Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set
This paper presents new high‐frequency data on trade policy changes targeting medical and food products since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic, documenting how countries used trade policy instruments in response to the health crisis on a week‐by‐week basis. The data set reveals a rapid increas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World economy 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.342-364 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 364 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 342 |
container_title | World economy |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Evenett, Simon Fiorini, Matteo Fritz, Johannes Hoekman, Bernard Lukaszuk, Piotr Rocha, Nadia Ruta, Michele Santi, Filippo Shingal, Anirudh |
description | This paper presents new high‐frequency data on trade policy changes targeting medical and food products since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic, documenting how countries used trade policy instruments in response to the health crisis on a week‐by‐week basis. The data set reveals a rapid increase in trade policy activism in February and March 2020 in tandem with the rise in COVID‐19 cases but also uncovers extensive heterogeneity across countries in both their use of trade policy and the types of measures used. Some countries acted to restrict exports and facilitate imports, others targeted only one of these margins, and many did not use trade policy at all. The observed heterogeneity suggests numerous research questions on the drivers of trade policy responses to COVID‐19, on the effects of these measures on trade and prices of critical products, and on the role of trade agreements in influencing the use of trade policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/twec.13119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8013749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2624835112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6049-9ac21217cde0c6c08cdbbe0175643d3b1d8df88d8e883b66c2c093eaf53d711e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFpYcMDIEtsUKUUHzsXm0UlNB1opUrdDGVpOfYJdZXEwc50NLs-As_Ik5CSUi4LvPHCn_5zrJ-Ql8COYTpvxy3aYxAA6glZQF5WmaoYPCULJiqZFYqzfXKQ0g1jUOacPSP7QkgOTOYLcrWOxiEdQuvtjkZMQ-gTJjoGOl4jXV5enZ9-v_sGig6md9h5S230yad3dHXrHfYWaRNDRw3tcUudGQ1NOD4ne41pE754uA_Jpw-r9fIsu7j8eL58f5HZkuUqU8Zy4FBZh8yWlknr6hoZVEWZCydqcNI1UjqJUoq6LC23TAk0TSFcBYDikJzMucOm7tBZ7MdoWj1E35m408F4_fdL76_1l3CrJQNR5WoKePMQEMPXDaZRdz5ZbFvTY9gkzQumeAU5h4m-_ofehE3sp-9pXvJcigKAT-poVjaGlCI2j8sA0_d16fu69M-6Jvzqz_Uf6a9-JkBngDb0Pv3OqhRjKle8mAjMZOtb3P1nml5_Xi3nuT8AYsCqsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624835112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Evenett, Simon ; Fiorini, Matteo ; Fritz, Johannes ; Hoekman, Bernard ; Lukaszuk, Piotr ; Rocha, Nadia ; Ruta, Michele ; Santi, Filippo ; Shingal, Anirudh</creator><creatorcontrib>Evenett, Simon ; Fiorini, Matteo ; Fritz, Johannes ; Hoekman, Bernard ; Lukaszuk, Piotr ; Rocha, Nadia ; Ruta, Michele ; Santi, Filippo ; Shingal, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents new high‐frequency data on trade policy changes targeting medical and food products since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic, documenting how countries used trade policy instruments in response to the health crisis on a week‐by‐week basis. The data set reveals a rapid increase in trade policy activism in February and March 2020 in tandem with the rise in COVID‐19 cases but also uncovers extensive heterogeneity across countries in both their use of trade policy and the types of measures used. Some countries acted to restrict exports and facilitate imports, others targeted only one of these margins, and many did not use trade policy at all. The observed heterogeneity suggests numerous research questions on the drivers of trade policy responses to COVID‐19, on the effects of these measures on trade and prices of critical products, and on the role of trade agreements in influencing the use of trade policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/twec.13119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33821084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Crises ; Data ; Economic analysis ; export restrictions ; Exports ; Food ; Healthy food ; Heterogeneity ; import liberalisation ; Imports ; International trade ; Original ; Pandemics ; Policy making ; Prices ; Trade agreements ; Trade policy</subject><ispartof>World economy, 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.342-364</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6049-9ac21217cde0c6c08cdbbe0175643d3b1d8df88d8e883b66c2c093eaf53d711e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6049-9ac21217cde0c6c08cdbbe0175643d3b1d8df88d8e883b66c2c093eaf53d711e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1070-2279 ; 0000-0002-6839-7142 ; 0000-0001-8007-7531</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftwec.13119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftwec.13119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evenett, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekman, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukaszuk, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingal, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><title>Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set</title><title>World economy</title><addtitle>World Econ</addtitle><description>This paper presents new high‐frequency data on trade policy changes targeting medical and food products since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic, documenting how countries used trade policy instruments in response to the health crisis on a week‐by‐week basis. The data set reveals a rapid increase in trade policy activism in February and March 2020 in tandem with the rise in COVID‐19 cases but also uncovers extensive heterogeneity across countries in both their use of trade policy and the types of measures used. Some countries acted to restrict exports and facilitate imports, others targeted only one of these margins, and many did not use trade policy at all. The observed heterogeneity suggests numerous research questions on the drivers of trade policy responses to COVID‐19, on the effects of these measures on trade and prices of critical products, and on the role of trade agreements in influencing the use of trade policy.