Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting

IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO) sharply decreases with time. Because EVT is restricted to comprehensive stroke centers, prehospital triage of patients with acute stroke codes for sLAVO is crucial, and although severa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of neurology (Chicago) 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.157-164
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, T. Truc My, van den Wijngaard, Ido R, Bosch, Jan, van Belle, Eduard, van Zwet, Erik W, Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara, Duijndam, Dion, Koster, Gaia T, de Schryver, Els L. L. M, Kloos, Loet M. H, de Laat, Karlijn F, Aerden, Leo A. M, Zylicz, Stas A, Wermer, Marieke J. H, Kruyt, Nyika D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Archives of neurology (Chicago)
container_volume 78
creator Nguyen, T. Truc My
van den Wijngaard, Ido R
Bosch, Jan
van Belle, Eduard
van Zwet, Erik W
Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara
Duijndam, Dion
Koster, Gaia T
de Schryver, Els L. L. M
Kloos, Loet M. H
de Laat, Karlijn F
Aerden, Leo A. M
Zylicz, Stas A
Wermer, Marieke J. H
Kruyt, Nyika D
description IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO) sharply decreases with time. Because EVT is restricted to comprehensive stroke centers, prehospital triage of patients with acute stroke codes for sLAVO is crucial, and although several prediction scales are already in use, external validation, head-to-head comparison, and feasibility data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To conduct external validation and head-to-head comparisons of 7 sLAVO prediction scales in the emergency medical service (EMS) setting and to assess scale feasibility by EMS paramedics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 in a large urban center in the Netherlands with a population of approximately 2 million people and included 2 EMSs, 3 comprehensive stroke centers, and 4 primary stroke centers. Participants were consecutive patients aged 18 years or older for whom an EMS-initiated acute stroke code was activated. Of 2812 acute stroke codes, 805 (28.6%) were excluded, because no application was used or no clinical data were available, leaving 2007 patients included in the analyses. EXPOSURES: Applications with clinical observations filled in by EMS paramedics for each acute stroke code enabling reconstruction of the following 7 prediction scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS); Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE); Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool; Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS); gaze-face-arm-speech-time; Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination; and gaze, facial asymmetry, level of consciousness, extinction/inattention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Planned primary and secondary outcomes were sLAVO and feasibility rates (ie, the proportion of acute stroke codes for which the prehospital scale could be reconstructed). Predictive performance measures included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of 2007 patients who received acute stroke codes (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [14.9] years; 1021 [50.9%] male), 158 (7.9%) had sLAVO. Accuracy of the scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, with LAMS and RACE scales yielding the highest scores. Sensitivity of the scales ranged from 38% to 62%, and specificity from 80% to 93%. Scale feasibility rates ranged from 78% to 88%, with the highest rate for the PASS scale. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that all 7 prediction scales had goo
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8015863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2773646</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2465757449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521t-11f73aa92bef80ca019e4b785bb90d95f33667549699f3c063a871f2701b8c143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtrGzEUhUVpaEKaP1BKEXTTjV29H5tCMG1TMCSQpFuhkSVbRjNypZlC_n01OHUfdyOh-52DDgeAtxgtMUL44972dvBTyWlJEEFLxrB6AS4IFmohMJcvT3emz8FVrXvURiHEKHsFziklnAiKL8BulfuDLbHmAeYA74rf5XqIo03w3tnkKwy5zM-b6MY4bOHalq2H18PoS2yb775Wn-Ctc2mqsZnEAY67BvTdlOzgPLz34yx8Dc6CTdVfPZ-X4PHL54fVzWJ9-_Xb6nq9sJzgcYFxkNRaTTofFHIWYe1ZJxXvOo02mgdKhZCcaaF1oA4JapXEgUiEO-Uwo5fg09H3MHW93zg_jMUmcyixt-XJZBvNv5sh7sw2_zQKYa4EbQYfng1K_jH5Opo-VudTS-PzVA1hgksuGdMNff8fus9TGVq8RmlJ2kjeKHakXMm1Fh9On8HIzG2aP22auU0zt9lk7_4OchL97q4Bb45AU5-2REoqmKC_AN3Ypuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497222275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Nguyen, T. Truc My ; van den Wijngaard, Ido R ; Bosch, Jan ; van Belle, Eduard ; van Zwet, Erik W ; Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara ; Duijndam, Dion ; Koster, Gaia T ; de Schryver, Els L. L. M ; Kloos, Loet M. H ; de Laat, Karlijn F ; Aerden, Leo A. M ; Zylicz, Stas A ; Wermer, Marieke J. H ; Kruyt, Nyika D</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, T. Truc My ; van den Wijngaard, Ido R ; Bosch, Jan ; van Belle, Eduard ; van Zwet, Erik W ; Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara ; Duijndam, Dion ; Koster, Gaia T ; de Schryver, Els L. L. M ; Kloos, Loet M. H ; de Laat, Karlijn F ; Aerden, Leo A. M ; Zylicz, Stas A ; Wermer, Marieke J. H ; Kruyt, Nyika D</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO) sharply decreases with time. Because EVT is restricted to comprehensive stroke centers, prehospital triage of patients with acute stroke codes for sLAVO is crucial, and although several prediction scales are already in use, external validation, head-to-head comparison, and feasibility data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To conduct external validation and head-to-head comparisons of 7 sLAVO prediction scales in the emergency medical service (EMS) setting and to assess scale feasibility by EMS paramedics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 in a large urban center in the Netherlands with a population of approximately 2 million people and included 2 EMSs, 3 comprehensive stroke centers, and 4 primary stroke centers. Participants were consecutive patients aged 18 years or older for whom an EMS-initiated acute stroke code was activated. Of 2812 acute stroke codes, 805 (28.6%) were excluded, because no application was used or no clinical data were available, leaving 2007 patients included in the analyses. EXPOSURES: Applications with clinical observations filled in by EMS paramedics for each acute stroke code enabling reconstruction of the following 7 prediction scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS); Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE); Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool; Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS); gaze-face-arm-speech-time; Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination; and gaze, facial asymmetry, level of consciousness, extinction/inattention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Planned primary and secondary outcomes were sLAVO and feasibility rates (ie, the proportion of acute stroke codes for which the prehospital scale could be reconstructed). Predictive performance measures included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of 2007 patients who received acute stroke codes (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [14.9] years; 1021 [50.9%] male), 158 (7.9%) had sLAVO. Accuracy of the scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, with LAMS and RACE scales yielding the highest scores. Sensitivity of the scales ranged from 38% to 62%, and specificity from 80% to 93%. Scale feasibility rates ranged from 78% to 88%, with the highest rate for the PASS scale. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that all 7 prediction scales had good accuracy, high specificity, and low sensitivity, with LAMS and RACE being the highest scoring scales. Feasibility rates ranged between 78% and 88% and should be taken into account before implementing a scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33252631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulances - standards ; Blood vessels ; Cardiovascular system ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - therapy ; Codes ; Cohort Studies ; Comments ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Services - standards ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Head ; Humans ; Image reconstruction ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occlusion ; Online First ; Original Investigation ; Patients ; Performance prediction ; Predictions ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stroke ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Archives of neurology (Chicago), 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.157-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Feb 2021</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521t-11f73aa92bef80ca019e4b785bb90d95f33667549699f3c063a871f2701b8c143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521t-11f73aa92bef80ca019e4b785bb90d95f33667549699f3c063a871f2701b8c143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,780,784,885,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33252631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, T. Truc My</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Wijngaard, Ido R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Belle, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zwet, Erik W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duijndam, Dion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Gaia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Schryver, Els L. L. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloos, Loet M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Laat, Karlijn F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerden, Leo A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylicz, Stas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wermer, Marieke J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyt, Nyika D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting</title><title>Archives of neurology (Chicago)</title><addtitle>JAMA Neurol</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO) sharply decreases with time. Because EVT is restricted to comprehensive stroke centers, prehospital triage of patients with acute stroke codes for sLAVO is crucial, and although several prediction scales are already in use, external