Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads
To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads. Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical science and engineering 2021-03, Vol.14 (3), p.83-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical science and engineering |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P Gevenosky, Loretta Biederman, Robert W W |
description | To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.
Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.
The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.
With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4236/jbise.2021.143009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7993908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506506100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2449-b76ae56a1478d3d09656ddc001803b93a914605fc4a71e9c84827545399cabdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVtLHTEQx0Op1Ev7AfpS8ujLHpNNNpcXQWy9gKKUFvoWZpPZGru7OSZ7FL-9q0cPFoaZgZn5zww_Qr5ytpC1UAe3bSy4qFnNF1wKxuwHssOt0JUy5s_HTa75Ntkt5ZYxZRpZfyLbQmita2N2SDhBKLGNfZweaero5c9zGke6hCniOBX6EKcbOqaxugaPA_zDfPAdu9jm2PcwpUwHnKDvo6cB76PHQmEMFNrZpxED7RFC-Uy2OugLfnmNe-T3yY9fx2fVxdXp-fHRReVrKW3VagXYKOBSmyACs6pRIXjGuGGitQIsl4o1nZegOVpvpKl1IxthrYc2eLFHDte6y1U7YPDzBxl6t8xxgPzoEkT3f2WMN-5vunfaWmGZmQX2XwVyulthmdwQi8f51RHTqri6YWo2ztjcytetPqdSMnabNZy5ZzruhY57puPWdOaZb-_v20y84RBPO9uNnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506506100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P ; Gevenosky, Loretta ; Biederman, Robert W W</creator><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P ; Gevenosky, Loretta ; Biederman, Robert W W</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.
Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.
The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.
With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-6871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-688X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2021.143009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33777288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of biomedical science and engineering, 2021-03, Vol.14 (3), p.83-93</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2449-b76ae56a1478d3d09656ddc001803b93a914605fc4a71e9c84827545399cabdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2449-b76ae56a1478d3d09656ddc001803b93a914605fc4a71e9c84827545399cabdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevenosky, Loretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biederman, Robert W W</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads</title><title>Journal of biomedical science and engineering</title><addtitle>J Biomed Sci Eng</addtitle><description>To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.
Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.
The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.
With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.</description><issn>1937-6871</issn><issn>1937-688X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkVtLHTEQx0Op1Ev7AfpS8ujLHpNNNpcXQWy9gKKUFvoWZpPZGru7OSZ7FL-9q0cPFoaZgZn5zww_Qr5ytpC1UAe3bSy4qFnNF1wKxuwHssOt0JUy5s_HTa75Ntkt5ZYxZRpZfyLbQmita2N2SDhBKLGNfZweaero5c9zGke6hCniOBX6EKcbOqaxugaPA_zDfPAdu9jm2PcwpUwHnKDvo6cB76PHQmEMFNrZpxED7RFC-Uy2OugLfnmNe-T3yY9fx2fVxdXp-fHRReVrKW3VagXYKOBSmyACs6pRIXjGuGGitQIsl4o1nZegOVpvpKl1IxthrYc2eLFHDte6y1U7YPDzBxl6t8xxgPzoEkT3f2WMN-5vunfaWmGZmQX2XwVyulthmdwQi8f51RHTqri6YWo2ztjcytetPqdSMnabNZy5ZzruhY57puPWdOaZb-_v20y84RBPO9uNnw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P</creator><creator>Gevenosky, Loretta</creator><creator>Biederman, Robert W W</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads</title><author>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P ; Gevenosky, Loretta ; Biederman, Robert W W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2449-b76ae56a1478d3d09656ddc001803b93a914605fc4a71e9c84827545399cabdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevenosky, Loretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biederman, Robert W W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran P</au><au>Gevenosky, Loretta</au><au>Biederman, Robert W W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical science and engineering</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Sci Eng</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>83-93</pages><issn>1937-6871</issn><eissn>1937-688X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.
Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.
The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.
With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33777288</pmid><doi>10.4236/jbise.2021.143009</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1937-6871 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical science and engineering, 2021-03, Vol.14 (3), p.83-93 |
issn | 1937-6871 1937-688X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7993908 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
title | Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20MRI%20in%20patients%20with%20non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator%20metallic%20devices%20and%20abandoned%20leads&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Gopalakrishnan,%20Prabhakaran%20P&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=83-93&rft.issn=1937-6871&rft.eissn=1937-688X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4236/jbise.2021.143009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2506506100%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506506100&rft_id=info:pmid/33777288&rfr_iscdi=true |