Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer
Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1120 |
container_start_page | 20200026 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Humbert-Vidan, Laia Patel, Vinod Oksuz, Ilkay King, Andrew Peter Guerrero Urbano, Teresa |
description | Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence.
A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test.
The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found.
Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points.
This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20200026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8010531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2499390067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yKEp_sw6FyS0orRSJS6txM2a2JPGJbGDnQUh_jxebVvBab4evTOal5C3nJ1zobsP_X0-F0wwxkT7jGz4VpnGGPbtOdnU3rbhwugT8qqU-0OpO_aSnEjZGiW52pA_uzQvkENJkaaBzuDGEJFOCDmGeEdnXMfkCx1SpktGH9wajmgqK6YMvpbociqh0BBd8Bgd1owusAaMa6G_wjrSEcFTiJ5W-Dt1UKH8mrwYYCr45iGektuLzze7y-b665er3afrxkmj1gb7TrNWMN1q2XJUOLBBawbGAQgNXg2m98opb5iAbhBdb2AreS9a8Gi8k6fk41F32fczelevyjDZJYcZ8m-bINj_JzGM9i79tIZxpiWvAu8fBHL6scey2jkUh9MEEdO-WKG6TnaMtduKnh3Rw0tKxuFpDWf24JetftlHvyr-7t_TnuBHg-RfybeVIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499390067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence.
A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test.
The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found.
Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points.
This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33684314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Incidence ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - radiation effects ; Middle Aged ; Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33684314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksuz, Ilkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence.
A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test.
The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found.
Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points.
This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - radiation effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yKEp_sw6FyS0orRSJS6txM2a2JPGJbGDnQUh_jxebVvBab4evTOal5C3nJ1zobsP_X0-F0wwxkT7jGz4VpnGGPbtOdnU3rbhwugT8qqU-0OpO_aSnEjZGiW52pA_uzQvkENJkaaBzuDGEJFOCDmGeEdnXMfkCx1SpktGH9wajmgqK6YMvpbociqh0BBd8Bgd1owusAaMa6G_wjrSEcFTiJ5W-Dt1UKH8mrwYYCr45iGektuLzze7y-b665er3afrxkmj1gb7TrNWMN1q2XJUOLBBawbGAQgNXg2m98opb5iAbhBdb2AreS9a8Gi8k6fk41F32fczelevyjDZJYcZ8m-bINj_JzGM9i79tIZxpiWvAu8fBHL6scey2jkUh9MEEdO-WKG6TnaMtduKnh3Rw0tKxuFpDWf24JetftlHvyr-7t_TnuBHg-RfybeVIg</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creator><creator>Patel, Vinod</creator><creator>Oksuz, Ilkay</creator><creator>King, Andrew Peter</creator><creator>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</title><author>Humbert-Vidan, Laia ; Patel, Vinod ; Oksuz, Ilkay ; King, Andrew Peter ; Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-eb950620565361e4ef0f550a8caa25ad4f8bd4c4d802a9f29b8a731b26ade8dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - radiation effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksuz, Ilkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humbert-Vidan, Laia</au><au>Patel, Vinod</au><au>Oksuz, Ilkay</au><au>King, Andrew Peter</au><au>Guerrero Urbano, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1120</issue><spage>20200026</spage><pages>20200026-</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Mandible osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The existing literature focuses on the correlation of mandible ORN and clinical and dosimetric factors. This study proposes the use of machine learning (ML) methods as prediction models for mandible ORN incidence.
A total of 96 patients (ORN incidence ratio of 1:1) treated between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the local HNC toxicity database. Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data (based on the mandible dose-volume histogram) were considered as model variables. Prediction accuracy (measured using a stratified fivefold nested cross-validation), sensitivity, specificity, precision and negative predictive value were used to evaluate the prediction performance of a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, a support vector machine (SVM) model, a random forest (RF) model, an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. The different models were compared based on their prediction accuracy and using the McNemar's hypothesis test.
The ANN model (77% accuracy), closely followed by the SVM (76%), AdaBoost (75%) and LR (75%) models, showed the highest overall prediction accuracy. The RF model (71%) showed the lowest prediction accuracy. However, based on the McNemar's test applied to all model pair combinations, no statistically significant difference between the models was found.
Based on our results, we encourage the use of ML-based prediction models for ORN incidence as has already been done for other HNC toxicity end points.
This research opens a new path towards personalised RT for HNC using ML to predict mandible ORN incidence.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>33684314</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20200026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.94 (1120), p.20200026 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8010531 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Female Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy Humans Incidence Machine Learning Male Mandible - diagnostic imaging Mandible - radiation effects Middle Aged Osteoradionecrosis - diagnosis Predictive Value of Tests Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20machine%20learning%20methods%20for%20prediction%20of%20osteoradionecrosis%20incidence%20in%20patients%20with%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Humbert-Vidan,%20Laia&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1120&rft.spage=20200026&rft.pages=20200026-&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20200026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2499390067%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499390067&rft_id=info:pmid/33684314&rfr_iscdi=true |