validation, head-to-head comparison, and feasibility data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To conduct external validation and head-to-head comparisons of 7 sLAVO prediction scales in the emergency medical service (EMS) setting and to assess scale feasibility by EMS paramedics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 in a large urban center in the Netherlands with a population of approximately 2 million people and included 2 EMSs, 3 comprehensive stroke centers, and 4 primary stroke centers. Participants were consecutive patients aged 18 years or older for whom an EMS-initiated acute stroke code was activated. Of 2812 acute stroke codes, 805 (28.6%) were excluded, because no application was used or no clinical data were available, leaving 2007 patients included in the analyses. EXPOSURES: Applications with clinical observations filled in by EMS paramedics for each acute stroke code enabling reconstruction of the following 7 prediction scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS); Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE); Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool; Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS); gaze-face-arm-speech-time; Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination; and gaze, facial asymmetry, level of consciousness, extinction/inattention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Planned primary and secondary outcomes were sLAVO and feasibility rates (ie, the proportion of acute stroke codes for which the prehospital scale could be reconstructed). Predictive performance measures included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of 2007 patients who received acute stroke codes (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [14.9] years; 1021 [50.9%] male), 158 (7.9%) had sLAVO. Accuracy of the scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, with LAMS and RACE scales yielding the highest scores. Sensitivity of the scales ranged from 38% to 62%, and specificity from 80% to 93%. Scale feasibility rates ranged from 78% to 88%, with the highest rate for the PASS scale. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that all 7 prediction scales had good accuracy, high specificity, and low sensitivity, with LAMS and RACE being the highest scoring scales. Feasibility rates ranged between 78% and 88% and should be taken into account before implementing a scale.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulances - standards</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - standards</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>Online First</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>2168-6149</issn><issn>2168-6157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtrGzEUhUVpaEKaP1BKEXTTjV29H5tCMG1TMCSQpFuhkSVbRjNypZlC_n01OHUfdyOh-52DDgeAtxgtMUL44972dvBTyWlJEEFLxrB6AS4IFmohMJcvT3emz8FVrXvURiHEKHsFziklnAiKL8BulfuDLbHmAeYA74rf5XqIo03w3tnkKwy5zM-b6MY4bOHalq2H18PoS2yb775Wn-Ctc2mqsZnEAY67BvTdlOzgPLz34yx8Dc6CTdVfPZ-X4PHL54fVzWJ9-_Xb6nq9sJzgcYFxkNRaTTofFHIWYe1ZJxXvOo02mgdKhZCcaaF1oA4JapXEgUiEO-Uwo5fg09H3MHW93zg_jMUmcyixt-XJZBvNv5sh7sw2_zQKYa4EbQYfng1K_jH5Opo-VudTS-PzVA1hgksuGdMNff8fus9TGVq8RmlJ2kjeKHakXMm1Fh9On8HIzG2aP22auU0zt9lk7_4OchL97q4Bb45AU5-2REoqmKC_AN3Ypuw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Nguyen, T. Truc My</creator><creator>van den Wijngaard, Ido R</creator><creator>Bosch, Jan</creator><creator>van Belle, Eduard</creator><creator>van Zwet, Erik W</creator><creator>Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara</creator><creator>Duijndam, Dion</creator><creator>Koster, Gaia T</creator><creator>de Schryver, Els L. L. M</creator><creator>Kloos, Loet M. H</creator><creator>de Laat, Karlijn F</creator><creator>Aerden, Leo A. M</creator><creator>Zylicz, Stas A</creator><creator>Wermer, Marieke J. H</creator><creator>Kruyt, Nyika D</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting</title><author>Nguyen, T. Truc My ; van den Wijngaard, Ido R ; Bosch, Jan ; van Belle, Eduard ; van Zwet, Erik W ; Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara ; Duijndam, Dion ; Koster, Gaia T ; de Schryver, Els L. L. M ; Kloos, Loet M. H ; de Laat, Karlijn F ; Aerden, Leo A. M ; Zylicz, Stas A ; Wermer, Marieke J. H ; Kruyt, Nyika D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521t-11f73aa92bef80ca019e4b785bb90d95f33667549699f3c063a871f2701b8c143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulances - standards</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - standards</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>Online First</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, T. Truc My</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Wijngaard, Ido R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Belle, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zwet, Erik W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duijndam, Dion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Gaia T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Schryver, Els L. L. