Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998
There is ongoing controversy about who should be referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing to estimate fracture risk and diagnose osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of use of BMD testing in Ontario between 1992 and 1998. All physician claims from the Ontario Health...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal 2000-10, Vol.163 (9), p.1139-1143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1139 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal |
container_volume | 163 |
creator | Jaglal, Susan B McIsaac, Warren J Hawker, Gillian Jaakkimainen, Liisa Cadarette, Suzanne M Chan, Benjamin T.B |
description | There is ongoing controversy about who should be referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing to estimate fracture risk and diagnose osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of use of BMD testing in Ontario between 1992 and 1998.
All physician claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) claims database for BMD testing between Jan. 1, 1992, and Dec. 31, 1998, were categorized by age and sex of the patient and the specialty of the physician who ordered the test. Time trends and regional rate variation analyses were also performed. To examine the prevalence of repeat testing, an inception cohort of women who had a BMD test in 1996 was followed for 2 years from the date of first test.
From 1992 to 1998 the number of BMD tests performed per year in women increased from 34,402 to 230,936 and in men from 2,162 to 13,579. In 1998 most tests were being ordered by family physicians (80.2% in 1998 v. 52.1% in 1992). Approximately 1 in 7 women aged 55-69 years had BMD tests done in 1998. Within a 2-year period 29.3% of these women had the test repeated; the mean time between tests was 16 months. Regional rate variation analyses of BMD tests performed in 1996-1998 indicated a 235-fold variation in BMD test rates across counties in Ontario, with a range from 0.2 to 47.1 per 1000 women in the population.
The number of BMD tests performed each year in Ontario is increasing rapidly. However, the significant variation between rates of testing in different regions indicates that the diffusion of this technology may not be taking place according to population need. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_80246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17040595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h350t-a42ffc46792efcd65dd3dce0b817e4b175b51ae28722c8e6ce4133e79e73eecc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKxTAQhosoery8ggQXurGQW5sE3Ih4A0EXug5pO7U5tOkxSS3n7Y14Qd24mYGZ7x_-mdnIFoRLmVNG1Wa2wBjLnHOsdrLdEJYYpzrm29kOIVgoXMhFdvVgYgTvAhpbNAV4T7EDVI0O0GAdeNOjBlywcY0ihIisQ_cuGm_HU0SUonkKcj_bak0f4OAz72VPV5ePFzf53f317cX5Xd6xAsfccNq2NS-FotDWTVk0DWtqwJUkAnhFRFEVxACVgtJaQlkDJ4yBUCAYQF2zvezsY-5qqgZIUheTQb3ydjB-rUdj9e-Os51-Hl-1xJSXSX78Kffjy5S20YMNNfS9cTBOQQvKiWQM_wsSgTkuVJHAoz_gcpy8SzfQ6dSSKslEgg5_uv62-_WGBJx8AJ197mbrQYfB9H3CiZ7nmZRMq0Qzxd4AfViRPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204829837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jaglal, Susan B ; McIsaac, Warren J ; Hawker, Gillian ; Jaakkimainen, Liisa ; Cadarette, Suzanne M ; Chan, Benjamin T.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaglal, Susan B ; McIsaac, Warren J ; Hawker, Gillian ; Jaakkimainen, Liisa ; Cadarette, Suzanne M ; Chan, Benjamin T.B</creatorcontrib><description>There is ongoing controversy about who should be referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing to estimate fracture risk and diagnose osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of use of BMD testing in Ontario between 1992 and 1998.
All physician claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) claims database for BMD testing between Jan. 1, 1992, and Dec. 31, 1998, were categorized by age and sex of the patient and the specialty of the physician who ordered the test. Time trends and regional rate variation analyses were also performed. To examine the prevalence of repeat testing, an inception cohort of women who had a BMD test in 1996 was followed for 2 years from the date of first test.
From 1992 to 1998 the number of BMD tests performed per year in women increased from 34,402 to 230,936 and in men from 2,162 to 13,579. In 1998 most tests were being ordered by family physicians (80.2% in 1998 v. 52.1% in 1992). Approximately 1 in 7 women aged 55-69 years had BMD tests done in 1998. Within a 2-year period 29.3% of these women had the test repeated; the mean time between tests was 16 months. Regional rate variation analyses of BMD tests performed in 1996-1998 indicated a 235-fold variation in BMD test rates across counties in Ontario, with a range from 0.2 to 47.1 per 1000 women in the population.
The number of BMD tests performed each year in Ontario is increasing rapidly. However, the significant variation between rates of testing in different regions indicates that the diffusion of this technology may not be taking place according to population need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4409</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11079058</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMAJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Can Med Assoc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - utilization ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone density ; Bones ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fractures, Spontaneous - epidemiology ; Fractures, Spontaneous - prevention & control ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Ontario - epidemiology ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Osteoporosis - prevention & control ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - prevention & control ; Public health ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal, 2000-10, Vol.163 (9), p.1139-1143</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Oct 31, 2000</rights><rights>2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC80246/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC80246/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11079058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaglal, Susan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIsaac, Warren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaakkimainen, Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadarette, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Benjamin T.B</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>There is ongoing controversy about who should be referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing to estimate fracture risk and diagnose osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of use of BMD testing in Ontario between 1992 and 1998.
All physician claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) claims database for BMD testing between Jan. 1, 1992, and Dec. 31, 1998, were categorized by age and sex of the patient and the specialty of the physician who ordered the test. Time trends and regional rate variation analyses were also performed. To examine the prevalence of repeat testing, an inception cohort of women who had a BMD test in 1996 was followed for 2 years from the date of first test.
