Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom
Two samples of 227 and 214 adults completed surveys of social support, perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 preventive activity – in Study 1 likelihood of testing was examined and in Study 2 likelihood of both testing and vaccination were examined during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2022-01, Vol.41 (1), p.492-504 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 504 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 492 |
| container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Jaspal, Rusi Breakwell, Glynis M. |
| description | Two samples of 227 and 214 adults completed surveys of social support, perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 preventive activity – in Study 1 likelihood of testing was examined and in Study 2 likelihood of both testing and vaccination were examined during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Path analysis showed, in Study 1, that access to help (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects through self-efficacy, perceived risk and preventive behavior; and, in Study 2, that neighborhood identification (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects on likelihood of both testing and vaccination through the mediators of strength of social network, loneliness, perceived risk of COVID-19, and preventive activity. Both studies suggest that level of social support (conceptualized in different ways) is an important determinant of COVID-19 testing and Study 2 shows it is also a determinant of likelihood of vaccination. As resurgences of COVID-19 occur, it will be necessary to monitor the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination behaviors and, especially, to promote confidence in the latter in individuals with decreased access to social support. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8026809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772000385</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772000385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c744t-9a1d87547e0c4e194e3bf02e821ac9da8ea6efe90d643ef37193ef4febe551f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhQdRbK3-AS9kQBAFpyaTTDLjhVCr1sVCwVpvQzbzZjbtTLImmUV76x83u1vrriwiucjXc04-3pNljzE6xAjxVwGXmNIClbhAmNW4uL6T7eOGsIJyQu6mMaKswASjvexBCJcIYc6a5n62R0hNGePVfvbz3Ckj-zyM87nz8WU-B6_ALKDNvQlXubRtHmeQ9-YKejNzrs2dzo_Pvk7eFbjJI4RobLfCFlIpY2U0zr7OlXchFAHUcpr8Wxllrr0bVm4X1sR0wqckbd3wMLunZR_g0U1_kF18eP_l-GNxenYyOT46LRSnNBaNxG3NK8oBKQq4oUCmGpVQl1iqppU1SAYaGtQySkATnr4CNNUwharCmpOD7M3adz5OB2gV2OhlL-beDNL_EE4asb1jzUx0biFqVLIaNcng-Y2Bd9_G9HQxmKCg76UFNwZRVrgkpGwYS-jTv9BLN_r0E4limGPU0GqD6mQPwljt0rlqaSqOOC8RQqSuElXsoDqwkC7pLGiTlrf4wx18ai0MRu0UvNgSJCbC99jJMQQxOf_8_-zbk2322QY7A9nHWXD9uMxE2AbLNbiKjQd9WxSMxDLrYp11kbIuVlkX10n0ZLOct5Lf4U4AWQMhbdkO_J8a_MP2FxfJB5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617109456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jaspal, Rusi ; Breakwell, Glynis M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaspal, Rusi ; Breakwell, Glynis M.</creatorcontrib><description>Two samples of 227 and 214 adults completed surveys of social support, perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 preventive activity – in Study 1 likelihood of testing was examined and in Study 2 likelihood of both testing and vaccination were examined during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Path analysis showed, in Study 1, that access to help (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects through self-efficacy, perceived risk and preventive behavior; and, in Study 2, that neighborhood identification (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects on likelihood of both testing and vaccination through the mediators of strength of social network, loneliness, perceived risk of COVID-19, and preventive activity. Both studies suggest that level of social support (conceptualized in different ways) is an important determinant of COVID-19 testing and Study 2 shows it is also a determinant of likelihood of vaccination. As resurgences of COVID-19 occur, it will be necessary to monitor the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination behaviors and, especially, to promote confidence in the latter in individuals with decreased access to social support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33846675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Breakwell, Glynis Marie ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 diagnostic tests ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Epidemics ; Global Psychological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic ; Health aspects ; Immunization ; Medical tests ; Psychology ; Public opinion ; Risk perception ; Social aspects ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Social support ; United Kingdom ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022-01, Vol.41 (1), p.492-504</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c744t-9a1d87547e0c4e194e3bf02e821ac9da8ea6efe90d643ef37193ef4febe551f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c744t-9a1d87547e0c4e194e3bf02e821ac9da8ea6efe90d643ef37193ef4febe551f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8463-9519 ; 0000-0002-2002-5681</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaspal, Rusi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breakwell, Glynis M.