CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department

The identification of a bacterial, viral, or even noninfectious cause is essential in the management of febrile syndrome in the emergency department (ED), especially in epidemic contexts such as flu or CoVID‐19. The aim was to assess discriminative performances of two biomarkers, CD64 on neutrophils...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry. Part A 2021-05, Vol.99 (5), p.435-445
Hauptverfasser: Bourgoin, Pénélope, Soliveres, Thomas, Barbaresi, Alexandra, Loundou, Anderson, Belkacem, Inès Ait, Arnoux, Isabelle, Bernot, Denis, Loosveld, Marie, Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel, Michelet, Pierre, Malergue, Fabrice, Markarian, Thibaut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 445
container_issue 5
container_start_page 435
container_title Cytometry. Part A
container_volume 99
creator Bourgoin, Pénélope
Soliveres, Thomas
Barbaresi, Alexandra
Loundou, Anderson
Belkacem, Inès Ait
Arnoux, Isabelle
Bernot, Denis
Loosveld, Marie
Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel
Michelet, Pierre
Malergue, Fabrice
Markarian, Thibaut
description The identification of a bacterial, viral, or even noninfectious cause is essential in the management of febrile syndrome in the emergency department (ED), especially in epidemic contexts such as flu or CoVID‐19. The aim was to assess discriminative performances of two biomarkers, CD64 on neutrophils (nCD64) and CD169 on monocytes (mCD169), using a new flow cytometry procedure, in patients presenting with fever to the ED during epidemics. Eighty five adult patients presenting with potential infection were included during the 2019 flu season in the ED of La Timone Hospital. They were divided into four diagnostic outcomes according to their clinical records: no‐infection, bacterial infection, viral infection and co‐infection. Seventy six patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were also compared to 48 healthy volunteers. For the first cohort, 38 (45%) patients were diagnosed with bacterial infections, 11 (13%) with viral infections and 29 (34%) with co‐infections. mCD169 was elevated in patients with viral infections, with a majority of Flu A virus or Respiratory Syncytial Virus, while nCD64 was elevated in subjects with bacterial infections, with a majority of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. nCD64 and mCD169 showed 90% and 80% sensitivity, and 78% and 91% specificity, respectively, for identifying patients with bacterial or viral infections. When studied in a second cohort, mCD169 was elevated in 95% of patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and remained at normal level in 100% of healthy volunteers. nCD64 and mCD169 have potential for accurately distinguishing bacterial and acute viral infections. Combined in an easy and rapid flow cytometry procedure, they constitute a potential improvement for infection management in the ED, and could even help for triage of patients during emerging epidemics.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cyto.a.24314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8014466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480754437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5194-cbe9162e3c53286df68d8f60fefaf0bdc01186d89eacc13a9facc2bbdf4670b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxlcIREvhxhlZ4gISCf6f9QUp2hRaKVIvBYmT5fWOG1e762DvpsqNR-AZeRIctkTQA6cZzfz8zXi-onhJ8JxgTN_b_RDmZk45I_xRcUqEoDOuGH58zCk9KZ6ldIsxE5jRp8UJY1wRRclpcVetiFTI9A2qVpIjG8a2QRtot6jxzkGEfvBmAFQbO0D0pkUuhg5V4cvl6uf3H0ShEFEYNhDRzsfc9r0DO_jQp5yi3EDnHcQb6O0erWBr4tBlzefFE2faBC_u41nx-eP5dXUxW199uqyW65kVRPGZrUERSYFZwWgpGyfLpnQSO3DG4bqxmJBcLhUYawkzyuVI67pxXC5wjdlZ8WHS3Y51B43No_OSeht9Z-JeB-P1v53eb_RN2OkSE86lzAJvJ4HNg2cXy7U-1PJRpVCK7khm39wPi-HbCGnQnU8W2tb0EMakKS_xQnDOFhl9_QC9DWPs8yk0FZSUYiEZz9S7ibIxpBTBHTcgWB_c1wf3tdG_3c_4q78_e4T_2J0BPgF3voX9f8V09fX6ajnp_gIq0b0S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521857634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bourgoin, Pénélope ; Soliveres, Thomas ; Barbaresi, Alexandra ; Loundou, Anderson ; Belkacem, Inès Ait ; Arnoux, Isabelle ; Bernot, Denis ; Loosveld, Marie ; Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel ; Michelet, Pierre ; Malergue, Fabrice ; Markarian, Thibaut</creator><creatorcontrib>Bourgoin, Pénélope ; Soliveres, Thomas ; Barbaresi, Alexandra ; Loundou, Anderson ; Belkacem, Inès Ait ; Arnoux, Isabelle ; Bernot, Denis ; Loosveld, Marie ; Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel ; Michelet, Pierre ; Malergue, Fabrice ; Markarian, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><description>The identification of a bacterial, viral, or even noninfectious cause is essential in the management of febrile syndrome in the emergency department (ED), especially in epidemic contexts such as flu or CoVID‐19. The aim was to assess discriminative performances of two biomarkers, CD64 on neutrophils (nCD64) and CD169 on monocytes (mCD169), using a new flow cytometry procedure, in patients presenting with fever to the ED during epidemics. Eighty five adult patients presenting with potential infection were included during the 2019 flu season in the ED of La Timone Hospital. They were divided into four diagnostic outcomes according to their clinical records: no‐infection, bacterial infection, viral infection and co‐infection. Seventy six patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were also compared to 48 healthy volunteers. For the first cohort, 38 (45%) patients were diagnosed with bacterial infections, 11 (13%) with viral infections and 29 (34%) with co‐infections. mCD169 was elevated in patients with viral infections, with a majority of Flu A virus or Respiratory Syncytial Virus, while nCD64 was elevated in subjects with bacterial infections, with a majority of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. nCD64 and mCD169 showed 90% and 80% sensitivity, and 78% and 91% specificity, respectively, for identifying patients with bacterial or viral infections. When studied in a second cohort, mCD169 was elevated in 95% of patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and remained at normal level in 100% of healthy volunteers. nCD64 and mCD169 have potential for accurately distinguishing bacterial and acute viral infections. Combined in an easy and rapid flow cytometry procedure, they constitute a potential improvement for infection management in the ED, and could even help for triage of patients during emerging epidemics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4930</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24314</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33491921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial diseases ; bacterial infection ; Bacterial infections ; Biomarkers ; COVID-19 ; COVID‐19 Fast Track ; E coli ; emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Epidemics ; Fever ; Flow cytometry ; Infections ; Leukocytes (neutrophilic) ; Life Sciences ; Monocytes ; Original ; Patients ; Public health ; Rapid flow ; Respiratory syncytial virus ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Streptococcus infections ; Viral diseases ; viral infection ; Viral infections ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Cytometry. Part A, 2021-05, Vol.99 (5), p.435-445</ispartof><rights>2021 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry</rights><rights>2021 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5194-cbe9162e3c53286df68d8f60fefaf0bdc01186d89eacc13a9facc2bbdf4670b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5194-cbe9162e3c53286df68d8f60fefaf0bdc01186d89eacc13a9facc2bbdf4670b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1322-1390 ; 0000-0002-8372-4148 ; 0000-0003-4530-9944 ; 0000-0003-1233-713X ; 0000-0003-4301-9476 ; 0000-0002-9970-2680 ; 0000-0002-5960-7240 ; 0000-0002-9065-722X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcyto.a.24314$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcyto.a.24314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://amu.hal.science/hal-03565992$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bourgoin, Pénélope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliveres, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaresi, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkacem, Inès Ait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernot, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loosveld, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malergue, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markarian, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><title>CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department</title><title>Cytometry. Part A</title><addtitle>Cytometry A</addtitle><description>The identification of a bacterial, viral, or even noninfectious cause is essential in the management of febrile syndrome in the emergency department (ED), especially in epidemic contexts such as flu or CoVID‐19. The aim was to assess discriminative performances of two biomarkers, CD64 on neutrophils (nCD64) and CD169 on monocytes (mCD169), using a new flow cytometry procedure, in patients presenting with fever to the ED during epidemics. Eighty five adult patients presenting with potential infection were included during the 2019 flu season in the ED of La Timone Hospital. They were divided into four diagnostic outcomes according to their clinical records: no‐infection, bacterial infection, viral infection and co‐infection. Seventy six patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were also compared to 48 healthy volunteers. For the first cohort, 38 (45%) patients were diagnosed with bacterial infections, 11 (13%) with viral infections and 29 (34%) with co‐infections. mCD169 was elevated in patients with viral infections, with a majority of Flu A virus or Respiratory Syncytial Virus, while nCD64 was elevated in subjects with bacterial infections, with a majority of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. nCD64 and mCD169 showed 90% and 80% sensitivity, and 78% and 91% specificity, respectively, for identifying patients with bacterial or viral infections. When studied in a second cohort, mCD169 was elevated in 95% of patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and remained at normal level in 100% of healthy volunteers. nCD64 and mCD169 have potential for accurately distinguishing bacterial and acute viral infections. Combined in an easy and rapid flow cytometry procedure, they constitute a potential improvement for infection management in the ED, and could even help for triage of patients during emerging epidemics.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>bacterial infection</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID‐19 Fast Track</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rapid flow</subject><subject>Respiratory syncytial virus</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>viral infection</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1552-4922</issn><issn>1552-4930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxlcIREvhxhlZ4gISCf6f9QUp2hRaKVIvBYmT5fWOG1e762DvpsqNR-AZeRIctkTQA6cZzfz8zXi-onhJ8JxgTN_b_RDmZk45I_xRcUqEoDOuGH58zCk9KZ6ldIsxE5jRp8UJY1wRRclpcVetiFTI9A2qVpIjG8a2QRtot6jxzkGEfvBmAFQbO0D0pkUuhg5V4cvl6uf3H0ShEFEYNhDRzsfc9r0DO_jQp5yi3EDnHcQb6O0erWBr4tBlzefFE2faBC_u41nx-eP5dXUxW199uqyW65kVRPGZrUERSYFZwWgpGyfLpnQSO3DG4bqxmJBcLhUYawkzyuVI67pxXC5wjdlZ8WHS3Y51B43No_OSeht9Z-JeB-P1v53eb_RN2OkSE86lzAJvJ4HNg2cXy7U-1PJRpVCK7khm39wPi-HbCGnQnU8W2tb0EMakKS_xQnDOFhl9_QC9DWPs8yk0FZSUYiEZz9S7ibIxpBTBHTcgWB_c1wf3tdG_3c_4q78_e4T_2J0BPgF3voX9f8V09fX6ajnp_gIq0b0S</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Bourgoin, Pénélope</creator><creator>Soliveres, Thomas</creator><creator>Barbaresi, Alexandra</creator><creator>Loundou, Anderson</creator><creator>Belkacem, Inès