Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes

More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics letters 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109840-109840, Article 109840
Hauptverfasser: Karabulut, Gokhan, Zimmermann, Klaus F., Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin, Doker, Asli Cansin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109840
container_issue
container_start_page 109840
container_title Economics letters
container_volume 203
creator Karabulut, Gokhan
Zimmermann, Klaus F.
Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin
Doker, Asli Cansin
description More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the association with five different democracy measures, this study shows that while the infection rates of the disease do indeed appear to be higher for more democratic countries so far, their observed case fatality rates are lower. There is also a negative association between case fatality rates and government attempts to censor media. However, such censorship relates positively to the infection rate. [Display omitted] •Common democracy measures have a robust relationship with coronavirus outcomes.•How do political regimes relate to infections and mortality caused by the pandemic.•Democratic countries are shown to have suffered from higher COVID-19 infection rates.•Coronavirus case fatality rates are higher in less democratic countries.•Government media censorship may cause higher infections, but lower mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7997903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176521001178</els_id><sourcerecordid>2556881440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-515713b8ec3e36c801618d7bf81b0c35c03f3aba6970cbe8e1f4212d90c9648b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1EBVvan0BZiUsvWTxxHNsXENql7UpIXGivljOZ0KySGOwEaf89RrugtpeeRvJ888bzHmOnwBfAobzYLAj90NG4yHkO6c3ogh-wGWglMiVUcchmiZMZqFIes48xbjiH3Ch5xI6F0FCUspixsxX1HoPD7dwN9Xx592u9ysDM_TSi7yl-Yh8a10X6vK8n7Oe3m_vlj-z27vt6eX2boSz5mEmQCkSlCQWJEnXaDLpWVaOh4igkctEIV7nSKI4VaYKmyCGvDUdTFroSJ-xyp_s4VT3VSMMYXGcfQ9u7sLXetfbvztD-tg_-2SpjlOEiCXzdCwT_NFEcbd9GpK5zA_kp2lxyrY00kCf0_B9046cwpPMSJUudvCl4ouSOwuBjDNS8fwa4fY3Abuw-Avsagd1FkOa-_HnJ-9Sb5wm42gGU_HxuKdiILQ1IdRsIR1v79j8rXgAFg5eS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556881440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Karabulut, Gokhan ; Zimmermann, Klaus F. ; Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin ; Doker, Asli Cansin</creator><creatorcontrib>Karabulut, Gokhan ; Zimmermann, Klaus F. ; Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin ; Doker, Asli Cansin</creatorcontrib><description>More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the association with five different democracy measures, this study shows that while the infection rates of the disease do indeed appear to be higher for more democratic countries so far, their observed case fatality rates are lower. There is also a negative association between case fatality rates and government attempts to censor media. However, such censorship relates positively to the infection rate. [Display omitted] •Common democracy measures have a robust relationship with coronavirus outcomes.•How do political regimes relate to infections and mortality caused by the pandemic.•Democratic countries are shown to have suffered from higher COVID-19 infection rates.•Coronavirus case fatality rates are higher in less democratic countries.•Government media censorship may cause higher infections, but lower mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33814654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Censorship ; Coronavirus ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Democracy ; Fatalities ; Health status ; Infections ; Lockdown ; Media censoring ; Pandemic</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109840-109840, Article 109840</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-515713b8ec3e36c801618d7bf81b0c35c03f3aba6970cbe8e1f4212d90c9648b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-515713b8ec3e36c801618d7bf81b0c35c03f3aba6970cbe8e1f4212d90c9648b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8564-8863</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176521001178$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33814654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karabulut, Gokhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Klaus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doker, Asli Cansin</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes</title><title>Economics letters</title><addtitle>Econ Lett</addtitle><description>More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the association with five different democracy measures, this study shows that while the infection rates of the disease do indeed appear to be higher for more democratic countries so far, their observed case fatality rates are lower. There is also a negative association between case fatality rates and government attempts to censor media. However, such censorship relates positively to the infection rate. [Display omitted] •Common democracy measures have a robust relationship with coronavirus outcomes.•How do political regimes relate to infections and mortality caused by the pandemic.•Democratic countries are shown to have suffered from higher COVID-19 infection rates.•Coronavirus case fatality rates are higher in less democratic countries.•Government media censorship may cause higher infections, but lower mortality.</description><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Coronavirus</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Lockdown</subject><subject>Media censoring</subject><subject>Pandemic</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><issn>0165-1765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1EBVvan0BZiUsvWTxxHNsXENql7UpIXGivljOZ0KySGOwEaf89RrugtpeeRvJ888bzHmOnwBfAobzYLAj90NG4yHkO6c3ogh-wGWglMiVUcchmiZMZqFIes48xbjiH3Ch5xI6F0FCUspixsxX1HoPD7dwN9Xx592u9ysDM_TSi7yl-Yh8a10X6vK8n7Oe3m_vlj-z27vt6eX2boSz5mEmQCkSlCQWJEnXaDLpWVaOh4igkctEIV7nSKI4VaYKmyCGvDUdTFroSJ-xyp_s4VT3VSMMYXGcfQ9u7sLXetfbvztD-tg_-2SpjlOEiCXzdCwT_NFEcbd9GpK5zA_kp2lxyrY00kCf0_B9046cwpPMSJUudvCl4ouSOwuBjDNS8fwa4fY3Abuw-Avsagd1FkOa-_HnJ-9Sb5wm42gGU_HxuKdiILQ1IdRsIR1v79j8rXgAFg5eS</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Karabulut, Gokhan</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Klaus F.</creator><creator>Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin</creator><creator>Doker, Asli Cansin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-8863</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes</title><author>Karabulut, Gokhan ; Zimmermann, Klaus F. ; Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin ; Doker, Asli Cansin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-515713b8ec3e36c801618d7bf81b0c35c03f3aba6970cbe8e1f4212d90c9648b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Coronavirus</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Lockdown</topic><topic>Media censoring</topic><topic>Pandemic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karabulut, Gokhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Klaus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doker, Asli Cansin</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karabulut, Gokhan</au><au>Zimmermann, Klaus F.</au><au>Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin</au><au>Doker, Asli Cansin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><addtitle>Econ Lett</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>203</volume><spage>109840</spage><epage>109840</epage><pages>109840-109840</pages><artnum>109840</artnum><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><eissn>0165-1765</eissn><abstract>More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the association with five different democracy measures, this study shows that while the infection rates of the disease do indeed appear to be higher for more democratic countries so far, their observed case fatality rates are lower. There is also a negative association between case fatality rates and government attempts to censor media. However, such censorship relates positively to the infection rate. [Display omitted] •Common democracy measures have a robust relationship with coronavirus outcomes.•How do political regimes relate to infections and mortality caused by the pandemic.•Democratic countries are shown to have suffered from higher COVID-19 infection rates.•Coronavirus case fatality rates are higher in less democratic countries.•Government media censorship may cause higher infections, but lower mortality.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33814654</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-8863</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1765
ispartof Economics letters, 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109840-109840, Article 109840
issn 0165-1765
1873-7374
0165-1765
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7997903
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Censorship
Coronavirus
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Democracy
Fatalities
Health status
Infections
Lockdown
Media censoring
Pandemic
title Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T12%3A22%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy%20and%20COVID-19%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Karabulut,%20Gokhan&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=203&rft.spage=109840&rft.epage=109840&rft.pages=109840-109840&rft.artnum=109840&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2556881440%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556881440&rft_id=info:pmid/33814654&rft_els_id=S0165176521001178&rfr_iscdi=true