From 1992 to 1998 the number of BMD tests performed per year in women increased from 34,402 to 230,936 and in men from 2,162 to 13,579. In 1998 most tests were being ordered by family physicians (80.2% in 1998 v. 52.1% in 1992). Approximately 1 in 7 women aged 55-69 years had BMD tests done in 1998. Within a 2-year period 29.3% of these women had the test repeated; the mean time between tests was 16 months. Regional rate variation analyses of BMD tests performed in 1996-1998 indicated a 235-fold variation in BMD test rates across counties in Ontario, with a range from 0.2 to 47.1 per 1000 women in the population.
The number of BMD tests performed each year in Ontario is increasing rapidly. However, the significant variation between rates of testing in different regions indicates that the diffusion of this technology may not be taking place according to population need.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - utilization</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Spontaneous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures, Spontaneous - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - prevention & control</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0008-4409</issn><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKxTAQhosoery8ggQXurGQW5sE3Ih4A0EXug5pO7U5tOkxSS3n7Y14Qd24mYGZ7x_-mdnIFoRLmVNG1Wa2wBjLnHOsdrLdEJYYpzrm29kOIVgoXMhFdvVgYgTvAhpbNAV4T7EDVI0O0GAdeNOjBlywcY0ihIisQ_cuGm_HU0SUonkKcj_bak0f4OAz72VPV5ePFzf53f317cX5Xd6xAsfccNq2NS-FotDWTVk0DWtqwJUkAnhFRFEVxACVgtJaQlkDJ4yBUCAYQF2zvezsY-5qqgZIUheTQb3ydjB-rUdj9e-Os51-Hl-1xJSXSX78Kffjy5S20YMNNfS9cTBOQQvKiWQM_wsSgTkuVJHAoz_gcpy8SzfQ6dSSKslEgg5_uv62-_WGBJx8AJ197mbrQYfB9H3CiZ7nmZRMq0Qzxd4AfViRPg</recordid><startdate>20001031</startdate><enddate>20001031</enddate><creator>Jaglal, Susan B</creator><creator>McIsaac, Warren J</creator><creator>Hawker, Gillian</creator><creator>Jaakkimainen, Liisa</creator><creator>Cadarette, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Chan, Benjamin T.B</creator><general>Can Med Assoc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001031</creationdate><title>Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998</title><author>Jaglal, Susan B ; McIsaac, Warren J ; Hawker, Gillian ; Jaakkimainen, Liisa ; Cadarette, Suzanne M ; Chan, Benjamin T.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h350t-a42ffc46792efcd65dd3dce0b817e4b175b51ae28722c8e6ce4133e79e73eecc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - utilization</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Spontaneous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures, Spontaneous - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - prevention & control</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaglal, Susan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIsaac, Warren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaakkimainen, Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadarette, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Benjamin T.B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaglal, Susan B</au><au>McIsaac, Warren J</au><au>Hawker, Gillian</au><au>Jaakkimainen, Liisa</au><au>Cadarette, Suzanne M</au><au>Chan, Benjamin T.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2000-10-31</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1139</spage><epage>1143</epage><pages>1139-1143</pages><issn>0008-4409</issn><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><coden>CMAJAX</coden><abstract>There is ongoing controversy about who should be referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing to estimate fracture risk and diagnose osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of use of BMD testing in Ontario between 1992 and 1998.
All physician claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) claims database for BMD testing between Jan. 1, 1992, and Dec. 31, 1998, were categorized by age and sex of the patient and the specialty of the physician who ordered the test. Time trends and regional rate variation analyses were also performed. To examine the prevalence of repeat testing, an inception cohort of women who had a BMD test in 1996 was followed for 2 years from the date of first test.
From 1992 to 1998 the number of BMD tests performed per year in women increased from 34,402 to 230,936 and in men from 2,162 to 13,579. In 1998 most tests were being ordered by family physicians (80.2% in 1998 v. 52.1% in 1992). Approximately 1 in 7 women aged 55-69 years had BMD tests done in 1998. Within a 2-year period 29.3% of these women had the test repeated; the mean time between tests was 16 months. Regional rate variation analyses of BMD tests performed in 1996-1998 indicated a 235-fold variation in BMD test rates across counties in Ontario, with a range from 0.2 to 47.1 per 1000 women in the population.
The number of BMD tests performed each year in Ontario is increasing rapidly. However, the significant variation between rates of testing in different regions indicates that the diffusion of this technology may not be taking place according to population need.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Can Med Assoc</pub><pmid>11079058</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-4409 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal, 2000-10, Vol.163 (9), p.1139-1143 |
issn | 0008-4409 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_80246 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - utilization Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone density Bones Cross-Sectional Studies Female Fractures, Spontaneous - epidemiology Fractures, Spontaneous - prevention & control Humans Incidence Male Mass Screening - utilization Middle Aged Ontario - epidemiology Osteoporosis - epidemiology Osteoporosis - prevention & control Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - prevention & control Public health Testing |
title | Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20use%20of%20the%20bone%20mineral%20density%20test%20in%20Ontario,%201992-1998&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Jaglal,%20Susan%20B&rft.date=2000-10-31&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1139&rft.epage=1143&rft.pages=1139-1143&rft.issn=0008-4409&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft.coden=CMAJAX&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17040595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204829837&rft_id=info:pmid/11079058&rfr_iscdi=true |