Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases
A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of eithe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American Journal of Neuroradiology 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1383 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1378 |
container_title | American Journal of Neuroradiology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Maynar, M Baldi, S Rostagno, R Zander, T Rabellino, M Llorens, R Alvarez, J Barajas, F |
description | A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices.
Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals.
Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after.
In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3174/ajnr.A0543 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7977659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68165270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhUcIRENhwwMgb2CBNMU_Y3vMAimk5UeqBBJUYmc5njuJK8dObSdD3x6XRgRWrK7k-_noXH1N85zgM0Zk98Zch3Q2x7xjD5oZUUy0iqsfD5sZJoq3guD-pHmS8zXGmCtJHzcnRArV807Mmv3CpFjcgL4VCMWFFZpcWcddQVcZUBzRe-N9jAHNw8rFrTe53CITBnTucjEefa2_wRZXiXPYOwv5bX0D7zYumHSLLn5uITkIFpALiGCMFiZDfto8Go3P8OwwT5urDxffF5_ayy8fPy_ml63lrCutJbSjSwWd5binI4NREC7rVXSgA-eyGwVAT8US7CAYHVXHey4ZE51UTI2CnTbv7nO3u-UGBltvTMbrbXKb2k5H4_S_m-DWehX3WiopBVc14NUhIMWbHeSiNy5b8N4EiLusRU8EpxL_F6S4Z1woWcHX96BNMecE4582BOs7n_rOp_7ts8Iv_u5_RA8CK_DyAJhsjR-TCdblI6cwYVKRY721W60nl0DnTTVbY4mepon2WupK9uwXbkK3KQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20835697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><description>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices.
Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals.
Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after.
In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0543</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17698546</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJNDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: Am Soc Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Carotid Stenosis - mortality ; Carotid Stenosis - surgery ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Interventional ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system ; Pilot Projects ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Spain - epidemiology ; Stents ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977659/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977659/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19013791$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17698546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostagno, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabellino, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><title>American Journal of Neuroradiology</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices.
Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals.
Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after.
In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Interventional</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><issn>1432-1920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhUcIRENhwwMgb2CBNMU_Y3vMAimk5UeqBBJUYmc5njuJK8dObSdD3x6XRgRWrK7k-_noXH1N85zgM0Zk98Zch3Q2x7xjD5oZUUy0iqsfD5sZJoq3guD-pHmS8zXGmCtJHzcnRArV807Mmv3CpFjcgL4VCMWFFZpcWcddQVcZUBzRe-N9jAHNw8rFrTe53CITBnTucjEefa2_wRZXiXPYOwv5bX0D7zYumHSLLn5uITkIFpALiGCMFiZDfto8Go3P8OwwT5urDxffF5_ayy8fPy_ml63lrCutJbSjSwWd5binI4NREC7rVXSgA-eyGwVAT8US7CAYHVXHey4ZE51UTI2CnTbv7nO3u-UGBltvTMbrbXKb2k5H4_S_m-DWehX3WiopBVc14NUhIMWbHeSiNy5b8N4EiLusRU8EpxL_F6S4Z1woWcHX96BNMecE4582BOs7n_rOp_7ts8Iv_u5_RA8CK_DyAJhsjR-TCdblI6cwYVKRY721W60nl0DnTTVbY4mepon2WupK9uwXbkK3KQ</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Maynar, M</creator><creator>Baldi, S</creator><creator>Rostagno, R</creator><creator>Zander, T</creator><creator>Rabellino, M</creator><creator>Llorens, R</creator><creator>Alvarez, J</creator><creator>Barajas, F</creator><general>Am Soc Neuroradiology</general><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</title><author>Maynar, M ; Baldi, S ; Rostagno, R ; Zander, T ; Rabellino, M ; Llorens, R ; Alvarez, J ; Barajas, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c1242b9e4c5082f3ef61571952d2d5574f6ee826becd632f94585733647939f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Interventional</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maynar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostagno, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabellino, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llorens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barajas, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American Journal of Neuroradiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maynar, M</au><au>Baldi, S</au><au>Rostagno, R</au><au>Zander, T</au><au>Rabellino, M</au><au>Llorens, R</au><au>Alvarez, J</au><au>Barajas, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases</atitle><jtitle>American Journal of Neuroradiology</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1378</spage><epage>1383</epage><pages>1378-1383</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><eissn>1432-1920</eissn><coden>AAJNDL</coden><abstract>A major concern during carotid artery stent placement is the potential for cerebral embolism. Diminishing the number of device manipulations across the lesion might reduce procedural stroke risk. For this purpose, we report our initial experience with carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices.
Eighty-seven consecutive patients with 100 carotid stenoses compose this series. Ninety four of the 100 hundred stented carotid arteries were either symptomatic (58 [58%]) or had a greater than 70% stenosis (36 [36%]). Six percent of them were asymptomatic and had stenosis between 50% and 70%. Patients underwent neurologic evaluation before the procedure and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Carotid sonography and plain films of the neck were performed immediately after the procedure and then at the same time intervals.
Primary stent placement was successful in 98 of 100 case subjects. In 2 case subjects, predilation was necessary before stent deployment. Neurologic periprocedural complications included 1 nondisabling and 1 disabling stroke and 5 transient ischemic attacks. The mean duration of follow-up was 23 months (range: 10-36 months). During the follow-up period, there were 5 deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major stroke. The degree of stenosis decreased from a mean of 78.85% before the procedure to a mean of 21.23% immediately after.
In this series, carotid stent placement without the use of either balloon angioplasty or distal protection devices was safe and effective with a low incidence of periprocedural complications.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>17698546</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A0543</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6108 |
ispartof | American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2007-08, Vol.28 (7), p.1378-1383 |
issn | 0195-6108 1936-959X 1432-1920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7977659 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Angioplasty, Balloon - mortality Biological and medical sciences Blood Vessel Prosthesis Carotid Stenosis - mortality Carotid Stenosis - surgery Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Female Humans Incidence Interventional Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nervous system Pilot Projects Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Spain - epidemiology Stents Survival Analysis Survival Rate Treatment Outcome |
title | Carotid Stenting without Use of Balloon Angioplasty and Distal Protection Devices: Preliminary Experience in 100 Cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carotid%20Stenting%20without%20Use%20of%20Balloon%20Angioplasty%20and%20Distal%20Protection%20Devices:%20Preliminary%20Experience%20in%20100%20Cases&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Neuroradiology&rft.au=Maynar,%20M&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1378&rft.epage=1383&rft.pages=1378-1383&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.coden=AAJNDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A0543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68165270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20835697&rft_id=info:pmid/17698546&rfr_iscdi=true |