cfZG9v5WCtJQWpdZ4N2jQPC_JohJjjZ2MAzKgZ-iLHk2mwtOREbf_ofu_BSymzPVtqTmFSGZev9AdTmGGMA8NUOJnGOXR7Fn-s1x_0_s35DZPfQJqYU</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Kim, Tae-Hoon</creator><creator>Jeong, Chang-Won</creator><creator>Kim, Ji Eon</creator><creator>Kim, Jin Woong</creator><creator>Jo, Hoon Gil</creator><creator>Kim, Youe Ree</creator><creator>Lee, Young Hwan</creator><creator>Yoon, Kwon-Ha</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-5687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-8510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-0665</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard</title><author>Kim, Tae-Hoon ; Jeong, Chang-Won ; Kim, Ji Eon ; Kim, Jin Woong ; Jo, Hoon Gil ; Kim, Youe Ree ; Lee, Young Hwan ; Yoon, Kwon-Ha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-963f9b4f3f93ae28ee831556361001491cfdfb3d38a2d79f0ee56e55411fe043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Hoon Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youe Ree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Kwon-Ha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Tae-Hoon</au><au>Jeong, Chang-Won</au><au>Kim, Ji Eon</au><au>Kim, Jin Woong</au><au>Jo, Hoon Gil</au><au>Kim, Youe Ree</au><au>Lee, Young Hwan</au><au>Yoon, Kwon-Ha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1697</spage><pages>1697-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Image-based quantitative methods for liver heterogeneity (L ) and nodularity (L ) provide helpful information for evaluating liver fibrosis; however, their combinations are not fully understood in liver diseases. We developed an integrated software for assessing L and L and compared L and L according to fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease (CLD). Overall, 111 CLD patients and 16 subjects with suspected liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. The procedures for quantifying L and L were bias correction, contour detection, liver segmentation, and L and L measurements. L and L scores among fibrosis stages (F0-F3) were compared using ANOVA with Tukey's test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 3.49 ± 0.34, 5.52 ± 0.88, 6.80 ± 0.97, and 7.56 ± 1.79, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The mean L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.91 ± 0.04, 1.09 ± 0.08, and 1.15 ± 0.14, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The combined L × L scores of F0, F1, F2, and F3 were 2.96 ± 0.46, 5.01 ± 0.91, 7.30 ± 0.89, and 8.48 ± 1.34, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). The AUROCs of L , L , and L × L for differentiating F1 vs. F2 and F2 vs. F3 were 0.845, 0.958, and 0.954; and 0.619, 0.689, and 0.761, respectively. The combination of L and L scores derived from routine MR images allows better differential diagnosis of fibrosis subgroups in CLD.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33920804</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10081697</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-5687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-8510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-0665</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-04, Vol.10 (8), p.1697
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8071162
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Abdomen
Archives & records
Bias
Biopsy
Clinical medicine
Hepatitis
Liver cirrhosis
Liver diseases
Methods
Patients
Software
title Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Stage Using Integrative Analysis of Hepatic Heterogeneity and Nodularity in Routine MRI with FIB-4 Index as Reference Standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Liver%20Fibrosis%20Stage%20Using%20Integrative%20Analysis%20of%20Hepatic%20Heterogeneity%20and%20Nodularity%20in%20Routine%20MRI%20with%20FIB-4%20Index%20as%20Reference%20Standard&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kim,%20Tae-Hoon&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1697&rft.pages=1697-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10081697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2520858508%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599065400&rft_id=info:pmid/33920804&rfr_iscdi=true