Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial

Despite decades of research the gap in primary and secondary cancer prevention services in the U. S. remains unacceptably wide. Innovative interventions are needed to address this persistent challenge. Electronic health records linked with Web-based clinical decision support may close this gap, espe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary clinical trials 2021-03, Vol.102, p.106271-106271, Article 106271
Hauptverfasser: Elliott, Thomas E., O'Connor, Patrick J., Asche, Stephen E., Saman, Daniel M., Dehmer, Steven P., Ekstrom, Heidi L., Allen, Clayton I., Bianco, Joseph A., Chrenka, Ella A., Freitag, Laura A., Harry, Melissa L., Truitt, Anjali R., Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106271
container_issue
container_start_page 106271
container_title Contemporary clinical trials
container_volume 102
creator Elliott, Thomas E.
O'Connor, Patrick J.
Asche, Stephen E.
Saman, Daniel M.
Dehmer, Steven P.
Ekstrom, Heidi L.
Allen, Clayton I.
Bianco, Joseph A.
Chrenka, Ella A.
Freitag, Laura A.
Harry, Melissa L.
Truitt, Anjali R.
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
description Despite decades of research the gap in primary and secondary cancer prevention services in the U. S. remains unacceptably wide. Innovative interventions are needed to address this persistent challenge. Electronic health records linked with Web-based clinical decision support may close this gap, especially if delivered to both patients and their providers. The Cancer Prevention Wizard (CPW) study is an implementation, clinic-randomized trial designed to achieve these aims: 1) assess impact of the Cancer Prevention Wizard-Clinical Decision Support (CPW-CDS) alone and CPW-CDS plus Shared Decision Making Tools (CPW + SDMTs) compared to usual care (UC) on tobacco cessation counseling and drugs, HPV vaccinations, and screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or lung cancer; 2) assess cost of the CPW-CDS intervention; and 3) describe critical facilitators and barriers for CPW-CDS implementation, use, and clinical impact using a mixed-methods approach supported by the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. 34 predominantly rural, primary care clinics were randomized to CPW-CDS, CPW + SMDTs, or UC. Between August 2018 and October 2020, primary care providers and their patients who met inclusion criteria in intervention clinics were exposed to the CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs. Study outcomes at 12 months post index visit include patients up to date on screening tests and HPV vaccinations, overall healthcare costs, and diagnostic codes and billing levels for cancer prevention services. We will test in rural primary care settings whether CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs can improve delivery of primary and secondary cancer prevention services. The trial and analyses are ongoing with results expected in 2021.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8009827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551714421000070</els_id><sourcerecordid>2482663270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5f696519d01e57a45984ebb48c7445aa7f3137ec789e7a17d91c4b7aa057638a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIlsIHsEFesslgx68EJKSqlIdUiQ2srTvOzdRDYgc7Gal8Cl9bT2daYMPK9nld24eQl5ytOOP6zXbl3LyqWc3LWdeGPyKnXKm2qplgj-_2vDJcyhPyLOctY0IrrZ6SEyEUE7I1p-T3B8x-EyiEjiaYfQwwII19AagPM6Ydhj1K50j9OKW4Q-ogOEx0SnhPLtmHDXWDD97BQDt0Pu_xvExTTPNder6GhN0fboQfxfSWnh99VSqqOPpfRTQnD8Nz8qSHIeOL43pGvn-8_Hbxubr6-unLxflV5aTic6V63WrF245xVAakahuJ67VsnJFSAZhecGHQmaZFA9x0LXdybQCYMlo0IM7I-0PutKxH7Fx5U4LBTsmPkG5sBG__ZYK_tpu4sw1jbVObEvD6GJDizwXzbEefHQ4DBIxLtrVsaq1FbViR8oPUpZhzwv5hDGd236nd2tKp3XdqD50Wz6u_7_fguC-xCN4dBFh-aecx2ew8lo46n7CEddH_J_4WIBG1_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2482663270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Elliott, Thomas E. ; O'Connor, Patrick J. ; Asche, Stephen E. ; Saman, Daniel M. ; Dehmer, Steven P. ; Ekstrom, Heidi L. ; Allen, Clayton I. ; Bianco, Joseph A. ; Chrenka, Ella A. ; Freitag, Laura A. ; Harry, Melissa L. ; Truitt, Anjali R. ; Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Thomas E. ; O'Connor, Patrick J. ; Asche, Stephen E. ; Saman, Daniel M. ; Dehmer, Steven P. ; Ekstrom, Heidi L. ; Allen, Clayton I. ; Bianco, Joseph A. ; Chrenka, Ella A. ; Freitag, Laura A. ; Harry, Melissa L. ; Truitt, Anjali R. ; Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite decades of research the gap in primary and secondary cancer prevention services in the U. S. remains unacceptably wide. Innovative interventions are needed to address this persistent challenge. Electronic health records linked with Web-based clinical decision support may close this gap, especially if delivered to both patients and their providers. The Cancer Prevention Wizard (CPW) study is an implementation, clinic-randomized trial designed to achieve these aims: 1) assess impact of the Cancer Prevention Wizard-Clinical Decision Support (CPW-CDS) alone and CPW-CDS plus Shared Decision Making Tools (CPW + SDMTs) compared to usual care (UC) on tobacco cessation counseling and drugs, HPV vaccinations, and screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or lung cancer; 2) assess cost of the CPW-CDS intervention; and 3) describe critical facilitators and barriers for CPW-CDS implementation, use, and clinical impact using a mixed-methods approach supported by the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. 