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloos, Loet M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Laat, Karlijn F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerden, Leo A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylicz, Stas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wermer, Marieke J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyt, Nyika D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of neurology (Chicago)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, T. Truc My</au><au>van den Wijngaard, Ido R</au><au>Bosch, Jan</au><au>van Belle, Eduard</au><au>van Zwet, Erik W</au><au>Dofferhoff-Vermeulen, Tamara</au><au>Duijndam, Dion</au><au>Koster, Gaia T</au><au>de Schryver, Els L. L. M</au><au>Kloos, Loet M. H</au><au>de Laat, Karlijn F</au><au>Aerden, Leo A. M</au><au>Zylicz, Stas A</au><au>Wermer, Marieke J. H</au><au>Kruyt, Nyika D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting</atitle><jtitle>Archives of neurology (Chicago)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Neurol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>157-164</pages><issn>2168-6149</issn><eissn>2168-6157</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for symptomatic large anterior vessel occlusion (sLAVO) sharply decreases with time. Because EVT is restricted to comprehensive stroke centers, prehospital triage of patients with acute stroke codes for sLAVO is crucial, and although several prediction scales are already in use, external validation, head-to-head comparison, and feasibility data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To conduct external validation and head-to-head comparisons of 7 sLAVO prediction scales in the emergency medical service (EMS) setting and to assess scale feasibility by EMS paramedics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 in a large urban center in the Netherlands with a population of approximately 2 million people and included 2 EMSs, 3 comprehensive stroke centers, and 4 primary stroke centers. Participants were consecutive patients aged 18 years or older for whom an EMS-initiated acute stroke code was activated. Of 2812 acute stroke codes, 805 (28.6%) were excluded, because no application was used or no clinical data were available, leaving 2007 patients included in the analyses. EXPOSURES: Applications with clinical observations filled in by EMS paramedics for each acute stroke code enabling reconstruction of the following 7 prediction scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS); Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE); Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool; Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (PASS); gaze-face-arm-speech-time; Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination; and gaze, facial asymmetry, level of consciousness, extinction/inattention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Planned primary and secondary outcomes were sLAVO and feasibility rates (ie, the proportion of acute stroke codes for which the prehospital scale could be reconstructed). Predictive performance measures included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the Youden index, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of 2007 patients who received acute stroke codes (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [14.9] years; 1021 [50.9%] male), 158 (7.9%) had sLAVO. Accuracy of the scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, with LAMS and RACE scales yielding the highest scores. Sensitivity of the scales ranged from 38% to 62%, and specificity from 80% to 93%. Scale feasibility rates ranged from 78% to 88%, with the highest rate for the PASS scale. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that all 7 prediction scales had good accuracy, high specificity, and low sensitivity, with LAMS and RACE being the highest scoring scales. Feasibility rates ranged between 78% and 88% and should be taken into account before implementing a scale.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>33252631</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6149
ispartof Archives of neurology (Chicago), 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.157-164
issn 2168-6149
2168-6157
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8015863
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Accuracy
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulances - standards
Blood vessels
Cardiovascular system
Cerebrovascular Disorders - diagnosis
Cerebrovascular Disorders - therapy
Codes
Cohort Studies
Comments
Emergency medical services
Emergency Medical Services - methods
Emergency Medical Services - standards
Feasibility Studies
Female
Head
Humans
Image reconstruction
Male
Middle Aged
Occlusion
Online First
Original Investigation
Patients
Performance prediction
Predictions
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke
Urban areas
title Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A19%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Prehospital%20Scales%20for%20Predicting%20Large%20Anterior%20Vessel%20Occlusion%20in%20the%20Ambulance%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20neurology%20(Chicago)&rft.au=Nguyen,%20T.%20Truc%20My&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=157-164&rft.issn=2168-6149&rft.eissn=2168-6157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2465757449%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497222275&rft_id=info:pmid/33252631&rft_ama_id=2773646&rfr_iscdi=true