How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change
Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology letters 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.687-697 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 697 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 687 |
container_title | Ecology letters |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Miller, Adam D. Inamine, Hidetoshi Buckling, Angus Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona Seabloom, Eric |
description | Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
Disturbance has many effects on communities, and much is still not known about how these effects accumulate over time. We use an annual plant model to demonstrate how legacies of disturbance can affect future community composition, long after disturbance regimes have changed. In particular, we show that differences in disturbance history can alter invasion success even when present disturbance regimes are identical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.13685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8048489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501877444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5095-98ba7e05825da1aaf3e748c6f2d2c4062651d6444fee9b0c61f2a9beb580ad8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rHCEUhqW05Puif6AIvWkuNlFHHacXgRI2SWGhUFLonZxxzuwaZjXVmYT99zHdZGkL9cYDPjy8x5eQ95yd8XLOccAzXmmj3pADLjWfMSHN291c_dwnhznfMcZFU_M9sl9VimlV6wPy_SY-0s7ncUotBId0VeaYNhSGEVOmPjxA9jHQPDmHOX-mrY-jd3TAJTiPmULoaMKlXyN1KwhLPCbvehgynrzcR-TH1fz28ma2-Hb99fLLYuYUa9SsMS3UyJQRqgMO0FdYS-N0LzrhJNNCK95pKWWP2LTMad4LaFpslWHQGVcdkYut935q19g5DGOCwd4nv4a0sRG8_fsl-JVdxgdrmDTSNEXw6UWQ4q8J82jXPjscBggYp2zLJwqthame0Y__oHdxSqGsZ4Vi3NR1CVqo0y3lUsw5Yb8Lw5l9bsqWpuzvpgr74c_0O_K1mgKcb4FHP-Dm_yY7X8y3yif20J6O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501877444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Miller, Adam D. ; Inamine, Hidetoshi ; Buckling, Angus ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona ; Seabloom, Eric</creator><contributor>Seabloom, Eric</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller, Adam D. ; Inamine, Hidetoshi ; Buckling, Angus ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona ; Seabloom, Eric ; Seabloom, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
Disturbance has many effects on communities, and much is still not known about how these effects accumulate over time. We use an annual plant model to demonstrate how legacies of disturbance can affect future community composition, long after disturbance regimes have changed. In particular, we show that differences in disturbance history can alter invasion success even when present disturbance regimes are identical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33506576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biotic legacy ; community ecology ; Community structure ; Decay ; Disturbance ; disturbance history ; disturbance regimes ; Ecological effects ; Ecosystem ; Introduced Species ; invasion ; Letter ; Letters ; Plants ; reciprocal yield law ; theoretical ecology</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.687-697</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5095-98ba7e05825da1aaf3e748c6f2d2c4062651d6444fee9b0c61f2a9beb580ad8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5095-98ba7e05825da1aaf3e748c6f2d2c4062651d6444fee9b0c61f2a9beb580ad8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5021-3459 ; 0000-0003-1170-4604 ; 0000-0002-7607-8248 ; 0000-0002-6367-4630 ; 0000-0002-2134-078X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.13685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.13685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Seabloom, Eric</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamine, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckling, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Katriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabloom, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
Disturbance has many effects on communities, and much is still not known about how these effects accumulate over time. We use an annual plant model to demonstrate how legacies of disturbance can affect future community composition, long after disturbance regimes have changed. In particular, we show that differences in disturbance history can alter invasion success even when present disturbance regimes are identical.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biotic legacy</subject><subject>community ecology</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>disturbance history</subject><subject>disturbance regimes</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>invasion</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>reciprocal yield law</subject><subject>theoretical ecology</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rHCEUhqW05Puif6AIvWkuNlFHHacXgRI2SWGhUFLonZxxzuwaZjXVmYT99zHdZGkL9cYDPjy8x5eQ95yd8XLOccAzXmmj3pADLjWfMSHN291c_dwnhznfMcZFU_M9sl9VimlV6wPy_SY-0s7ncUotBId0VeaYNhSGEVOmPjxA9jHQPDmHOX-mrY-jd3TAJTiPmULoaMKlXyN1KwhLPCbvehgynrzcR-TH1fz28ma2-Hb99fLLYuYUa9SsMS3UyJQRqgMO0FdYS-N0LzrhJNNCK95pKWWP2LTMad4LaFpslWHQGVcdkYut935q19g5DGOCwd4nv4a0sRG8_fsl-JVdxgdrmDTSNEXw6UWQ4q8J82jXPjscBggYp2zLJwqthame0Y__oHdxSqGsZ4Vi3NR1CVqo0y3lUsw5Yb8Lw5l9bsqWpuzvpgr74c_0O_K1mgKcb4FHP-Dm_yY7X8y3yif20J6O</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Miller, Adam D.</creator><creator>Inamine, Hidetoshi</creator><creator>Buckling, Angus</creator><creator>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Shea, Katriona</creator><creator>Seabloom, Eric</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-3459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-4604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6367-4630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-078X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change</title><author>Miller, Adam D. ; Inamine, Hidetoshi ; Buckling, Angus ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona ; Seabloom, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5095-98ba7e05825da1aaf3e748c6f2d2c4062651d6444fee9b0c61f2a9beb580ad8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biotic legacy</topic><topic>community ecology</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>disturbance history</topic><topic>disturbance regimes</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>invasion</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>reciprocal yield law</topic><topic>theoretical ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inamine, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckling, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Katriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabloom, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Adam D.</au><au>Inamine, Hidetoshi</au><au>Buckling, Angus</au><au>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</au><au>Shea, Katriona</au><au>Seabloom, Eric</au><au>Seabloom, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>687</spage><epage>697</epage><pages>687-697</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
Disturbance has many effects on communities, and much is still not known about how these effects accumulate over time. We use an annual plant model to demonstrate how legacies of disturbance can affect future community composition, long after disturbance regimes have changed. In particular, we show that differences in disturbance history can alter invasion success even when present disturbance regimes are identical.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33506576</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13685</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-3459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-4604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6367-4630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-078X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
ispartof | Ecology letters, 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.687-697 |
issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8048489 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biodiversity Biotic legacy community ecology Community structure Decay Disturbance disturbance history disturbance regimes Ecological effects Ecosystem Introduced Species invasion Letter Letters Plants reciprocal yield law theoretical ecology |
title | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20disturbance%20history%20alters%20invasion%20success:%20biotic%20legacies%20and%20regime%20change&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Miller,%20Adam%20D.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=687&rft.epage=697&rft.pages=687-697&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2501877444%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501877444&rft_id=info:pmid/33506576&rfr_iscdi=true |