34 predominantly rural, primary care clinics were randomized to CPW-CDS, CPW + SMDTs, or UC. Between August 2018 and October 2020, primary care providers and their patients who met inclusion criteria in intervention clinics were exposed to the CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs. Study outcomes at 12 months post index visit include patients up to date on screening tests and HPV vaccinations, overall healthcare costs, and diagnostic codes and billing levels for cancer prevention services. We will test in rural primary care settings whether CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs can improve delivery of primary and secondary cancer prevention services. The trial and analyses are ongoing with results expected in 2021.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33503497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical decision support ; Cluster-randomized trial ; Decision Making ; Decision Making, Shared ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Delivery of Health Care ; Health informatics ; Humans ; Implementation research ; Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Primary &amp; secondary cancer prevention ; Primary Health Care ; Shared decision making</subject><ispartof>Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-03, Vol.102, p.106271-106271, Article 106271</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5f696519d01e57a45984ebb48c7445aa7f3137ec789e7a17d91c4b7aa057638a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5f696519d01e57a45984ebb48c7445aa7f3137ec789e7a17d91c4b7aa057638a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asche, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saman, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehmer, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekstrom, Heidi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clayton I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrenka, Ella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitag, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harry, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truitt, Anjali R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial</title><title>Contemporary clinical trials</title><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Despite decades of research the gap in primary and secondary cancer prevention services in the U. S. remains unacceptably wide. Innovative interventions are needed to address this persistent challenge. Electronic health records linked with Web-based clinical decision support may close this gap, especially if delivered to both patients and their providers. The Cancer Prevention Wizard (CPW) study is an implementation, clinic-randomized trial designed to achieve these aims: 1) assess impact of the Cancer Prevention Wizard-Clinical Decision Support (CPW-CDS) alone and CPW-CDS plus Shared Decision Making Tools (CPW + SDMTs) compared to usual care (UC) on tobacco cessation counseling and drugs, HPV vaccinations, and screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or lung cancer; 2) assess cost of the CPW-CDS intervention; and 3) describe critical facilitators and barriers for CPW-CDS implementation, use, and clinical impact using a mixed-methods approach supported by the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. 34 predominantly rural, primary care clinics were randomized to CPW-CDS, CPW + SMDTs, or UC. Between August 2018 and October 2020, primary care providers and their patients who met inclusion criteria in intervention clinics were exposed to the CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs. Study outcomes at 12 months post index visit include patients up to date on screening tests and HPV vaccinations, overall healthcare costs, and diagnostic codes and billing levels for cancer prevention services. We will test in rural primary care settings whether CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs can improve delivery of primary and secondary cancer prevention services. The trial and analyses are ongoing with results expected in 2021.</description><subject>Clinical decision support</subject><subject>Cluster-randomized trial</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Making, Shared</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Health informatics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation research</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Primary &amp; secondary cancer prevention</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Shared decision making</subject><issn>1551-7144</issn><issn>1559-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIlsIHsEFesslgx68EJKSqlIdUiQ2srTvOzdRDYgc7Gal8Cl9bT2daYMPK9nld24eQl5ytOOP6zXbl3LyqWc3LWdeGPyKnXKm2qplgj-_2vDJcyhPyLOctY0IrrZ6SEyEUE7I1p-T3B8x-EyiEjiaYfQwwII19AagPM6Ydhj1K50j9OKW4Q-ogOEx0SnhPLtmHDXWDD97BQDt0Pu_xvExTTPNder6GhN0fboQfxfSWnh99VSqqOPpfRTQnD8Nz8qSHIeOL43pGvn-8_Hbxubr6-unLxflV5aTic6V63WrF245xVAakahuJ67VsnJFSAZhecGHQmaZFA9x0LXdybQCYMlo0IM7I-0PutKxH7Fx5U4LBTsmPkG5sBG__ZYK_tpu4sw1jbVObEvD6GJDizwXzbEefHQ4DBIxLtrVsaq1FbViR8oPUpZhzwv5hDGd236nd2tKp3XdqD50Wz6u_7_fguC-xCN4dBFh-aecx2ew8lo46n7CEddH_J_4WIBG1_g</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Elliott, Thomas E.</creator><creator>O'Connor, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Asche, Stephen E.</creator><creator>Saman, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Dehmer, Steven P.</creator><creator>Ekstrom, Heidi L.