Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer

Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026
Hauptverfasser: Humbert-Vidan, Laia, Patel, Vinod, Oksuz, Ilkay, King, Andrew Peter, Guerrero Urbano, Teresa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1120
container_start_page 20200026
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 94
creator Humbert-Vidan, Laia
Patel, Vinod
Oksuz, Ilkay
King, Andrew Peter
Guerrero Urbano, Teresa
description Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence. A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test. The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found. Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points. This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20200026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8010531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2499390067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yKEp_sw6FyS0orRSJS6txM2a2JPGJbGDnQUh_jxebVvBab4evTOal5C3nJ1zobsP_X0-F0wwxkT7jGz4VpnGGPbtOdnU3rbhwugT8qqU-0OpO_aSnEjZGiW52pA_uzQvkENJkaaBzuDGEJFOCDmGeEdnXMfkCx1SpktGH9wajmgqK6YMvpbociqh0BBd8Bgd1owusAaMa6G_wjrSEcFTiJ5W-Dt1UKH8mrwYYCr45iGektuLzze7y-b665er3afrxkmj1gb7TrNWMN1q2XJUOLBBawbGAQgNXg2m98opb5iAbhBdb2AreS9a8Gi8k6fk41F32fczelevyjDZJYcZ8m-bINj_JzGM9i79tIZxpiWvAu8fBHL6scey2jkUh9MEEdO-WKG6TnaMtduKnh3Rw0tKxuFpDWf24JetftlHvyr-7t_TnuBHg-RfybeVIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499390067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence. A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test. The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found. Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points. This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33684314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Incidence ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - radiation effects ; Middle Aged ; Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33684314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksuz, Ilkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence. A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test. The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found. Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points. This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - radiation effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yKEp_sw6FyS0orRSJS6txM2a2JPGJbGDnQUh_jxebVvBab4evTOal5C3nJ1zobsP_X0-F0wwxkT7jGz4VpnGGPbtOdnU3rbhwugT8qqU-0OpO_aSnEjZGiW52pA_uzQvkENJkaaBzuDGEJFOCDmGeEdnXMfkCx1SpktGH9wajmgqK6YMvpbociqh0BBd8Bgd1owusAaMa6G_wjrSEcFTiJ5W-Dt1UKH8mrwYYCr45iGektuLzze7y-b665er3afrxkmj1gb7TrNWMN1q2XJUOLBBawbGAQgNXg2m98opb5iAbhBdb2AreS9a8Gi8k6fk41F32fczelevyjDZJYcZ8m-bINj_JzGM9i79tIZxpiWvAu8fBHL6scey2jkUh9MEEdO-WKG6TnaMtduKnh3Rw0tKxuFpDWf24JetftlHvyr-7t_TnuBHg-RfybeVIg</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creator><creator>Patel, Vinod</creator><creator>Oksuz, Ilkay</creator><creator>King, Andrew Peter</creator><creator>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><author>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - radiation effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksuz, Ilkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</au><au>Patel, Vinod</au><au>Oksuz, Ilkay</au><au>King, Andrew Peter</au><au>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1120</issue><spage>20200026</spage><pages>20200026-</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence. A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test. The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found. Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points. This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>33684314</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20200026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8010531
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Female
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
Incidence
Machine Learning
Male
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Mandible - radiation effects
Middle Aged
Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20machine%20learning%20methods%20for%20prediction%20of%20osteoradionecrosis%20incidence%20in%20patients%20with%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Humbert-Vidan,%20Laia&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1120&rft.spage=20200026&rft.pages=20200026-&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20200026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2499390067%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499390067&rft_id=info:pmid/33684314&rfr_iscdi=true