Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles

RNA therapeutics have high potential that is yet to be fully realized, largely due to challenges involved in the appropriate delivery to target cells. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bound nanoparticles released by cells of all types and possess numerous features that may help overcome this h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nano letters 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1888-1895
Hauptverfasser: Murphy, Daniel E, de Jong, Olivier G, Evers, Martijn J. W, Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah, Schiffelers, Raymond M, Vader, Pieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1895
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1888
container_title Nano letters
container_volume 21
creator Murphy, Daniel E
de Jong, Olivier G
Evers, Martijn J. W
Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah
Schiffelers, Raymond M
Vader, Pieter
description RNA therapeutics have high potential that is yet to be fully realized, largely due to challenges involved in the appropriate delivery to target cells. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bound nanoparticles released by cells of all types and possess numerous features that may help overcome this hurdle and have emerged as a promising RNA delivery vehicle candidate. Despite extensive research into the engineering of EVs for RNA delivery, it remains unclear how the intrinsic RNA delivery efficiency of EVs compares to currently used synthetic RNA delivery vehicles. Using a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based RNA transfer reporter system, we compared the delivery efficiency of EVs to clinically approved state-of-the-art DLin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticles and several in vitro transfection reagents. We found that EVs delivered RNA several orders of magnitude more efficiently than these synthetic systems. This finding supports the continued research into EVs as potential RNA delivery vehicles.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8023702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489271012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a515t-b5083630bb048be842530d56e6d63a6ad0abf401f8fd7a125cedee0024e238583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1v0zAUtRATG4V_gJAfeWm5tuM04QGpKgMmTUVibK-W49xQT05cbGei_x6HdtV44cGypfNxz_Uh5A2DBQPO3msTF4MevMOUFswAQF08IxdMCpiXdc2fn95VcU5exng_UYSEF-RcCLmEuiwvSNroNAbtqA_0Zj-kLSZr6PfNin5CZx8w7D_QFb1J3pqt9T2mkOG173c62OgH6jt6-TsFbdC50elA7zBa4zBSPbRPHDc5adakv9grctZpF_H18Z6R28-XP9Zf59ffvlytV9dzLZlM80ZCJUoBTQNF1WBV8LxPK0ss21LoUregm64A1lVdu9SMS4MtIgAvkItKVmJGPh58d2PTY2twyEmd2gXb67BXXlv1LzLYrfrpH1QFXCzzmZF3R4Pgf40Yk-ptnFbVA_oxKl5UNV8yYBO1OFBN8DEG7E5jGKipMJULU4-FqWNhWfb2acST6LGhTIADYZLf-zEM-cf-7_kHE-qotw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489271012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Murphy, Daniel E ; de Jong, Olivier G ; Evers, Martijn J. W ; Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah ; Schiffelers, Raymond M ; Vader, Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Daniel E ; de Jong, Olivier G ; Evers, Martijn J. W ; Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah ; Schiffelers, Raymond M ; Vader, Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>RNA therapeutics have high potential that is yet to be fully realized, largely due to challenges involved in the appropriate delivery to target cells. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bound nanoparticles released by cells of all types and possess numerous features that may help overcome this hurdle and have emerged as a promising RNA delivery vehicle candidate. Despite extensive research into the engineering of EVs for RNA delivery, it remains unclear how the intrinsic RNA delivery efficiency of EVs compares to currently used synthetic RNA delivery vehicles. Using a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based RNA transfer reporter system, we compared the delivery efficiency of EVs to clinically approved state-of-the-art DLin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticles and several in vitro transfection reagents. We found that EVs delivered RNA several orders of magnitude more efficiently than these synthetic systems. This finding supports the continued research into EVs as potential RNA delivery vehicles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-6984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33570966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Letter</subject><ispartof>Nano letters, 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1888-1895</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society 2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a515t-b5083630bb048be842530d56e6d63a6ad0abf401f8fd7a125cedee0024e238583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a515t-b5083630bb048be842530d56e6d63a6ad0abf401f8fd7a125cedee0024e238583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1012-9815 ; 0000-0002-7059-8920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Olivier G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Martijn J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffelers, Raymond M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles</title><title>Nano letters</title><addtitle>Nano Lett</addtitle><description>RNA therapeutics have high potential that is yet to be fully realized, largely due to challenges involved in the appropriate delivery to target cells. