Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era
More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil emboli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurologia medico-chirurgica 2021, Vol.61(3), pp.204-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Neurologia medico-chirurgica |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | HOSOO, Hisayuki TSURUTA, Wataro KATSUMATA, Masahiro ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro ISHIKAWA, Eiichi MATSUMARU, Yuji MATSUMURA, Akira |
description | More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil embolization for unruptured aneurysm by comparing re-treatment and neurological events between the pre-stent and stent eras. Unruptured aneurysms treated by coil embolization between April 2005 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided cases into two groups: the pre-stent era and the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment and neurological events were assessed and compared. During the period, 177 aneurysms were treated in the pre-stent era and 354 aneurysms were treated in the stent era. The median follow-up was 55 months. In the stent era, the dome/neck (D/N) ratio was significantly lower (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0221 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7966204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2507997405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c786t-de3c16ae2f7893d62fc44546421649594b4e387728251f5d09ceee1acdef289d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUjSbQVo2984Qs8ZziryQOD0hT6cakCpDGni3Hvmk9Ers4DlP3f_ifOO1WxoOv5XvPPefIJ8veEjynpCo_uF7PvZpTTHGOKSUn2YwwXucC0_pVNsO8wrkguDjLLobBNhhTLjgT1Wl2xliRxozOsj8r79Z5hNCjz2NQje1s3CHfooW3HVr2je_so4rWO9T6gO5cGLdxDGDQpYMx7IYeqTatoxsXgzej3kPTftwA-gr6Z94Ea9aAbiO4-DHR9lsV7JBADcQHALdHfg-QDxMCLYNCypl99_a58yZ73apugIun-zy7u1r-WHzJV9-ubxaXq1xXooy5AaZJqYC2laiZKWmrOS94ySkpeV3UvOGQPqCighakLQyuNQAQpQ20VNSGnWefDrzbsenB6CQfVCe3wfYq7KRXVv4_cXYj1_63rOqypJgngvdPBMH_GmGI8t6PwSXPkha4quuK4yKh8AGlgx-GAO1RgWA5ZStTtklNTtnKKdu08u6ls-PCc5IJcH0ApKnVqvOusw7-yWtDpsBg4iQS45Jglq50ku9U0rMqhBCT1NWB6X6Iag1HKRWi1R3svZVEsqm89HgE6I0KEhz7CxBr0yA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507997405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>HOSOO, Hisayuki ; TSURUTA, Wataro ; KATSUMATA, Masahiro ; ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro ; ISHIKAWA, Eiichi ; MATSUMARU, Yuji ; MATSUMURA, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>HOSOO, Hisayuki ; TSURUTA, Wataro ; KATSUMATA, Masahiro ; ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro ; ISHIKAWA, Eiichi ; MATSUMARU, Yuji ; MATSUMURA, Akira ; Faculty of Medicine ; Department of Neurosurgery ; University of Tsukuba ; Toranomon Hospital ; Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment ; Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><description>More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil embolization for unruptured aneurysm by comparing re-treatment and neurological events between the pre-stent and stent eras. Unruptured aneurysms treated by coil embolization between April 2005 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided cases into two groups: the pre-stent era and the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment and neurological events were assessed and compared. During the period, 177 aneurysms were treated in the pre-stent era and 354 aneurysms were treated in the stent era. The median follow-up was 55 months. In the stent era, the dome/neck (D/N) ratio was significantly lower (P <0.001) and the number of aneurysms located at the posterior circulation was higher (P <0.001). A stent was used in 31.92% of cases in the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment was significantly higher in the pre-stent era than it was in the stent era in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.008, P = 0.008, respectively). The cumulative rate of neurological events was not significantly different between the two groups. The re-treatment rate has been improved without increasing neurological complications after introduction of the neck-bridge stent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0470-8105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-8029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0221</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33504732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Japan Neurosurgical Society</publisher><subject>Aneurysm ; Aneurysms ; cerebral aneurysm ; coil embolization ; Embolization ; Endovascular coiling ; Hemorrhage ; Implants ; Ischemia ; Neck ; neck-bridge stent ; Neurological complications ; Original</subject><ispartof>Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2021, Vol.61(3), pp.204-210</ispartof><rights>2021 The Japan Neurosurgical Society</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c786t-de3c16ae2f7893d62fc44546421649594b4e387728251f5d09ceee1acdef289d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c786t-de3c16ae2f7893d62fc44546421649594b4e387728251f5d09ceee1acdef289d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966204/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966204/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,1877,4010,27904,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOSOO, Hisayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSURUTA, Wataro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATSUMATA, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIKAWA, Eiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUMARU, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUMURA, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Tsukuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toranomon Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era</title><title>Neurologia medico-chirurgica</title><addtitle>Neurol. Med. Chir.(Tokyo)</addtitle><description>More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil embolization for unruptured aneurysm by comparing re-treatment and neurological events between the pre-stent and stent eras. Unruptured aneurysms treated by coil embolization between April 2005 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided cases into two groups: the pre-stent era and the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment and neurological events were assessed and compared. During the period, 177 aneurysms were treated in the pre-stent era and 354 aneurysms were treated in the stent era. The median follow-up was 55 months. In the stent era, the dome/neck (D/N) ratio was significantly lower (P <0.001) and the number of aneurysms located at the posterior circulation was higher (P <0.001). A stent was used in 31.92% of cases in the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment was significantly higher in the pre-stent era than it was in the stent era in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.008, P = 0.008, respectively). The cumulative rate of neurological events was not significantly different between the two groups. The re-treatment rate has been improved without increasing neurological complications after introduction of the neck-bridge stent.