</creator><creator>Allen, Clayton I.</creator><creator>Bianco, Joseph A.</creator><creator>Chrenka, Ella A.</creator><creator>Freitag, Laura A.</creator><creator>Harry, Melissa L.</creator><creator>Truitt, Anjali R.</creator><creator>Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial</title><author>Elliott, Thomas E. ; O'Connor, Patrick J. ; Asche, Stephen E. ; Saman, Daniel M. ; Dehmer, Steven P. ; Ekstrom, Heidi L. ; Allen, Clayton I. ; Bianco, Joseph A. ; Chrenka, Ella A. ; Freitag, Laura A. ; Harry, Melissa L. ; Truitt, Anjali R. ; Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5f696519d01e57a45984ebb48c7445aa7f3137ec789e7a17d91c4b7aa057638a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical decision support</topic><topic>Cluster-randomized trial</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Making, Shared</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Health informatics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation research</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Primary &amp; secondary cancer prevention</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Shared decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asche, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saman, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehmer, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekstrom, Heidi L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clayton I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrenka, Ella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitag, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harry, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truitt, Anjali R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Thomas E.</au><au>O'Connor, Patrick J.</au><au>Asche, Stephen E.</au><au>Saman, Daniel M.</au><au>Dehmer, Steven P.</au><au>Ekstrom, Heidi L.</au><au>Allen, Clayton I.</au><au>Bianco, Joseph A.</au><au>Chrenka, Ella A.</au><au>Freitag, Laura A.</au><au>Harry, Melissa L.</au><au>Truitt, Anjali R.</au><au>Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>106271</spage><epage>106271</epage><pages>106271-106271</pages><artnum>106271</artnum><issn>1551-7144</issn><eissn>1559-2030</eissn><abstract>Despite decades of research the gap in primary and secondary cancer prevention services in the U. S. remains unacceptably wide. Innovative interventions are needed to address this persistent challenge. Electronic health records linked with Web-based clinical decision support may close this gap, especially if delivered to both patients and their providers. The Cancer Prevention Wizard (CPW) study is an implementation, clinic-randomized trial designed to achieve these aims: 1) assess impact of the Cancer Prevention Wizard-Clinical Decision Support (CPW-CDS) alone and CPW-CDS plus Shared Decision Making Tools (CPW + SDMTs) compared to usual care (UC) on tobacco cessation counseling and drugs, HPV vaccinations, and screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or lung cancer; 2) assess cost of the CPW-CDS intervention; and 3) describe critical facilitators and barriers for CPW-CDS implementation, use, and clinical impact using a mixed-methods approach supported by the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. 34 predominantly rural, primary care clinics were randomized to CPW-CDS, CPW + SMDTs, or UC. Between August 2018 and October 2020, primary care providers and their patients who met inclusion criteria in intervention clinics were exposed to the CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs. Study outcomes at 12 months post index visit include patients up to date on screening tests and HPV vaccinations, overall healthcare costs, and diagnostic codes and billing levels for cancer prevention services. We will test in rural primary care settings whether CPW-CDS with or without SDMTs can improve delivery of primary and secondary cancer prevention services. The trial and analyses are ongoing with results expected in 2021.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33503497</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7144
ispartof Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-03, Vol.102, p.106271-106271, Article 106271
issn 1551-7144
1559-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8009827
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Clinical decision support
Cluster-randomized trial
Decision Making
Decision Making, Shared
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Delivery of Health Care
Health informatics
Humans
Implementation research
Neoplasms - prevention & control
Primary & secondary cancer prevention
Primary Health Care
Shared decision making
title Design and rationale of an intervention to improve cancer prevention using clinical decision support and shared decision making: A clinic-randomized trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20and%20rationale%20of%20an%20intervention%20to%20improve%20cancer%20prevention%20using%20clinical%20decision%20support%20and%20shared%20decision%20making:%20A%20clinic-randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Elliott,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=106271&rft.epage=106271&rft.pages=106271-106271&rft.artnum=106271&rft.issn=1551-7144&rft.eissn=1559-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2482663270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2482663270&rft_id=info:pmid/33503497&rft_els_id=S1551714421000070&rfr_iscdi=true