</creatorcontrib><title>Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Two samples of 227 and 214 adults completed surveys of social support, perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 preventive activity – in Study 1 likelihood of testing was examined and in Study 2 likelihood of both testing and vaccination were examined during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Path analysis showed, in Study 1, that access to help (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects through self-efficacy, perceived risk and preventive behavior; and, in Study 2, that neighborhood identification (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects on likelihood of both testing and vaccination through the mediators of strength of social network, loneliness, perceived risk of COVID-19, and preventive activity. Both studies suggest that level of social support (conceptualized in different ways) is an important determinant of COVID-19 testing and Study 2 shows it is also a determinant of likelihood of vaccination. As resurgences of COVID-19 occur, it will be necessary to monitor the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination behaviors and, especially, to promote confidence in the latter in individuals with decreased access to social support.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Breakwell, Glynis Marie</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 diagnostic tests</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Global Psychological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhQdRbK3-AS9kQBAFpyaTTDLjhVCr1sVCwVpvQzbzZjbtTLImmUV76x83u1vrriwiucjXc04-3pNljzE6xAjxVwGXmNIClbhAmNW4uL6T7eOGsIJyQu6mMaKswASjvexBCJcIYc6a5n62R0hNGePVfvbz3Ckj-zyM87nz8WU-B6_ALKDNvQlXubRtHmeQ9-YKejNzrs2dzo_Pvk7eFbjJI4RobLfCFlIpY2U0zr7OlXchFAHUcpr8Wxllrr0bVm4X1sR0wqckbd3wMLunZR_g0U1_kF18eP_l-GNxenYyOT46LRSnNBaNxG3NK8oBKQq4oUCmGpVQl1iqppU1SAYaGtQySkATnr4CNNUwharCmpOD7M3adz5OB2gV2OhlL-beDNL_EE4asb1jzUx0biFqVLIaNcng-Y2Bd9_G9HQxmKCg76UFNwZRVrgkpGwYS-jTv9BLN_r0E4limGPU0GqD6mQPwljt0rlqaSqOOC8RQqSuElXsoDqwkC7pLGiTlrf4wx18ai0MRu0UvNgSJCbC99jJMQQxOf_8_-zbk2322QY7A9nHWXD9uMxE2AbLNbiKjQd9WxSMxDLrYp11kbIuVlkX10n0ZLOct5Lf4U4AWQMhbdkO_J8a_MP2FxfJB5s</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Jaspal, Rusi</creator><creator>Breakwell, Glynis M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-9519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5681</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom</title><author>Jaspal, Rusi ; Breakwell, Glynis M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c744t-9a1d87547e0c4e194e3bf02e821ac9da8ea6efe90d643ef37193ef4febe551f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Breakwell, Glynis Marie</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 diagnostic tests</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Global Psychological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaspal, Rusi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breakwell, Glynis M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaspal, Rusi</au><au>Breakwell, Glynis M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>492-504</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Two samples of 227 and 214 adults completed surveys of social support, perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 preventive activity – in Study 1 likelihood of testing was examined and in Study 2 likelihood of both testing and vaccination were examined during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Path analysis showed, in Study 1, that access to help (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects through self-efficacy, perceived risk and preventive behavior; and, in Study 2, that neighborhood identification (as an indicator of social support) had a direct effect on likelihood of testing and indirect effects on likelihood of both testing and vaccination through the mediators of strength of social network, loneliness, perceived risk of COVID-19, and preventive activity. Both studies suggest that level of social support (conceptualized in different ways) is an important determinant of COVID-19 testing and Study 2 shows it is also a determinant of likelihood of vaccination. As resurgences of COVID-19 occur, it will be necessary to monitor the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination behaviors and, especially, to promote confidence in the latter in individuals with decreased access to social support.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33846675</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-9519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5681</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
| ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022-01, Vol.41 (1), p.492-504 |
| issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8026809 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Breakwell, Glynis Marie Coronaviruses COVID-19 diagnostic tests COVID-19 vaccines Epidemics Global Psychological Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic Health aspects Immunization Medical tests Psychology Public opinion Risk perception Social aspects Social networks Social Sciences Social support United Kingdom Vaccination |
| title | Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20support,%20perceived%20risk%20and%20the%20likelihood%20of%20COVID-19%20testing%20and%20vaccination:%20cross-sectional%20data%20from%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Jaspal,%20Rusi&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=492-504&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA772000385%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617109456&rft_id=info:pmid/33846675&rft_galeid=A772000385&rfr_iscdi=true |