</description><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>cerebral aneurysm</subject><subject>coil embolization</subject><subject>Embolization</subject><subject>Endovascular coiling</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>neck-bridge stent</subject><subject>Neurological complications</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>0470-8105</issn><issn>1349-8029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUjSbQVo2984Qs8ZziryQOD0hT6cakCpDGni3Hvmk9Ers4DlP3f_ifOO1WxoOv5XvPPefIJ8veEjynpCo_uF7PvZpTTHGOKSUn2YwwXucC0_pVNsO8wrkguDjLLobBNhhTLjgT1Wl2xliRxozOsj8r79Z5hNCjz2NQje1s3CHfooW3HVr2je_so4rWO9T6gO5cGLdxDGDQpYMx7IYeqTatoxsXgzej3kPTftwA-gr6Z94Ea9aAbiO4-DHR9lsV7JBADcQHALdHfg-QDxMCLYNCypl99_a58yZ73apugIun-zy7u1r-WHzJV9-ubxaXq1xXooy5AaZJqYC2laiZKWmrOS94ySkpeV3UvOGQPqCighakLQyuNQAQpQ20VNSGnWefDrzbsenB6CQfVCe3wfYq7KRXVv4_cXYj1_63rOqypJgngvdPBMH_GmGI8t6PwSXPkha4quuK4yKh8AGlgx-GAO1RgWA5ZStTtklNTtnKKdu08u6ls-PCc5IJcH0ApKnVqvOusw7-yWtDpsBg4iQS45Jglq50ku9U0rMqhBCT1NWB6X6Iag1HKRWi1R3svZVEsqm89HgE6I0KEhz7CxBr0yA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>HOSOO, Hisayuki</creator><creator>TSURUTA, Wataro</creator><creator>KATSUMATA, Masahiro</creator><creator>ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro</creator><creator>ISHIKAWA, Eiichi</creator><creator>MATSUMARU, Yuji</creator><creator>MATSUMURA, Akira</creator><general>The Japan Neurosurgical Society</general><general>THE JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era</title><author>HOSOO, Hisayuki ; TSURUTA, Wataro ; KATSUMATA, Masahiro ; ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro ; ISHIKAWA, Eiichi ; MATSUMARU, Yuji ; MATSUMURA, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c786t-de3c16ae2f7893d62fc44546421649594b4e387728251f5d09ceee1acdef289d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>cerebral aneurysm</topic><topic>coil embolization</topic><topic>Embolization</topic><topic>Endovascular coiling</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>neck-bridge stent</topic><topic>Neurological complications</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOSOO, Hisayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSURUTA, Wataro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATSUMATA, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIKAWA, Eiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUMARU, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUMURA, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Tsukuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toranomon Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurologia medico-chirurgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOSOO, Hisayuki</au><au>TSURUTA, Wataro</au><au>KATSUMATA, Masahiro</au><au>ISHIGAMI, Daiichiro</au><au>ISHIKAWA, Eiichi</au><au>MATSUMARU, Yuji</au><au>MATSUMURA, Akira</au><aucorp>Faculty of Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Neurosurgery</aucorp><aucorp>University of Tsukuba</aucorp><aucorp>Toranomon Hospital</aucorp><aucorp>Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era</atitle><jtitle>Neurologia medico-chirurgica</jtitle><addtitle>Neurol. Med. Chir.(Tokyo)</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>204-210</pages><issn>0470-8105</issn><eissn>1349-8029</eissn><abstract>More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil embolization for unruptured aneurysm by comparing re-treatment and neurological events between the pre-stent and stent eras. Unruptured aneurysms treated by coil embolization between April 2005 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided cases into two groups: the pre-stent era and the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment and neurological events were assessed and compared. During the period, 177 aneurysms were treated in the pre-stent era and 354 aneurysms were treated in the stent era. The median follow-up was 55 months. In the stent era, the dome/neck (D/N) ratio was significantly lower (P <0.001) and the number of aneurysms located at the posterior circulation was higher (P <0.001). A stent was used in 31.92% of cases in the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment was significantly higher in the pre-stent era than it was in the stent era in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.008, P = 0.008, respectively). The cumulative rate of neurological events was not significantly different between the two groups. The re-treatment rate has been improved without increasing neurological complications after introduction of the neck-bridge stent.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Japan Neurosurgical Society</pub><pmid>33504732</pmid><doi>10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0221</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0470-8105 |
ispartof | Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2021, Vol.61(3), pp.204-210 |
issn | 0470-8105 1349-8029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7966204 |
source | J-STAGE Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aneurysm Aneurysms cerebral aneurysm coil embolization Embolization Endovascular coiling Hemorrhage Implants Ischemia Neck neck-bridge stent Neurological complications Original |
title | Long-term Durability of Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysm after Introduction of the Neck-bridge Stent: Comparison between the Pre-stent Era and the Stent Era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20Durability%20of%20Coil%20Embolization%20for%20Unruptured%20Aneurysm%20after%20Introduction%20of%20the%20Neck-bridge%20Stent:%20Comparison%20between%20the%20Pre-stent%20Era%20and%20the%20Stent%20Era&rft.jtitle=Neurologia%20medico-chirurgica&rft.au=HOSOO,%20Hisayuki&rft.aucorp=Faculty%20of%20Medicine&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=204-210&rft.issn=0470-8105&rft.eissn=1349-8029&rft_id=info:doi/10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0221&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2507997405%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507997405&rft_id=info:pmid/33504732&rfr_iscdi=true |