Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases

A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of eithe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American Journal of Neuroradiology 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383
Hauptverfasser: Maynar, M, Baldi, S, Rostagno, R, Zander, T, Rabellino, M, Llorens, R, Alvarez, J, Barajas, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1383
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1378
container_title American Journal of Neuroradiology
container_volume 28
creator Maynar, M
Baldi, S
Rostagno, R
Zander, T
Rabellino, M
Llorens, R
Alvarez, J
Barajas, F
description A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals. Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after. In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.
doi_str_mv 10.3174/ajnr.A0543
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7977659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68165270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhUcIRENhwwMgb2CBNMU_Y3vMAimk5UeqBBJUYmc5njuJK8dObSdD3x6XRgRWrK7k-_noXH1N85zgM0Zk98Zch3Q2x7xjD5oZUUy0iqsfD5sZJoq3guD-pHmS8zXGmCtJHzcnRArV807Mmv3CpFjcgL4VCMWFFZpcWcddQVcZUBzRe-N9jAHNw8rFrTe53CITBnTucjEefa2_wRZXiXPYOwv5bX0D7zYumHSLLn5uITkIFpALiGCMFiZDfto8Go3P8OwwT5urDxffF5_ayy8fPy_ml63lrCutJbSjSwWd5binI4NREC7rVXSgA-eyGwVAT8US7CAYHVXHey4ZE51UTI2CnTbv7nO3u-UGBltvTMbrbXKb2k5H4_S_m-DWehX3WiopBVc14NUhIMWbHeSiNy5b8N4EiLusRU8EpxL_F6S4Z1woWcHX96BNMecE4582BOs7n_rOp_7ts8Iv_u5_RA8CK_DyAJhsjR-TCdblI6cwYVKRY721W60nl0DnTTVbY4mepon2WupK9uwXbkK3KQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20835697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><description>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals. Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after. In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0543</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17698546</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJNDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: Am Soc Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Carotid Stenosis - mortality ; Carotid Stenosis - surgery ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Interventional ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system ; Pilot Projects ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Spain - epidemiology ; Stents ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977659/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977659/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19013791$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17698546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostagno, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabellino, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><title>American Journal of Neuroradiology</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals. Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after. In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Interventional</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><issn>1432-1920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhUcIRENhwwMgb2CBNMU_Y3vMAimk5UeqBBJUYmc5njuJK8dObSdD3x6XRgRWrK7k-_noXH1N85zgM0Zk98Zch3Q2x7xjD5oZUUy0iqsfD5sZJoq3guD-pHmS8zXGmCtJHzcnRArV807Mmv3CpFjcgL4VCMWFFZpcWcddQVcZUBzRe-N9jAHNw8rFrTe53CITBnTucjEefa2_wRZXiXPYOwv5bX0D7zYumHSLLn5uITkIFpALiGCMFiZDfto8Go3P8OwwT5urDxffF5_ayy8fPy_ml63lrCutJbSjSwWd5binI4NREC7rVXSgA-eyGwVAT8US7CAYHVXHey4ZE51UTI2CnTbv7nO3u-UGBltvTMbrbXKb2k5H4_S_m-DWehX3WiopBVc14NUhIMWbHeSiNy5b8N4EiLusRU8EpxL_F6S4Z1woWcHX96BNMecE4582BOs7n_rOp_7ts8Iv_u5_RA8CK_DyAJhsjR-TCdblI6cwYVKRY721W60nl0DnTTVbY4mepon2WupK9uwXbkK3KQ</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Maynar, M</creator><creator>Baldi, S</creator><creator>Rostagno, R</creator><creator>Zander, T</creator><creator>Rabellino, M</creator><creator>Llorens, R</creator><creator>Alvarez, J</creator><creator>Barajas, F</creator><general>Am Soc Neuroradiology</general><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><author>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Interventional</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostagno, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabellino, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American Journal of Neuroradiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maynar, M</au><au>Baldi, S</au><au>Rostagno, R</au><au>Zander, T</au><au>Rabellino, M</au><au>Llorens, R</au><au>Alvarez, J</au><au>Barajas, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</atitle><jtitle>American Journal of Neuroradiology</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1378</spage><epage>1383</epage><pages>1378-1383</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><eissn>1432-1920</eissn><coden>AAJNDL</coden><abstract>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals. Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after. In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>17698546</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A0543</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
1432-1920
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7977659
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Carotid Stenosis - mortality
Carotid Stenosis - surgery
Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording
Female
Humans
Incidence
Interventional
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system
Pilot Projects
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Spain - epidemiology
Stents
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carotid%20Stenting%20without%20Use%20of%20Balloon%20Angioplasty%20and%20Distal%20Protection%20Devices:%20Preliminary%20Experience%20in%20100%20Cases&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Neuroradiology&rft.au=Maynar,%20M&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1378&rft.epage=1383&rft.pages=1378-1383&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.coden=AAJNDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A0543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68165270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20835697&rft_id=info:pmid/17698546&rfr_iscdi=true