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bound nanoparticles released by cells of all types and possess numerous features that may help overcome this hurdle and have emerged as a promising RNA delivery vehicle candidate. Despite extensive research into the engineering of EVs for RNA delivery, it remains unclear how the intrinsic RNA delivery efficiency of EVs compares to currently used synthetic RNA delivery vehicles. Using a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based RNA transfer reporter system, we compared the delivery efficiency of EVs to clinically approved state-of-the-art DLin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticles and several in vitro transfection reagents. We found that EVs delivered RNA several orders of magnitude more efficiently than these synthetic systems. This finding supports the continued research into EVs as potential RNA delivery vehicles.</description><subject>Letter</subject><issn>1530-6984</issn><issn>1530-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UV1v0zAUtRATG4V_gJAfeWm5tuM04QGpKgMmTUVibK-W49xQT05cbGei_x6HdtV44cGypfNxz_Uh5A2DBQPO3msTF4MevMOUFswAQF08IxdMCpiXdc2fn95VcU5exng_UYSEF-RcCLmEuiwvSNroNAbtqA_0Zj-kLSZr6PfNin5CZx8w7D_QFb1J3pqt9T2mkOG173c62OgH6jt6-TsFbdC50elA7zBa4zBSPbRPHDc5adakv9grctZpF_H18Z6R28-XP9Zf59ffvlytV9dzLZlM80ZCJUoBTQNF1WBV8LxPK0ss21LoUregm64A1lVdu9SMS4MtIgAvkItKVmJGPh58d2PTY2twyEmd2gXb67BXXlv1LzLYrfrpH1QFXCzzmZF3R4Pgf40Yk-ptnFbVA_oxKl5UNV8yYBO1OFBN8DEG7E5jGKipMJULU4-FqWNhWfb2acST6LGhTIADYZLf-zEM-cf-7_kHE-qotw</recordid><startdate>20210224</startdate><enddate>20210224</enddate><creator>Murphy, Daniel E</creator><creator>de Jong, Olivier G</creator><creator>Evers, Martijn J. W</creator><creator>Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah</creator><creator>Schiffelers, Raymond M</creator><creator>Vader, Pieter</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-9815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-8920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210224</creationdate><title>Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles</title><author>Murphy, Daniel E ; de Jong, Olivier G ; Evers, Martijn J. W ; Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah ; Schiffelers, Raymond M ; Vader, Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a515t-b5083630bb048be842530d56e6d63a6ad0abf401f8fd7a125cedee0024e238583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Letter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Olivier G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Martijn J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffelers, Raymond M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nano letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murphy, Daniel E</au><au>de Jong, Olivier G</au><au>Evers, Martijn J. W</au><au>Nurazizah, Maratussholikhah</au><au>Schiffelers, Raymond M</au><au>Vader, Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles</atitle><jtitle>Nano letters</jtitle><addtitle>Nano Lett</addtitle><date>2021-02-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1888</spage><epage>1895</epage><pages>1888-1895</pages><issn>1530-6984</issn><eissn>1530-6992</eissn><abstract>RNA therapeutics have high potential that is yet to be fully realized, largely due to challenges involved in the appropriate delivery to target cells. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bound nanoparticles released by cells of all types and possess numerous features that may help overcome this hurdle and have emerged as a promising RNA delivery vehicle candidate. Despite extensive research into the engineering of EVs for RNA delivery, it remains unclear how the intrinsic RNA delivery efficiency of EVs compares to currently used synthetic RNA delivery vehicles. Using a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based RNA transfer reporter system, we compared the delivery efficiency of EVs to clinically approved state-of-the-art DLin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticles and several in vitro transfection reagents. We found that EVs delivered RNA several orders of magnitude more efficiently than these synthetic systems. This finding supports the continued research into EVs as potential RNA delivery vehicles.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>33570966</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-9815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-8920</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-6984
ispartof Nano letters, 2021-02, Vol.21 (4), p.1888-1895
issn 1530-6984
1530-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8023702
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Letter
title Natural or Synthetic RNA Delivery: A Stoichiometric Comparison of Extracellular Vesicles and Synthetic Nanoparticles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A54%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20or%20Synthetic%20RNA%20Delivery:%20A%20Stoichiometric%20Comparison%20of%20Extracellular%20Vesicles%20and%20Synthetic%20Nanoparticles&rft.jtitle=Nano%20letters&rft.au=Murphy,%20Daniel%20E&rft.date=2021-02-24&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1888&rft.epage=1895&rft.pages=1888-1895&rft.issn=1530-6984&rft.eissn=1530-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2489271012%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489271012&rft_id=info:pmid/33570966&rfr_iscdi=true