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>export restrictions</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Healthy food</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>import liberalisation</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Trade agreements</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><issn>0378-5920</issn><issn>1467-9701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALUdFpYcMDIEtsUKUUHzsXm0UlNB1opUrdDGVpOfYJdZXEwc50NLs-As_Ik5CSUi4LvPHCn_5zrJ-Ql8COYTpvxy3aYxAA6glZQF5WmaoYPCULJiqZFYqzfXKQ0g1jUOacPSP7QkgOTOYLcrWOxiEdQuvtjkZMQ-gTJjoGOl4jXV5enZ9-v_sGig6md9h5S230yad3dHXrHfYWaRNDRw3tcUudGQ1NOD4ne41pE754uA_Jpw-r9fIsu7j8eL58f5HZkuUqU8Zy4FBZh8yWlknr6hoZVEWZCydqcNI1UjqJUoq6LC23TAk0TSFcBYDikJzMucOm7tBZ7MdoWj1E35m408F4_fdL76_1l3CrJQNR5WoKePMQEMPXDaZRdz5ZbFvTY9gkzQumeAU5h4m-_ofehE3sp-9pXvJcigKAT-poVjaGlCI2j8sA0_d16fu69M-6Jvzqz_Uf6a9-JkBngDb0Pv3OqhRjKle8mAjMZOtb3P1nml5_Xi3nuT8AYsCqsA</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Evenett, Simon</creator><creator>Fiorini, Matteo</creator><creator>Fritz, Johannes</creator><creator>Hoekman, Bernard</creator><creator>Lukaszuk, Piotr</creator><creator>Rocha, Nadia</creator><creator>Ruta, Michele</creator><creator>Santi, Filippo</creator><creator>Shingal, Anirudh</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-2279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-7142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-7531</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set</title><author>Evenett, Simon ; Fiorini, Matteo ; Fritz, Johannes ; Hoekman, Bernard ; Lukaszuk, Piotr ; Rocha, Nadia ; Ruta, Michele ; Santi, Filippo ; Shingal, Anirudh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6049-9ac21217cde0c6c08cdbbe0175643d3b1d8df88d8e883b66c2c093eaf53d711e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>export restrictions</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Healthy food</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>import liberalisation</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Trade agreements</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evenett, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekman, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukaszuk, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingal, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evenett, Simon</au><au>Fiorini, Matteo</au><au>Fritz, Johannes</au><au>Hoekman, Bernard</au><au>Lukaszuk, Piotr</au><au>Rocha, Nadia</au><au>Ruta, Michele</au><au>Santi, Filippo</au><au>Shingal, Anirudh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set</atitle><jtitle>World economy</jtitle><addtitle>World Econ</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>342-364</pages><issn>0378-5920</issn><eissn>1467-9701</eissn><abstract>This paper presents new high‐frequency data on trade policy changes targeting medical and food products since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic, documenting how countries used trade policy instruments in response to the health crisis on a week‐by‐week basis. The data set reveals a rapid increase in trade policy activism in February and March 2020 in tandem with the rise in COVID‐19 cases but also uncovers extensive heterogeneity across countries in both their use of trade policy and the types of measures used. Some countries acted to restrict exports and facilitate imports, others targeted only one of these margins, and many did not use trade policy at all. The observed heterogeneity suggests numerous research questions on the drivers of trade policy responses to COVID‐19, on the effects of these measures on trade and prices of critical products, and on the role of trade agreements in influencing the use of trade policy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33821084</pmid><doi>10.1111/twec.13119</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-2279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-7142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-7531</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5920 |
ispartof | World economy, 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.342-364 |
issn | 0378-5920 1467-9701 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8013749 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | COVID-19 Crises Data Economic analysis export restrictions Exports Food Healthy food Heterogeneity import liberalisation Imports International trade Original Pandemics Policy making Prices Trade agreements Trade policy |
title | Trade policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade%20policy%20responses%20to%20the%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20pandemic%20crisis:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20new%20data%20set&rft.jtitle=World%20economy&rft.au=Evenett,%20Simon&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=342-364&rft.issn=0378-5920&rft.eissn=1467-9701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/twec.13119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2624835112%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624835112&rft_id=info:pmid/33821084&rfr_iscdi=true |