Ait</creator><creator>Arnoux, Isabelle</creator><creator>Bernot, Denis</creator><creator>Loosveld, Marie</creator><creator>Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel</creator><creator>Michelet, Pierre</creator><creator>Malergue, Fabrice</creator><creator>Markarian, Thibaut</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1322-1390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-4148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-9944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-713X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-2680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-7240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9065-722X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department</title><author>Bourgoin, Pénélope ; Soliveres, Thomas ; Barbaresi, Alexandra ; Loundou, Anderson ; Belkacem, Inès Ait ; Arnoux, Isabelle ; Bernot, Denis ; Loosveld, Marie ; Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel ; Michelet, Pierre ; Malergue, Fabrice ; Markarian, Thibaut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5194-cbe9162e3c53286df68d8f60fefaf0bdc01186d89eacc13a9facc2bbdf4670b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>bacterial infection</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID‐19 Fast Track</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rapid flow</topic><topic>Respiratory syncytial virus</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>viral infection</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bourgoin, Pénélope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliveres, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaresi, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkacem, Inès Ait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernot, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loosveld, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malergue, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markarian, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cytometry. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bourgoin, Pénélope</au><au>Soliveres, Thomas</au><au>Barbaresi, Alexandra</au><au>Loundou, Anderson</au><au>Belkacem, Inès Ait</au><au>Arnoux, Isabelle</au><au>Bernot, Denis</au><au>Loosveld, Marie</au><au>Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel</au><au>Michelet, Pierre</au><au>Malergue, Fabrice</au><au>Markarian, Thibaut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry A</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>435-445</pages><issn>1552-4922</issn><eissn>1552-4930</eissn><abstract>The identification of a bacterial, viral, or even noninfectious cause is essential in the management of febrile syndrome in the emergency department (ED), especially in epidemic contexts such as flu or CoVID‐19. The aim was to assess discriminative performances of two biomarkers, CD64 on neutrophils (nCD64) and CD169 on monocytes (mCD169), using a new flow cytometry procedure, in patients presenting with fever to the ED during epidemics. Eighty five adult patients presenting with potential infection were included during the 2019 flu season in the ED of La Timone Hospital. They were divided into four diagnostic outcomes according to their clinical records: no‐infection, bacterial infection, viral infection and co‐infection. Seventy six patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were also compared to 48 healthy volunteers. For the first cohort, 38 (45%) patients were diagnosed with bacterial infections, 11 (13%) with viral infections and 29 (34%) with co‐infections. mCD169 was elevated in patients with viral infections, with a majority of Flu A virus or Respiratory Syncytial Virus, while nCD64 was elevated in subjects with bacterial infections, with a majority of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. nCD64 and mCD169 showed 90% and 80% sensitivity, and 78% and 91% specificity, respectively, for identifying patients with bacterial or viral infections. When studied in a second cohort, mCD169 was elevated in 95% of patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and remained at normal level in 100% of healthy volunteers. nCD64 and mCD169 have potential for accurately distinguishing bacterial and acute viral infections. Combined in an easy and rapid flow cytometry procedure, they constitute a potential improvement for infection management in the ED, and could even help for triage of patients during emerging epidemics.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33491921</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.a.24314</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1322-1390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-4148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-9944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-713X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-2680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-7240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9065-722X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4922
ispartof Cytometry. Part A, 2021-05, Vol.99 (5), p.435-445
issn 1552-4922
1552-4930
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8014466
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bacteria
Bacterial diseases
bacterial infection
Bacterial infections
Biomarkers
COVID-19
COVID‐19 Fast Track
E coli
emergency department
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Epidemics
Fever
Flow cytometry
Infections
Leukocytes (neutrophilic)
Life Sciences
Monocytes
Original
Patients
Public health
Rapid flow
Respiratory syncytial virus
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Streptococcus infections
Viral diseases
viral infection
Viral infections
Viruses
title CD169 and CD64 could help differentiate bacterial from CoVID‐19 or other viral infections in the Emergency Department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CD169%20and%20CD64%20could%20help%20differentiate%20bacterial%20from%20CoVID%E2%80%9019%20or%20other%20viral%20infections%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Cytometry.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Bourgoin,%20P%C3%A9n%C3%A9lope&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=435-445&rft.issn=1552-4922&rft.eissn=1552-4930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2480754437%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521857634&rft_id=info:pmid/33491921&rfr_iscdi=true